Spying Windows 10 - How much truth is into this..


Recommended Posts

Just now, noneofyourbusiness said:

Just as an example... if only 20 - 25 year old males like Cortana what do they need to improve to make it acceptable to other demographics? Additional voices? Different visual appeal? Etc.

They can use the info for all sorts of purposes to make a product better.

In addition to this, there are other interesting questions that demographics can help answer: if a new set of glyphs or icons needs to be designed for a new app or program:

- What scales or size increments need to be made to accommodate the large majority of users?

- What's the best spacing to use between different interactive elements so that information density is correctly balanced against sufficient separation (differs by language, age)? How much contrast does there need to be between foreground and background?

- What sort of visual cues make sense for representing a particular action? Does a rotary phone dial still make sense? A floppy disk? Are multiple symbols necessary for specific regions, and if so, what is the minimum number that must be created?

 

There's also some more data that helps guide the interaction between users and software/hardware that involves more intensive data collection - one example correlating users to literacy levels (how technical can you make your help manual?) - but I don't think that's directly collected here.

 

Some of this is covered better than I can describe in a book called "User Interfaces for All: Concepts, Methods, and Tools". However, the basic gist is that one's understanding and interaction with a given interface is colored by some physical parameters, as well as cultural ones. Software conveys information. For anyone who has received training on presenting information, a common rule is to know your audience so that you can adjust your delivery to make the information more accessible.

43 minutes ago, zhangm said:

In addition to this, there are other interesting questions that demographics can help answer: if a new set of glyphs or icons needs to be designed for a new app or program:

- What scales or size increments need to be made to accommodate the large majority of users?

- What's the best spacing to use between different interactive elements so that information density is correctly balanced against sufficient separation (differs by language, age)? How much contrast does there need to be between foreground and background?

- What sort of visual cues make sense for representing a particular action? Does a rotary phone dial still make sense? A floppy disk? Are multiple symbols necessary for specific regions, and if so, what is the minimum number that must be created?

 

I had to honestly laugh a bit at this. I certainly don't get the impression MS concern themselves with such things in any amount of detail . If they do, you wouldn't know it by the result. If anything it seems to me they care way too much about 'the data' as a rationale for making design decisions (which you can always interpret any which way you want). Funny how that worked out for the Start Screen or the hidden Start button.

44 minutes ago, zhangm said:

In addition to this, there are other interesting questions that demographics can help answer: if a new set of glyphs or icons needs to be designed for a new app or program:

- What scales or size increments need to be made to accommodate the large majority of users?

- What's the best spacing to use between different interactive elements so that information density is correctly balanced against sufficient separation (differs by language, age)? How much contrast does there need to be between foreground and background?

- What sort of visual cues make sense for representing a particular action? Does a rotary phone dial still make sense? A floppy disk? Are multiple symbols necessary for specific regions, and if so, what is the minimum number that must be created?

 

There's also some more data that helps guide the interaction between users and software/hardware that involves more intensive data collection - one example correlating users to literacy levels (how technical can you make your help manual?) - but I don't think that's directly collected here.

 

Some of this is covered better than I can describe in a book called "User Interfaces for All: Concepts, Methods, and Tools". However, the basic gist is that one's understanding and interaction with a given interface is colored by some physical parameters, as well as cultural ones. Software conveys information. For anyone who has received training on presenting information, a common rule is to know your audience so that you can adjust your delivery to make the information more accessible.

 

1 hour ago, noneofyourbusiness said:

Just as an example... if only 20 - 25 year old males like Cortana what do they need to improve to make it acceptable to other demographics? Additional voices? Different visual appeal? Etc.

They can use the info for all sorts of purposes to make a product better.

@noneofyourbusiness @zhangm , if this is truly their goal there are better ways of getting feedback than forcing their users to give it.  It's not like they listen anyway, I remember the crap storm around the web when they pulled the Start Menu from Windows 8, then it continued with Windows 8.1, and it still continues today with Windows 10. People have been telling Microsoft they don't want a single UI for every device, but nope they keep plugging along. We keep telling them to let us opt out of their data gathering and they are not listening. They finally gave into on this for the Enterprise version, but only because they feared for their wallets if the business sector avoided Windows 10 due to privacy issues. Since they don't have to fear for their wallets with the consumer editions there will be no change.

