Lumia 950 review...not so good


Recommended Posts

Have any of you ever used a windows phone? I am not taking about a cheap one I am talking about the 930 or a 1020. I will give you just several examples - texting - texting on an android device is just painful and iPhone you should just give up even trying. The windows mobile OS is  by far the most efficient OS available and most secure based on many security experts. There is a reason if the windows OS runs rings around the android OS if you put it on the same hardware. There is also the camera my old 1020 still is better than the S6 I am required to use for work. The S6 is good but it is no 1020 and the 950 has an even better camera. Now if you need certain apps that is the only reason to get an android or Apple. There is also windows 10 mobile which is fantastic. There is also one other killer feature that no one else has called Continuum - that you can turn your windows phone into a pc and it really works even better than shown.

windows-10-continuum-shown-off-in-new-vi

  

I've used all three for texting and NONE of them are better or worse at it. The WP was an HTC One M8. 

Same can be said for Android and iOS. What have they got as platforms that Windows Phone doesn't? Don't play the app card though because that's a store limitation not a platform limitation.

The Lumia 640 isn't a premium phone so I am sure the lowered quality will give you a bad impression. You can always get the imulator for free. Having said that, windows 10 mobile isn't that different than windows 10 tablet mode

I want to like it, but I've had a horrible experience early on with WP7. It got abandoned, and WP10 doesn't look all that promising. There is absolutely nothing promising on WM10 - app developers (banking apps and such) are abandoning ship, and Microsoft themselves give me no reason to migrate to WM10. I can reap all the benefits of their ecosystem on iOS and Android, so why bother moving to a platform that doesn't have apps, devices or feature parity? I'm sorry but as much as I want to root for MS, it's a DOA platform. 

I am playing with all 3 platforms at the moment and I have a huge list of reasons why I always go back to the windows device

If it works for you, that's awesome (Y). I love that MS releases the Office, Xbox, RDP apps on Android/iOS. Me personally, I'd rather use iOS and Android with Microsoft software/services. Hell, I can even get Cortana on Android! 

I want to like it, but I've had a horrible experience early on with WP7. It got abandoned, and WP10 doesn't look all that promising. There is absolutely nothing promising on WM10 - app developers (banking apps and such) are abandoning ship, and Microsoft themselves give me no reason to migrate to WM10. I can reap all the benefits of their ecosystem on iOS and Android, so why bother moving to a platform that doesn't have apps, devices or feature parity? I'm sorry but as much as I want to root for MS, it's a DOA platform. 

UWP is the killer feature. As desktop users continue migrating to Windows 10 (and let's be honest, with the November update it's performing better than both 7 and 8.1), they're building an insanely large userbase. Developers are then basically offered to target tablet, Xbox, Continuum and mobile users with next to no effort. I mean, it's easy to complain right now, because Universal Apps and things like Continuum are in their infancy, but if you look at the bigger picture, they're doing the right thing. It won't happen over night, but it is happening, and it's a great incentive for developers. Just look at Viber, right now, they're supporting three different apps for Windows (legacy desktop, RT app for Windows 8 desktop/tablets, and a WP app). With UWP, they can cut down their development effort to two models (Universal and legacy desktop for Windows 7 users), while at the same time opening the doors to new platforms at no cost.

The second thing is that Microsoft is promising that Windows 10 will get timely updates on mobile. If they manage to pull that one off, they'll be solving a major gripe Android users have with their phones - lack of support. As I said, I used (and enjoyed to a large part) Android, but sooner or later, you're left on your own, chasing ROMs because the phone manufacturers usually give up on supporting the phone as soon as they release it.

Other things, like performance, design language etc, that will surely be refined and improved in time. So as easy it is to complain (and I do it as much as the next guy, especially when Microsoft pulls stunts like releasing unfinished software or rebooting their platforms every second year), I still think it's far from DOA. If they ride this one through, they have a good shot at entering the market imo. This is what they should have been doing with W8, but better late than never.

