Recommended Posts

Hello…

 

I work at IT and this happened 3 times in the past 2, 3 weeks.

 

I do many clean installs and yesterday was the third computer that I had cleaned and install fresh on old PCs (5-8 years). All went well and they were running with a good speed, but after all the updates for Windows 7, they started to run very, very slow, it's impossible to work with the PCs like that, I had to reformat again, install OS and don't do no updates, and so far, so good, the speed is good again.

 

Obviously this isn't the best solution because of the safety issue.

 

I tried to find the problem with the slow down, AV, CCC, stats of hardware, but nothing.

 

I don't want to update them to Windows 10 because some external hardware might not be fully compatible.

 

What other choices do I have?

 

Thank you.

After doing the install and all the updates do another reboot then manually start System Maintenance from within Control Panel -> Security and Maintenance -> Maintenance. Then leave the computer until it is finished. Then run it again! Yes I know it is a pain in the ass but what this does is all Windows to go through and tidy up everything. It will optimise the disks (defrag), clean up and regen all of the .NET GAC, do boot optimisations, etc. I have found doing this gets the computer back up to running at a good speed. I am sure others will say it is pointless but just give it a try on one machine and then see if it made any difference for you. I don't have many Windows 7 machines these days but for the ones I do have this has always worked great for me. 

  • Like 2

silly q but anything showing under "all users" in task manager sucking up resources?

 

i support 1500 desktops on w7 pro and haven't experienced this slowdown or have end users report systems being slow post patching (via WSUS) since the last major W7 service pack.

 Have you tried other source media, incase somethings not quite right with the image your using? Ive seen usb W7 media installs go awry from time to time. outwith my own home pcs, I cant recall the last time i reformatted a pc without using SCCM, thankfully we have limited standard boxes of tin so management is simple.

 

You need to work out whats causing it, as leaving w7 PCs unpatched is not recommended, for security reasons at the very least, as you have stated :) 

 

I always remove old login profiles that no longer access systems, disk clean (advanced system clean) then defragment the drive also when a lot of patches have been applied. an old habit, but a good habit :) I also make sure sys restore etc is disabled before joining to the domain if its an old school install method, this is very rarely, i usually just nuke existing installs and redeploy the image.

 

I also make sure all clients have at least 4Gb ram especially if platter drives. win 7 on any less is painful :) 

Edited by Mando
23 hours ago, Pedro3 said:

Thanks for the tips, will try what you both told me and then I'll give feedback :)

a slow and painful way is to apply each patch singular and test after each one, no fun but doable buddy :) One to watch for is Office validation file, ive seen that slow down MS Office to the point the whole machine struggles.

On 1/31/2016 at 6:29 AM, Pedro3 said:

Hello…

 

I work at IT and this happened 3 times in the past 2, 3 weeks.

 

I do many clean installs and yesterday was the third computer that I had cleaned and install fresh on old PCs (5-8 years). All went well and they were running with a good speed, but after all the updates for Windows 7, they started to run very, very slow, it's impossible to work with the PCs like that, I had to reformat again, install OS and don't do no updates, and so far, so good, the speed is good again.

 

Obviously this isn't the best solution because of the safety issue.

 

I tried to find the problem with the slow down, AV, CCC, stats of hardware, but nothing.

 

I don't want to update them to Windows 10 because some external hardware might not be fully compatible.

 

What other choices do I have?

 

Thank you.

If you do a lot of re-installs of the same version of Windows 7 I suggest that you prepare a Preinstallation image that is up to date and loaded with all common programs. This can easily be restored to a hard drive (we use Macrium Reflect) and put to use quickly. It's a huge time saver.

15 hours ago, seeprime said:

If you do a lot of re-installs of the same version of Windows 7 I suggest that you prepare a Preinstallation image that is up to date and loaded with all common programs. This can easily be restored to a hard drive (we use Macrium Reflect) and put to use quickly. It's a huge time saver.

If I do that, I just need to install the drivers for the specific machine, right?

13 hours ago, Pedro3 said:

If I do that, I just need to install the drivers for the specific machine, right?

Yes. Anu drivers not in the pre-installation image need to be downloaded and installed for the clean install to run well. 

it's hard to diagnose something like this. I'm guessing that the hard drives here are traditional hard drives so there's probably a lot of trashing happening. Perhaps the C: partition is too small, so the updates are taking too much free space. Perhaps there's not enough RAM so there's a lot of thrashing with the page file. Perhaps the computers are missing chipset drivers. This will cripple a PC's performance.

