Spying Windows 10 - How much truth is into this..


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, adrynalyne said:

So you too are making stuff up. 

It is apparently fair game to make claims about something—claims without evidence—as long as they cannot be proven false. The burden of proof does not matter.

  • Like 2

It would be my guess that I have access to more of a Neowin user's personally identifiable information than Microsoft does if that tells you anything.

 

I honestly don't think they care what you're doing on your device past technical data to identify issues and improve the OS.

If by "spying" you mean the error reporting and performance/stability telemetry, then yes, they're "spying" on you.

 

There are other things like advertising ID, cortana, etc. but they can all be disabled through settings. Better yet, if you do not want to share anything, then do not sign-in with a microsoft account. Use a local account.

 

There are some wild claims on the internet that windows 10 scans your storage and sends a list of files you have to microsoft. None of this has ever been proven. If you believe this to be the case, then why not also believe that this also applies to windows 7 and 8 too? If it cannot be disproven for windows 10, then the same would apply to 7 and 8, right?

 

There are some funny things that I come across, like MS keeping track of your contacts, emails, uploaded photos, etc. Apparently these people do not even realize that by using a MS account, those stuff are already on the damn servers. They don't need to monitor them. Perhaps they also don't realize that any online service, be it google/gmail, icloud, yahoo etc. already have your information and/or data on their hard drives.

 

The problem is that so far all we've had are claims and no proof. There are people who are so good at hacking and cracking stuff. How come they haven't sniffed and captured the packets going from windows 10 to MS, cracked them open and looked for what's inside already?

 

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."

  • Like 7
4 minutes ago, Nik L said:

Who are these "lot of people" you talk about?  I don't think I can name one person either in my daily life nor on here who has ever asserted that "Windows was free".

I did not make that statement. Please fix your quote. 

13 hours ago, simplezz said:

A lot of people are under the impression that Windows 10 is free; It's not, you are the product. Giving up your data and your privacy is the price you pay. If you're happy with that arrangement, welcome to the future of Windows.

Well, windows 10 is NOT free to begin with. It's a free UPGRADE, and only for a year. If I do not own a genuine windows 7 or 8 license, then in order to get 10, I'd have to pay for a retail or OEM version.

There is certainly more going on in data collection than MS claims. A Checz analyst while probing Windows 10 telemetry  discovered some disturbing issues on Windows 10. Later analysis by Arstechnica confirmed that MS is not telling the whole story.

 

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=cs&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Faeronet.cz%2Fnews%2Fanalyza-windows-10-ve-svem-principu-jde-o-pouhy-terminal-na-sber-informaci-o-uzivateli-jeho-prstech-ocich-a-hlasu%2F&edit-text=
 

4 minutes ago, Yogurth said:

There is certainly more going on in data collection than MS claims. A Checz analyst while probing Windows 10 telemetry  discovered some disturbing issues on Windows 10. Later analysis by Arstechnica confirmed that MS is not telling the whole story.

 

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=cs&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Faeronet.cz%2Fnews%2Fanalyza-windows-10-ve-svem-principu-jde-o-pouhy-terminal-na-sber-informaci-o-uzivateli-jeho-prstech-ocich-a-hlasu%2F&edit-text=
 

That doesn't go against what MS said and just like the translated article, Ars doesn't know what is sent. 

 

Come back to us with real evidence that it is anything more than diagnostic data and data used to improve spell checking, cortana, etc. 

  • Like 3
11 hours ago, Yogurth said:

There is certainly more going on in data collection than MS claims. A Checz analyst while probing Windows 10 telemetry  discovered some disturbing issues on Windows 10. Later analysis by Arstechnica confirmed that MS is not telling the whole story.

 

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=cs&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Faeronet.cz%2Fnews%2Fanalyza-windows-10-ve-svem-principu-jde-o-pouhy-terminal-na-sber-informaci-o-uzivateli-jeho-prstech-ocich-a-hlasu%2F&edit-text=
 


LOL Well golly Gee - I guess that solves it     /s 2

  • Like 2

Look, just like anywhere else on the internet, one third of the people here don't know what they are talking about, and one third of them are just plain stupid. Here's a rule of thumb for sites like Neowin; I call it the Tech Site Paradox:

 

"A commenters actual knowledge about a given subject is inversely proportional to the volume of their comments and how strenuously they propound their (myopic) point of view."

 

Microsoft doesn't care who you talk to or what you say. The Justice Department and Google do, but Microsoft doesn't.

15 hours ago, Yogurth said:

There is certainly more going on in data collection than MS claims. A Checz analyst while probing Windows 10 telemetry  discovered some disturbing issues on Windows 10. Later analysis by Arstechnica confirmed that MS is not telling the whole story.

 

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=cs&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Faeronet.cz%2Fnews%2Fanalyza-windows-10-ve-svem-principu-jde-o-pouhy-terminal-na-sber-informaci-o-uzivateli-jeho-prstech-ocich-a-hlasu%2F&edit-text=
 

That pretty much confirms everyone's worst fears. Microsoft appears to be collecting everything users do on Windows 10. How are all the apologists going to explain this one away I wonder?

15 hours ago, eddman said:

Well, windows 10 is NOT free to begin with. It's a free UPGRADE, and only for a year. If I do not own a genuine windows 7 or 8 license, then in order to get 10, I'd have to pay for a retail or OEM version.

The point is it's not a free upgrade (some might argue it's actually a downgrade). The price is your privacy and data.

7 hours ago, simplezz said:

That pretty much confirms everyone's worst fears. Microsoft appears to be collecting everything users do on Windows 10. How are all the apologists going to explain this one away I wonder?

