Spying Windows 10 - How much truth is into this..


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, adrynalyne said:

So you too are making stuff up. 

It is apparently fair game to make claims about something—claims without evidence—as long as they cannot be proven false. The burden of proof does not matter.

  • Like 2

It would be my guess that I have access to more of a Neowin user's personally identifiable information than Microsoft does if that tells you anything.

 

I honestly don't think they care what you're doing on your device past technical data to identify issues and improve the OS.

If by "spying" you mean the error reporting and performance/stability telemetry, then yes, they're "spying" on you.

 

There are other things like advertising ID, cortana, etc. but they can all be disabled through settings. Better yet, if you do not want to share anything, then do not sign-in with a microsoft account. Use a local account.

 

There are some wild claims on the internet that windows 10 scans your storage and sends a list of files you have to microsoft. None of this has ever been proven. If you believe this to be the case, then why not also believe that this also applies to windows 7 and 8 too? If it cannot be disproven for windows 10, then the same would apply to 7 and 8, right?

 

There are some funny things that I come across, like MS keeping track of your contacts, emails, uploaded photos, etc. Apparently these people do not even realize that by using a MS account, those stuff are already on the damn servers. They don't need to monitor them. Perhaps they also don't realize that any online service, be it google/gmail, icloud, yahoo etc. already have your information and/or data on their hard drives.

 

The problem is that so far all we've had are claims and no proof. There are people who are so good at hacking and cracking stuff. How come they haven't sniffed and captured the packets going from windows 10 to MS, cracked them open and looked for what's inside already?

 

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."

4 minutes ago, Nik L said:

Who are these "lot of people" you talk about?  I don't think I can name one person either in my daily life nor on here who has ever asserted that "Windows was free".

I did not make that statement. Please fix your quote. 

13 hours ago, simplezz said:

A lot of people are under the impression that Windows 10 is free; It's not, you are the product. Giving up your data and your privacy is the price you pay. If you're happy with that arrangement, welcome to the future of Windows.

Well, windows 10 is NOT free to begin with. It's a free UPGRADE, and only for a year. If I do not own a genuine windows 7 or 8 license, then in order to get 10, I'd have to pay for a retail or OEM version.

There is certainly more going on in data collection than MS claims. A Checz analyst while probing Windows 10 telemetry  discovered some disturbing issues on Windows 10. Later analysis by Arstechnica confirmed that MS is not telling the whole story.

 

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=cs&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Faeronet.cz%2Fnews%2Fanalyza-windows-10-ve-svem-principu-jde-o-pouhy-terminal-na-sber-informaci-o-uzivateli-jeho-prstech-ocich-a-hlasu%2F&edit-text=
 

4 minutes ago, Yogurth said:

There is certainly more going on in data collection than MS claims. A Checz analyst while probing Windows 10 telemetry  discovered some disturbing issues on Windows 10. Later analysis by Arstechnica confirmed that MS is not telling the whole story.

 

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=cs&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Faeronet.cz%2Fnews%2Fanalyza-windows-10-ve-svem-principu-jde-o-pouhy-terminal-na-sber-informaci-o-uzivateli-jeho-prstech-ocich-a-hlasu%2F&edit-text=
 

That doesn't go against what MS said and just like the translated article, Ars doesn't know what is sent. 

 

Come back to us with real evidence that it is anything more than diagnostic data and data used to improve spell checking, cortana, etc. 

  • Like 3
11 hours ago, Yogurth said:

There is certainly more going on in data collection than MS claims. A Checz analyst while probing Windows 10 telemetry  discovered some disturbing issues on Windows 10. Later analysis by Arstechnica confirmed that MS is not telling the whole story.

 

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=cs&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Faeronet.cz%2Fnews%2Fanalyza-windows-10-ve-svem-principu-jde-o-pouhy-terminal-na-sber-informaci-o-uzivateli-jeho-prstech-ocich-a-hlasu%2F&edit-text=
 


LOL Well golly Gee - I guess that solves it     /s 2

  • Like 2

Look, just like anywhere else on the internet, one third of the people here don't know what they are talking about, and one third of them are just plain stupid. Here's a rule of thumb for sites like Neowin; I call it the Tech Site Paradox:

 

"A commenters actual knowledge about a given subject is inversely proportional to the volume of their comments and how strenuously they propound their (myopic) point of view."

 

Microsoft doesn't care who you talk to or what you say. The Justice Department and Google do, but Microsoft doesn't.

15 hours ago, Yogurth said:

There is certainly more going on in data collection than MS claims. A Checz analyst while probing Windows 10 telemetry  discovered some disturbing issues on Windows 10. Later analysis by Arstechnica confirmed that MS is not telling the whole story.

 

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=cs&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Faeronet.cz%2Fnews%2Fanalyza-windows-10-ve-svem-principu-jde-o-pouhy-terminal-na-sber-informaci-o-uzivateli-jeho-prstech-ocich-a-hlasu%2F&edit-text=
 

That pretty much confirms everyone's worst fears. Microsoft appears to be collecting everything users do on Windows 10. How are all the apologists going to explain this one away I wonder?

15 hours ago, eddman said:

Well, windows 10 is NOT free to begin with. It's a free UPGRADE, and only for a year. If I do not own a genuine windows 7 or 8 license, then in order to get 10, I'd have to pay for a retail or OEM version.

The point is it's not a free upgrade (some might argue it's actually a downgrade). The price is your privacy and data.

7 hours ago, simplezz said:

That pretty much confirms everyone's worst fears. Microsoft appears to be collecting everything users do on Windows 10. How are all the apologists going to explain this one away I wonder?