All the benchmarks in this review were browser based

and the graphics benchmark is bs. the software gives bogus results. my 1520 gets such a low score comparable to those cheap disposable android phones, yet realworld graphics rendering in games is better than other android phones with the same snapdragon chipset.

Not trying to troll, I just don't see what is so compelling about Windows phones. I just don't know what about them would jingle someones jangles.

I mean sure for $30 I would buy a Lumia 640 to play with and to experiment on.

Aside from the lovely camera, I was almost sort of glad when I broke my 930.  Much much happier with my Nexus 6! :p

Plenty of cheap models, updated for years, UI is usually always responsive and applications can't install useless and irritating background services. When the alternatives at the same price are some Samsung Super Mini Neo Trinity Morpheus Déjà vu edition that will likely never be updated or some chinaphones the Lumias seem a pretty reasonable alternative. But I would never ever buy a phone without ad-blocking, especially with those awesome network operators we have here in Italy that would sell their souls to have users end up subscripted to premium SMS services.

Erm, yes they can. Go look at the universal application samples for windows 10, half of them have foreground methods and background methods for the examples.

True there is a limited number of things they can access and do in the background, but they can do things in the background none-the-less.

Erm, yes they can. Go look at the universal application samples for windows 10, half of them have foreground methods and background methods for the examples. True there is a limited number of things they can access and do in the background, but they can do things in the background none-the-less.

They can run all the time they want in background now? I thought those were limited to handling notifications/events. Oh well, at least Windows has a way to disable only the background part, on Android I have to disable the entire applications to get rid of the services (unless I root, or terminate them every time).

hmm I stopped reading when the reviewer said he can't even make a benchmark because the screen is shutting down every 5 minutes. I can't seem to take this guy seriously. too lazy to go to the settings and change it to "never". clearly, the author/reviewer wasn't as knowledgeable to what he was reviewing - maybe he just don't use Microsoft products at all as what he's profile is saying and considering the insider was available a long time ago.

peter bright is trolling.

 

Smartphones have always been more about what people want rather than need so...

The difference is with more sites going HTML5 and more apps being glorified sites in a web browser, they're going to matter significantly less as time goes on. 

(Yes, I recognize that time is not yet.  But it is definitely happening.)

Not trying to troll, I just don't see what is so compelling about Windows phones. I just don't know what about them would jingle someones jangles.

I mean sure for $30 I would buy a Lumia 640 to play with and to experiment on.

No top end android phone comes even close to matching my old lumia 1020 for the camera. An while I like my current xperia, when I pick up the lumia again it feels so much better to use, everything is smooth, nice and works, there's no fuss, information is there where you need it all the time. 

To use an old Apple slogan, it just works. sure the xperia may currently have more "power" in some ways, but, I don't ever use it. I don't care for or play much mobile games, and when I do, there's more than enough of them to keep me entertained on windows phone. and everything else just works works better on WP. I can't tweak and customize and all that as much, but I don't need to.  

And there's some things that are just stupidly designed on Android, like folder and SD folder permissions. inconsistent cross application functions. some apps will be able to log in through the FB app, others will insist on bringing up the FB web login windows with tiny text and crap. it feels much less planned out and badly designed. 

I like Android, it's just like linux, fun to play around with, can be tweaked a lot, but if you just want to use it for what it's meant to. it's not that great or efficient, 

 

And as a bonus, the 1020 doesn't try to burn my hand off for playing simple 2D games, or other simple stuff. whereas the androids, have all decided to fire up the CPU to 100% eating battery even when you just need 2% of it. 

I like Android, it's just like linux, fun to play around with, can be tweaked a lot, but if you just want to use it for what it's meant to. it's not that great or efficient,

 

Personally, while I enjoy a good camera, it's not the end all for a phone. I would much rather have applications available to me when I want them.  I will admit that my investment in the goggle service ecosystem does influence my choice of operating system.

My LG G3 has a nice camera, obviously not as good as that windows phone camera but good enough to whip it out of my pocket and take a decent photo

18623945793_b055ce6d8e.jpg

As far as using android for what it's meant to, it is great and efficient.

