Apple Made to Pay $1,800 After Data Loss During iPhone Repair


Recommended Posts

Quote

Apple has been made to pay £1,200 ($1,800) in damages after Apple store accidentally deleted all the data from a customer’s iPhone during repair. Deric White, 68, had honeymoon photos and 15 years’ worth of contacts on his iPhone 5 before taking it to the Apple Store with a technical fault.

iPhone Owner was initially asking for £7,000, then reduced his demands to £1,000.

Apple refused to settle the case out of court, and so it was forced to pay White £1,200 instead, plus £773 in court costs.

 

Via Craxworld

shouldn't of gotten anything! you are made fully aware that data could be lost during a repair at an apple store and any tech repair store for that matter

 

and I want to know how he had 15yrs of contracts on a phone that isn't more then a couple years old, where did he store the contacts before that?     why doesn't he still have that "backup" of them? that would be his own stupidity if he got rid of his old storage system or backup of contacts

2 minutes ago, neufuse said:

shouldn't of gotten anything! you are made fully aware that data could be lost during a repair at an apple store and any tech repair store for that matter

 

and I want to know how he had 15yrs of contracts on a phone that isn't more then a couple years old, where did he store the contacts before that?     why doesn't he still have that "backup" of them? that would be his own stupidity if he got rid of his old storage system or backup of contacts

Maybe, or maybe not, he was aware that data could be lost. Maybe Apple just took his phone, wiped it and gave it back without explaining to him?

 

Don't assume everyone is as tech-savvy as you, especially people pushing 70.

1 minute ago, BobSlob said:

Maybe, or maybe not, he was aware that data could be lost. Maybe Apple just took his phone, wiped it and gave it back without explaining to him?

 

Don't assume everyone is as tech-savvy as you, especially people pushing 70.

ignorance isn't allowed in court, you can't claim ignorance to not knowing what happened if you where given terms of service you were made fully aware of what could happen... if the guy at his age had a child come in and use his computer to download warez / copyright material, guess what, still his fault... can't claim I'm old I didn't know a computer could do that or someone could do that with my computer...

3 minutes ago, neufuse said:

ignorance isn't allowed in court, you can't claim ignorance to not knowing what happened if you where given terms of service you were made fully aware of what could happen... if the guy at his age had a child come in and use his computer to download warez / copyright material, guess what, still his fault... can't claim I'm old I didn't know a computer could do that or someone could do that with my computer...

Well, the courts just proved you wrong. They were ordered to pay damages resulting from accidentally deleting images during the repair.

12 minutes ago, BobSlob said:

Maybe, or maybe not, he was aware that data could be lost. Maybe Apple just took his phone, wiped it and gave it back without explaining to him?

 

Don't assume everyone is as tech-savvy as you, especially people pushing 70.

At least here in the US, they have a spiel they need to go through, which includes telling you they may wipe the phone. You also sign an e-doc saying you acknowledge this.

To be fair this was a Small Claims Court case so really the bottom of the court system and it does not allow costs for legal representation. Not a surprise he won as the lower courts can deal more with sympathy than facts or law. I suspect Apple will just write it off rather than risk the publicity of appealing and often this is why small courts and publicity can do more than facts and law ever can.

49 minutes ago, BobSlob said:

Well, the courts just proved you wrong. They were ordered to pay damages resulting from accidentally deleting images during the repair.

court was still wrong, since it wasn't a trial the defendant (apple) couldn't do much to put an end to it though

1 hour ago, neufuse said:

shouldn't of gotten anything!

Shouldn't have gotten anything.  Yikes, no one knows English anymore.

Apparently, the Apple customer service rep didn't ask about any data on the device until after they had already wiped it.  They should have (or should've, but not should of) stated it before they even started doing anything with the phone.

  • Like 2
4 minutes ago, devHead said:

Shouldn't have gotten anything.  Yikes, no one knows English anymore.

Apparently, the Apple customer service rep didn't ask about any data on the device until after they had already wiped it.  They should have (or should've, but not should of) stated it before they even started doing anything with the phone.

I don't understand what's so difficult to understand about this. Seeing all the comments on the front page :s

 

I can completely understand if the rep asked the man about his data/backup before wiping, but it doesn't seem like he did. Surely this makes the rep at fault, and Apple need to cough up. How much the data is valued at is something else....but bottom line. Apple rep did something they shouldn't have and now they need to face the consequences

2 minutes ago, dipsylalapo said:

I don't understand what's so difficult to understand about this. Seeing all the comments on the front page :s

 

I can completely understand if the rep asked the man about his data/backup before wiping, but it doesn't seem like he did. Surely this makes the rep at fault, and Apple need to cough up. How much the data is valued at is something else....but bottom line. Apple rep did something they shouldn't have and now they need to face the consequences

Exactly!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!