US Plot to Evacuate Top Jihadis From Ramadi Uncovered


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, jjkusaf said:

Which was Iranian.  Yep...very credible also. :)

 

It is true!  It all is because one guy said something, a russian sponsored news site reported it, and a news site from Iran which the US has been enemies for decades and only recently agreed of a few issues.

11 minutes ago, ctebah said:

Sputnik quoted another article from another news agency.  If you read before commenting you would realize this.  I'm simply pointing out your hypocrisy.  You sure come up with a lot of excuses when it comes to defending U.S. policies.  Now that is what I call funny. 

What is hilarious here is how many comments you make concerning other countries, or comments made, and how they are not true due to lack of proof, and then you turn around here and do the same thing. 

Edited by techbeck
Just now, techbeck said:

What is hilarious here is how many comments you make concerning other countries and lack of proof, and then you turn around here and do the same thing

This sentence makes no sense.  

 

This is just classic denial based on where the news comes from, the same thing U.S. does every time it's accused of something.  People denied the Afghan hospital bombing based on the source, and the same militia reporting on this reported about 30+ Iraqi soldiers being bombed by U.S. planes.  Both turned out to be true.    

Just now, ctebah said:

This sentence makes no sense.  

 

This is just classic denial based on where the news comes from, the same thing U.S. does every time it's accused of something.  People denied the Afghan hospital bombing based on the source, and the same militia reporting on this reported about 30+ Iraqi soldiers being bombed by U.S. planes.  Both turned out to be true.    

I edited my comment.  But my point was, you dismiss a lot of things due to lack of proof but then turn around and post a "news" story lacking any proof what so ever and claim it is true.   And those others stories that turned out to be true, there was something called evidence that backed it up.  And this article is just flame bait until/if evidence is proven.

 

I am sure glad most rest of the world does not believe something just of hearsay, or because a certain news agency/group has been right before.  There is a reason why evidence is needed to condemn someone for their actions.

  • Like 2
Just now, ctebah said:

This sentence makes no sense.  

 

This is just classic denial based on where the news comes from, the same thing U.S. does every time it's accused of something.  People denied the Afghan hospital bombing based on the source, and the same militia reporting on this reported about 30+ Iraqi soldiers being bombed by U.S. planes.  Both turned out to be true.    

That's great, but it doesn't make this story true because of the previous articles.  Until other news organizations/officials corroborate this, it is simply an unsubstantiated report.

7 minutes ago, ctebah said:

This sentence makes no sense.  

 

This is just classic denial based on where the news comes from, the same thing U.S. does every time it's accused of something.  People denied the Afghan hospital bombing based on the source, and the same militia reporting on this reported about 30+ Iraqi soldiers being bombed by U.S. planes.  Both turned out to be true.    

 

Makes total sense, all you do is post anti American nonsense from less than reputable sites that make CNN and Fox look unbiased, but when it comes to something you agree on you have qualms dismissing the source as propaganda, yey uour two "sources" are much worse than all the sites you dismiss as propaganda combined 

5 minutes ago, techbeck said:

I edited my comment.  But my point was, you dismiss a lot of things due to lack of proof but then turn around and post a "news" story lacking any proof what so ever and claim it is true.   And those others stories that turned out to be true, there was something called evidence that backed it up.  And this article is just flame bait until/if evidence is proven.

 

I am sure glad most rest of the world does not believe something just of hearsay, or because a certain news agency/group has been right before.  There is a reason why evidence is needed to condemn someone for their actions.

Can you backup that point please?  A few days ago you posted an article about Russian "supposed" bombing of civilians, and my reply was that "It wasn't supposed, it was definitely Russian."

 

In this long line of denial you try and accuse me of defending Russia when in fact I do the contrary and have no problem agreeing that the Russians are as guilty as anyone else.

 

PS:  most of the world knows U.S. created ISIS.   

2 minutes ago, Anibal P said:

 

Makes total sense, all you do is post anti American nonsense from less than reputable sites that make CNN and Fox look unbiased, but when it comes to something you agree on you have qualms dismissing the source as propaganda, yey uour two "sources" are much worse than all the sites you dismiss as propaganda combined 

So, just like I asked tech, can you backup your claim that I "dismiss" other sources?  And he was so in hurry to type out some denial that his initial sentience made absolutely no sense.  