 

Microsoft had the chance to kick the stink of Windows 8 off of themselves, but instead the seem to have decided to "data mine" their user base. Whats funny, if they had just given the option to opt out. nobody would care about it. It honestly boggles my mind how companies continue to shoot themselves in the foot, and if they are only getting the minimal amount of data, is it worth it to alienate their own user base?

Quote

We keep telling them to let us opt out of their data gathering and they are not listening.

It seems to me that many people who care about this issue have control over what goes in and out at the network level. Surely you can block anything that you wish with less suspicion than using an on/off toggle switch provided by Microsoft, whom you don't trust anyway.

 

I don't think you need to tell them how old you are, or whether you're male or female. I don't recall giving them such information.

 

Edit. Then again, based on access point signal strength, they may be able to tell which bathrooms you're going into. :shifty:

Edited by zhangm
  • Like 3
8 hours ago, Active. said:

As most of us know, Microsoft has relented and is now  offering enterprise customers a way to completely opt out of any telemetry due to privacy concerns of said decision makers. It's simply user-hostile to not  extend the same courtesy to their regular users. If they really wanted to, they could shut this whole discussion down fairly quickly. Change the user defaults and give users the option to opt out completely. 

Because the average user doesn't have the technical awareness to actually understand what it does (I'm thinking of the Dunning–Kruger effect, but I'm not entirely sure if it applies), similar as to why Microsoft doesn't let home users disable software updates, because those who do very rarely actually have a valid reason to (While the pro version is often used for workstations, where you want a centralized update schedule, etc.)

 

If people think something is bad, and they can turn it off, they will, regardless of what it actually does.

1 hour ago, The_Decryptor said:

Because the average user doesn't have the technical awareness to actually understand what it does (I'm thinking of the Dunning–Kruger effect, but I'm not entirely sure if it applies), similar as to why Microsoft doesn't let home users disable software updates, because those who do very rarely actually have a valid reason to (While the pro version is often used for workstations, where you want a centralized update schedule, etc.)

 

If people think something is bad, and they can turn it off, they will, regardless of what it actually does.

 

Worse than the clueless ones are the "Windows ricrers" (just made it up!) who actively believe, wrongly, that "tweaking" windows settings and disabling "unwanted" processes will somehow make windows "faster" and have no qualms breaking windows for 0.0001 seconds gained 

On 1/21/2016 at 11:02 PM, Jared- said:

Cortana is a marketing gimmick and nothing else. It's simply search, with some chick making you feel good. 

 

Can easily be switched off via GPO, no biggie. 

thank the stars huh! 

On 1/22/2016 at 6:09 AM, Jared- said:

Oh, and I thought turning off the page file was recommended??? I do have 16gbs of RAM!!

^^ Your joking right? :p cos we all trust and know programs and windows tobe coded correctly not to still need at least a tiny swapfile :p I still stick with 2Gb static personally.

On 1/16/2016 at 6:19 AM, fusi0n said:

I've upgraded to Windows 10 a few times and found my self downgrading back to 8.1 due to driver issues with my SLI.. However, I'm ready to give Windows 10 another try.. 

 

I realize that this could thread and start a huge debate, and please don't do that. Mods, feel free to lock this down as soon as some light is shed.. 

 

The only reason I'm asking is because of Neowin actually.. A lot of people post that it sends a lot of info back to Microsoft.. Some hackers around the world say the same thing.. And there are a lot of tools to disable this sort of tracking.. Just google Windows 10 Spy removal.. 
This is a good article.. http://bgr.com/2015/07/31/windows-10-upgrade-spying-how-to-opt-out/

Do you really think you will get an unbiased reply here ?  This site is called NeoWIN. Fire up Fiddler or another network monitor and see for yourself.

 

Dennis

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!