• 0

Best way to design a web site?


Question

This may be a very general topic, but I have no experience with web design. I have Adobe CC 2015 with Dreamweaver so I can use that. I have messed with it and I am really not very good with it yet. Is there better software for beginners? I want to design a very simple web site for my business that just has basic information pages and a price sheet.

I am very versed in Illustrator. Is it feasible for me to create web page designs in Illustrator and then just extract the elements and place them in the web design software to recreate it?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1275396-best-way-to-design-a-web-site/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I just wouldn't host with windows azure they hiked pricing up drastically in the past 2 months... my site that only got 1000 hits in one month racked up 50 dollars in charges!!! and it was sitting low at 10/mo till they mucked with the database tiers 2 months ago!

Damn I feel happy hearing that at $2/m xD

  • 0

Here is what I have so far designed totally with Muse. The copy was all just put in kind of fast because I wanted something on each page. What do you guys think?

http://coveredwagonembroidery.com/index.html

 

The design makes me feel nostalgic :p

And It doesn't look and work bad but the fact that the text is actually an image is bad for a lot of reasons: high res screens see a low res image of text which results in blurry text, seo obviously, page size(mobile devices have a network data limit) and since the content is an image it's hard to update the text with some sort of cms.

  • 0

The design makes me feel nostalgic :p

And It doesn't look and work bad but the fact that the text is actually an image is bad for a lot of reasons: high res screens see a low res image of text which results in blurry text, seo obviously, page size(mobile devices have a network data limit) and since the content is an image it's hard to update the text with some sort of cms.

What do you mean? I created all the text with the text box tool in Muse.

and what do you mean nostalgic? Dies it look dated or something?

  • 0

What do you mean? I created all the text with the text box tool in Muse.

and what do you mean nostalgic? Dies it look dated or something?

The text tool in muse generated images with text in them :/ Which means your website is made out of multiple images instead of text.

And yes it looks a bit dated :p

Gimme 1min and I'll rewrite your current website in proper code so you can take a look at that ;) Which font did you use?

  • 0

Hmm, why would it render the text as an image? The font is Unisans.

That's probably how the program you use works :(

Anyway here's the frontpage in proper code: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4281191/cw.zip

I used OpenSans Instead of Unisans since Unisans was a licensed font for which I don't have a license ^^

  • 0

Strange nobody has suggested Google's Web Designer:

https://www.google.com/webdesigner/

I know it can be daunting at first (Web), but if it's something easy and fast to use, no better tool than the one above... Plus it's free!

As far as I remember it was meant to be used to create ads and such right?

  • 0

What do you mean? I created all the text with the text box tool in Muse.

and what do you mean nostalgic? Dies it look dated or something?

That's the problem with ~WYSIWYG builders, they take the easy route rather than the correct one. Not a lot you can do about that.
Your most important thing there is that your brand name, main navigation and contact details are all images which is baaaaaaaad.

As for design, yeah it's very dated. Try cutting out the drop shadows and glows. That should help it look a tad more modern.

As far as I remember it was meant to be used to create ads and such right?

Yeah originally. I've seen a few sites it spits out and it's chilling :o

  • 0

I just wouldn't host with windows azure they hiked pricing up drastically in the past 2 months... my site that only got 1000 hits in one month racked up 50 dollars in charges!!! and it was sitting low at 10/mo till they mucked with the database tiers 2 months ago!

$50 for 1000 hits! Unless your site is distributing massive ISO's or films, that's just ridiculous.
We only use Amazon/Azure fr large scale sites where scalability is a major factor, otherwise it's a VPS on a reputable hosting company.

  • 0

That's probably how the program you use works :(

Anyway here's the frontpage in proper code: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4281191/cw.zip

I used OpenSans Instead of Unisans since Unisans was a licensed font for which I don't have a license ^^

That's how it's done! Look at Sea's code along side the Muse code, and you'll see a brilliant example of what i'm talking about. 

  • 0

 

$50 for 1000 hits! Unless your site is distributing massive ISO's or films, that's just ridiculous.
We only use Amazon/Azure fr large scale sites where scalability is a major factor, otherwise it's a VPS on a reputable hosting company.

Not really anything large... just a wordpress based site and a static html based site... no downloads and the wordpress based one only has a gallery with 1MB images, nothing really huge or 4K.

 

I am going to dispute it if I freakin find out how to thier system is so clunky and hard to find anything... and people are allready raging on forums bc of that recent change. This is BS and I have to move to another host..

