• 0

C++ to C# (converting libraries)


Question

Heya, 
This is my first post and I hope I don't break any rules (which I did read :)). Anyway, here is my problem:
 
I have a project which I would really like to do in C# to expand my knowledge with this specific programming language. However, the libraries for this project are written in C++.
 
I won't ask for someone to convert the whole thing, because that's just very unfair (and breaks the rules I think :p). So I will just ask for the following the be explained in plain English! 
 
(In C++)
What does:
#ifndef
#include
#define
#void
...all mean or represent?
 
Thanks very much!
Swampy
 
Here is the code in full (in C++) just incase anyone would like to read it:

http://pastebin.com/nUQ7npTR

 

(This was initially made by Adafruit, the help support team said that they were ok with converting their code as long as it was not for commercial use (which it's not, it's a home project! :D).

 

Thanks again!

 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1259864-c-to-c-converting-libraries/
Share on other sites

23 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

The keywords starting with # are called "compiler directives". #ifndef means "if not defined" #define is used to define a constant. #include includes a (header) file. Those aren't exactly part of the C++ language spec and you don't see them very often unless you're working with device driver libraries and such (which this looks like).

 

I don't see a #void in this code but void as in C++ void type. In OOP languages like C++ and C# methods or functions have a return type (int, string, etc) or void if the function or method doesn't return any value. 

 

// Returns a value (of type Int)

public int Add(int a, int b)

{

  return a + b;

}

 

// Doesn't return a value (ie. void)

public void Sleep()

{

  Thread.Sleep(1000);

}

 

I'm probably not the best person to explain all this though...

  • 0

The keywords starting with # are called "compiler directives" and not really part of the C++ language specification. #ifndef means "if not defined" #define instructs the compiler to define a constant. Those aren't exactly part of the C++ language spec and you don't see them very often unless you're working with device driver libraries and such (which this looks like).

 

#ifndef -> "if not defined"

#define -> defines a project constant

#include -> include a (header) file

 

I don't see a #void in this code but void as in C++ void type. In OOP languages like C++ and C# methods or functions have a return type (int, string, etc) or void if the function or method doesn't return any value. 

 

Ex:

 

public int add(int a, int b)

{

  return a + b;

}

 

public void doNothing()

{

 

}

Oh alrighy thanks!

So is there a function or some kind of operator for, if not defined for C#?

  • 0

Yes it does - #define, #ifndef, #if #endif, etc. It does not have #include directive though. You won't see much of that in C# (is what I should've said in my first post).

 

In C# you generally include your external libraries as part of your project and then use:

 

using Vendor.Library.SomeNamespace;

using Vendor.Library.SomeNamespace.SubNamespace;

 

(instead of #include)

 

That being said, you should be able to include C++ libraries (compiled into .dll) in C# and use them that way without having to re-write them.

 

Check this out ( searching on google will give you a lot more 

  • 0

Yes it does - #define, #ifndef, #if #endif, etc. It does not have #include directive though. You won't see much of that in C# (is what I should've said in my first post).

 

In C# you generally include your external libraries as part of your project and then use:

 

using Vendor.Library.SomeNamespace;

using Vendor.Library.SomeNamespace.SubNamespace;

 

(instead of #include)

 

That being said, you should be able to include C++ libraries (compiled into .dll) in C# and use them that way without having to re-write them.

 

Check this out ( searching on google will give you a lot more 

If you would like to see the whole provided files: https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit-PWM-Servo-Driver-Library

 

To my knowledge I would be doing

using .... (and so on) when it comes to this. I thought using was combine file properties. (I don't think that makes much sense). This libary was giving properties to the addresses for this device.

  • 0

void is the return type of the function, in this case 

void write8(uint8_t addr, uint8_t d);

is a function called write8 that returns void, that is it returns nothing.

 

The #include, #define, etc. are compiler pre-processor directives. They are instructions to the compiler to do before it does anything else.

 

#include will include whatever file is specified. #if is a conditional. So the following code 

#if ARDUINO >= 100
 #include "Arduino.h"
#else
 #include "WProgram.h"
#endif

mean if ARDUINO is defined to be of greater-than-or-equal to 100 it will include the file Arduino.h otherwise it will include WProgram.h

 

The .h files are header files, in this case they are not standard library header files but ones provided as part of that adafruit library. You will come across two types of #include directives generally. Ones with the filename enclosed in double quotes are custom header files and their location is relative to the source file. Ones enclosed between angle brackets are standard library headers such as iostream.

