Looking to Upgrade my Late 2008 Nehalem System


Recommended Posts

So I've been out of the loop somewhat insofar as how the various components have developed over the years. What I'm trying to get at is I want to ensure there isn't some new tech in a particular area that's coming out between new and the remainder of 2015 that I might want to hold off for in order to implement in the build.

Current:

CPU – Intel Core i7 920

Mobo – Asus P6T Deluxe

RAM – 6 GB (3x2) DDR3

Primary Drive – SATA 7200 HDD

Optical – DVD Drive

GPU – GTX 460 (Was originally a GTX 260 Core 216 that needed replacing when it failed)

Monitor - Acer x223w 22" LCD 1680x1050

As you can tell my current system is pretty standard fare for a new system back in late 2008. The goal was to wait until both system began to truly struggle to run the software I wanted and the hardware developed far enough in every area to justify what is essentially building an entirely new system as most of my parts cannot be upgraded in the traditional sense at this point. I already have most of the parts locked down, but there are a couple I'm on the fence about.

I'm not sure what monitor to replace my current one with. It wasn't quite full HD so to speak when I bought it, but I'm unsure if I should just stick with the traditional 1920x1080 this time around or consider going into 2k at the very least with a 4k monitor a possibly another 7 years down the line. I'd also like the replace my HDD with a SSD, but I'm not sure if there's a particular form factor and interface i should be looking into. As far I understand it, The upcoming M.2 form factor PCI Express using NVMe is considered to be the most recent option in that area. Is that about right? If so, I'll hold off for that

If you choose to upgrade your existing rig, then upgrade your ram, gfx card , and add a normal size ssd. As for your monitor, a 1080p monitor should be sufficient. Anything beyond 1080 is more costly down for the time being. 

An SSD and a new monitor would make it feel like a whole different computer.  I have the same processor in mine and it still runs great.  Over the years I added a new monitor and SSD drive and it felt like a whole different computer.  Mind you I went from 17" to 28" and then to 32" 3K.  Still pretty happy with the performance.

At first i thought i could eek by with just a bit more RAM since the 6 GB I have know is far from cutting it which in 2015 makes sense. The number of times I've seen the Windows you don't have enough RAM left please close X programs is much too high. Turns out I can also bring the i7 920 to its knees with a single high bitrate video. I have to keep Process/Task manager open to kill processes before they make my regularly slow unresponsive system melt. It's kind of funny. It's become increasingly apparent especially with the installation of Windows 10 that my current machine just isn't up to the challenge anymore.

I prefer to build new systems only after my current one has gotten a lengthy period of use (in this case 7+ years) and avoid the whole minor upgrades in certain areas every couple years or so unless a component fails and needs replacing. That is to say I prefer to get the most I can out of my parts as they were first assembled. Again I could slap 6 more GB of DDR3 RAM in there, but I'm also well aware I'd only be delaying the inevitable more so given DDR4 is the current standard anyway. It would only be a temporary solution to a problem that involves my whole system. 

Same deal with an SSD. I'm not going to add an SSD to this motherboard when i know perfectly well I'd be forcing myself to use an already outdated interface. Remember my current Mobo lacks an M.2 slot. it would be sort of like willingly installing a 5200 HDD when you could go with a 7200 one only far more extreme a difference. You obviously don't necessarily need 2015 hardware to run high quality 2015 files/software, but it does allow a system to last a long time without any upgrades all the same. 

I'm going to hold of a little longer for the parts I'm waiting on to actually be released. I'll keep everything y'all have mentioned in mind as well. Thanks a lot for your replies. I greatly appreciate them.

 

At first i thought i could eek by with just a bit more RAM since the 6 GB I have know is far from cutting it which in 2015 makes sense. The number of times I've seen the Windows you don't have enough RAM left please close X programs is much too high. Turns out I can also bring the i7 920 to its knees with a single high bitrate video. I have to keep Process/Task manager open to kill processes before they make my regularly slow unresponsive system melt. It's kind of funny. It's become increasingly apparent especially with the installation of Windows 10 that my current machine just isn't up to the challenge anymore.

I prefer to build new systems only after my current one has gotten a lengthy period of use (in this case 7+ years) and avoid the whole minor upgrades in certain areas every couple years or so unless a component fails and needs replacing. That is to say I prefer to get the most I can out of my parts as they were first assembled. Again I could slap 6 more GB of DDR3 RAM in there, but I'm also well aware I'd only be delaying the inevitable more so given DDR4 is the current standard anyway. It would only be a temporary solution to a problem that involves my whole system. 

Same deal with an SSD. I'm not going to add an SSD to this motherboard when i know perfectly well I'd be forcing myself to use an already outdated interface. Remember my current Mobo lacks an M.2 slot. it would be sort of like willingly installing a 5200 HDD when you could go with a 7200 one only far more extreme a difference. You obviously don't necessarily need 2015 hardware to run high quality 2015 files/software, but it does allow a system to last a long time without any upgrades all the same. 

