MS Chief Marketing Officer talks Windows 10 and previous versions.


Recommended Posts

Quote

Windows 7 runs on 55% of all the computers on the planet, but according to news this week that is actually a bad and potentially dangerous thing. Says who? Actually Microsoft MSFT -1.82%… 

Speaking to Windows Weekly, Microsoft Marketing chief Chris Capossela explained that users who choose Windows 7 do so “at your own risk, at your own peril” and he revealed Microsoft has concerns about its future software and hardware compatibility, security and more.

“We do worry when people are running an operating system that’s 10 years old that the next printer they buy isn’t going to work well, or they buy a new game, they buy Fallout 4, a very popular game, and it doesn’t work on a bunch of older machines,” Capossela stated. “And so, as we are pushing our ISV [Independent Software Vendor] and hardware partners to build great new stuff that takes advantage of Windows 10 that obviously makes the old stuff really bad and not to mention viruses and security problems.”

 

He also stressed it is “so incredibly important to try to end the fragmentation of the Windows install base” and to get users to a “safer place”.

 

There’s only one problem with Capossela’s statements: they are complete rubbish.

Windows 7 is no less secure than Windows 10 (it will be supported until 2020) and no less compatible with new hardware and software. In fact its far greater market share means it is developers’ priority and has greater compatibility with legacy programmes and peripherals. If Fallout 4 won’t run on your Windows 7 computer, it will be upgrading your components not installing Windows 10 which fixes that.

 

 

Read more:

  • Like 1

Isn't Chris Capossela responsible for the whole GWX thing (which is fine if there was a convenient opt-out) and making Windows 10 as a "recommended update"?  Anyway, he is spreading absolute rubbish.  The Fallout 4 remark had me laughing a bit ... it is as if he was saying that Windows 10 would automatically allow Fallout 4 to play on older hardware.

 

Guess my biggest issue with him is that he believes he knows what is best for me.  I will decide when/if I upgrade my other systems to 10.  I will take responsibility if I miss the July cut off and not complain if I have to fork over cash for 10.  Until then, he (and Microsoft) needs to back off with their aggressive tactics/rhetoric.

 

"at your own risk, at your own peril"  ... well yes ... in 2020.

It is entirely unsurprising that Microsoft wants people to move to up to date OS releases, the last thing we need is another Windows XP holding everything back.

They want to give you for "free", the "improved" "benefits" of "upgrading" to Windows 10. What is everyone waiting for? Just move to Windows 10 already. :p Everything earlier is obsolete, outdated, insecure and so yesterday. :p 

So far the only thing Windows 10 has impressed me with is how pervasive Microsoft has been with trying to push everyone into using it.

 

Here's a hint, not that they'll actually listen to a Linux zealot like me or anything: fix the annoyances that have existed since Vista and 7. 

1 hour ago, Unobscured Vision said:

So far the only thing Windows 10 has impressed me with is how pervasive Microsoft has been with trying to push everyone into using it.

 

...

Opposed to their previous OS releases, which had no marketing whatsoever.

2 hours ago, UXGaurav said:

They want to give you for "free", the "improved" "benefits" of "upgrading" to Windows 10. What is everyone waiting for? Just move to Windows 10 already. :p Everything earlier is obsolete, outdated, insecure and so yesterday. :p 

" And this is the part Microsoft has forgotten: technically it keeps giving users a choice, but by enforcing nagging pop-ups, cutting opt-out options and spreading groundless fear for the average user it appears there is no choice at all… ".

 

Windows 10 UI sucks. Fix THAT above all else and I'll consider moving forward but not out of FEAR, I will move forward out of Want!

  • Like 2

Wasn't this already mentioned in a front page news?

https://www.neowin.net/news/microsofts-marketing-chief-confirms-new-breakthrough-phone-talks-windows-10-upgrade-push

Nobody cared to discus the issue there. So why now after one week? Hate mongering?