 

#define is an old C way of defining a constant. So the following code 

#define PCA9685_SUBADR1 0x2

Will declare a constant called PCA9685_SUBADR1 with the value of 0x2

 

What the compiler does in this case is everywhere it sees PCA9685_SUBADR1 in your source file it will do a simple search and replace of the value 0x2. 

 

And lastly the following code

#ifndef _ADAFRUIT_PWMServoDriver_H

means If Not Defined so if _ADAFRUIT_PWMServoDriver_H is not already defined then the following #define will define it. If it is already defined then the #define on the following line is skipped over so as to not try and define it again.

 

Hope that helps?

  • 0

void is the return type of the function, in this case 

void write8(uint8_t addr, uint8_t d);

is a function called write8 that returns void, that is it returns nothing.

 

The #include, #define, etc. are compiler pre-processor directives. They are instructions to the compiler to do before it does anything else.

 

#include will include whatever file is specified. #if is a conditional. So the following code 

#if ARDUINO >= 100
 #include "Arduino.h"
#else
 #include "WProgram.h"
#endif

mean if ARDUINO is defined to be of greater-than-or-equal to 100 it will include the file Arduino.h otherwise it will include WProgram.h

 

The .h files are header files, in this case they are not standard library header files but ones provided as part of that adafruit library. You will come across two types of #include directives generally. Ones with the filename enclosed in double quotes are custom header files and their location is relative to the source file. Ones enclosed between angle brackets are standard library headers such as iostream.

 

#define is an old C way of defining a constant. So the following code 

#define PCA9685_SUBADR1 0x2

Will declare a constant called PCA9685_SUBADR1 with the value of 0x2

 

What the compiler does in this case is everywhere it sees PCA9685_SUBADR1 in your source file it will do a simple search and replace of the value 0x2. 

 

And lastly the following code

#ifndef _ADAFRUIT_PWMServoDriver_H

means If Not Defined so if _ADAFRUIT_PWMServoDriver_H is not already defined then the following #define will define it. If it is already defined then the #define on the following line is skipped over so as to not try and define it again.

 

Hope that helps?

 

Very much so!

I don't suppose you could show me how it would look in C#?

(I'm referring to: #if ARDUINO >= 100

#include "Arduino.h"

#else

#include "WProgram.h"

#endif)

 

and so would the #define PCA9685_SUBADR1 0x2 be written as        const string PCA9685_SUBADR1 = "0x2";?

  • 0

Very much so!

I don't suppose you could show me how it would look in C#?

(I'm referring to: #if ARDUINO >= 100

#include "Arduino.h"

#else

#include "WProgram.h"

#endif)

 

and so would the #define PCA9685_SUBADR1 0x2 be written as        const string PCA9685_SUBADR1 = "0x2";?

 

Sorry but I don't know enough C# to know how you would or if it is even possible to use the C++ headers in your C# app. 

  • 0

#if and #define don't work quite the same way in C# as they do in C++.

#define in C++ can be used by itself with just an identifier, (#define DEBUG) or it can be assigned a value, (#define constValue 1) or it can be used as a macro that is replaced with code at compile time (#define INC_VALUE(val) val++).

C#'s define directive only can be used as in the first case. It's essentially a Boolean flag where it exists or it doesn't.

C# also doesn't have "ifndef" or "ifdef". You just use #if and the NOT operator. (#if DEBUG or #if !DEBUG).

Includes in C# are made using the "using" keyword rather than the include preprocessor command, so you would use "using Arduino;" at the top of your source file. This would require you have something that is in that namespace, of course.

You can call c++ library functions from C#, it's just a bit more complicated. The library either needs to be COM+ or you have to create platform invoke functions for the library.

  • 0

All of the answers so far are micro focused on a literal reply to the question and ignores the context where the person asking the question by the very nature of the question might actually be asking the wrong question - yeah parse that.

 

Google tells me that Swampy is probably looking for something like this:

 

https://github.com/raspberry-sharp/raspberry-sharp-io

 

He wants to use C# to talk to some hardware via industry standard I2C protocol.

 

Pca9685 is sample code for his device:

 

https://github.com/raspberry-sharp/raspberry-sharp-io/tree/master/Raspberry.IO.Components/Controllers/Pca9685

  • 0

You can call c++ library functions from C#, it's just a bit more complicated. The library either needs to be COM+ or you have to create platform invoke functions for the library.

