Lumia 950 review...not so good


Recommended Posts

Not trying to troll, I just don't see what is so compelling about Windows phones. I just don't know what about them would jingle someones jangles.

I mean sure for $30 I would buy a Lumia 640 to play with and to experiment on.

I miss not having to use iTunes, file system access and the shape writing keyboard, but thats about it. I think MS will abandon WP within a year. No one wants it. No apps, no real selection of phones and carriers aren't making any effort to push the platform.

MS tried to reinvent the wheel too many times, screwed people over and made us wait too long for decent phones. They're done.

I miss not having to use iTunes, file system access and the shape writing keyboard, but thats about it. I think MS will abandon WP within a year. No one wants it. No apps, no real selection of phones and carriers aren't making any effort to push the platform.

MS tried to reinvent the wheel too many times, screwed people over and made us wait too long for decent phones. They're done.

Uh, I think the Insider's Program has shown that Windows Phone has its fanbase. Microsoft still cares about WP, but it just has a hard time showing it. Most Windows Phone are available off carrier, and are easily bought online. Windows 10 is starting to show developers there is a base for them to start making apps, and many have already created universal apps for the Windows platform.

I agree there is a fanbase, but its not translating into adoption rate. The Amiga 500 stills has a fanbase.

Well Microsoft hasn't had a worthwhile handset available for some time. Thankfully, they've corrected their error.

Well Microsoft hasn't had a worthwhile handset available for some time. Thankfully, they've corrected their error.

We'll know in a year or sooner, I guess. I hope it survives for the sake of competition, but its hard too be optimistic at this point.

On 11/22/2015, 12:46:26, krobin said:

 I will give you just several examples - texting - texting on an android device is just painful and iPhone you should just give up even trying.   

 

For IoS - unlock, press messages then press new or reply, type message then send, that is sooooooo hard I gave up. So the question is, for example, have you tried messaging with android or IoS? The answer appears to be no.

On 21/11/2015, 20:54:36, warwagon said:

Not trying to troll, I just don't see what is so compelling about Windows phones. I just don't know what about them would jingle someones jangles.

I mean sure for $30 I would buy a Lumia 640 to play with and to experiment on.

Well, I can tell you my experience.

 

As you can see I own a 640 XL LTE.

 

The screen is beautiful, I can't see any pixels here. Both cameras are great, I'd dare say that the fron facing camera is better than my friend's iPhone 6's camera, and I don't find the main camera to be inferior to that of the iPhone 6, I have not run any benchmarks here, just a visual comparison of pictures taken in comparable conditions, far from a professional comparison.

 

All the apps I have work perfectly, even Facebook and Twitter that many users say they don't work, are snappy, load fast, and no app has crashed on me yet.

 

Battery life is crazy, I can get 48 hours if I don't play games, I do not have demanding games, probably the most demanding is Dream League Soccer, it loads fast and plays perfectly and, only after more than one hour, it gets the back of the phone slightly warm, other games I have: chess, checkers, Microsoft Mahjong, blackjack and yahtzee.

 

After having used it for a while I think that many reviews are just nitpicking stuff that users won't even notice, like pixels or benchmarks.

 

As for apps, I have all the apps I currently need, I miss a good Backgammon app but that's no deal breaker at all.

 

Only one small issue, I live on the 5th floor when I'm in the street it already picks up my wi-fi and connects to it, and for those briefs seconds I can't use my connection since the signal is too weak, but besides that browsing and anything internet related both on wi-fi and 4G is crazy fast, I found that, using my 100 MBit connection is somewhat faster to upload stuff on OneDrive and then download it to my phone than moving files from PC to the phone.

 

Apps that I moved to the Micro SD (Samsung HC EVO, UHS-1, Class 10, 32 GB) take a little longer to load, maybe a second or two.

 

Maybe another issue, it shows me that there are almost 600MB of files on the phone, classified as "Other" I have no idea what they are and how to get rid of them, or if I should get rid of them, I'll try connecting the phone to a Windows machine.