  • Like 1
  • 0

I updated the site with a web safe font. I guess I learned that if you create a text object with a font that is not web safe, it makes it an image?

I also took out the glows and drop shadows. I do still have the glow on the menu words for active status. Do you guys recommend something else other than glow to make it look more modern?

  • 0

I updated the site with a web safe font. I guess I learned that if you create a text object with a font that is not web safe, it makes it an image?

I also took out the glows and drop shadows. I do still have the glow on the menu words for active status. Do you guys recommend something else other than glow to make it look more modern?

Personal opinion...

  • Remove the gradients from the purple bars
  • Pick a better font pair for use on the headers and body text (have a look at http://fontpair.co/), currently you're using Arial which falls back to Helvetica on Macs, neither are particularly good at readability on screen.
  • Make your text a darker grey rather than solid black (#000) as it makes font blending less apparent and easier on the eye. Don;t go crazy though, you'll still need some contrast.
  • Have a look at your colours. I'm not going to go in to all aspects of colour theory right now, but some of the choices are very clashing (light blue hovers on purple, for instance).

Those adjustments should go some way to perking it up a bit.

  • 0

 

Personal opinion...

  • Remove the gradients from the purple bars
  • Pick a better font pair for use on the headers and body text (have a look at http://fontpair.co/), currently you're using Arial which falls back to Helvetica on Macs, neither are particularly good at readability on screen.
  • Make your text a darker grey rather than solid black (#000) as it makes font blending less apparent and easier on the eye. Don;t go crazy though, you'll still need some contrast.
  • Have a look at your colours. I'm not going to go in to all aspects of colour theory right now, but some of the choices are very clashing (light blue hovers on purple, for instance).

Those adjustments should go some way to perking it up a bit.

I will certainly try all of that, thanks I really appreciate it. I think I am starting to learn what is more modern but boy am I a noob at web design.

I guess flat is what looks modern? People seem to be consistently saying that the bevels, gradients, glows, etc. don't look good. Do you have a recommendation for the states of the menu text? I have them white and just made the highlight color blue just because it seemed visible, And the glow seemed like the best option to show the active menu.

  • Like 1
  • 0

Google font embedding FTW though... works very solidly... I would use those if you were to use a different font.

It is quick and easy, but personally i never trust a third party with the performance and stability of a client (or personal) site.

An example of this is FontKit. It went down for three days at the beginning of the month and caused havoc with sites using it. Some of my colleagues were getting 30 calls a day from ###### off clients, even more ###### off when they were told there was nothing that could be done. Having a decent font stack in place goes some way to alleviating the issue, but it is still an issue none the less.

 

@font-face ftw. 

  • 0

I will certainly try all of that, thanks I really appreciate it. I think I am starting to learn what is more modern but boy am I a noob at web design.

I guess flat is what looks modern? People seem to be consistently saying that the bevels, gradients, glows, etc. don't look good. Do you have a recommendation for the states of the menu text? I have them white and just made the highlight color blue just because it seemed visible, And the glow seemed like the best option to show the active menu.


No problem mate, every one starts somewhere, most importantly is you want the help and you're listening. I've worked in the industry since 2001 (when gradients, glows, drop shadows and bevels were par the course!), run my own business since 2006 and run a web design forum so i actually enjoy helping :p

The flat thing is very 'in' right now, but it's actually more the web finding it's own style, just so happens "flat" is trendy at the same time. I'd say less 'flat' is the way forward and more 'subtlety' is the way forward.

In regards to the navigation items, i'd have the items, that are the current pages, stay as the same as the hover effect. Either that or have the current items underlined. Again subtlety is the key. 

  • 0

 

It is quick and easy, but personally i never trust a third party with the performance and stability of a client (or personal) site.

An example of this is FontKit. It went down for three days at the beginning of the month and caused havoc with sites using it. Some of my colleagues were getting 30 calls a day from ###### off clients, even more ###### off when they were told there was nothing that could be done. Having a decent font stack in place goes some way to alleviating the issue, but it is still an issue none the less.

 

@font-face ftw. 

Ouch!! That sucks...

  • Like 1
  • 0

how many hits you get though? and how many databases?

I got 100GB bandwidth so hits are kinda infinite :p
And I got unlimited databases ;)

It's shared hosting btw, if you want an actual vps: http://vpsdepot.com It's a part of webhostingpad ^^

  • 0

Ouch!! That sucks...