 

That option would asume he is running the C# code on Windows. If so, he has some larger issues to deal with such as writing a device driver or using the parallel port that may not exist etc.

  • 0

I have noticed, and has been pointed out that I did lack some context. Well here it is :D.

 

I currently have a Raspberry Pi 2 in my possession, this RasPi is currently connected to a 'Adafruit 16-channel Servo hat'. Amongst many of it's features, for this problem, my only concern is for the 3 servos I have connected to servo-Output ports (if you care what ports: 1,3 and 5).

 

As I have said before, I wanted to expand my knowledge in C# and decided to try and program it in that language, however, I noticed their libraries were written in C++ (also python, but I'm not too bothered about that). 

 

I had two possible solutions (which I think were my only two):

1). Try and rewrite them into C#

2). Try and see if there was any possibility to use the C++ libraries in my C# program to use the servos.

 

Thanks very much everyone!

Swampy

 

PS: I am using the I2C protocol to communicate between the RasPi and the servo hat. 

  • 0

All of the answers so far are micro focused on a literal reply to the question and ignores the context where the person asking the question by the very nature of the question might actually be asking the wrong question - yeah parse that.

 

Google tells me that Swampy is probably looking for something like this:

 

https://github.com/raspberry-sharp/raspberry-sharp-io

 

He wants to use C# to talk to some hardware via industry standard I2C protocol.

 

Pca9685 is sample code for his device:

 

https://github.com/raspberry-sharp/raspberry-sharp-io/tree/master/Raspberry.IO.Components/Controllers/Pca9685

 

 

I think the second link is the C++ to C# converted version. Am I wrong?

 

C++ version:

http://pastebin.com/nUQ7npTR

 

C# version:

https://github.com/raspberry-sharp/raspberry-sharp-io/blob/master/Raspberry.IO.Components/Controllers/Pca9685/Pca9685Connection.cs

  • 0

I have noticed, and has been pointed out that I did lack some context. Well here it is :D.

 

I currently have a Raspberry Pi 2 in my possession, this RasPi is currently connected to a 'Adafruit 16-channel Servo hat'. Amongst many of it's features, for this problem, my only concern is for the 3 servos I have connected to servo-Output ports (if you care what ports: 1,3 and 5).

 

As I have said before, I wanted to expand my knowledge in C# and decided to try and program it in that language, however, I noticed their libraries were written in C++ (also python, but I'm not too bothered about that). 

 

I had two possible solutions (which I think were my only two):

1). Try and rewrite them into C#

2). Try and see if there was any possibility to use the C++ libraries in my C# program to use the servos.

 

Thanks very much everyone!

Swampy

 

PS: I am using the I2C protocol to communicate between the RasPi and the servo hat. 

 

 

Well you gave 1/2 the context. You are using Raspberry Pi 2 hardware.

 

Next, which O/S - there are quite a few which run on that board.

 

Since you want to use C#, Windows 10 is a natural fit:

 

http://www.hanselman.com/blog/SettingUpWindows10ForIoTOnYourRaspberryPi2.aspx

 

Or the default Linux where C# is implemented in the Mono project.

  • 0

I think the second link is the C++ to C# converted version. Am I wrong?

 

C++ version:

http://pastebin.com/nUQ7npTR

 

C# version:

https://github.com/raspberry-sharp/raspberry-sharp-io/blob/master/Raspberry.IO.Components/Controllers/Pca9685/Pca9685Connection.cs

 

A very quick look at both suggests to me that the Raspberry Sharp project is not a "conversion" (http://www.raspberry-sharp.org/)

 

Note that in your fruit code, the main I2C comm is in some library named "Wire" which is not in that project

 

There is so little code in that adafruit sample that "conversion" is not really a useful pattern. Just understand what is doing and implement it in C# or perhaps just ignore the adafruit code and start with the Raspberry Sharp project which has a bunch of useful C# code that at a quick glance appears to be just fine as an example of C# programming.

 

Also, that Githib code is the first thing I found on a quick search so I could plop in an example, so there may be lots of other stuff on GitHub - search with "Raspberry" maybe and other source code places on the internet

  • 0

Well you gave 1/2 the context. You are using Raspberry Pi 2 hardware.

 

Next, which O/S - there are quite a few which run on that board.

 

Since you want to use C#, Windows 10 is a natural fit:

 

http://www.hanselman.com/blog/SettingUpWindows10ForIoTOnYourRaspberryPi2.aspx

 

Or the default Linux where C# is implemented in the Mono project.

