Recommended Posts

How often do average home users upgrade the OS, without the intervention of someone who knows what they're doing? 

 

Answer: not very often - they'll get a new OS when they buy a new box. 

 

Microsoft makes most of it's revenue from licenses included with the new PCs. Even in the enterprise world, 5 years is the typical lifespan of a PC, so once a new OS is due typically you just buy a new PC which includes an OEM license. This is how I've worked for the last what, 10 years?

If you do that (assuming MS doesn't do the obvious thing and run another service to protect it) you probably don't want to be on the Home version.

 

I don't mind the updates, but a compromise can be automatic security updates but "recommended" updates for drivers and software.

I realise it's trying to fix a nail with a sledge hammer, but there isn't much other choice.

 

I don't have a problem with MS pushing out automatic updates for home users, but there is a scope for abuse there. Worse, as people point out, it shouldn't apply to driver updates as these could bork things.

Let's also not forget Microsoft have slipped on a few updates that have broken things, so I'd be a bit wary about that too...

Also, keep in mind that patch Tuesday is dead now.  They probably provided bad updates in the past to meet the patch Tuesday deadline, and later had to pull it.  This is no longer the case.  Updates will be available when they are finished.  No hard deadline anymore.

Have you disabled the option through the Advanced System Properties Hardware Device Installation Settings?

 

I really wanted this to work, but I just tried it and Windows 10 is ignoring that setting and reinstalled the new graphics card drivers even with that setting set to "Never".

Also, keep in mind that patch Tuesday is dead now.  They probably provided bad updates in the past to meet the patch Tuesday deadline, and later had to pull it.  This is no longer the case.  Updates will be available when they are finished.  No hard deadline anymore.

 

Are you sure patch Tuesday is dead? I thought I read somewhere that it would continue as usual.

Only now patches will first be tested by fast and slow rings before they get pushed out to the rest of the public

 

So in theory patches should go even better then they do now

Plus, also keep in mind that even if you wait a year to apply updates, some user somewhere will have some configuration that will cause the update to mess things up.  That is the problem with millions of hardware configurations available.  Updates can never be 100% guaranteed to be error-proof.  Even if they wait yearly to provide updates.  Programmers are human, they will make mistakes.  Some hardware configuration could mess an update up too.

  • Like 3

Are you sure patch Tuesday is dead? I thought I read somewhere that it would continue as usual.

Only now patches will first be tested by fast and slow rings before they get pushed out to the rest of the public

 

So in theory patches should go even better then they do now

 

Yes, with the announcement of Windows Update for Business, there will no longer be a patch Tuesday.  I guess they could always change their minds.

 

Some links here -

http://www.computerworld.com/article/2920181/microsoft-windows/patch-tuesday-may-be-dead-but-microsofts-not-confessing-to-the-crime.html

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/05/04/microsoft_windows_10_updates/

http://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/news/2407222/no-more-patch-tuesday-windows-10-to-update-automatically-every-day

http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/937305-windows-10-security-means-no-more-patch-tuesday-is-that-good

http://www.gfi.com/blog/no-more-patch-tuesday/

 

 

"Patch Tuesday" was more of a term coined in the corporate world - home users shouldn't care what day they're released, just install them when they nag you. 

 
Nope.  Unless there is a major patch needed, or a major security issue, patches only are released on Patch Tuesday.  Therefore, it is a hard deadline and might cause some patches to be rushed.  Therefore, it might have been the cause for some of those bad patches.  And yes, home users should have been caring about patch Tuesday.  It gives them one day to guarantee updates will be available.  Put it on their calendar with the birthdays and update your computer monthly.  But people do not and that is why many generic users have un-patched systems.
  • Like 2

Are you sure patch Tuesday is dead? I thought I read somewhere that it would continue as usual.

Only now patches will first be tested by fast and slow rings before they get pushed out to the rest of the public

 

So in theory patches should go even better then they do now

I read where they will keep Patch Tuesday for Enterprise users. I don't know about small business/consumers.

Drivers should never be mandatory/automatic... there are simply way too many times that you need to run either beta or previous version drivers. That may not apply to most Home users, but it is better to not force it. 

 

But users need to be more aware of needing upgrades, or that they are available. Most of the regular-folk in my family don't even know which version of Windows they have or what a driver is. The option needs to be crammed in their faces.

 

Yes, with the announcement of Windows Update for Business, there will no longer be a patch Tuesday.  I guess they could always change their minds.

 

Some links here -

http://www.computerworld.com/article/2920181/microsoft-windows/patch-tuesday-may-be-dead-but-microsofts-not-confessing-to-the-crime.html

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/05/04/microsoft_windows_10_updates/

http://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/news/2407222/no-more-patch-tuesday-windows-10-to-update-automatically-every-day

http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/937305-windows-10-security-means-no-more-patch-tuesday-is-that-good

http://www.gfi.com/blog/no-more-patch-tuesday/

 

 

 
Nope.  Unless there is a major patch needed, or a major security issue, patches only are released on Patch Tuesday.  Therefore, it is a hard deadline and might cause some patches to be rushed.  Therefore, it might have been the cause for some of those bad patches.  And yes, home users should have been caring about patch Tuesday.  It gives them one day to guarantee updates will be available.  Put it on their calendar with the birthdays and update your computer monthly.  But people do not and that is why many generic users have un-patched systems.

 

 

LOL! I can tell you right now, the average person has more to worry about than marking a day on their calendar to update their computer. 

I read where they will keep Patch Tuesday for Enterprise users. I don't know about small business/consumers.

 

From Ignite 2015, they said Patch Tuesday is dead.  They said patches will be available when they are ready instead of one day of the month.  They also announced Windows Update for Businesses which control which ring enterprise systems will use.