Yeah it was a bit of a headache for them. None of my clients using TypeKit (I haven't used it for a commercial project for a while) actually noticed the down time because i'll always put as close as possible web safe fonts in the font stack just in case. Either that or they just never looked :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Chrome 149.0.7827.156 (offline installer) by Razvan Serea The web browser is arguably the most important piece of software on your computer. You spend much of your time online inside a browser: when you search, chat, email, shop, bank, read the news, and watch videos online, you often do all this using a browser. Google Chrome is a browser that combines a minimal design with sophisticated technology to make the web faster, safer, and easier. Use one box for everything--type in the address bar and get suggestions for both search and Web pages. Thumbnails of your top sites let you access your favorite pages instantly with lightning speed from any new tab. Desktop shortcuts allow you to launch your favorite Web apps straight from your desktop. Chrome has many useful features built in, including automatic full-page translation and access to thousands of apps, extensions, and themes from the Chrome Web Store. Google Chrome is one of the best solutions for Internet browsing giving you high level of security, speed and great features. This update includes 33 security fixes. [N/A][516496659] Critical CVE-2026-12437: Use after free in WebShare. Reported by Google on 2026-05-25 [N/A][516947912] Critical CVE-2026-12438: Inappropriate implementation in WebView. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][519728275] Critical CVE-2026-12439: Use after free in Digital Credentials. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][519731619] Critical CVE-2026-12440: Use after free in DigitalCredentials. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][520157118] Critical CVE-2026-12441: Use after free in File Input. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][521950423] Critical CVE-2026-12442: Use after free in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-06-09 [N/A][522566295] Critical CVE-2026-12443: Use after free in Web Authentication. Reported by Google on 2026-06-11 [N/A][513160088] High CVE-2026-12444: Out of bounds read in Chromoting. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513199795] High CVE-2026-12445: Use after free in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513313107] High CVE-2026-12446: Insufficient data validation in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513405023] High CVE-2026-12447: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][513458233] High CVE-2026-12448: Inappropriate implementation in WebView. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][513480539] High CVE-2026-12449: Use after free in Chromoting. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][514531776] High CVE-2026-12450: Inappropriate implementation in Media. Reported by Zhixin Tu on 2026-05-19 [N/A][514741076] High CVE-2026-12451: Use after free in DigitalCredentials. Reported by Google on 2026-05-19 [N/A][515462244] High CVE-2026-12452: Use after free in Downloads. Reported by Google on 2026-05-21 [N/A][516448843] High CVE-2026-12453: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input. Reported by Google on 2026-05-25 [N/A][516926968] High CVE-2026-12454: Race in Safe Browsing. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517069848] High CVE-2026-12455: Use after free in Tab Strip. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517124587] High CVE-2026-12456: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517153117] High CVE-2026-12457: Insufficient data validation in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517258337] High CVE-2026-12458: Incorrect security UI in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517406035] High CVE-2026-12459: Inappropriate implementation in Serial. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28 [N/A][517484284] High CVE-2026-12460: Insufficient policy enforcement in File System Access. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28 [N/A][517727318] High CVE-2026-12461: Out of bounds read in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-05-29 [N/A][517916024] High CVE-2026-12462: Use after free in Media. Reported by Google on 2026-05-29 [N/A][518042749] High CVE-2026-12463: Inappropriate implementation in Views. Reported by Google on 2026-05-30 [N/A][519358344] High CVE-2026-12464: Use after free in Browser. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][520189702] High CVE-2026-12465: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Metrics. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][520199394] High CVE-2026-12466: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][520202726] High CVE-2026-12467: Use after free in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][521485244] High CVE-2026-12468: Inappropriate implementation in Updater. Reported by Google on 2026-06-08 [N/A][521618871] High CVE-2026-12469: Uninitialized Use in GPU. Reported by Google on 2026-06-09 Important to know! The offline installer links do not include the automatic update feature. Download web installer: Google Chrome Web 32-bit | Google Chrome 64-bit | Freeware Download: Google Chrome Offline Installer 64-bit | Direct Link | 131.0 MB Download: Google Chrome Offline Installer 32-bit | Direct Link | 119.0 MB Download page: Google Chrome Portable Download: Chrome ARM64 | Direct Link View: Chrome Website | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • they couldnt do W11 LTSC so the support lasts longer....
    • The fact that the pref is not enabled by default tells you that what you see is what you get...for now. Hopefully the final version will have all the quirks ironed out.
    • It's enterprise, not consumer. And "...affected scenarios involve third-party software..." Would be good to know that in headline, not way down in the article. Instead, you lead with Windows update, which is not very helpful and misleading, IMHO. Just saying.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      85
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!