Recommended Posts

*sigh*  So you're upset that you bought an OS in 2009 that is getting a free upgrade in 2015 but it's not the right upgrade you want...   Just make believe Microsoft never offered you Windows 10 for free and pay the $99 like you would normally.

 

I wouldn't pay $99 anyway. And if I am not even going to take the free upgrade because of this, then that seems like a bit of an issue to me.

 

 

No, you should be happy Microsoft is making the whole Windows infrastructure safer for everyone while giving Pro users the ability to still get what they want by buying the Pro upgrade.

 

If auto installing drivers can causes issues & one cannot change that setting then that's a problem. And you're saying pay $99 to solve it? It's not a issue on Windows 8, so why would take the free upgrade at all let alone pay $99??

It should be enabled by default not even giving them the choice during the setup as it currently does (win7, win8) however forcing it and locking out the option to opt out is poor design and an artificial way to prop up the pro version at best. Given the occasional driver and patch issues that still occur I dare say this feature will become a pi

  • Like 2

Sorry but you're plain wrong, as a tech savvy user who will keep Home and let the updates roll I have no issue with this, and neither should you, al this nonsense about drivers is a weak deflection, very rarely do drivers cause issues, especially not in fairly "new" hardware

 

If you're so hell bent on having the "right" to screw up your system by not updating, then pay the price, simple as that 

Absolutely they're not doing it out of the goodness of their heart.  They want to corner the market like any other business out there.  In the meantime, they also realize that having insecure and out of date systems (with even outdated drivers) cause people to blame the OS and conversely the company that made the OS, so they are letting it loose for free under their conditions.

 

But, you, as a consumer, have choices.  You put yours in a previous post.  You can have an opinion whether it's fair or not.  Your opinion can get criticized in a public forum.  These are all things that happen in a free market.

 

No one has any idea yet what the forced driver updates will be like so saying that they will cause issues no matter what is an uninformed opinion.  I, for one, agree with Sikh in that I think this will make Microsoft more picky about the drivers it approves for the automatic updates.  Otherwise bad drivers would get out and ultimately harm the Windows name, which is what Microsoft is trying to avoid.

 

It's one thing if Microsoft was offering this as the only solution and you had no options.  No, this is the free upgrade solution.  You are more than welcome to upgrade to Pro, El Capitan, Ubuntu, or whatever else you want.

Are you guys sure driver updates are automatic?  I never had this happen other than on my Surface Pro 3.  I am still on a 2 month old video driver and I run Windows Update every chance I get.  Are you sure it isn't an option somewhere that you guys are checking?

 

All the computers at work show them as optional updates too.  Not automatic.

Sorry but you're plain wrong, as a tech savvy user who will keep Home and let the updates roll I have no issue with this, and neither should you, al this nonsense about drivers is a weak deflection, very rarely do drivers cause issues, especially not in fairly "new" hardware

 

If you're so hell bent on having the "right" to screw up your system by not updating, then pay the price, simple as that 

 

Right.  If it ain't broken, keep fixing it until it is.

 

Absolutely they're not doing it out of the goodness of their heart.  They want to corner the market like any other business out there.  In the meantime, they also realize that having insecure and out of date systems (with even outdated drivers) cause people to blame the OS and conversely the company that made the OS, so they are letting it loose for free under their conditions.

 

But, you, as a consumer, have choices.  You put yours in a previous post.  You can have an opinion whether it's fair or not.  Your opinion can get criticized in a public forum.  These are all things that happen in a free market.

 

No one has any idea yet what the forced driver updates will be like so saying that they will cause issues no matter what is an uninformed opinion.  I, for one, agree with Sikh in that I think this will make Microsoft more picky about the drivers it approves for the automatic updates.  Otherwise bad drivers would get out and ultimately harm the Windows name, which is what Microsoft is trying to avoid.

 

It's one thing if Microsoft was offering this as the only solution and you had no options.  No, this is the free upgrade solution.  You are more than welcome to upgrade to Pro, El Capitan, Ubuntu, or whatever else you want.

 

Yes, we do know what the forced driver updates are like.  It's happening right now with the W10 preview.  I even got video card drivers being auto-installed.   I have an older video card and the newer drivers for it have been less stable for me than the old.

You really think that their system will stop malware from disabling it? just making it the default on would be enough. most of the people that don't know about managing their updates won't go in and change the settings anyway. (Pro users get what they want as long as MS gets some extra $$ in the deal to upgrade any per-built computers like laptops that most of the time have the OS Premium version with it.)

