Recommended Posts

Hello…

 

I work at IT and this happened 3 times in the past 2, 3 weeks.

 

I do many clean installs and yesterday was the third computer that I had cleaned and install fresh on old PCs (5-8 years). All went well and they were running with a good speed, but after all the updates for Windows 7, they started to run very, very slow, it's impossible to work with the PCs like that, I had to reformat again, install OS and don't do no updates, and so far, so good, the speed is good again.

 

Obviously this isn't the best solution because of the safety issue.

 

I tried to find the problem with the slow down, AV, CCC, stats of hardware, but nothing.

 

I don't want to update them to Windows 10 because some external hardware might not be fully compatible.

 

What other choices do I have?

 

Thank you.

After doing the install and all the updates do another reboot then manually start System Maintenance from within Control Panel -> Security and Maintenance -> Maintenance. Then leave the computer until it is finished. Then run it again! Yes I know it is a pain in the ass but what this does is all Windows to go through and tidy up everything. It will optimise the disks (defrag), clean up and regen all of the .NET GAC, do boot optimisations, etc. I have found doing this gets the computer back up to running at a good speed. I am sure others will say it is pointless but just give it a try on one machine and then see if it made any difference for you. I don't have many Windows 7 machines these days but for the ones I do have this has always worked great for me. 

  • Like 2

silly q but anything showing under "all users" in task manager sucking up resources?

 

i support 1500 desktops on w7 pro and haven't experienced this slowdown or have end users report systems being slow post patching (via WSUS) since the last major W7 service pack.

 Have you tried other source media, incase somethings not quite right with the image your using? Ive seen usb W7 media installs go awry from time to time. outwith my own home pcs, I cant recall the last time i reformatted a pc without using SCCM, thankfully we have limited standard boxes of tin so management is simple.

 

You need to work out whats causing it, as leaving w7 PCs unpatched is not recommended, for security reasons at the very least, as you have stated :) 

 

I always remove old login profiles that no longer access systems, disk clean (advanced system clean) then defragment the drive also when a lot of patches have been applied. an old habit, but a good habit :) I also make sure sys restore etc is disabled before joining to the domain if its an old school install method, this is very rarely, i usually just nuke existing installs and redeploy the image.

 

I also make sure all clients have at least 4Gb ram especially if platter drives. win 7 on any less is painful :) 

Edited by Mando
23 hours ago, Pedro3 said:

Thanks for the tips, will try what you both told me and then I'll give feedback :)

a slow and painful way is to apply each patch singular and test after each one, no fun but doable buddy :) One to watch for is Office validation file, ive seen that slow down MS Office to the point the whole machine struggles.

On 1/31/2016 at 6:29 AM, Pedro3 said:

Hello…

 

I work at IT and this happened 3 times in the past 2, 3 weeks.

 

I do many clean installs and yesterday was the third computer that I had cleaned and install fresh on old PCs (5-8 years). All went well and they were running with a good speed, but after all the updates for Windows 7, they started to run very, very slow, it's impossible to work with the PCs like that, I had to reformat again, install OS and don't do no updates, and so far, so good, the speed is good again.

 

Obviously this isn't the best solution because of the safety issue.

 

I tried to find the problem with the slow down, AV, CCC, stats of hardware, but nothing.

 

I don't want to update them to Windows 10 because some external hardware might not be fully compatible.

 

What other choices do I have?

 

Thank you.

If you do a lot of re-installs of the same version of Windows 7 I suggest that you prepare a Preinstallation image that is up to date and loaded with all common programs. This can easily be restored to a hard drive (we use Macrium Reflect) and put to use quickly. It's a huge time saver.

15 hours ago, seeprime said:

If you do a lot of re-installs of the same version of Windows 7 I suggest that you prepare a Preinstallation image that is up to date and loaded with all common programs. This can easily be restored to a hard drive (we use Macrium Reflect) and put to use quickly. It's a huge time saver.

If I do that, I just need to install the drivers for the specific machine, right?

13 hours ago, Pedro3 said:

If I do that, I just need to install the drivers for the specific machine, right?

Yes. Anu drivers not in the pre-installation image need to be downloaded and installed for the clean install to run well. 

it's hard to diagnose something like this. I'm guessing that the hard drives here are traditional hard drives so there's probably a lot of trashing happening. Perhaps the C: partition is too small, so the updates are taking too much free space. Perhaps there's not enough RAM so there's a lot of thrashing with the page file. Perhaps the computers are missing chipset drivers. This will cripple a PC's performance.

 

How does it act slow, exactly? For how long?

5 hours ago, Jason S. said:

it's hard to diagnose something like this. I'm guessing that the hard drives here are traditional hard drives so there's probably a lot of trashing happening. Perhaps the C: partition is too small, so the updates are taking too much free space. Perhaps there's not enough RAM so there's a lot of thrashing with the page file. Perhaps the computers are missing chipset drivers. This will cripple a PC's performance.

 

How does it act slow, exactly? For how long?

Totally agree, it's hard to diagnose. The HDDs are SATA and 120GB (I think). There's no partitions. RAM is 2GB. I've formatted one of them, install everything except updates and is working great (for an old PC).

 

When I turn them on, they work OK, but after about 15 minutes I can't do almost nothing, I click on the Start Menu and have to wait almost a minute. They work, but are so slooooow. And it's not just the Start Menu, it's everything that I click, a folder, open an application, etc.

It sounds windows performing a shadow copy at every boot or reboot or user login. Are you sure you installed (the SP1 iso install to current) updates in order, without manipulation, adding optional updates manually in between?

There is a windows 7 32-bit update for windows update itself, WindowsUpdate would be stuck in "checking for updates" state and never update. Are you using 32-bit installs, because you are running only 2GB?

Google for "windows update stuck at checking for updates" --> http://superuser.com/questions/951960/windows-7-sp1-windows-update-stuck-checking-for-updates

 

I had that same issue (similar) with some Vista installations, it detected a incorrect /  wrong shutdown and would initiate a full system scan and system recovery at each and every boot and or user login (this scenario should only take place once a week)

The HDD LED would burn continuously for 1 to 2 hours before settling down, it turned out to be a windows service that was misbehaving after a windows update.

I turned off almost everything regarding system checking and still it would hogg the HDD and perform a recovery or shadow volume copy.

Only recently there was a fix in the updates that finally fixed that issue with that service.

 

  • 1 year later...

Up until now, after resinstalling windows 7 and not doing no updates, the computers work fine.

 

Yes, I know it's a security risk and I always talk about it, but people prefer to take that risk instead of buying a new computer. And, in a certain way, I agree with them. Looks like is just Apple forcing us to buy new hardware…

51 minutes ago, Dot Matrix said:

This post is a year old... 

 

But if you're my IT Dept... Have you tried cleaning the browser cache? :p

In all fairness, I've seen some employees with over 2GB worth of browser cache alone. Not counting what's in the rest of the temp folder or the recycle bin.

  • zhangm locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!