 

Call quality and the speakers are really great, even the Microsoft headphones have a great sound, even if they feel a little fragile.

 

And the keyboard is awesome, so is speech recognition in Cortana, despite it being still in alpha.

On ‎11‎/‎22‎/‎2015‎ ‎8‎:‎50‎:‎06‎, BajiRav said:

Having used both Lumia 630 and Lumia 640, I call ###### on this post. The 640 is an amazing phone for the price.

I created a thread similar to glen8's post. I bought a 640 for my brother on Black Friday, and besides the lack of Apps, one of his biggest reasons for not liking the phone was because it performed poorly during web usage, while his Android phone worked fine on the exact website. He also notes that the phone would become sluggish after prolonged use, and the need to reboot the phone was the only remedy. I don't think the OS runs as smoothly on lower specs as everyone here says. I won't even get into my Lumia 635, that thing is junk.

4 minutes ago, JHBrown said:

I created a thread similar to glen8's post. I bought a 640 for my brother on Black Friday, and besides the lack of Apps, one of his biggest reasons for not liking the phone was because it performed poorly during web usage, while his Android phone worked fine on the exact website. He also notes that the phone would become sluggish after prolonged use, and the need to reboot the phone was the only remedy. I don't think the OS runs as smoothly on lower specs as everyone here says. I won't even get into my Lumia 635, that thing is junk.

Yep, I have a Lumia 520 ...what a piece of crap! :D

1 minute ago, warwagon said:

Yep, I have a Lumia 520 ...what a piece of crap! :D

Poor performance also? My 635 is unbearable doing basic tasks. It often crashes browsing Neowin. My daughter now uses it for Netflix when her iPad battery is dead.

Just now, JHBrown said:

Poor performance also? My 635 is unbearable doing basic tasks. It often crashes browsing Neowin. My daughter now uses it for Netflix when her iPad battery is dead.

I just installed the new windows 10 build. over all it seems snappier that before. But I tried web browsing but then just gave up waiting. very sluggish. That being said, I can't believe these cheap phones like the lumia only had 512 megs of ram. I know they are really cheap but 1GB or ram might make it more bareable.

Just now, warwagon said:

I just installed the new windows 10 build. over all it seems snappier that before. But I tried web browsing but then just gave up waiting. very sluggish. That being said, I can't believe these cheap phones like the lumia only had 512 megs of ram. I know they are really cheap but 1GB or ram might make it more bareable.

I believe the 640 has 1GB? He still states it was sluggish. I told him to do a factory reset, then remove all the AT&T pre-installed junk, along with other pre-installed junk. Still a no-go! I have the latest Windows 10 build on my 635, and using Edge for browsing, is like someone poking a finger in my eye.

7 minutes ago, JHBrown said:

I believe the 640 has 1GB? He still states it was sluggish. I told him to do a factory reset, then remove all the AT&T pre-installed junk, along with other pre-installed junk. Still a no-go! I have the latest Windows 10 build on my 635, and using Edge for browsing, is like someone poking a finger in my eye.

 

I dunno, I was watching some performance reviews about the 640 and it looks like it preformed great.

If apps will always trump specs in your world, then there isn't much to discuss there.  Sounds like you all use the browser way more than I do as well, which confuses me since you have 'all' those apps...

 

On ‎11‎/‎28‎/‎2015‎ ‎10‎:‎29‎:‎10‎, AR556 said:

I miss not having to use iTunes, file system access and the shape writing keyboard, but thats about it.

I agree, those are all pros of using WP.

 

 

On ‎12‎/‎5‎/‎2015‎ ‎4‎:‎04‎:‎21‎, JHBrown said:

Poor performance also? My 635 is unbearable doing basic tasks. It often crashes browsing Neowin. My daughter now uses it for Netflix when her iPad battery is dead.

Tried resetting it and starting fresh?  The only time I've seen mine slow down at all is if I had the drive completely filled up, so now I keep a decent amount of space free (happens to most flash/SSDs though it's often handled differently.)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!