Star Citizen Drama


Recommended Posts

Anyone else following this?
 
I thought this was a well written piece:
 
How No Game Developer Should Revoke Access for an Opinion

 

There's tons of other background and articles that are too much to recap here, especially if no one here cares anyway, but I'm curious if anyone else is following it and what thoughts they have on it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1265006-star-citizen-drama/
Share on other sites

first time i heard of it, but i had some time to read the article and dereks posts and other articles about them.

while i do not yet know about the future of star citizen, i have no problem of them publicly announcing HIS ban.  

the dude is a massive troll, and pretty much deserved it, it seems!

 

just my 2c

 

 

Claiming he

If it was expressing concerns about, I'm afraid this game will never get done, I wish I could get refund, etc. It's still within game dev right (not that I agree to this). 

That being said, the person banned with the information above was just asking for it.

 

Also... Kickstarter is not a pre-order, you **invest** in a project, which promises a reward. Some investments go south, and you lose it all. 

I can understand frustration, I've had a kickstarter fail (game even) fail. But I knew the risk up front.

This is the fear kickstarter has, too many funded failures drag kickstarter down.

 

Also Star Citzen has spent money, I doubt they have money to "refund" everyone if it collapses. 

It's not like they were sitting on it, doing nothing.

 

From Kickstarter

https://www.kickstarter.com/trust?ref=checkout

 

We take our responsibility as Kickstarter's stewards very seriously. It's our job to provide a system deserving of your trust

I agree he's a massive troll, however I agree with the article I linked.

 

To me it doesn't matter how big of a troll he has been in the past.  I don't think it's right to just say "Oh it's Derek Smart, lets ban him, close his account, and refund his money."

 

He did give them at least $250 (I'm not sure if he bought anything additional on RSI but that's his kickstarter pledge and what they refunded).

 

He didn't "troll" them from the time he made that pledge to well beyond the projected release date published in the kickstarter.  Considering how big of a troll he is that leads me to believe that he honestly wanted the game and had the game he backed been finished on time he would have been happy.

 

While I may not agree with all of his "demands" (the dude has an ego that won't quit) there IS some reason for concern, especially for kickstarter backers.

I don't think it can be argued that the scope of the game has not changed from what the kickstarter backers pledged, more and more has been added to the game AFTER the kickstarter closed and their money was taken.  As a result of the greatly increased scope the project is way behind schedule.  What is being made now is not what kickstarter backers paid for.

 

Even if you consider his posts trolling (I'm certainly not going to argue they're not) or even an attempt for publicity or to promote his own game(s) he's doing so ON HIS PERSONAL BLOG.  I don't think it's right for any company to take back a product they sold you (without even a warning) because they don't like what you post on your own personal blog.  If he posted those blogs on their message board then absolutely, ban him (although even then I'd think a forum ban would be sufficient not a complete removal of his account and refund)  Personally I suspect they did that because part of his "trolling" is threatening lawsuits and they hoped that by refunding him his money he'd have no legal standing to bring such a lawsuit.

 

He's also apparently willing to put his money where is mouth is by contributing up to $1m in an escrow account to help pay for an independent audit.  So he's willing to put his money where his mouth is.

 

Now I backed Star Citizen both on the Kickstarter and on the RSI page and I don't currently want a refund.  I still hope the game comes out, I'm happy with it's increased scope, and I'm willing to wait longer to get it.

 

I only backed for $5 on Kickstarter though with the bulk of my support being done on RSI.  I know the RSI money is not eligible for a refund and I knew the risks when I gave it and I'm ok with that.  That being said I can see why someone who never went to the RSI site but just backed the Kickstarter for a solid amount of money might want their money back since the game is no longer what they backed and it's passed the projected release date.  I like the increased scope, others may not and I don't think that makes them bad.  The Kickstarter money was only like $2m of an $85m project so I really don't think it would be the end of the world to offer kickstarter backers refunds of their kickstarter pledges.  I would hope that even if they did make that offer many would stick around and buy into the increased scope and not ask for it.

Also... Kickstarter is not a pre-order, you **invest** in a project, which promises a reward. Some investments go south, and you lose it all. 

I can understand frustration, I've had a kickstarter fail (game even) fail. But I knew the risk up front.

This is the fear kickstarter has, too many funded failures drag kickstarter down.

To play Devil's advocate here he's not treating it as a pre-order as you say. The kickstarter didn't just fail.

You're absolutely right that you **invest** in a project and it may fail but the project originator is supposed to make a good faith effort to deliver what was described in the estimated time.

It can be argued that they aren't even making what was described anymore, they've got well beyond that. It's also not like they tried to make what they sold and failed.

If I can use an analogy it would be like hiring someone to build you a 2 bedroom house. They estimate it will take a year.

You come back in a year and it would be ok if they ran into unexpeted delays in trying to make your house and weren't done on time.