Just now, ctebah said:

So, just like I asked tech, can you backup your claim that I "dismiss" other sources?  And he was so in hurry to type out some denial that his initial sentience made absolutely no sense.  

 

It's called your post history, want a link to it? 

 

4 minutes ago, ctebah said:

Can you backup that point please?  A few days ago you posted an article about Russian "supposed" bombing of civilians, and my reply was that "It wasn't supposed, it was definitely Russian."

 

In this long line of denial you try and accuse me of defending Russia when in fact I do the contrary and have no problem agreeing that the Russians are as guilty as anyone else.

 

PS:  most of the world knows U.S. created ISIS.   

I mentioned George Haswani, you said as usual US had no proof of the accusations.   I can find more issues, but frankly this flame bait posting is not worth my time and effort to do so.

 

And this is not about how ISIS was created.   Didnt you just accuse me of deflection the discussion...or should I go before you start commenting on my lack of grammar/education to try and prove your point.

1 minute ago, ctebah said:

Perfect, so you and Tech shouldn't have a problem finding posts to backup your claims.

Since 2 people here made the same comment and didnt originally provide any proof (I did tho), that makes it 100 percent true!   Just like the OP!!

4 minutes ago, techbeck said:

I mentioned George Haswani, you said as usual US had no proof of the accusations.   I can find more issues, but frankly this flame bait posting is not worth my time and effort to do so.

 

And this is not about how ISIS was created.   Didnt you just accuse me of deflection the discussion...or should I go before you start commenting on my lack of grammar/education to try and prove your point.

To which I replied that Assad is definitely buying oil from ISIS, just not as much as Turkey.  I also mentioned where Assad and Rebels/ISIS share the electricity from the Aleppo power station.  

 

A direct reply isn't a deflection.  One has only to look at your replies to see classic examples of deflection.  First it was the source, then it was "other countries are doing it", what's next?

 

But please, continue....

8 minutes ago, ctebah said:

To which I replied that Assad is definitely buying oil from ISIS, just not as much as Turkey.  I also mentioned where Assad and Rebels/ISIS share the electricity from the Aleppo power station.  

 

But please, continue....

You may have made a comment about Assad buying oil from ISIS, but it was not in that tread.  You also made a comment in the same thread about how no one but Russia has offered concrete proof of where ISIS oil is going.  But whatever, continue your anti US campaign.  Quite amusing. 

 

And that was not your reply when I mentioned George Haswani.

 

12 minutes ago, ctebah said:

A direct reply isn't a deflection.  One has only to look at your replies to see classic examples of deflection.  First it was the source, then it was "other countries are doing it", what's next?

 

 

Just pointing out that what you are complaining that one group is doing, most, if not all, other groups do the same thing.  To complain about one and support the other is being hypocritical.  I just realize that every country does the same/similar crap and it comes as no surprise to me and I dont use it to further my anti group agenda.

Just now, techbeck said:

You may have made a comment about Assad buying oil from ISIS, but it was not in that tread.  You also made a comment in the same thread about how no one but Russia has offered concrete proof of where ISIS oil is going.  But whatever, continue your anti US campaign.  Quite amusing. 

 

Exactly, that was a fact.  The U.S. offered no proof and denied it until the amount of evidence was overwhelming.  Then they "politely asked" Turkey to try and close it's borders.  A post from FunkyMike nails it:

 

Quote

Just a few weeks ago the US was in denial that the Oil is going into Turkey.

 

Then Russia dumped pictures. The US administration denied it again saying that the pictures are static and do not show the trucks going over the border. (This is no joke)

 

Then Russia dumped videos of moving trucks. Still the US denied it saying that it is just a few trucks worth and that they do not have any intelligence of oil movement.

 

Then Russia dumped videos of their drones filming US drones that are filming the Syrian Turkey border + oil movement.