 

How does it act slow, exactly? For how long?

5 hours ago, Jason S. said:

it's hard to diagnose something like this. I'm guessing that the hard drives here are traditional hard drives so there's probably a lot of trashing happening. Perhaps the C: partition is too small, so the updates are taking too much free space. Perhaps there's not enough RAM so there's a lot of thrashing with the page file. Perhaps the computers are missing chipset drivers. This will cripple a PC's performance.

 

How does it act slow, exactly? For how long?

Totally agree, it's hard to diagnose. The HDDs are SATA and 120GB (I think). There's no partitions. RAM is 2GB. I've formatted one of them, install everything except updates and is working great (for an old PC).

 

When I turn them on, they work OK, but after about 15 minutes I can't do almost nothing, I click on the Start Menu and have to wait almost a minute. They work, but are so slooooow. And it's not just the Start Menu, it's everything that I click, a folder, open an application, etc.

It sounds windows performing a shadow copy at every boot or reboot or user login. Are you sure you installed (the SP1 iso install to current) updates in order, without manipulation, adding optional updates manually in between?

There is a windows 7 32-bit update for windows update itself, WindowsUpdate would be stuck in "checking for updates" state and never update. Are you using 32-bit installs, because you are running only 2GB?

Google for "windows update stuck at checking for updates" --> http://superuser.com/questions/951960/windows-7-sp1-windows-update-stuck-checking-for-updates

 

I had that same issue (similar) with some Vista installations, it detected a incorrect /  wrong shutdown and would initiate a full system scan and system recovery at each and every boot and or user login (this scenario should only take place once a week)

The HDD LED would burn continuously for 1 to 2 hours before settling down, it turned out to be a windows service that was misbehaving after a windows update.

I turned off almost everything regarding system checking and still it would hogg the HDD and perform a recovery or shadow volume copy.

Only recently there was a fix in the updates that finally fixed that issue with that service.

 

  • 1 year later...

Up until now, after resinstalling windows 7 and not doing no updates, the computers work fine.

 

Yes, I know it's a security risk and I always talk about it, but people prefer to take that risk instead of buying a new computer. And, in a certain way, I agree with them. Looks like is just Apple forcing us to buy new hardware…

51 minutes ago, Dot Matrix said:

This post is a year old... 

 

But if you're my IT Dept... Have you tried cleaning the browser cache? :p

In all fairness, I've seen some employees with over 2GB worth of browser cache alone. Not counting what's in the rest of the temp folder or the recycle bin.

  • zhangm locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
    • Meta announces a major leadership change at WhatsApp by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta has announced a major leadership change at WhatsApp, with Will Cathcart stepping down after seven years of leading the world's largest messaging platform. CRED CEO and founder Kunal Shah will take over as the next global head of WhatsApp. CRED is an Indian fintech company focused on creditworthy consumers. As part of the transition, Meta is also making a minority investment in CRED through its Series H funding round. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Will Cathcart will remain at Meta and move into a new role focused on building new products from the ground up. Cathcart led WhatsApp during a major growth phase, helping the app reach more than 3 billion users worldwide. He also played a key role in expanding WhatsApp’s business offerings while keeping privacy and end-to-end encryption central to the product. Meta’s Chief Product Officer, Chris Cox, said Kunal Shah was selected after a search for a leader who understands WhatsApp’s global scale and future potential. In a leaked internal memo, Cox described Shah as a “serial founder” and one of India’s most respected entrepreneurs, adding that he brings “entrepreneurial energy” and a strong product mindset to the role. As part of the Series H funding round, CRED is raising ₹8,550 crore, or about $900 million, in a round led by Meta. The funding values CRED at ₹43,239 crore, or about $4.5 billion, on a post-money basis. It is important to note that this investment will not give Meta access to CRED customer information. Kunal posted the following on X regarding his new role at Meta: Although Kunal Shah will be stepping away from his operating role as CRED CEO, he will retain his personal shareholding in the company.
    • It wouldn't be hard for me to turn off my TV, if I had one. For one thing, I never scroll Instagram. The only reason I have an account is because Meta created one when it merged the account systems for its various services.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      98
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!