It would be bad luck but still understandable of they just couldn't make the house, ran out of money trying, and the company folded.

But if you come back in a year when it's supposed to be done and what you see is the foundation laid for a 12 bedroom mansion then that's an issue.

They aren't trying to make just a two bedroom house anymore, maybe you don't want a mansion and you don't want to wait for them to build that beast (even if they can)

That's kind of the situation Star Citizen is in. I personally want the mansion, I'm glad its gone from 2 bedrooms to 12, I'm willing to wait longer and I realize they could fail but I hope they don't.

I understand why others wouldn't share my opinion though.

Also Star Citzen has spent money, I doubt they have money to "refund" everyone if it collapses. 

It's not like they were sitting on it, doing nothing.

That's not the case. Star Citizen isn't being run like a normal kickstarter (that's part of the issue). They didn't stop collecting money when the Kickstarter finished (or shortly thereafter) as kickstarter normally do, they're STILL collecting money even now.

Kickstarter was only a small fraction of their total funds (roughly $2m of $85m) and Chris Roberts in the past has said that they keep a reserve so that if money just suddenly stopped flowing in they'd have enough to finish the project, scaled back from what they are aiming for but still well beyond what was sold in the kickstarter.

If that's the case then that reserve should be more than enough to refund the small kickstarter percentage of the total funding... and again hopefully a lot of the kickstarter backers wouldn't want a refund even if it was offered.

I knew the name Derek Smart was familiar: Google gave me immediately 'Battlecruiser 3000AD' and I remember the associated drama with it from almost 20 years ago. He is a massive drama queen.

He actually created a whole blog post about it that documents his "trolling" pretty well:

http://www.dereksmart.org/2015/07/the-gaming-urban-legend/

 

I don't think anyone is trying to say Derek Smart is a nice guy.  That doesn't make it ok to take back something you sold him and ban him for what he says on his own personal blog though.

I know little of this, but after 10mins reading his articles I can feel nothing but ego and self love dribbling of every page. Arrogant and shifting all blame to others around it seems, with nothing ever being his sole fault.

Even if Star Citizen is going belly up and is being totally un-fair to backers, this guy does nothing but promote his own ego at every turn.

Ive honestly never seen or read such an egotistical blog!!

Literally every article reads "me..me..me..ME!"

  • Like 1

Well I read the article and the comments above and I just don't have an opinion.  Or rather star citizen itself is such a bigger drama this seems insignificant. 

 

Interesting either way, will either be one of the best games in history or it will fail so hard that a generation of people may never trust and believe in anything ever again.  The hope of a million backers could be wiped out to the extent that the jedi feel it.

I guess I don't understand the allure to a rendered spaceship without any context, no environment, no gameplay, just a rendered graphic. I guess it's why I really don't get the whole "invest" terminology when it comes to this Star Citizen. This whole Star Citizen thing is confusing to me, why it's so accepted, etc.

  • Like 1

The guy is clearly a drama queen and troll, however, I've been convinced Star Citizen was nothing but a sham from the very start.  The whole thing stinks to high heaven, and I'm glad I didn't back it.

 

He does come off as a troll, but his arguments are valid. 

 

I do hope the game does end up to be good though, though I'm afraid in their eagerness to chase graphics, they've made the game unplayable for the majority of their users.

There are some people I would listen to but this guy is awe-full.   The reason why I decided to back it because I think most Publisher suck Activitsion, EA, ubisoft, Warne rbrothers and Sony..  These are really bad companies that like to regurgitate Tittles over and over  produce broken and incomplete games.  That don't like to push the limits.  I don't if star citizen will be successful but personally think has good shot because of the talent the recently acquired even from crytek.   I have PS4 and frankly it sucks it pitifully underprowed I am not impressed with it graphics at all.  

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

 Could we have shipped a small scale 30 mission game in the old Wing Commander format in two years? Yes, but that's not the game the community wants or the game we're building. 

 

Well he never really asked them. He set up the kick starter he created the stretch goals and decided what game i was going to be without asking the community. the community just paid for a space sim. reaching the stretch goal doesn't mean they all wanted an open persistent universe. I'd wager the majority of backers and players would be happy with a multiplayer combat module(squadron 42) and a standard quality single player campaign, probably more so than a persistent universe with cookie cutter grind "quests"  I have yet to see any of these system have a worthwhile story. 

 

  • Like 2

 

Well he never really asked them. He set up the kick starter he created the stretch goals and decided what game i was going to be without asking the community. the community just paid for a space sim. reaching the stretch goal doesn't mean they all wanted an open persistent universe. I'd wager the majority of backers and players would be happy with a multiplayer combat module(squadron 42) and a standard quality single player campaign, probably more so than a persistent universe with cookie cutter grind "quests"  I have yet to see any of these system have a worthwhile story. 

