Looking to Upgrade my Late 2008 Nehalem System


Recommended Posts

So I've been out of the loop somewhat insofar as how the various components have developed over the years. What I'm trying to get at is I want to ensure there isn't some new tech in a particular area that's coming out between new and the remainder of 2015 that I might want to hold off for in order to implement in the build.

Current:

CPU – Intel Core i7 920

Mobo – Asus P6T Deluxe

RAM – 6 GB (3x2) DDR3

Primary Drive – SATA 7200 HDD

Optical – DVD Drive

GPU – GTX 460 (Was originally a GTX 260 Core 216 that needed replacing when it failed)

Monitor - Acer x223w 22" LCD 1680x1050

As you can tell my current system is pretty standard fare for a new system back in late 2008. The goal was to wait until both system began to truly struggle to run the software I wanted and the hardware developed far enough in every area to justify what is essentially building an entirely new system as most of my parts cannot be upgraded in the traditional sense at this point. I already have most of the parts locked down, but there are a couple I'm on the fence about.

I'm not sure what monitor to replace my current one with. It wasn't quite full HD so to speak when I bought it, but I'm unsure if I should just stick with the traditional 1920x1080 this time around or consider going into 2k at the very least with a 4k monitor a possibly another 7 years down the line. I'd also like the replace my HDD with a SSD, but I'm not sure if there's a particular form factor and interface i should be looking into. As far I understand it, The upcoming M.2 form factor PCI Express using NVMe is considered to be the most recent option in that area. Is that about right? If so, I'll hold off for that

If you choose to upgrade your existing rig, then upgrade your ram, gfx card , and add a normal size ssd. As for your monitor, a 1080p monitor should be sufficient. Anything beyond 1080 is more costly down for the time being. 

An SSD and a new monitor would make it feel like a whole different computer.  I have the same processor in mine and it still runs great.  Over the years I added a new monitor and SSD drive and it felt like a whole different computer.  Mind you I went from 17" to 28" and then to 32" 3K.  Still pretty happy with the performance.

At first i thought i could eek by with just a bit more RAM since the 6 GB I have know is far from cutting it which in 2015 makes sense. The number of times I've seen the Windows you don't have enough RAM left please close X programs is much too high. Turns out I can also bring the i7 920 to its knees with a single high bitrate video. I have to keep Process/Task manager open to kill processes before they make my regularly slow unresponsive system melt. It's kind of funny. It's become increasingly apparent especially with the installation of Windows 10 that my current machine just isn't up to the challenge anymore.

I prefer to build new systems only after my current one has gotten a lengthy period of use (in this case 7+ years) and avoid the whole minor upgrades in certain areas every couple years or so unless a component fails and needs replacing. That is to say I prefer to get the most I can out of my parts as they were first assembled. Again I could slap 6 more GB of DDR3 RAM in there, but I'm also well aware I'd only be delaying the inevitable more so given DDR4 is the current standard anyway. It would only be a temporary solution to a problem that involves my whole system. 

Same deal with an SSD. I'm not going to add an SSD to this motherboard when i know perfectly well I'd be forcing myself to use an already outdated interface. Remember my current Mobo lacks an M.2 slot. it would be sort of like willingly installing a 5200 HDD when you could go with a 7200 one only far more extreme a difference. You obviously don't necessarily need 2015 hardware to run high quality 2015 files/software, but it does allow a system to last a long time without any upgrades all the same. 

I'm going to hold of a little longer for the parts I'm waiting on to actually be released. I'll keep everything y'all have mentioned in mind as well. Thanks a lot for your replies. I greatly appreciate them.

 

At first i thought i could eek by with just a bit more RAM since the 6 GB I have know is far from cutting it which in 2015 makes sense. The number of times I've seen the Windows you don't have enough RAM left please close X programs is much too high. Turns out I can also bring the i7 920 to its knees with a single high bitrate video. I have to keep Process/Task manager open to kill processes before they make my regularly slow unresponsive system melt. It's kind of funny. It's become increasingly apparent especially with the installation of Windows 10 that my current machine just isn't up to the challenge anymore.

I prefer to build new systems only after my current one has gotten a lengthy period of use (in this case 7+ years) and avoid the whole minor upgrades in certain areas every couple years or so unless a component fails and needs replacing. That is to say I prefer to get the most I can out of my parts as they were first assembled. Again I could slap 6 more GB of DDR3 RAM in there, but I'm also well aware I'd only be delaying the inevitable more so given DDR4 is the current standard anyway. It would only be a temporary solution to a problem that involves my whole system. 

Same deal with an SSD. I'm not going to add an SSD to this motherboard when i know perfectly well I'd be forcing myself to use an already outdated interface. Remember my current Mobo lacks an M.2 slot. it would be sort of like willingly installing a 5200 HDD when you could go with a 7200 one only far more extreme a difference. You obviously don't necessarily need 2015 hardware to run high quality 2015 files/software, but it does allow a system to last a long time without any upgrades all the same. 

I'm going to hold of a little longer for the parts I'm waiting on to actually be released. I'll keep everything y'all have mentioned in mind as well. Thanks a lot for your replies. I greatly appreciate them.

 

You never once stated what you use your computer for so any suggestions by default become random noise.

The 920 is not a bad CPU even by 2015 standards. You can O/C it a bit to get an extra year or two or if you just browse the web, another decade or two...

3 8 gig DIMMs will get you 24 gis RAM.

M.2 is no big advantage unless you get the faster version showing up with Skylake mobos and then the drives for that such as the Samsung 950 are about $200 extra for the same size giving you unknown advantage yeah depending in what you do with a computer. Video editing comes to mind for super-fast transfer rates but usually even in that scenario, there needs to be multiple fast drives and most mobos only have a single M.2 slot.

Going from SSD on SATA 3 to SSD on M.2-PCI-e x4 will be more like 7200rpm to 10,000 rpm but less for most people.

Buying a large Samsung 850 today will be the largest performance improvement you can make and again depending on how you actually use a computer might make the eventual complete rebuild produce rather boring results. There is no way this would be a bad move since the SSD would be easily transferable to a new build.

Your video card is reasonably modern and depending on what it is used for may or may not have a lot of lifetime in it. A new GPU is also not dependant on a rebuild.

Your descriptions of performance issues seem software related perhaps. If you did an upgrade install of Windows 10, sometimes weird things can be leftover that don't work well with 10. In particular anything that installs an explorer add-on which is common for up to 50% of all software can be problematic. Try sorting your software installs from oldest to newest and try to guess which of the older ones installed some "right-click" handler.

 

 

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!