This was exactly what happened before the U.S. came out and said that "Assad is buying oil (which no one denied) and that "some of it is going to Turkey".  Facts on the ground showed thousands, if not tens of thousands, of oil trucks crossing into Turkey every single day.  When asked why they don't bomb ISIS oil installations in the Eastern Syria, a U.S army official said it was due to "environmental concerns" (definitely not a joke)

 

The only person looking pathetic is the one denying all the facts on the ground.  But go on...

3 minutes ago, ctebah said:

Exactly, that was a fact.  The U.S. offered no proof and denied it until the amount of evidence was overwhelming.  Then they "politely asked" Turkey to try and close it's borders.  A post from FunkyMike nails it:

 

Fact, that the US did not have concrete proof. Sure, but the same goes for the article you posted.  You posted a crap article with no evidence and took it as proof enough to condemn the US.   And that was my point, you accuse others over lack of proof but deny accusations towards others due to lack of proof.  This has nothing to do with what FunkyMike said as this is what YOU do.

 

And you were even wrong on your reply when I mentioned George Haswani.  And my point was not concerning the buying ISIS oil, it was how you, again, take no evidence and condemn someone and then do the oppoisite.

4 minutes ago, techbeck said:

Fact, that the US did not have concrete proof.

U.S. and it's allies bombed ISIS for a year before Russia stepped in and had no proof of oil routes to Turkey.  Russia comes in and immediately embarrasses the West, NATO and Turkey over the oil smuggling routes.  Yeah, it's very "believable" that the U.S. didn't have proof....

 

Quote

You posted a crap article with no evidence and took it as proof enough to condemn the US.   And that was my point, you accuse others over lack of proof but deny accusations towards others due to lack of proof.  This has nothing to do with what FunkyMike said as this is what YOU do.

  You're all over the place man.  Doing a lot of defending for something you believe is a conspiracy.  Hilarious.    

6 minutes ago, ctebah said:

U.S. and it's allies bombed ISIS for a year before Russia stepped in and had no proof of oil routes to Turkey.  Russia comes in and immediately embarrasses the West, NATO and Turkey over the oil smuggling routes.  Yeah, it's very "believable" that the U.S. didn't have proof....

 

  You're all over the place man.  Doing a lot of defending for something you believe is a conspiracy.  Hilarious.    

You like to disagree with one side due to lack of proof while agreeing with another for the same thing.   And evidently, I am not the only one who thinks the OP article is a load of crap.

 

What is funny is how you are taking something 1 person said as fact.  I have some swamp land to sell in AZ...want to buy it?

Just now, techbeck said:

You like to disagree with one side due to lack of proof while agreeing with another for the same thing. 

 

What is funny is how you are taking something 1 person said as fact.  I have some swamp land to sell in AZ...want to buy it?

Yes, I tend to disagree with the side that helped created ISIS and that sponsors terrorists and agree with the side that is bombing them.  Remember, we heard almost nothing about the ISIS oil routes until Russians exposed it.  And like I mentioned before, do some research on the guy that made this accusation.  

3 minutes ago, ctebah said:

Yes, I tend to disagree with the side that helped created ISIS and that sponsors terrorists and agree with the side that is bombing them.  Remember, we heard almost nothing about the ISIS oil routes until Russians exposed it.  And like I mentioned before, do some research on the guy that made this accusation.  

Yup, according to you the Russians are saints.  Any accusations currently against Russia are crap since it is from western media or the US said it

 

Something you may need for the new year....

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/vladimir-putin-calendar-2016_567e5d2fe4b0b958f6597836

 

US is not perfect, far from it.  And I recognize the issue where they screw up.  But I am not going to take one person's word for anything without proof.  If there is proof of the article in the OP, hard proof, I would be one of the first to condemn the US for it.

Just now, techbeck said:

Yup, according to you the Russians are saints.  Any accusations currently against Russia are crap since it is from western media or the US said it

 

Something you may need for the new year....

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/vladimir-putin-calendar-2016_567e5d2fe4b0b958f6597836

Man, you must have the memory of a goldfish.

 

Quote

 A few days ago you posted an article about Russian "supposed" bombing of civilians, and my reply was that "It wasn't supposed, it was definitely Russian."

