What are the best security apps for Android?

By Pubudu Kodikara
in Android Support

 Share

What are the best security apps for Android?  

4 members have voted

  1. 1. What are the best security apps for Android?

    • Avast
      1
    • 360 Security
      3
    • CM Security
      0

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

dipsylalapo Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

^ Unless you're visiting dodgy sites and allowing permissions to the phone or installing apps not from the Play store you should be fine. I don't get the obsession with installing AV/security on phones.

  • The Evil Overlord, link6155 and WAQT
  • Like 3
Grand Master

Nick H. Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

I have 360 installed on my phone and I haven't found any issues with it. However, I also haven't found any virus attempts unless I'm actively trying to test the software. As a general rule I think the setup of the OS makes it pretty secure, whereby only human error could cause something to infect you. And you could have as many antivirus programs running as you like, they cannot prevent human error. ;)

Out of the three I voted for 360 security. But it might help to learn what you're planning on doing with your phone in order for us to make a better suggestion. For example, if you have rooted your phone then your priority should be something like SuperSU, which will pause an application before it runs because it is asking for root access. Those are the situations you need to watch out for.

Collaborator

Pubudu Kodikara

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I have 360 installed on my phone and I haven't found any issues with it. However, I also haven't found any virus attempts unless I'm actively trying to test the software. As a general rule I think the setup of the OS makes it pretty secure, whereby only human error could cause something to infect you. And you could have as many antivirus programs running as you like, they cannot prevent human error. ;)

Out of the three I voted for 360 security. But it might help to learn what you're planning on doing with your phone in order for us to make a better suggestion. For example, if you have rooted your phone then your priority should be something like SuperSU, which will pause an application before it runs because it is asking for root access. Those are the situations you need to watch out for.

 

Actually my devise is not rooted :-) But one question... Can we turn off memory boost, junk file cleaning and all those optimization stuff in 360? Heard that those stuff will only reduce the performance.

Grand Master

Nick H. Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

Actually my devise is not rooted :-) But one question... Can we turn off memory boost, junk file cleaning and all those optimization stuff in 360? Heard that those stuff will only reduce the performance.

They don't happen automatically - or at least, you can stop them from happening automatically. When I was first pointed towards 360 I was told to ignore those options and only use it for the antivirus function that was provided. So yes, you'll be getting an app with features that you won't use, but as you point out the general consensus seems to be not to bother with those functions in the first place. (Y)
Grand Master

Nick H. Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

Security apps are a waste, just like "battery saving" apps, you are better off with common sense and not using dodgy apps from random websites

I would argue the battery saving apps, if for no reason other than they give you a better rundown of your battery's consumption over the built-in option. Some of the battery apps can even stop things from restarting even once you close the bad apps down, although this is a root ability and you need to know what you're preventing from running.

But yeah, as I said above there is no substitute for common sense. Unless I'm actively trying to test 360, it hasn't thrown up a single warning since installing it. The moderation of the Play store is better than it was, and a phone that isn't rooted can't have too many bad things happen without the user forcing it to happen.

  • +Random Stranger
  • Like 1
Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

ESET has an Android Security suite and I use it. As already pointed out the best security is being smart about things, but it does do some nice features and barely uses any System resources as well. I would strongly recommend checking it out if you want Security for your Android device.

  • +Random Stranger and goretsky
  • Like 2
Grand Master

Nick H. Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

ESET has an Android Security suite and I use it. As already pointed out the best security is being smart about things, but it does do some nice features and barely uses any System resources as well. I would strongly recommend checking it out if you want Security for your Android device.

Having just moved to ESET on my computer, I may consider looking in to the mobile variation as well. Although that wasn't one of the options in the poll. ;)
  • +Random Stranger and goretsky
  • Like 2
Collaborator

Pubudu Kodikara

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Having just moved to ESET on my computer, I may consider looking in to the mobile variation as well. Although that wasn't one of the options in the poll. ;)

 

The main reason I didn't include it is that it don't even have a basic free plan :-)

Grand Master

Nick H. Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

The main reason I didn't include it is that it don't even have a basic free plan :-)

Link

Android offers it for free, at least. Not sure what the difference is between the free and premium version though. We should get Goretsky to tell us. ;)

Collaborator

Pubudu Kodikara

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Oh my... I did some research and found this http://androidforums.com/threads/be...ters-data-collection-and-your-privacy.919363/ To be honest CM Security is what I used... Just removed it!


Link

Android offers it for free, at least. Not sure what the difference is between the free and premium version though. We should get Goretsky to tell us. ;)

 

Ah sorry.. Yes they have a free version but a bit limited :-(

Grand Master

Nick H. Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

Ah sorry.. Yes they have a free version but a bit limited :-(

Can you tell me more? If ESET offers me 100% antivirus and warns me beforehand, I would say that it could be better than 360 which - as we discussed - comes with a booster option and a cleanup option, neither of which I care to use. But again, I would probably end up testing it [ESET] for a bit before giving a definite opinion.

ESET is great on the computer, I don't know enough about it's mobile variant to comment.

Collaborator

Pubudu Kodikara

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Can you tell me more? If ESET offers me 100% antivirus and warns me beforehand, I would say that it could be better than 360 which - as we discussed - comes with a booster option and a cleanup option, neither of which I care to use. But again, I would probably end up testing it [ESET] for a bit before giving a definite opinion.

ESET is great on the computer, I don't know enough about it's mobile variant to comment.

 

ESET have kept browser protection as a permium feature which is a drawback but they have 100% protection according to AV-Tests. Im also testing Avast

Grand Master

goretsky Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

Hello,

 

A quick (and very incomplete) listing of security apps for Android OS:

 

  • Ahn Lab V3 Mobile Security
  • Alibaba Mobile Security
  • Anguanjia Security Manager
  • Antiy AVL
  • Avast! Mobile Security
  • AVG Antivirus Free
  • Avira Free Android Security
  • Baidu Mobile Security
  • BitDefender Mobile Security
  • Bullguard Mobile Security
  • CheetahMobile CM Security
  • ESET Mobile Security
  • G Data Internet Security
  • Ikarus Mobile Security
  • Kaspersky Internet Security
  • Intel (formerly McAfee) Mobile.Security
  • NSHC Droid-X
  • PSafe Total 2.1
  • Qihu 360 Antivirus
  • Quick Heal Total security
  • Sophos Mobile Security
  • Symantec Norton Mobile Security
  • Tencent Mobile Security Manager
  • Trend Micro Mobile Security
  • Webroot Secure Anywhere

 

I think it might be a good idea to restart the test.  Focusing on just three products in this space is somewhat limiting.  You could maybe just pick free ones, or only ones with certain feature sets if you don't have the resources to test all of them.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans

      By Karthik Mudaliar · Posted

      GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Grand Theft Auto VI pricing revealed alongside Ultimate Edition and pre-loading details

      By thartist · Posted

      Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic

      By Karthik Mudaliar · Posted

      Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors

      By Primey_ · Posted

      This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash

      By Karthik Mudaliar · Posted

      Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!