I feel sorry for you.
For some reason you have a hatred for a company.  Typically, in order to harbor such strong feelings one has to be affected directly.  What did MS do to you personally ?

Its strange for someone to be so anti- a company if they weren't personally wronged by said company.  Like hating Bank of America because they have horrible customer service, dont care about their account holders, etc - that might garner strong emotions.

But - you have been anti-MS for a long time and constantly perpetuating fear-mongering, exaggerated claims, then - like the quote above, cling to any disparaging comment like a dog humping someone's leg.

You dont know anything about the legitimacy of the article, the people who supposedly authored the piece,  and think it "confirms" things for you ?  


I had an intern working for me one summer - was so anti-microsoft he would use linux stuff and waste an entire day on something that would have taken 1 hour if he would have just used the tools that were at his disposal.

I had such fun telling him he needs to get a grip on reality, then telling him we were stopping his internship effective immediately.

  • Like 3
1 hour ago, simplezz said:

The point is it's not a free upgrade (some might argue it's actually a downgrade). The price is your privacy and data.

OK, let's ignore the inane comment about a downgrade - which serves no purpose other than to define your stance on Windows 10.  No, the price is the savings that can be made by not having a massively variable market.  The more people they can get to the latest platform the better, and the easier support becomes.  Win10 has not once been actually shown to report back anything more or less than Win8/7/Vista - yes, there IS more traffic, that is undeniable, but anything about what that traffic actually is has only ever been speculation that the Anti-Microsoft brigade have misinterpreted to suit their agenda.

2 hours ago, Nik L said:

OK, let's ignore the inane comment about a downgrade - which serves no purpose other than to define your stance on Windows 10.  No, the price is the savings that can be made by not having a massively variable market.  The more people they can get to the latest platform the better, and the easier support becomes.  Win10 has not once been actually shown to report back anything more or less than Win8/7/Vista - yes, there IS more traffic, that is undeniable, but anything about what that traffic actually is has only ever been speculation that the Anti-Microsoft brigade have misinterpreted to suit their agenda.

I've asked several times for these guys to actually back up their claims with evidence that anything other than data for diagnostics and improvement of applications is being sent. 

 

Ive yet to have a single one of them provide a single shred of evidence. They like to post links, but then those links are also not giving any evidence. 

I like how people are alternatively defending Windows 10 by making largely incompatible claims:

 

- it doesn't spy on you

- it probably doesn't spy on you

- we have no proof it's spying on you

- Microsoft wouldn't spy on you
- it does spy on you but it's the kind of spying you shouldn't worry about – what's wrong with spying anyway?
- it does spy on you, but it's actually good for you  Microsoft
- it does sort of spy on you but so did previous versions so clearly that's ok
- it does spy on you and it's a problem but so does product Y that you're probably using, so...I guess it's a wash
- it does spy on you but so does everyone else - what're you gonna do?
- it does spy on you but there's nothing wrong with that, , i.e. keep your head in the sand
....

  • Like 2
4 minutes ago, Active. said:

I like how people are alternatively defending Windows 10 by making largely incompatible claims:

 

- it doesn't spy on you

- it probably doesn't spy on you

- we have no proof it's spying on you

- Microsoft wouldn't spy on you
- it does spy on you but it's the kind of spying you shouldn't worry about – what's wrong with spying anyway?
- it does spy on you, but it's actually good for you  Microsoft
- it does sort of spy on you but so did previous versions so clearly that's ok
- it does spy on you and it's a problem but so does product Y that you're probably using, so...I guess it's a wash
- it does spy on you but so does everyone else - what're you gonna do?
- it does spy on you but there's nothing wrong with that, , i.e. keep your head in the sand
....

I'm not defending anything. I want these people accusing of spying to provide proof that spying is going on. That means, not diagnostic  /improvement data. 

 

It shouldn't be too much to ask but I have yet to see it. 

 

Its easy to make claims that you don't have to back up. 

2 hours ago, adrynalyne said:

I'm not defending anything. I want these people accusing of spying to provide proof that spying is going on. That means, not diagnostic  /improvement data. 

 

It shouldn't be too much to ask but I have yet to see it. 

 

Its easy to make claims that you don't have to back up. 

I wish Microsoft would just show us what they are collecting and with who it's going to be shared with, I find Microsoft’s lack of transparency quite disturbing.

 

It's also easy to sit back and say "prove it", when you yourself do not know what is being collected. I'm all for innocent until proven guilty, but every time you give a corporation the benefit of a doubt they ###### all over you.

 

I'll ask this... is it possible that Microsoft is collecting personal information? Is it possible, just possible that they are doing the wrong thing?

  • Like 2

Sure it's possible, but why would they do it? It'd be a huge amount of data and offer them exactly nothing (Apart from huge legal files). People have been worried about this stuff since the 9x era, it's never been substantiated and has never progressed past the conspiracy theory stage.

 

I remember people getting freaked out over Microsoft's cloud plans, because they thought Windows would upload the contents of your hard drive to Microsoft's servers and store all data there. That idea is so stupid that I'm not entirely sure why anybody ever gave it consideration.

20 minutes ago, DavidM said:

I wish Microsoft would just show us what they are collecting and with who it's going to be shared with, I find Microsoft’s lack of transparency quite disturbing.

 

It's also easy to sit back and say "prove it", when you yourself do not know what is being collected. I'm all for innocent until proven guilty, but every time you give a corporation the benefit of a doubt they ###### all over you.

 

I'll ask this... is it possible that Microsoft is collecting personal information? Is it possible, just possible that they are doing the wrong thing?

Of course it's possible. They might be archiving everything on your computer, but so might every other OS in existence. Unless you have an old TV it's probably spying on you, too.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!