Recommended Posts

I always hated that bloated Chrome but the Android version of Firefox had proven unstable on my phone. I wouldn't change my desktop browser because of being able to sync.

I recently decided to give the Android version another try. I'm happy to report that it is performing very well on my phone. No crashes, and performance seems to be good.

I am glad that I am able to use Firefox because it "feels" leaner to me. I was really pushing the desktop version a couple of days ago. I was having to learn Github and was constantly having to look things up and switching between a lot of tabs. It performed admirably. (Y)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1267882-i-changed-to-firefox/
Share on other sites

My problem with Firefox is its horrible Sync when compared to Chrome's. I constantly have to battle with Firefox Sync messing up the order of my bookmarks on both the PC and Android phone after I make changes to bookmarks and also reviving bookmarks I deleted some time ago.

  • Like 2

I don't believe Adblock Plus for Chrome is a separate app - there is a separate app for Internet Explorer. I'd recommend giving uBlock, Adblock (not Plus) or Adguard for Chrome a try instead of Adblock Plus.

He's not talking about the desktop. Chrome on Android doesn't support extensions, hence he needs a separate app to block ads in it on the phone/tablet. Firefox for Android supports extensions.

My problem with Firefox is its horrible Sync when compared to Chrome's. I constantly have to battle with Firefox Sync messing up the order of my bookmarks on both the PC and Android phone after I make changes to bookmarks and also reviving bookmarks I deleted some time ago.

Yeah I hands down prefer firefox to chrome except this, it really annoys me:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=812348

The sync sucks, hands down. I did a clean install on Windows 10 recently, and decided against manually backing up bookmarks, thinking the sync will take care of it. I install the browser and sign in to Sync, and guess what? It didn't retrieve anything, it only started syncing as if I had just made my account. Luckily, had a full system backup.

 

He's not talking about the desktop. Chrome on Android doesn't support extensions, hence he needs a separate app to block ads in it on the phone/tablet. Firefox for Android supports extensions.

Ahh, yeah, you're right. Also by default doesn't Adblock Plus for Android require root or not? I'd highly suggest giving Adguard for Android a try - you can actually import your user filters and it doesn't require root access (but does work with it)... and it's free too unless you want some premium features.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      445
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!