Edited by warwagon

hmm I stopped reading when the reviewer said he can't even make a benchmark because the screen is shutting down every 5 minutes. I can't seem to take this guy seriously. too lazy to go to the settings and change it to "never". clearly, the author/reviewer wasn't as knowledgeable to what he was reviewing - maybe he just don't use Microsoft products at all as what he's profile is saying and considering the insider was available a long time ago.

peter bright is trolling.

 

He tried that already, the "never" setting isn't there for him.

 

As far as using android for what it's meant to, it is great and efficient.

Is that why no one uses the actual android dialer and messaging clients. every OEM replaces it with their own better versions. Any uses with some knowledge replaces that again with another one of their choice along with the launcher. 

doesn't say "works great and efficient" to me. it says "needs replacement". 

 

Is that why no one uses the actual android dialer and messaging clients. every OEM replaces it with their own better versions. Any uses with some knowledge replaces that again with another one of their choice along with the launcher. 

doesn't say "works great and efficient" to me. it says "needs replacement". 

 

On the flip side you can replace the stock dialer and messaging application  and launcher to what ever you want. I love pure android but recently put on a modified stock LG rom for my phone and I actually really like it.

A lot of the pure stuff is great, but at the same time some of the modifications LG has made in a few area's are also kind of nice..

But i'm not going to Lie, if the Nexus 6p had an Micro SD card slot, I would have probably gotten one. The thought of monthly updates along with a finger print reader, Jingles my Jangles.

Edited by warwagon

Or you can simply have a superior 1st party experience.  That you have so elevated the need for 3rd party 'apps' makes it hard to take you seriously.

I generally disagree with this review now that I have one.  He diminishes the pros, and exaggerates the cons.  Benchmarks, really?

Runs fine on a 521 over here. Hit the insider program on it, it upgraded it from Cyan to Denim, rebooted and complete that, then checked for updates and it popped 15856.11 on it. Only problem was the store erred on upgrading a few of the 3rd party apps, but uninstall and re-download from the store and things are fine. Some apps are a little slow to start, but they were also that on 8.1. Does what's needed, and does it well.

 

He tried that already, the "never" setting isn't there for him.

I have investigated and this "timeout" problem falls on at&t's installed build. somehow some settings like the lockscreen timeout and double tap to wake is missing from the latest build for 950. the problem doesn't exist though on the most recent build of w10m (insider). the first batch of 950 got an old build signed by at&t and I assumed they went that way as they have not certified the new build. when w10m hits the public on december, 950s will surely be updated and will rock the same build as anybody have - let's see if this still persist.

 

Your post kind of highlights my personal impression of the so called app gap. It is highly subjective and depends on the user. I think most people have what they need on Windows Phone.

For you, apps are more important than a good camera
For me, camera is more important than lots of apps

I care more about a good camera because I take at least one photo a day whereas I think I have deposited like 1-2 checks using the (now missing) Bank of America app.

Personally, while I enjoy a good camera, it's not the end all for a phone. I would much rather have applications available to me when I want them.  I will admit that my investment in the goggle service ecosystem does influence my choice of operating system.

My LG G3 has a nice camera, obviously not as good as that windows phone camera but good enough to whip it out of my pocket and take a decent photo

18623945793_b055ce6d8e.jpg

As far as using android for what it's meant to, it is great and efficient.

Your post is a perfect example of why the app gap is exaggerated when discussing Windows Phone.

For you, apps are more important than a camera in smartphone.
For me, camera is lot more important than apps.
I don't care for banking apps because the only real use of the Bank of America app for me was when I deposited 1-2 checks using it when the app was available. That's not much in 2-3 years the app was in the store.
In contrast, I constantly shoot photos (at least 2-3 per day) using my phone. Android cameras are barely getting there now and 950 leaves them(and iPhone) in the dust again. 

  • Like 2

 

apps apps apps apps apps apps apps

What kind of apps? Games? I'll pass. Windows Phone has the apps I need. As someone who doesn't need eleventy billion apps, that's not really a compelling argument.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!