LOL! I can tell you right now, the average person has more to worry about than marking a day on their calendar to update their computer. 

 

Tell that to the numerous people that had to have their laptops fixed by me and found out they had 100 updates available.  Updating your system is critical.

From Ignite 2015, they said Patch Tuesday is dead.  They dais patches will be available when they are ready instead of one day of the month.  They also announced Windows Update for Businesses which control which ring enterprise systems will use.

I will try to find a link but I think they retracted that. The reason is that having a Patch Tuesday has been more manageable for large businesses than patches coming out willy-nilly. They are able to test the patches before implementing them everywhere. There was negative feedback about the new plan so Microsoft retracted their continuous update plans.   

 

EDIT: Found a link. This is not the previous one I read. But it does state what you say about Windows Update for Businesses. Still same thing for businesses though because they determine when the updating is done.

 

http://www.itpro.co.uk/operating-systems/24603/windows-10-patch-tuesday-is-not-dead

"Download updates and install automatically" - problem solved. You've just saved yourself a few hundred hours supporting users. 

 

I don't only support one person and one computer you know.  Then another client will visit with the same problem, they didn't install updates.  I actually have someone in the family that is the goto IT guy for my grandma since she lives in a different state.  He CONSTANTLY keeps disabling automatic updates.  I keep telling them to not go to this guy but they keep going to him.

 

This should NOT be an option on home versions.  Why would any person claiming to be knowledgable in IT disable automatic updates for a grandma that does not know technology too well?  Windows 10 prevents this.  He will not be able to disable it now.

Drivers should never be mandatory/automatic... there are simply way too many times that you need to run either beta or previous version drivers. That may not apply to most Home users, but it is better to not force it. 

 

But users need to be more aware of needing upgrades, or that they are available. Most of the regular-folk in my family don't even know which version of Windows they have or what a driver is. The option needs to be crammed in their faces.

 

Unfortunately, at the moment there's option I can see that allows us to choose whether or not to have new drivers installed.  Defer updates doesn't do anything, setting Windows Updates to never install drivers(System>Advanced System Settings>Hardware>Device Installation Settings>No, let me choose what to do>Never Install Driver Software from Windows Update) doesn't do anything.  The only option available is to install all updates and drivers(!) that Windows Updates chooses for you to install.  

 

This article mentions that "Windows 10 Pro and Windows 10 Enterprise users will have the ability to defer updates."  I don't know if there was any further clarification on this, but I hope that use of "defer" means "choose" rather than simply "delay".  What about those that get their updates through Windows Server Update Services?  It has to mean Pro and Enterprise will be able to choose which to install at least at some point in the process.

I will try to find a link but I think they retracted that. The reason is that having a Patch Tuesday has been more manageable for large businesses than patches coming out willy-nilly. They are able to test the patches before implementing them everywhere. There was negative feedback about the new plan so Microsoft retracted their continuous update plans.   

 

EDIT: Found a link. This is not the previous one I read. But it does state what you say about Windows Update for Businesses. Still same thing for them, though because they determine when the updating is done.

 

I doubt they retracted it.  With Windows Update for Businesses, you can configure it to be the second Tuesday of the month if you want to.  Along with controlling which ring your computers belong to.  It is more customizable.

 

Here is another link - https://blogs.windows.com/bloggingwindows/2015/05/04/announcing-windows-update-for-business/

 

If they retracted it, I am sure Windows Update for Business would be killed too.  And I am sure I would be able to find a link somewhere.  Which I haven't

Let me ask this, (just to keep the conversation going  :/ ), assuming I"m not knowledgeable enough to know when and if I need to install my updates, it only follows then that I shouldn't be allowed to even know what updates I've gotten, or heaven forbid(!) show me where to look in case there is a problem? Tut, tut. No log files for these users!  :rofl:

The one time that I remember serious issues being caused by a patch Tuesday on a large scale, was when the users (and there were a lot of them) already had contracted a rootkit.

The one time that I remember serious ssues being caused by patch Tuesday on a large scale, is when a user(s) (and there were a lot of them) already had contracted a rootkit.

 

 

I agree.  All the complainers about mandatory updates make it sound like 99% of Windows Updates cause issues.  It is very rare.  And like I said, even if they waited yearly for each patch, there would still be a rare glitch.

I agree.  All the complainers about mandatory updates make it sound like 99% of Windows Updates cause issues.  It is very rare.  And like I said, even if they waited yearly for each patch, there would still be a rare glitch.

 

If you think of all of the different system configurations Microsoft has to support, its amazing patches don't go ###### up more often.

Let me ask this, (just to keep the conversation going  :/ ), assuming I"m not knowledgeable enough to know when and if I need to install my updates, it only follows then that I shouldn't be allowed to even know what updates I've gotten, or heaven forbid(!) show me where to look in case there is a problem? Tut, tut. No log files for these users!  :rofl:

One of the problems is that Windows Update has really, really sucked as a program. It was actually better 15 years ago when it was a web-based system. The Win10 WU does seem better in giving you info on what is going on and better linking to patch notes.

 

Of course, the KB links only really make sense if you know exactly what you are doing. I have a problem on my 8.1 system where it refuses to update, but also doesn't give any info on exactly what is failing...

One of the problems is that Windows Update has really, really sucked as a program. It was actually better 15 years ago when it was a web-based system. The Win10 WU does seem better in giving you info on what is going on and better linking to patch notes.

 

Of course, the KB links only really make sense if you know exactly what you are doing. I have a problem on my 8.1 system where it refuses to update, but also doesn't give any info on exactly what is failing...

 

You are kidding right?  It took SOOOOO LOOOOONG for Windows XP to scan and display a list of updates.  The system 15 years ago was much worse.

 

I agree that failing updates provide useless random error codes.  I hate that too.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!