An interesting (and worrying!) issue with one of my Hard Disks ... assistance needed!


Recommended Posts

Maybe someone can help me get this figured out.

 

I have a SATA-connected Hard Disk, a Toshiba 320GB from a now-defunct Laptop. I am unable to set this hard disk to auto-mount in fstab, because if I do, the system cannot find it and halts with an error -- and then I need to load up recovery mode, remove the entry from fstab and then reboot. But I have no problem mounting the volume in Nemo after I'm loaded up -- no problems at all, no errors. It runs fine. In fact, I use it for storing VM files.

 

The really odd part -- Windows will not see the volume at all. No matter what I do, even in Disk Management and third-party Partition Managers, the volume does not appear at all. It's formatted NTFS -- I formatted it myself with gparted. The Hard Disk itself does not exist, according to Windows or my BIOS.

 

What's going on here?

BIOS isn't even acknowledging its' existence. Might be the SATA Channel I've connected it to. The drive in question is on channel 3, and I know that this particular board refuses to boot from channels other than 1 & 2. It's an older ASUS board (top of the line when it was purchased in 2008), but it's got a fairly recent BIOS update (currently rev.1513), so I dunno.

 

No worries. I'm just going to add a command to mount the drive after I log in. I don't need the data accessible at the "bare-metal" fstab-level. I'm not going to be booting VBox Images as OS choices.

Have you tried formatting as EXT4 and running a full check on it? That and what Haggis suggested. smartctl (smartctl --test=long /dev/sda) has some useful functions for testing drives.

 

As for mounting, are you identifying it with its UUID?

  • Like 1
9 minutes ago, simplezz said:

Have you tried formatting as EXT4 and running a full check on it? That and what Haggis suggested. smartctl (smartctl --test=long /dev/sda) has some useful functions for testing drives.

 

As for mounting, are you identifying it with its UUID?

a) No, formatted as NTFS to be Win32-readable. I suppose it won't hurt to format as ext4. I can certainly add the ext2/3/4 driver to Windows (if I ever install Windows again, which I likely will sometime down the road).

 

b) smartctl isn't a bad idea at all for anyone to be running. I'll do that this evening. :) 

 

c) No, identifying it by label. I know, I know. That's not the "suggested" way to do it. ;) 

 

Let me finish making supper and I'll get busy. :yes: 

Performed the scan using GSmartControl application. No errors found, the device reported old age/pre-failure but passed all tests. No bad sectors, no issues detected. Overall Health Assessment Test: Passed.

 

Hrmph. Well then. Guess it's ext4 format and relegated to VM Storage for that one after all. No worries. ;) 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!