I feel sorry for you.
For some reason you have a hatred for a company.  Typically, in order to harbor such strong feelings one has to be affected directly.  What did MS do to you personally ?

Its strange for someone to be so anti- a company if they weren't personally wronged by said company.  Like hating Bank of America because they have horrible customer service, dont care about their account holders, etc - that might garner strong emotions.

But - you have been anti-MS for a long time and constantly perpetuating fear-mongering, exaggerated claims, then - like the quote above, cling to any disparaging comment like a dog humping someone's leg.

You dont know anything about the legitimacy of the article, the people who supposedly authored the piece,  and think it "confirms" things for you ?  


I had an intern working for me one summer - was so anti-microsoft he would use linux stuff and waste an entire day on something that would have taken 1 hour if he would have just used the tools that were at his disposal.

I had such fun telling him he needs to get a grip on reality, then telling him we were stopping his internship effective immediately.

  • Like 3
1 hour ago, simplezz said:

The point is it's not a free upgrade (some might argue it's actually a downgrade). The price is your privacy and data.

OK, let's ignore the inane comment about a downgrade - which serves no purpose other than to define your stance on Windows 10.  No, the price is the savings that can be made by not having a massively variable market.  The more people they can get to the latest platform the better, and the easier support becomes.  Win10 has not once been actually shown to report back anything more or less than Win8/7/Vista - yes, there IS more traffic, that is undeniable, but anything about what that traffic actually is has only ever been speculation that the Anti-Microsoft brigade have misinterpreted to suit their agenda.

2 hours ago, Nik L said:

OK, let's ignore the inane comment about a downgrade - which serves no purpose other than to define your stance on Windows 10.  No, the price is the savings that can be made by not having a massively variable market.  The more people they can get to the latest platform the better, and the easier support becomes.  Win10 has not once been actually shown to report back anything more or less than Win8/7/Vista - yes, there IS more traffic, that is undeniable, but anything about what that traffic actually is has only ever been speculation that the Anti-Microsoft brigade have misinterpreted to suit their agenda.

I've asked several times for these guys to actually back up their claims with evidence that anything other than data for diagnostics and improvement of applications is being sent. 

 

Ive yet to have a single one of them provide a single shred of evidence. They like to post links, but then those links are also not giving any evidence. 

I like how people are alternatively defending Windows 10 by making largely incompatible claims:

 

- it doesn't spy on you

- it probably doesn't spy on you

- we have no proof it's spying on you

- Microsoft wouldn't spy on you
- it does spy on you but it's the kind of spying you shouldn't worry about – what's wrong with spying anyway?
- it does spy on you, but it's actually good for you  Microsoft
- it does sort of spy on you but so did previous versions so clearly that's ok
- it does spy on you and it's a problem but so does product Y that you're probably using, so...I guess it's a wash
- it does spy on you but so does everyone else - what're you gonna do?
- it does spy on you but there's nothing wrong with that, , i.e. keep your head in the sand
....

  • Like 2
4 minutes ago, Active. said:

I like how people are alternatively defending Windows 10 by making largely incompatible claims:

 

- it doesn't spy on you

- it probably doesn't spy on you

- we have no proof it's spying on you

- Microsoft wouldn't spy on you
- it does spy on you but it's the kind of spying you shouldn't worry about – what's wrong with spying anyway?
- it does spy on you, but it's actually good for you  Microsoft
- it does sort of spy on you but so did previous versions so clearly that's ok
- it does spy on you and it's a problem but so does product Y that you're probably using, so...I guess it's a wash
- it does spy on you but so does everyone else - what're you gonna do?
- it does spy on you but there's nothing wrong with that, , i.e. keep your head in the sand
....

I'm not defending anything. I want these people accusing of spying to provide proof that spying is going on. That means, not diagnostic  /improvement data. 

 

It shouldn't be too much to ask but I have yet to see it. 

 

Its easy to make claims that you don't have to back up. 

  • Like 5
2 hours ago, adrynalyne said:

I'm not defending anything. I want these people accusing of spying to provide proof that spying is going on. That means, not diagnostic  /improvement data. 

 

It shouldn't be too much to ask but I have yet to see it. 

 

Its easy to make claims that you don't have to back up. 

I wish Microsoft would just show us what they are collecting and with who it's going to be shared with, I find Microsoft’s lack of transparency quite disturbing.

 

It's also easy to sit back and say "prove it", when you yourself do not know what is being collected. I'm all for innocent until proven guilty, but every time you give a corporation the benefit of a doubt they ###### all over you.

 

I'll ask this... is it possible that Microsoft is collecting personal information? Is it possible, just possible that they are doing the wrong thing?

  • Like 2

Sure it's possible, but why would they do it? It'd be a huge amount of data and offer them exactly nothing (Apart from huge legal files). People have been worried about this stuff since the 9x era, it's never been substantiated and has never progressed past the conspiracy theory stage.

 

I remember people getting freaked out over Microsoft's cloud plans, because they thought Windows would upload the contents of your hard drive to Microsoft's servers and store all data there. That idea is so stupid that I'm not entirely sure why anybody ever gave it consideration.

20 minutes ago, DavidM said:

I wish Microsoft would just show us what they are collecting and with who it's going to be shared with, I find Microsoft’s lack of transparency quite disturbing.

 

It's also easy to sit back and say "prove it", when you yourself do not know what is being collected. I'm all for innocent until proven guilty, but every time you give a corporation the benefit of a doubt they ###### all over you.

 

I'll ask this... is it possible that Microsoft is collecting personal information? Is it possible, just possible that they are doing the wrong thing?

Of course it's possible. They might be archiving everything on your computer, but so might every other OS in existence. Unless you have an old TV it's probably spying on you, too.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!