I'm going to hold of a little longer for the parts I'm waiting on to actually be released. I'll keep everything y'all have mentioned in mind as well. Thanks a lot for your replies. I greatly appreciate them.

 

You never once stated what you use your computer for so any suggestions by default become random noise.

The 920 is not a bad CPU even by 2015 standards. You can O/C it a bit to get an extra year or two or if you just browse the web, another decade or two...

3 8 gig DIMMs will get you 24 gis RAM.

M.2 is no big advantage unless you get the faster version showing up with Skylake mobos and then the drives for that such as the Samsung 950 are about $200 extra for the same size giving you unknown advantage yeah depending in what you do with a computer. Video editing comes to mind for super-fast transfer rates but usually even in that scenario, there needs to be multiple fast drives and most mobos only have a single M.2 slot.

Going from SSD on SATA 3 to SSD on M.2-PCI-e x4 will be more like 7200rpm to 10,000 rpm but less for most people.

Buying a large Samsung 850 today will be the largest performance improvement you can make and again depending on how you actually use a computer might make the eventual complete rebuild produce rather boring results. There is no way this would be a bad move since the SSD would be easily transferable to a new build.

Your video card is reasonably modern and depending on what it is used for may or may not have a lot of lifetime in it. A new GPU is also not dependant on a rebuild.

Your descriptions of performance issues seem software related perhaps. If you did an upgrade install of Windows 10, sometimes weird things can be leftover that don't work well with 10. In particular anything that installs an explorer add-on which is common for up to 50% of all software can be problematic. Try sorting your software installs from oldest to newest and try to guess which of the older ones installed some "right-click" handler.

 

 

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
    • Hello, Bonjour is Apple's implementation of a multicast-DNS service, which allows devices running Apple's software and/or hardware to find each other on your local network.  I believe the Windows version was last updated around 2010. If you do not need it, you can stop and disable the Bonjour service in the Services Control Manager (filename: SERVICES.MSC).  Once you have done that, the operating system will no longer attempt to load the service. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • This AMD RX 9070 16GB GPU that performs close to Nvidia 5070 is under $600 by Sayan Sen With the memory shortage that's prevalent nowadays, discounts are super-hard to get. As such we post good deals whenever they pop up. Recently, we covered a few great discounts on SSDs wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup NVMe PCIe Gen4 drive for just $400 thanks to a special coupon. If you want a faster product but don't need all that capacity, you can also opt for Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB that is on sale for its lowest price in over three months. Let's say though that you are on the hunt for a 1440p gaming card. In that case AMD's RX 9070 non-XT can help, and with its 16GB VRAM, you can also run AI models locally without worrying about bottlenecking (check out our recent 9070 GRE reviews for gaming and productivity to get an idea). The PowerColor Reaper variant of the RX 9070 is currently on sale for just $580 which is a very good price in the current state of affairs (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Reaper cooler on this 9070 uses a triple‑fan design with ring‑blade fans, paired with premium dual ball bearings to extend lifespan and reduce friction. "Intelligent" fan control allows the fans to remain idle at lower temperatures, only spinning up when the GPU is under load. A nickel‑plated copper base makes direct contact with both the GPU and memory modules, helping to spread heat evenly. PowerColor also applies Honeywell PTM7950 phase‑change thermal interface material (TIM), which fills microscopic gaps between the die and heatsink for more efficient thermal transfer. The fan shroud is shorter in height as the firm has made it such that it can be used in certain SFF (small form factor) cases. The technical specifications of the Reaper RX 9070 are given in the table below: Specification Value Stream Processors 3584 Units Video Memory 16GB GDDR6 Memory Speed 20.0 Gbps Memory Interface 256-bit Engine Clock Game Clock: up to 2070 MHz Boost Clock: up to 2520 MHz Bus Standard PCI Express 5.0 x16 Display Connectors 1 x HDMI 2.1b, 3 x DisplayPort 2.1a Maximum Resolution DisplayPort: 7680 × 4320 HDMI: 7680 × 4320 Board Dimensions 289mm × 111mm × 41mm 304mm × 127mm × 42mm (with bracket) Slot 2 Minimum System Power Requirement 600W Power Connectors Two 8-pin PCI Express Get the PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 at the links below (you get only a 90-day warranty on Woot): PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $579.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $700) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $559.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Are they marketed as an entry into astronomy or astrophotography? I do astrophotography. With big rigs, lots of computers, cables and headaches. I love it. And by learning this ridiculously complex hobby, I’ve learned about the objects I’m shooting. Astronomy followed from photography.
    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      578
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!