 

But those users will have one of their IT Pro friends that knows everything so much better then MS turn those updates off when they can, leaving those users unprotected again. You hear those stories here way to often

Sorry but you're plain wrong, as a tech savvy user who will keep Home and let the updates roll I have no issue with this, and neither should you, al this nonsense about drivers is a weak deflection, very rarely do drivers cause issues, especially not in fairly "new" hardware

 

If you're so hell bent on having the "right" to screw up your system by not updating, then pay the price, simple as that 

 

I have a Gforce 560 ti and a few months of headaches a while ago that would like to have words with that driver statement.

Not quite sure what the big deal is. I guess i've just been lucky.. on the 2nd Tuesday of the month I do all the monthly updates on all my machines the moment they come out and I've never had a problem.

 

The average user has been having updates install automatically forever anyway.

  • Like 2

Sorry but you're plain wrong, as a tech savvy user who will keep Home and let the updates roll I have no issue with this, and neither should you, al this nonsense about drivers is a weak deflection, very rarely do drivers cause issues, especially not in fairly "new" hardware

 

If you're so hell bent on having the "right" to screw up your system by not updating, then pay the price, simple as that 

 

Okay...

 

https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/836914/geforce-drivers/official-nvidia-353-06-whql-game-ready-display-driver-feedback-thread-released-5-31-15-/39/

 

There's 45 pages of people complaining about driver issues with their brand new hardware. That's just one thread of many created in the last two weeks.

How about a forced chkdsk /f prior to updates being downloaded and installed. While the update process is mostly harmless where I see it do damage is when the person has cross linked files and corrupted files. Having the system do a chkdsk prior to download and install would help with this a ton.

Since when? Driver updates have always come under the optional tab.

They shouldn't be getting auto installed.

 

There is no optional tab.  This is happening as we speak on W10 preview.  As far as we know this will not affect W7&8.1.

Since when? Driver updates have always come under the optional tab.

They shouldn't be getting auto installed, and well I have never ever seen them auto install across all my Windows devices.

Right now 10 does not have a "optional" tab so not sure what MS plans on those updates.

There is no optional tab.  This is happening as we speak on W10 preview.  As far as we know this will not affect W7&8.1.

Oh right you mean on Windows 10. Sorry wasn't paying attention to which forum this topic was in.

I'm going to guess that with those driver updates they will be tested by MS beforehand which is a good thing. Nvidia driver quality is downright pathetic. ATI/AMD used to be atrocious but at least they have made improvements in the past few years. Nvidia seems more concerned with pushing ###### 500% performance improvement in this one tiny tiny bit of this game rather than making sure their drivers aren't buggy.

Let's not even get into how crap their vbioses are either.

Since when? Driver updates have always come under the optional tab.

They shouldn't be getting auto installed.

 

Same, I do not know what everybody is going on about.  I never had drivers auto update, and they are always in the Optional tab.

  • Like 2

Is Microsoft creating these drivers, or just distributing them?  I do not think it is Microsoft's fault if a driver is bad.  If you manually install the latest drivers whenever they are released, you would have the same problem wouldn't you?  Go yell at the manufacturers who are making the bad drivers to begin with.  

This is only an issue to a pro user, who shouldn't be using Home in the first place. 

 

Next.

 

Regardless of who you are, updates sometimes break things.  Trag3dy mentioned users of the GTX 980 having stuff go wrong with the latest graphics drivers.  The issue is that

 

1) They'll install drivers even for major components automatically

 

2) If the drivers break something and you revert back to previous drivers, the new drivers that broke things will be installed again.

 

Is Microsoft creating these drivers, or just distributing them?  I do not think it is Microsoft's fault if a driver is bad.  If you manually install the latest drivers whenever they are released, you would have the same problem wouldn't you?  Go yell at the manufacturers who are making the bad drivers to begin with.  

 

It's Microsoft forcing the drivers to be installed and not giving me an option to opt out without paying them $100 that's the problem.

Regardless of who you are, updates sometimes break things.  Trag3dy mentioned users of the GTX 980 having stuff go wrong with the latest graphics drivers.  The issue is that

 

1) They'll install drivers even for major components automatically

 

2) If the drivers break something and you revert back to previous drivers, the new drivers that broke things will be installed again.

 

 

 

It's Microsoft forcing the drivers to be installed and not giving me an option to opt out without paying them $100 that's the problem.

 

Have you disabled the option through the Advanced System Properties Hardware Device Installation Settings?

The sound drivers during my windows 10 testing took a turn for the worse on the last few builds.  The defaults were changed in a way that didn't make much sense.  Defaulting my sound to head phones when I had none, and setting the sound format to 24-bit when the card apparently didn't support it.  It's like they want the user to think the drivers don't work.  Then on my notebook I have hybrid graphics.  Nothing on windows update supported my card when windows 8 first came out.  We're talking bluescreens here people.  So do I want them to implement forced updates on drivers?  HELL YES!  It's the only way they will ever learn.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!