I am using the Raspian O/S. However, I will probably change it to windows 10.

 

Will do that tomorrow :D

A very quick look at both suggests to me that the Raspberry Sharp project is not a "conversion" (http://www.raspberry-sharp.org/)

 

Note that in your fruit code, the main I2C comm is in some library named "Wire" which is not in that project

 

There is so little code in that adafruit sample that "conversion" is not really a useful pattern. Just understand what is doing and implement it in C# or perhaps just ignore the adafruit code and start with the Raspberry Sharp project which has a bunch of useful C# code that at a quick glance appears to be just fine as an example of C# programming.

 

Also, that Githib code is the first thing I found on a quick search so I could plop in an example, so there may be lots of other stuff on GitHub - search with "Raspberry" maybe and other source code places on the internet

 

The thing is, I spoke to the Adafruit help developers and we couldn't find a good version in C#. :/

 

I will keep researching :).

  • 0

 

The thing is, I spoke to the Adafruit help developers and we couldn't find a good version in C#. :/

 

 

 

Again, there just is not a lot of code there. The Raspberry Sharp project has two GitHub projects, one general libe and an I/O lib

 

So you could grab bits n pieces of each to implement I2C and then use the device specific bits from Raspberry Sharp and Adafruit to add your servo board specifics. Don't try for a direct conversion since the Adafruit code is crap from a C# point of view.

 

Start with the smallest thing that could possibly work such as a repeating  I2C bitstream to a pin. I would have to imagine that various people have cobbled up I2C monitor software for a PC that you can use like an oscilliscope to see if your code makes proper I2C. Your turn to google and let me know if my guess is correct...

  • 0

Again, there just is not a lot of code there. The Raspberry Sharp project has two GitHub projects, one general libe and an I/O lib

 

So you could grab bits n pieces of each to implement I2C and then use the device specific bits from Raspberry Sharp and Adafruit to add your servo board specifics. Don't try for a direct conversion since the Adafruit code is crap from a C# point of view.

 

Start with the smallest thing that could possibly work such as a repeating  I2C bitstream to a pin. I would have to imagine that various people have cobbled up I2C monitor software for a PC that you can use like an oscilliscope to see if your code makes proper I2C. Your turn to google and let me know if my guess is correct...

 

Good plan :D I'll report back soon.

  • 0

Is there an Arduino C# library that you are already using or wanted to use?