  • Like 2

What do you really want him to come out and say? Windows 7 is supported until 2020 so keep using it? Let's be honest if he wasn't trying to push Windows 10 he would be a pretty rubbish Marketing Chief.

 

It's quite possible when you buy new hardware or games when Windows 7 is 10 years old it might not be compatible. Look at Windows Vista, it's not even 10 years old and hasn't been officially supported by a lot of hardware / games for years, yet Microsoft still support it.

 

Personally I think it's a good thing Microsoft are trying to push Windows 10 to the average user, these are the majority of users, the users who need as much help as possible protecting themselves and staying up to date.  Anyone on Neowin who doesn't like Windows 10 is smart enough not to upgrade.

  • Like 2

Windows 10:

 

They've asked nicely, tried to force it on us, now its flat out scare tactics,.......

 

Next thing will be a knock on our doors from Microsoft reps with baseball bats,

  • Like 2
9 hours ago, The_Decryptor said:

Opposed to their previous OS releases, which had no marketing whatsoever.

That's not what I meant at all. I have no issue with Microsoft wanting everyone to use Windows 10. The issues I have with Windows are the long-standing UI and under-the-hood annoyances that have gone unfixed since (in one case) Windows 2000 or even earlier. Microsoft needs to commit to making a better-quality product whenever possible; and an annoyance like "taskbar auto-hide settings becoming disregarded by the system" is inexcusable.

I think Windows 10 is great and that Windows 7 comparatively 'showing its age'.  I personally would not advise running Windows 7 unless absolutely necessary (i.e. to overcome some incompatibility that cannot be resolved through any other means).

 

This article is complete BS though... 

8 hours ago, Aheer.R.S. said:

I really want to rant now, but I'll refrain, in asking (and yes, I already know the answer) let me see pre '98 games run on win 10

(yes I am aware that SOME will)

Virtual machines & DOSBox are your friends. :)

Original interview was taken totally out of context, then author decided to start story with a clickbait title and first couple of paragraphs. Horrible journalism. 

 

I'm changing the title of this thread to stop the FUD/Clickbait even though I know the source article has the same title.

  • Like 3
6 hours ago, DoctorD said:

Windows 10:

 

They've asked nicely, tried to force it on us, now its flat out scare tactics,.......

 

Next thing will be a knock on our doors from Microsoft reps with baseball bats,

what scare tactics? Everything he said is true and he wasn't really saying Windows 7 has "Serious problems" in that podcast. I know because I watched it live - this is just clickbait from forbes.

 

Windows 10/8.x are just better at newer hardware than Windows 7 and that is also a fact. Think SSDs, USB 3.0 etc.

1 minute ago, xendrome said:

Original interview was taken totally out of context, then author decided to start story with a clickbait title and first couple of paragraphs. Horrible journalism. 

 

I'm changing the title of this thread to stop the FUD/Clickbait even though I know the source article has the same title.

Fix the formatting too.

 

I know the article source is available, but it would save people some time.

Quote

“And so, as we are pushing our ISV [Independent Software Vendor] and hardware partners to build great new stuff that takes advantage of Windows 10 that obviously makes the old stuff really bad and not to mention viruses and security problems.”

I can't help but cringe reading this. It sounds more like the words you would hear out of a coached retail sales employee.

 

Even if what he's saying is true, the vagueness and wording (at least, what's taken away for the article) comes off very shallow. I can understand why some people would be calling "FUD", especially when it comes from a company who benefits financially when you upgrade (let's not pretend Windows 10 is free here either).

  • Like 2
6 hours ago, Mirumir said:

 

Word.

Of course that statement is untrue. Windows 10 has additional security features. Of course, security is relative to the type of attack against it. You can build a more secure OS but if you aren't mitigating the same attack vector that made the previous OS vulnerable, it doesn't really matter.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • And Microsoft got walloped on here for what they were charging for the new Surface book. Not looking as bad now. This was inevitable as they have to maintain those Apple margins.
    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      450
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Xenon
      77
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!