Joe Biden's Son Blames "Russian Agents" For Ashley Madison Profile


Recommended Posts

 

Last night we heard the best 'excuse' yet if you are caught with an Ashley Madison account, from Dan Loeb - "due diligence."

Today, not to be outdone by a married hedge fund manager, Vice-President Joe Biden's son "Hunter" has unleashed his own set of excuses for member ship of the extramarital affairs website, as Breitbart reports  - Biden thinks international agents, possibly Russian, who objected to his board membership with a Ukrainian gas company set up a fake account to discredit him. However, IP mapping suggests otherwise...

 

As Breitbart reports,

 
 

Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden’s account on the extramarital dating website Ashley Madison was used and likely created on the Georgetown University campus while Biden was teaching there.

 

Business executive Robert “Hunter” Biden, reportedly an adviser to his father’s political career, told Breitbart News Monday that he suspected his enemies of creating a fake Ashley Madison account for him in order to discredit him. The email address provided for “Robert Biden’s” account matched a personal email address once used by Biden, the vice president’s son confirmed.

 

Biden thinks international agents, possibly Russian, who objected to his board membership with a Ukrainian gas company set up a fake account to discredit him. A source close to Biden told People Magazine after the first Breitbart story ran that the IP address for the account traces to Jacksonville, Florida.

 

But account information shows that the profile, which was confirmed by a credit card purchase in 2014, was used at the latitude/longitude point of 38.912682, -77.071704.

 

20150828_biden1_0.jpg

 

That latitude-longitude point just happens to exist on the Georgetown University campus, at an administrative building on Reservoir Road. And Hunter Biden just happened to be teaching there around the time the account was set up.

 

Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/27/exclusive-hunter-biden-ashley-madison-account-created-at-college-he-taught-at/

Via: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-08-28/joe-bidens-son-blames-russian-agents-ashley-madison-profile

Why do people care so much about cheating in the USA?

I really don't get it. Who cares what people do in their private life? As long as it doesn't affect the persons work you should just mind your own business.

You all sound like holy crusaders, judging people all the time. Why is that?

 

  • Like 1

Why do people care so much about cheating in the USA?

I really don't get it. Who cares what people do in their private life? As long as it doesn't affect the persons work you should just mind your own business.

You all sound like holy crusaders, judging people all the time. Why is that?

 

Who said so many care, the number of people responding on Neowin is hardly representative of the total number of people in America.

 

Who said so many care, the number of people responding on Neowin is hardly representative of the total number of people in America.

You tried to impeach a president for lying about an affair, doesn't that say enough :)

  • Like 1

 

Last night we heard the best 'excuse' yet if you are caught with an Ashley Madison account, from Dan Loeb - "due diligence."

Today, not to be outdone by a married hedge fund manager, Vice-President Joe Biden's son "Hunter" has unleashed his own set of excuses for member ship of the extramarital affairs website, as Breitbart reports  - Biden thinks international agents, possibly Russian, who objected to his board membership with a Ukrainian gas company set up a fake account to discredit him. However, IP mapping suggests otherwise...

 

As Breitbart reports,

 

Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/27/exclusive-hunter-biden-ashley-madison-account-created-at-college-he-taught-at/

Via: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-08-28/joe-bidens-son-blames-russian-agents-ashley-madison-profile

wait a minute, someone used HIS old email and they are russian agents? Muahahahaha...  He is on the board of Ukraines natural gas and oil company He's just trying to cover his butt to his wife. women aren't stupid, they know when their man is getting lunch elsewhere...

Impeached for lying under oath and obstruction of justice

Because you were sticking your noses where they didn't belong. Why did it matter what he did with other women. Did that affect his job in any way.

The only person with reason to bitch about this was Hilary, nobody else, yet you made a big ###### show out of it

 

Because you were sticking your noses where they didn't belong. Why did it matter what he did with other women. Did that affect his job in any way.

The only person with reason to bitch about this was Hilary, nobody else, yet you made a big ###### show out of it

Doesn't change the fact he lied under oath.

 

You tried to impeach a president for lying about an affair, doesn't that say enough :)

No.

He was impeached by the House of Representative for perjury and obstruction of justice and acquitted by the Senate.   Had nothing to do with the majority of Americans.

Why are you insistent on putting down Americans?

And a person's private behavior can have an impact on their professional performance and the decisions they make.

  • Like 3

 

You got to love righteous America! Where people's career depends on how well they behave in private. Land of the Free, my ass

No, you also have to look at the office (position of power) the person holds and if their actions (such as adultery) can bring discredit to that office or if their conduct is prejudicial to good order and discipline.  For example, members of the military can be kicked out for adultery ... and who is the "boss" of the military ... the POTUS.  McDonald's wouldn't care as long as you can serve hamburgers.

Obviously that isn't what the Republicans (in both House and Senate) were thinking when they voted to impeach him.  

Politics... sigh ... another topic.

  • Like 2

 

Because you were sticking your noses where they didn't belong. Why did it matter what he did with other women. Did that affect his job in any way.

The only person with reason to bitch about this was Hilary, nobody else, yet you made a big ###### show out of it

He should have been impeached for trading campaign donations from the Chinese for missile technology, anyway.

 

He should have been impeached for trading campaign donations from the Chinese for missile technology, anyway.

Yep...I've long felt they got away with something there.  

Maybe the FBI will find something on Hillary's "private" email servers which brings the Clinton's crashing down.  Not getting my hopes up too high though.

Yep...I've long felt they got away with something there.  

Maybe the FBI will find something on Hillary's "private" email servers which brings the Clinton's crashing down.  Not getting my hopes up too high though.

I think Kenneth Starr overreached a bit myself, btw ; I just can't feel sorry for the Clintons, because they're pretty corrupt, and Bill Clinton had plenty of scandals besides the Lewinsky affair.

I actually think Republicans wanted to go after him on the other stuff, not the Lewinsky affair, but Janet Reno was stonewalling, and Lewinsky is all the media would talk about, because that's how the media is -- sensationalistic. So I'd blame the media more than the Congressional Republicans, although I don't think they should have taken the bait. The whole impeachment was pretty divisive and polarized public opinion; and that was really the beginning of the polarization we see today.

I don't care what mistakes people make in their private lives; I think some people cheat because they hate their relationships, and their jobs, and their life, and feel trapped, and maybe lack the emotional maturity to deal with this the right way, or maybe they're so stressed that they lose good judgement. Although, I think Ashley Madison is a sleazy site that enables bad choices.

  • Like 2

 

If you can make up things so can others.

 

True, its a guess but an informed one. In a related subject, support for unrestricted abortion, about 2/3 of supporters are liberals.  Other studies show that about 15% say marital affairs are OK or not a moral issue.  If we apply the abortion liberal split to extramarital affairs we get 10%.

 

 

True, its a guess but an informed one. In a related subject, support for unrestricted abortion, about 2/3 of supporters are liberals.  Other studies show that about 15% say marital affairs are OK or not a moral issue.  If we apply the abortion liberal split to extramarital affairs we get 10%.

 

 

Again quite a stretch even for you.  Abortion?   That has nothing to do with the topic, nothing, you're making things up to suit your bias.

And we can both go back and forth about which group is guilty/innocent of indiscretions, etc.  Neither group is better/worse than the other.

  • Like 2

 

You got to love righteous America! Where people's career depends on how well they behave in private. Land of the Free, my ass

You know it was not the relationship with Lewinsky that got him impeached correct?

It is that he lied about it in a Deposition in a Sexual Harassment Lawsuit from the time that he was Governed of Arkansas.

That is also the reason he was stripped of his Law License in Arkansas for 5 years. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!