 

In this long line of denial you try and accuse me of defending Russia when in fact I do the contrary and have no problem agreeing that the Russians are as guilty as anyone else.

 

4 minutes ago, ctebah said:

Man, you must have the memory of a goldfish.

 

 

Congratulations, you have an instance where you accused Russia.  Want a cookie?  Your praise of Russia and believing what they say far negates anything negative you say about them.  Little tip, Russia is as full of crap as the US is.  They lie/say things to make themselves appear like the good guys.  And really, until I see hard proof, I dont believe any one of them.

 

And memory of a goldfish...funny, considering you got the reply yo made to me concerning Asaad buying ISIS oil wrong and could not understand why I brought up Russia in a post where the OP source links to Russian run news outlet.  But ok then!

1 minute ago, techbeck said:

Congratulations, you have an instance where you accused Russia.  Want a cookie?

1 instance lol. It's like an Apple zealot defending one thing MS does and trying to call themselves unbiased. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Passkeys: Think of them like a broken heart necklace. Imagine one of those heart necklaces that breaks into two matching pieces. One person keeps one half, and the other person keeps the other half. With passkeys, the website has one half, and you have the other half. If the website gets hacked and someone steals its half, that stolen piece is useless by itself. It cannot unlock your account without your matching half. This particular heart necklace is one of a kind, there is only one in existence. Your half of the necklace has to be stored somewhere. It might be stored on your phone, tablet, computer, security key, or a password manager that can sync it between all your devices. A security key is a small physical device that you keep with you, kind of like a house key, car key, or flash drive. I would not usually recommend a security key as the first option for the average person. For most people, it is easier to use their phone, computer, or a password manager that can sync passkeys between their devices. A security key is more like a spare key you keep in a safe place, just in case you lose access to your other devices or your password manager. Some security keys plug into your computer. Some plug into your phone or tablet. Some get tapped against your device. The idea is simple: a security key can hold another passkey for the same website. Think of it like creating a second one-of-a-kind heart necklace for the same account. One necklace could be paired with your password manager, while another necklace could be paired with your security key. That means the website has more than one matching half on file. One half matches the passkey in your password manager. Another half matches the passkey stored on your security key. So, if you lose access to your phone, computer, or password manager, you would still be able to log in using the passkey stored on your security key. Think of it like keeping an extra special necklace piece on a tiny keychain, stored somewhere safe. The website still has the matching half for that security key, but your half is safely stored inside the little key. A passkey does not automatically exist on every device you own. It lives wherever you save it. If your half is stored on one device, then that device is the one that has the matching piece. For example, if you create the passkey on your Windows computer and it is only saved to that computer, your iPhone does not automatically have that same half. If you create it on your iPhone and it only stays on that iPhone, your Android phone does not automatically have it either. That is where password managers come in. A password manager can act like a protected jewelry box for your passkeys. Instead of your half of the necklace being locked to only one device, the password manager can securely sync that half to your other approved devices. For example, Apple Passwords and iCloud Keychain can sync passkeys between your Apple devices. Google Password Manager can sync passkeys with your Google account. But password managers such as 1Password and Bitwarden can sync passkeys between everything, your phones, tablets and computers. Now, you might ask: “What happens if I lose access to the device that has my passkey?” That depends on where your passkey was saved and what recovery options the website gives you. If your passkey was synced through a password manager, you may be able to sign in from another device that has access to that same password manager. For example, if your passkey is saved in iCloud Keychain, Google Password Manager, 1Password, or Bitwarden, another approved device may still have access to it. If your passkey was saved only on one phone, computer, or security key, and you lose that device, then you may not have your half of the necklace anymore. In that case, you would usually need to use the website’s backup login or account recovery options. A lot of websites that support passkeys still let you fall back to your regular password. So if you lose access to your