 

Squadron 42 isn't a multiplayer combat module.  Squadron 42 is the single-player story campaign that's akin to the old Wing Commander games.  As stretch goals they added more (drop-in coop and such) but the base kickstarter was basically just for a new Wing Commander successor and it grew from there.  As such I suspect there are quite a few backers who absolutely would be happy with a 30 mission story based game like Wing Commander... just updated to CryEngine level graphics and such.

Personally I was hoping it would grow to something more akin to Wing Commander: Privateer or Freelancer (single-player open world) via stretch goals when I initially backed it though I would have been happy with just a Wing Commander/Starlancer game.  I don't really care about persistent online universe but of what it HAS become that's what interests me the most.  I have ZERO interest in "Star Marine" the whole FPS thing they're doing now and little interest in just a PvP combat.  I either want single player story with combat (Wing Commander/Starlancer) or I want to do the merchant, trading, exploring thing in their persistent world (online Privateer/Freelancer).

Again I'm still holding out hope they actually deliver but I have to say it doesn't look good right now.  Again I only backed $5 via Kickstarter but I'm in the hundreds over the years via their website which I'm fully aware I'll never get back if it tanks.  I knew that going in though when I chose to back via their website.  Kickstarter offers more assurance to backers though then going direct through so people who backed for large amounts of money through them actually have more rights.

KWzFoKA.jpg

You got to have balls to pull off a project like this. Employees weep like little girls when they overview Chris Roberts mighty vision.

 

It was also alleged that Roberts' wife and Cloud Imperium Games Vice President of Marketing Sandi Gardiner enforced discriminatory hiring practices.

Oh she is his wife?! :D 

Looks like the guy who wrote the piece on The Escapist is a known troll.

 

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14979-Chairmans-Response-To-The-Escapist

Edited by FunkyMike

 

You got to have balls to pull off a project like this. Employees weep like little girls when they overview Chris Roberts mighty vision.

 

 

Unfortunately, projects led by visionaries tend to always fail. Visionaires are good to be creative leads, but as much as we hate to see games released without everything promised(Peter Molyneux syndrome) for projects and games to bi finished, they need to be reined in by a leader who can see what can be done and what can't be done and what may need to be reduced at least for now. 

KWzFoKA.jpg

You got to have balls to pull off a project like this. Employees weep like little girls when they overview Chris Roberts mighty vision.

 

Oh she is his wife?! :D 

Looks like the guy who wrote the piece on The Escapist is a known troll.

 

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14979-Chairmans-Response-To-The-Escapist

The "guy who wrote the piece on The Escapist" is Lizzy Finnegan, I'm pretty sure she's not a guy.  Also the response on Roberts Space Industries is linked right at the top of the escapist article I provided the link for (I posted it here after the Update that included it went live or I would have included the response myself)

The "known troll" is Derek Smart and is not mentioned at all in the article.  Who Derek Smart is has already been gone over in this topic if you've read it from the start.

 

The "guy who wrote the piece on The Escapist" is Lizzy Finnegan, I'm pretty sure she's not a guy.  Also the response on Roberts Space Industries is linked right at the top of the escapist article I provided the link for (I posted it here after the Update that included it went live or I would have included the response myself)

The "known troll" is Derek Smart and is not mentioned at all in the article.  Who Derek Smart is has already been gone over in this topic if you've read it from the start.

Actually Derek is mentioned once, in a quote by Chris. of course that quote alone gives me more respect for Derek than Chris, so there's that. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
    • Nvidia GeForce NOW gains support for Dark Scrolls, Empulse, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final update of June for Nvidia's cloud gaming service GeForce NOW is now available, and it is touting support for six more games. The company is also drawing subscriber attention towards the summer sales kicking off across stores, so they can stock up on more cloud-supported titles. Of course, the Steam Summer Sale is the biggest promotion, which is kicking off later today. "Supported Steam games can be streamed across devices with GeForce NOW, making it easy to buy a game once, keep progress synced and pick up where the gameplay left off on PCs, Macs, handheld devices, phones, TVs and more," says the company. "In other words, the Steam Summer Sale brings the deals; GeForce NOW adds the flexibility." Don't forget that the GeForce NOW summer sale is still active as well. This limited-time offer drops the 12-month Performance membership from $99.99 to $64.99, saving members $35. At the same time, the 12-month Ultimate membership is currently going for $129.99, dropping the price by $70 from the original $199.99. Here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: Dark Scrolls (New release on Steam, available June 22) SAND: Raiders of Sophie (New release on Steam, available June 22) Deer & Boy (New release on Steam, available June 23) EMPULSE (New release on Steam, available June 24) The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales (Steam) FATAL FURY: City of the Wolves (Steam) With the June expansions coming to an end, Nvidia should be announcing its July GeForce NOW plans next week. Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!