Converting the library (I found the source on Github) is very simple, but it's interfacing with Arduino's Wire library so that would also need to either be implemented if there isn't an existing project for it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The government is not the good guy either. You propose 99% of people require that the government overreach and govern their freedom of information and privacy, while ignoring the government is made up 100% of people, of which 99% are (as you described) brain dead. You can't have both. The reality is Signal is absolutely right and the government is doing what it has always done. Ignoring that we are their boss and grabbing all the power they possibly can to make sure we aren't. Your (societies) ###### parenting is not reason enough as to why I can't have a safe platform for my data/information. Thinking the government is helping is precisely what they are targeting psychologically to take suckers like you for a ride. "Think of the children" was, has, is, and will always be a mechanism of control. In the rare occasion it's actually essential the mass consensus has always been there and it doesn't become a debate.
    • Google Chrome 149.0.7827.103 (offline installer) by Razvan Serea The web browser is arguably the most important piece of software on your computer. You spend much of your time online inside a browser: when you search, chat, email, shop, bank, read the news, and watch videos online, you often do all this using a browser. Google Chrome is a browser that combines a minimal design with sophisticated technology to make the web faster, safer, and easier. Use one box for everything--type in the address bar and get suggestions for both search and Web pages. Thumbnails of your top sites let you access your favorite pages instantly with lightning speed from any new tab. Desktop shortcuts allow you to launch your favorite Web apps straight from your desktop. Chrome has many useful features built in, including automatic full-page translation and access to thousands of apps, extensions, and themes from the Chrome Web Store. Google Chrome is one of the best solutions for Internet browsing giving you high level of security, speed and great features. Important to know! The offline installer links do not include the automatic update feature. Download web installer: Google Chrome Web 32-bit | Google Chrome 64-bit | Freeware Download: Google Chrome Offline Installer 64-bit | Direct Link | 131.0 MB Download: Google Chrome Offline Installer 32-bit | Direct Link | 119.0 MB Download page: Google Chrome Portable Download: Chrome ARM64 | Direct Link View: Chrome Website | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Apple would rather delay Siri AI than open iOS to rival assistants in the EU by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, Apple today announced a revamped Siri AI experience for iOS and iPadOS users. However, this new Siri AI experience will not be available on iPhones and iPads in the European Union when iOS 27 and iPadOS 27 launch later this year. In a detailed press release, Apple blamed the Siri delay on the EU’s Digital Markets Act, highlighting that EU regulators did not accept its proposed solutions for bringing Siri AI to the region. Consequently, there is currently no timeline for Siri AI’s availability on iOS and iPadOS in the EU. Here is what EU users will be missing due to this delay: Siri AI, Apple’s next-generation assistant powered by Apple Intelligence A new dedicated Siri app for revisiting conversations Expanded Visual Intelligence features Integrated AI-assisted writing tools Siri mode in Camera on iOS Other system-level AI features Since the new Siri experience on watchOS 27 is dependent on an iOS 27 device, EU users will also miss out on Siri AI on watchOS 27. The most frustrating part is that even developers based in the EU will not be able to test or use the new Siri AI features for their apps on iOS 27, iPadOS 27, and watchOS 27. In its press release, Apple mentioned that making Siri AI available in the EU would require the company to give other AI assistants (like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini) broad access to private user data and the ability to control installed apps. Essentially, the EU wants competing AI systems to be able to read and send messages, make purchases, access files, and perform actions across apps. To address these concerns, Apple proposed an intermediary system called Trusted System Agent. This system would have allowed other virtual assistants to access the same features as Siri AI in a safer way. However, the European Commission rejected Apple's proposals, and it is currently unclear why. The good news is that Apple stated it will continue working with EU regulators to bring Siri AI to the region. For now, however, iPhone and iPad users in the EU will have to wait. If platform gatekeepers such as Apple and Google reserve deep operating system capabilities only for their own AI assistants, rival services such as ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and others will be at a major disadvantage. Modern AI assistants are no longer simple chatbots. They require access to core OS-level capabilities such as reading on-screen context, interacting with installed apps, sending messages, creating calendar events, managing files, and completing user-approved actions across the device. If only Siri on iOS or Gemini on Android can access these capabilities, competing AI services will struggle to offer the same level of convenience, even if their underlying models are better. This is exactly what the European Union's DMA is trying to address. Apple and Google should be allowed to protect user privacy and security, but they should not be permitted to use those concerns as a blanket excuse to block rival AI assistants from getting fair access to core platform features. A secure permission-based framework could allow users to choose their preferred AI assistant without giving any company unrestricted access to personal data.
    • Firefox 151.0.4 by Razvan Serea Firefox is a fast, full-featured Web browser. It offers great security, privacy, and protection against viruses, spyware, malware, and it can also easily block pop-up windows. The key features that have made Firefox so popular are the simple and effective UI, browser speed and strong security capabilities. Firefox has complete features for browsing the Internet. It is very reliable and flexible due to its implemented security features, along with customization options. Firefox includes pop-up blocking, tab-browsing, integrated Google search, simplified privacy controls, a streamlined browser window that shows you more of the page than any other browser and a number of additional features that work with you to help you get the most out of your time online. Firefox key features Enhanced Tracking Protection (ETP) – Blocks trackers, cookies, cryptominers, and fingerprinters by default. Private Browsing Mode – Deletes history, cookies, and temporary files when closed. Lightweight & Fast Performance – Optimized memory usage with efficient page loading. Cross-Platform Sync – Sync bookmarks, passwords, history, and open tabs across devices. Customizable Interface – Toolbars, themes, and extensions can be tailored to user needs. Strong Privacy Controls – Options to manage cookies, permissions, and site data easily. Reader Mode – Strips away clutter for distraction-free reading. Pocket Integration – Save and read articles offline with Pocket built into Firefox. Picture-in-Picture (PiP) – Watch videos in a floating window while multitasking. Extensions & Add-ons – Vast library for productivity, security, and personalization. Built-in PDF Viewer – No need for external software to view PDFs. Firefox Monitor – Alerts users if their email is part of a known data breach. Multi-Account Containers – Isolate browsing sessions (e.g., work, personal, shopping). Performance & Resource Efficiency – Uses fewer system resources than some competitors. Open Source & Community-Driven – Transparent development with global contributions. Download: Firefox 64-bit | Firefox 32-bit | ARM64 | ~70.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Firefox for MacOS | 145.0 MB View: Firefox Home Page | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!