Ubuntu Privacy Issues Eerily Similar To Windows 10


Recommended Posts

Ubuntu Privacy Issues Eerily Similar To Windows 10

27 Aug, 2015  in  Privacy  /  Technology   by bitblp

Users are eagerly looking for an alternative solution to the Windows 10 debacle. Naturally, the nix users are first to suggest a linux platform. And when most Windows users hear the word “Linux” they automatically think of Ubuntu.

If you are planning to make the move to Ubuntu or already have, you may want to rethink that decision. It turns out, although the Canonical Privacy Policy is no where near as bad as the Microsoft Privacy Policy, it is still pretty scary. Unfortunately, the fact that Ubuntu collects user data isn’t the worst part of their policy either.

When opening the privacy policy, one can see that Canonical openly admits to harvesting user data. The first sentence of the first paragraph reads “Canonical collects personal information from you in a number of different ways.” They go on to explain why they share your data. “We don’t store personal information unless required for the on-going operation of services to you, to provide you with products, to comply with law or to protect our rights”, reads a bullet point from the policy. This basically describes that Canonical’s use of your data is only collected when required to offer a needed service, such as the operating system itself. This goes without saying, they will always collect your data, in order to provide you the service of the operating system.

Read Further - http://www.hakspek.com/technology/ubuntu-privacy-issues-eerily-similar-to-windows-10/

Sorry, the article's author lost all credibility with me after sentence #1. I am not currently using it since I am on Debian, but Windows 10 is not even close to being a debacle. Microsoft is pretty much doing what Google does in terms of data collection, most of which can be easily disabled.

And honestly, I trust Microsoft a heck of a lot more than I do Canonical.

What debacle?

 

Check this thread on the Microsoft Community to get an idea of some of the paranoia going around. I'm not sure about the amount of telemetry tracking in 10, but there's some serious panic there.

They're also the same guys who claim 10 is a failure because it's "only" at around 5-6% 4 weeks in.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
    • My Photos app is version 2026.11050.1001.0 and it remembers the window size and position. My Snipping Tool is version 11.2602.49.0 and it can capture the taskbar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!