passkey, the site may still let you log in with your password, a code sent to your email, a text message, a recovery code, or some other account recovery process. That is convenient, but it is also important to understand: if the website still allows password login, then your password still matters. Passkeys are safer than passwords, but if your account still has a password as a backup, you should still use a strong, unique password and turn on two-factor authentication if the website offers it. This is why it is a good idea to have more than one safe way back into important accounts. For example, you might keep your passkey in a syncing password manager, add a second trusted device, save recovery codes somewhere safe, or set up a backup security key. A passkey is very secure, but just like a real key, you need a backup plan in case you lose access to it. Now, you might ask: “What stops a hacker from copying my half of the necklace?” That’s the important part: your half is protected. It is not something you type in, and it is not something the website gets to keep. Think of your half as being locked inside a tiny safe on your phone, computer, security key, or password manager. That safe only opens when you approve it with your fingerprint, face, PIN, or device password. When you log in, the website does not need to see your half. It only needs proof that your half matches its half. Your actual half is not handed over to the website. This is different from a password. With a password, you type the secret into the website. If you type it into a fake website, the hacker now has it. With a passkey, you are not typing your secret into the website. Your device is proving you have the matching half without giving the half away. That also helps protect you from fake websites. If someone makes a fake login page that looks like the real site, your device can tell it is not the real match. It will not use your passkey there. Now, could someone use your passkey if they stole your device, got into your password manager, or somehow unlocked the safe that holds your half? Yes, that is why your device password, PIN, fingerprint, face unlock, and password manager security still matter. But a hacker cannot just steal your passkey from the website or trick you into typing it into a fake page like they can with a password. That is why passkeys are safer than passwords. The two matching pieces have to come together, like two lovebirds who were once separated and are finally reunited.
    • Newegg offers insane combo deal on Amazon Prime Day 2026 that beats Steam Machine by Sayan Sen Building a PC is undoubtedly difficult nowadays but with this epic combo deal, Newegg is trying to make it as easy for you as it is possible. If you are making a new one or even upgrading an old system to a new Windows 11 device, this combo bundle is truly unmissable as you get AMD's Ryzen 9800X3D, a compatible X870 motherboard, a 240mm AIO liquid cooler and finally a Samsung 990 PRO SSD all for under $1000 (purchase link under the specs table down below). This should beat out the newly launched Steam Machine from Valve in terms of performance and performance per dollar especially if you are willing to set Linux up on it. Essentially with this combo you will get the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-core 3D V cache CPU, Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD, the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI ATX Motherboard, and finally the Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240. Thanks to that massive vertically stacked L3 cache, the X3D desktop processors, including the 9800X3D, also come with the benefit of not needing fast memory. Even DDR5-5600 should be plenty for it. The technical specifications of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D are given in the table below: Specification Value Architecture Zen 5 Cores / Threads 8 / 16 Base Clock 4.7 GHz Max Boost Clock Up to 5.2 GHz L1 Cache 640 KB L2 Cache 8 MB L3 Cache 96 MB Total Cache 104 MB CPU Core Process TSMC 4nm FinFET I/O Die Process TSMC 6nm FinFET Socket AM5 Default TDP 120W Max Temperature (Tjmax) 95°C Thermal Solution Not included Memory Type DDR5 Max Capacity 256 GB Memory Speeds 2x1R: DDR5-5600 2x2R: DDR5-5600 4x1R: DDR5-3600 4x2R: DDR5-3600 PCIe Version PCIe 5.0 PCIe Lanes (Total/Usable) 28 / 24 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) 4 USB 2.0 1 Graphics Cores 2 CU RDNA 2 Frequency 2200 MHz DisplayPort over USB-C Yes Overclocking Unlocked Up next we have the tech specs for the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI Motherboard: Specification Value Chipset AMD X870 CPU Support AMD Ryzen 9000 / 8000 / 7000 Series Desktop Processors Socket AM5 Memory Slots 4 × DDR5 UDIMM Maximum Memory Capacity 256GB Memory Support DDR5 8400–5600 MT/s (OC), DDR5 5600–4800 MT/s (JEDEC) Integrated Graphics Outputs 1 × HDMI 2.1 FRL (up to 8K 60Hz) 2 × USB4 Type-C with DisplayPort 1.4 HBR3 (up to 4K 60Hz) Expansion Slots PCI_E1: PCIe 5.0 x16 (CPU) PCI_E2: PCIe 3.0 x1 (Chipset) PCI_E3: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset) Audio Realtek ALC4080 Codec 7.1-Channel USB