Recommended Posts

Does anyone know if windows supports TRIM on M.2 SSD's?

 

I know this sounds like a common sense question BUT I've been reading that windows does not support TRIM natively on PCI express bus SSD's and the M.2 is a PCI express bus SSD technically and it only supports it on SATA interfaces natively.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1258842-m2-ssd-and-trim-on-windows/
Share on other sites

M.2 SSDs appear use a SATA controller to function so it should work just fine... Unless using Windows 7.

not all them do though, the ones that use a SATA controller are slower then native pci express SSD's you can get some insane speeds on native PCI express SSD's

It's working for me. You can use this nifty little tool to verify: https://github.com/CyberShadow/trimcheck

 

http://blog.thecybershadow.net/2012/12/09/ssd-trim-check-tool/

See I just ran it on a native M.2 pcie card and got this....

 

TRIM check v0.7 - Written by Vladimir Panteleev

https://github.com/CyberShadow/trimcheck

Loading continuation data from C:\Users\Default.Z99\Desktop\trimcheck-cont.json.

..

  Drive path   :  \\.\C:

  Offset       :  15902396416

  Random data  :  B0 AF A4 5C D7 59 52 95 31 D9 9E 43 3F 85 FA 43...

Reading raw volume data...

  Opening \\.\C:...

  Seeking to position 15902396416...

  Reading 16384 bytes...

  First 16 bytes: B0 AF A4 5C D7 59 52 95 31 D9 9E 43 3F 85 FA 43...

Data unchanged.

CONCLUSION: TRIM appears to be NOT WORKING (or has not kicked in yet).

You can re-run this program to test again with the same data block,

or delete trimcheck-cont.json to create a new test file.

Press Enter to exit...

 

I tried it multiple times waiting different lengths of time and even a reboot and get the same result "not working" yet windows claims trim is enabled

See I just ran it on a native M.2 pcie card and got this....

 

I tried it multiple times waiting different lengths of time and even a reboot and get the same result "not working" yet windows claims trim is enabled

 

That sucks. I need to do a little research. I'm on a SATA m.2. Perhaps PCI Express does not support it ... I'm going to follow this thread as my next system will def be m.2 PCI Express x4.

That sucks. I need to do a little research. I'm on a SATA m.2. Perhaps PCI Express does not support it ... I'm going to follow this thread as my next system will def be m.2 PCI Express x4.

 

I only went looking when reading about it in some forensics newsletter we get at work... and low and behold it seems to be missing support for PCIe M.2 cards in windows.. it claims Linux supports it but now windows, windows only supports SATA interface TRIM commands

not all them do though, the ones that use a SATA controller are slower then native pci express SSD's you can get some insane speeds on native PCI express SSD's

I'm not sure I follow you... M.2 is a subset of the SATA specification and the logical interface for all drives is SATA... The spec requires it to pass through a SATA controller...

 

Source: Wikipedia M.2 Specification Overview

 

Windows 7 lacks TRIM support for M.2 SSDs due to lacking awareness of the interface in its built in AHCI driver. Windows 8+ doesn't suffer from this limitation.

 

See I just ran it on a native M.2 pcie card and got this....

 

TRIM check v0.7 - Written by Vladimir Panteleev

https://github.com/CyberShadow/trimcheck

Loading continuation data from C:\Users\Default.Z99\Desktop\trimcheck-cont.json.

..

  Drive path   :  \\.\C:

  Offset       :  15902396416

  Random data  :  B0 AF A4 5C D7 59 52 95 31 D9 9E 43 3F 85 FA 43...

Reading raw volume data...

  Opening \\.\C:...

  Seeking to position 15902396416...

  Reading 16384 bytes...

  First 16 bytes: B0 AF A4 5C D7 59 52 95 31 D9 9E 43 3F 85 FA 43...

Data unchanged.

CONCLUSION: TRIM appears to be NOT WORKING (or has not kicked in yet).

You can re-run this program to test again with the same data block,

or delete trimcheck-cont.json to create a new test file.

