Man who sued apple for wiping his data wins!


Recommended Posts

While waiting for the hundred comments like on the post from earlier...

 

This a real story? The Sun is a tabloid newspaper after all. Regardless, the man was an imbecile for not backing up his data but the Apple "Genius" should have told him what he was doing before the wipe. Apple should pay....

Ultimately, unless you have the signed work authorisation which states Apple aren't responsible for data loss, then they're responsible.

 

Backup or no backup, they can't just wipe your phone without telling you.

6 minutes ago, Astra.Xtreme said:

I'm sure Apple just decided to offer up a sum of money, which would end up being cheaper than paying a lawyer to continue to fight it.

 

Actually, the opposite was true, apparently it went through court. It's only a small claims, so wont' have been expensive. i'd be surprised if the legal fees were more than £1k.

2 minutes ago, Brian M. said:

Ultimately, unless you have the signed work authorisation which states Apple aren't responsible for data loss, then they're responsible.

 

Backup or no backup, they can't just wipe your phone without telling you.

 

Actually, the opposite was true, apparently it went through court. It's only a small claims, so wont' have been expensive. i'd be surprised if the legal fees were more than £1k.

 

Whenever apple genius works on a product you do have sign something like that I don't know if it was done in this case but in my case they did make do it.

I love the fact that this topic when discussed earlier seemed to throw up corporate shill after corporate shill blaming the guy. If the tech guys wiped the data without warning him that they were going to do it, or making him aware in writing, they *ARE* at fault. They got sloppy and botched a job. Get over it.

18 minutes ago, Melfster said:

Why do you believe this guy over the Apple "Genius"?  I have only been once to apple genius they did tell me to back up my stuff before they did anything.

 

 

Some people are not perfect.... for example, a tech can forget to ask a customer about backing up...    like this:

 

cus: Hello, I have a problem with my phone.

tech: No problem, we can get it fixed. Be right back.

tech with fixed phone: Here you go. Anything else can I help you with?

cus: Thanks... [looking at phone and noticed data is wiped]  WTF?!  My data is gone!

tech: Oh I forgot to ask you about backing up. I am so sorry.

 

Instead of this:

 

cus: Hello, I have a problem with my phone.

tech: Before we do that, back your data up, would you like for us to setup icloud before we repair the phone?

option 1:

    cus if chosen cloud option: That's fine.

    tech: Ok, [setting up icloud account with customer, then backing up]

option 2:

    cus if no icloud option: No. I will do that when I get home.. I will come back.

    tech: No problem. Anything else can I help you with?

 

Sometimes people forget to say the company name like this:

 

[Pick the phone up] This is Apple Store, How can I help you with?

 

But instead, [pick up the phone] Hello.

 

 

No one is perfect these days...  we make mistakes no matter what it is...   all come from your mind as long as you remember what to do. If not, you miss a step or two.. such as forgot to ask a customer about backing up.

33 minutes ago, Brian M. said:

Ultimately, unless you have the signed work authorisation which states Apple aren't responsible for data loss, then they're responsible.

 

Backup or no backup, they can't just wipe your phone without telling you.

 

Actually, the opposite was true, apparently it went through court. It's only a small claims, so wont' have been expensive. i'd be surprised if the legal fees were more than £1k.

 

If it was small claims court then there are no lawyer fees and court costs are between £80-150. You win if the other side fails to show 95% of the time and some of the judges know very little about the law. I'll take all of this with the usual pinch of salt based on The Sun as a source but if he did win good luck to him.

3 minutes ago, Depicus said:

 

If it was small claims court then there are no lawyer fees and court costs are between £80-150. You win if the other side fails to show 95% of the time and some of the judges know very little about the law. I'll take all of this with the usual pinch of salt based on The Sun as a source but if he did win good luck to him.

 

From what I remember reading, this wasn't allocated to the small claims track. Probably because it was a complex case.

1 hour ago, Brian M. said:

 

From what I remember reading, this wasn't allocated to the small claims track. Probably because it was a complex case.

 

Mmmm something very odd indeed, The Royal Courts of Justice is the High Court and usually where appeals from County Courts would go, so how did he manage to get his case heard at the High Court and within a year, sounds very fishy indeed. I'm inclined to think there is a lot of creative licence in this story.

 

Edit: seems they have a county court there as well, been many a time and never noticed it.

Edited by Depicus
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I and many others did not vote to get out of the E.u because of Putin or Farage, we did so for our own reasons. You don't have to tel me what my own did or did not do when it comes to the E.U. The EEC is or was the European Economic Community, a different beast to what the E.U is now.The EEC was a mainly about trading, the E.U have gone far beyond that and as I have said before, is now more of a United States of Europe. The U.K did not vote to join a United States of Europe. Anyway, they did not want us in there in the first place, Charles de Gaulle stopped us joining as he claimed we didn’t agree with the core ideas of integration. He was not wrong and that is why we voted out of the E.U when the time came. I was not old enough to vote the first time. My only regret is that we did not have the referendum years ago and got out years ago. If we rejoined, we would have to agree to join the Euro and no doubt Schengen, agree with freedom of movement, we have enough problem with people coming over here as it is. i have no problem with people coming over here if they work and don't try to push their way of life onto us. The E.U has a currency, freedom of movement, an anthem a flag, a parliament, well they are there, not sure if they do anything. Don't sound like something that is just for trading. Oh yeah, also wanted a euro Army. How many stupid rules have the E.U made that we had to follow? I doubt I will see the Uk rejoin the E.U, which suits me. Oh yeah, my partner is Polish, she came over here before Poland joined the E.U and she got fed up of people just coming over here with ease, while she had to struggle. She is now a British citizen and have been for a fair few years
    • Hello, Paul. Thanks for the editorial. It was interesting. I'm going research more into the app and its concept. Of course, if you know me at all, you know that I'd say your articles needs some editing! I a;ways do, don't I? For instance, the article occasionally mentions a concept before defining it, e.g., relays.
    • Screamer is 50% off on Steam, making it £24.99 here in the UK: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2814990/Screamer/ You might remember the series from the mid 90s / early 2000s, this new game is also by Milestone who created the older games.
    • U.S. partially reverses Anthropic AI ban for Mythos but keeps Fable 5 off the market by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic says that the U.S. government has finally allowed it to restore Claude Mythos 5. But of course, there's a catch. The rollout is again for a limited set of U.S. organizations that operate and defend critical infrastructure. The company announced this in a post on X (formerly Twitter). This does not mean that Anthropic's latest frontier models are back to normal availability. Fable 5, which was a tuned version of Mythos 5 for public release, remains unavailable. Anthropic said that it is still working with the government to expand Mythos 5 access and make Fable 5 available again, but there's no timeline. Reports from Bloomberg and Reuters say that this decision actually came through a letter from the U.S. Commerce Department. According to Reuters, this would allow more than 100 companies and institutions access to Mythos 5. Reuters also reported that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s letter removes the need for export licenses for approved companies’ non-US citizen employees, as well as Anthropic’s own non-US citizen employees, while restrictions remain for organizations outside the approved list. Anthropic isn't alone with this kind of controlled rollout. OpenAI's newest model family, GPT 5.6, was announced just yesterday, but isn't available for everyone yet. In its announcement, OpenAI also said that access to these models is initially limited to a select group of trusted partners and organizations, with broader access planned later this year. Both of these cases show that frontier AI launches are no longer just ordinary product releases and more like slow and vetted deployments shaped heavily by the U.S. government.
    • Sol, Terra, Luna - aren't those the names of failed crypto coins? 🤣🤣🤣
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!