High Performance Audio Supports up to 32-bit/384kHz playback on front panel S/PDIF output M.2 Slots 4 × M.2 M2_1: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 22110/2280) M2_2: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 2280/2260) M2_3: PCIe 4.0 x2 (Chipset, 2280/2260) M2_4: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset, 2280/2260) SATA Ports 4 × SATA 6Gb/s RAID Support RAID 0, 1, 5, 10 for M.2 NVMe storage devices Rear USB Ports 4 × USB 2.0 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 2 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 2 × USB4 40Gbps Type-C Front USB Headers 4 × USB 2.0 4 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 20Gbps Type-C LAN Realtek 8126-CG 5G LAN Wireless Wi-Fi 7 (M.2 Key-E module pre-installed) Supports 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz bands Up to 5.8Gbps Supports 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4, MLO, 4KQAM Internal Power Connectors 1 × 24-pin ATX Power 2 × CPU Power Connectors 1 × PCIe 8-pin Power Connector Fan Headers 1 × CPU Fan 1 × Combo Fan (Pump/System) 6 × System Fan RGB Headers 3 × Addressable V2 RGB (JARGB_V2) 1 × RGB LED (JRGB) Other Internal Headers 1 × EZ Conn-header 2 × Front Panel Headers 1 × Chassis Intrusion 1 × Front Audio 1 × TPM 2.0 Header Debug Features 4 × EZ Debug LEDs 1 × EZ Digit Debug LED Rear I/O Ports Clear CMOS Button Flash BIOS Button HDMI 2 × USB 40Gbps Type-C 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 4 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 4 × USB 2.0 5G LAN Port Wi-Fi/Bluetooth Antenna Connectors Audio Connectors Form Factor ATX The Samsung 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification Value Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC DRAM Cache 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,200 TBW MTBF 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink No Get the combo deal at this link: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, Samsung 990 PRO 2TB, MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI motherboard, Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240: $784.99 + $25 off with promo code FTTF77: $759.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US) Good to know This Newegg deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I heard from a lot of people that driver support for the latest games when RDNA first came out (Radeon 5000 series) was pretty bad, but if you didn't buy the card on day one, or were not trying to play the latest titles, then you were isolated from that issue. Other than that, it's been good and only getting better.
    • Meta launches new AI glasses in 26 styles and Muse Spark multimodal capabilties by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta today announced a new line of Meta Glasses in partnership with EssilorLuxottica. The new AI glasses build on the company’s existing smart glasses portfolio, which is sold under the Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta brands. The new Meta Glasses start at just $299, are compatible with prescription lenses, and will be available in 26 styles across different colors, lenses, and frames. At launch, Meta Glasses will be available in three frame styles. The Meta Adventurer features a clean rectangular design and comes in Standard and Large sizes. The Meta Fury is a bolder frame for users who want a stronger look. Meta Glasses by Kylie is a slim oval frame designed in collaboration with Kylie Jenner. Similar to existing Meta AI Glasses, the new Meta Glasses include a dedicated action button that can be used to quickly access Meta AI or launch a favorite feature. They also feature open-ear speakers for calls, music, and more. Meta has also included a multi-mic array with wind noise reduction for calls and messaging. Users can capture photos and videos hands-free using voice commands. Meta claims more than eight hours of battery life, while the portable charging case can provide up to 40 additional hours. As expected, Meta Glasses come pre-loaded with Meta AI powered by Muse Spark from day one. Muse Spark is the first model from Meta Superintelligence Labs with improved multimodal capabilities. The same Meta AI upgrade is also now available on existing Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta Glasses in the US and Canada via an update. With the Muse Spark-powered AI assistant, Meta AI in the new glasses can provide smarter answers, understand what the user is seeing, and help with daily tasks such as calendar management and navigation. Meta also announced an upcoming feature called the dynamic photo feature, which captures multiple frames and recommends the best one. Pedestrian navigation is also coming soon to these glasses. Meta is also adding support for 14 new live translation languages, including Japanese, Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, and Korean. The new Meta Glasses are available starting today through Meta.com, Best Buy, Amazon, LensCrafters, Sunglass Hut, and select retailers.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      166
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!