Officer refused service at Dunkin Dounuts


Recommended Posts

WEST HARTFORD, CT (WFSB) -

A West Hartford police officer was declined service at a Dunkin' Donuts in West Hartford on Saturday morning.

According to police, the officer entered the coffee shop located at 1234 Farmington Ave., at about 8:30 a.m.

Police said the officer was standing in the back of the line, and a store employee looked over at him and stated very loudly, "he didn't get the message, we don't serve cops here."

The officer left the store without saying anything. When the officer got to his cruiser, he was approached by the manager and the employee who apologized to him.

According to police, the officer told the employee she should apologize to the patrons who seemed to have taken offense to her comment.

The employee then returned inside the store with the manager and officer and apologized to the patrons. She also offered the officer a free cup of coffee, which he decline.

Dunkin' Donuts put out a statement saying, "we are aware of the situation at the Dunkin' Donuts at 1234 Farmington Avenue in West Hartford. The crew member exhibited poor judgment and apologized immediately to the police officer. The franchise owner, a long-time supporter of local police, has also reached out to apologize on behalf of the restaurant. Dunkin' Donuts and our franchisees share a commitment to the well-being and fair treatment of all guests."
http://www.wfsb.com/story/30178998/officer-refused-service-at-coffee-shop

It's amusing to note that when a shop refuses to serve gay people it's all "muh religious libertyz" but when they do the same to a cop, it's all "fire that employee at once".

I don't disagree that the employee's behaviour was rude and absurdly unprofessional but the double standards of some people never cease to amaze me.

West Hartford is riddled with a bunch of rich liberals who talk a good game, but can't back it up 

Wonder how it would be spinned if the WHPD said they didn't serve that DD if they ever were to call for help 

Well if they had any brains, they would probably point out that the police force aren't a business, but a service paid for out of the money of all of the locale's taxes that have no legal right to discriminate against people.

 

blah blah "Main stream media" blah blah "leftists".. broken record.

Well they ARE the ones pushing this retarded anti police nonsense and inciting riots, so yes, I would place the blame on them 

  • Like 5

 

Well they ARE the ones pushing this retarded anti police nonsense and inciting riots, so yes, I would place the blame on them 

And sovereign citizen's and many libertarians  

now that cop wil have a chip on thier shoulder for the employee now.... 

Wouldn't think so. The cop clearly was a level headed gentlemen. He didn't kick up a fuss, asked the employee to apologise to the other customers and even refused a free cup of coffee. Not exactly the workings of grudge bearing, chip on the shoulder type now is it?

WEST HARTFORD, CT (WFSB) -

A West Hartford police officer was declined service at a Dunkin' Donuts in West Hartford on Saturday morning.

According to police, the officer entered the coffee shop located at 1234 Farmington Ave., at about 8:30 a.m.

Police said the officer was standing in the back of the line, and a store employee looked over at him and stated very loudly, "he didn't get the message, we don't serve cops here."

The officer left the store without saying anything. When the officer got to his cruiser, he was approached by the manager and the employee who apologized to him.

According to police, the officer told the employee she should apologize to the patrons who seemed to have taken offense to her comment.

The employee then returned inside the store with the manager and officer and apologized to the patrons. She also offered the officer a free cup of coffee, which he decline.

Dunkin' Donuts put out a statement saying, "we are aware of the situation at the Dunkin' Donuts at 1234 Farmington Avenue in West Hartford. The crew member exhibited poor judgment and apologized immediately to the police officer. The franchise owner, a long-time supporter of local police, has also reached out to apologize on behalf of the restaurant. Dunkin' Donuts and our franchisees share a commitment to the well-being and fair treatment of all guests."
http://www.wfsb.com/story/30178998/officer-refused-service-at-coffee-shop

 

Imagine the outcry if the officer was a black person.

And what a wimp this cop is. If someone would pull that ###### on me in front of a bunch of people, I would drag him over the counter and kick his ass.

And what a wimp this cop is. If someone would pull that ###### on me in front of a bunch of people, I would drag him over the counter and kick his ass.

How stupid would that be...especially in a time where a lot of people are paranoid about the police.  The cop responded in the way he should have responded.  Kicking anyone's ass would wind the cop in jail.

  • Like 2

 

Imagine the outcry if the officer was a black person.

And what a wimp this cop is. If someone would pull that ###### on me in front of a bunch of people, I would drag him over the counter and kick his ass.

I'd hope you'd then arrest yourself and get charged with assault. Two wrongs don't make a right. Thank goodness you're not a cop.

And what a wimp this cop is. If someone would pull that ###### on me in front of a bunch of people, I would drag him over the counter and kick his ass.


I'm guessing you probably wouldn't. You know, not if you valued your job, career, livelihood and reputation.

  • Like 1

If I ever hear a story about a Sheetz store in the eastern USA market doing this I will laugh considering they give cops in uniform free coffee as a method of bringing in police into the stores to create an image of safety without security guards and have done that for as long as I can remember as corporate policy

And what a wimp this cop is. If someone would pull that ###### on me in front of a bunch of people, I would drag him over the counter and kick his ass.

Well that would certainly calm the situation and restore public trust in the police...

  • Like 3

Well that would certainly calm the situation and restore public trust in the police...

yeah, if anything he should of stayed in line went up to the counter and asked to speak to her manager told them what he heard and dealt with it in the appropriate manner... leaving and saying I don't care I don't want to deal with that crap is also an option, but I'd of at least brought it to managements attention

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      444
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!