Press Enter to exit...

 

I tried it multiple times waiting different lengths of time and even a reboot and get the same result "not working" yet windows claims trim is enabled

Why is this program more trustworthy than Windows directly?

Why is this program more trustworthy than Windows directly?

 

Good question. Windows enables trim, doesn't verify it. Nothing in Windows says, trim is working. Prior to the Series 7 Intel chipset, trim on Raid 0 did not work. Post Series 7, it should. The only app to actually perform a physical test and validate trim is physically working that I've found is this. TRIM has to be supported by the drive/firmware, chipset/controller, and OS.

Don't know if this is relivent, but if you click "Optimise" in windows disk defrag for a SSD in Windows 8.1, the second it takes to run it will show "74% trimmed". I hadn't noticed that until only recently though (who checks disk defrag these days). 128GB M.2 SATA 42mm SSD in a Thinkpad Yoga.

I'm not sure I follow you... M.2 is a subset of the SATA specification and the logical interface for all drives is SATA... The spec requires it to pass through a SATA controller...

 

Source: Wikipedia M.2 Specification Overview

 

Windows 7 lacks TRIM support for M.2 SSDs due to lacking awareness of the interface in its built in AHCI driver. Windows 8+ doesn't suffer from this limitation.

 

Why is this program more trustworthy than Windows directly?

 

The forensic docs I'm reading claim there are two ways M.2 works, SATA and native, it also claims windows in version 7 does not support native mode (NVMHCI not AHCI) but few M.2 SSD's run in this mode apparently and just use plain SATA with AHCI, and up to windows 10 it does not support direct PCIe bus (one example card is the Plextor M6e that doesn't use SATA for M.2) these direct to PCIe cards can reach 2GB/s and actually make use of the PCI express bus bandwidth.

  • 1 year later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Surprise! We still can't get it right. With the current state of AI, the crappy software, the huge mega-corporations that back all of these idiot things, I think we are a very long way away from SAE Level 5. I, for one, will never get in one.
    • Nice. September/October GA?! I'll keep following it, but won't install any preview or beta versions.
    • Wow, that could have been dangerous, certainly not ready for these things. They have to be 100% or pretty well close to it. Not that I will see one i doubt, never mind ride in one, they may have them in London, but I doubt they will come to where I live.
    • Nothing kills CMF Phone 2 Pro's successor due to rising memory prices by Hamid Ganji Storage and RAM prices have been rising over the past year, leading to a significant increase in the cost of electronics for customers around the world. Many companies are now revising their plans for upcoming devices due to higher component costs and overall production expenses. CMF is the latest company to cancel the successor to one of its best-selling phones due to rising memory prices. CMF is a sub-brand of Nothing and focuses on making budget smartphones for growing markets. The brand launched the CMF Phone 2 Pro last year with some eye-catching specifications and an affordable price. While many customers may have been waiting for a successor this year, one of the company’s executives has announced that CMF will not release a new smartphone this year. And AI is to blame. As Nothing co-founder Akis Evangelidis announced on X, the company has been working on a successor to the CMF Phone 2 Pro, but with current memory prices, it cannot “build a phone that feels like a genuine step forward at a price that makes sense for CMF.” So, no new CMF phone will be launched this year. Meanwhile, Evangelidis said the company still has several new products in the pipeline, including some in entirely new categories. He added that the Nothing brand will also continue launching new products through 2026. Budget smartphones are among the first victims of the surge in RAM and memory prices, as they have become more expensive to build. The sharp increase in memory costs could also reshape the traditional price ranges associated with budget phones. Apple CEO Tim Cook also recently said that price increases for some of the company’s products are unavoidable because RAM and memory have become significantly more expensive this year. Analysts estimate that the base price of the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro could rise to $1,399 due to current market shortages.
    • Nudge me when they bring back hardware audio acceleration so I can get my EAX 5 back. We've evolved graphics to real-time path tracing, but regressed audio some 15 years back in time with this stupid software audio stack.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      541
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!