Recommended Posts

Hello…

 

I work at IT and this happened 3 times in the past 2, 3 weeks.

 

I do many clean installs and yesterday was the third computer that I had cleaned and install fresh on old PCs (5-8 years). All went well and they were running with a good speed, but after all the updates for Windows 7, they started to run very, very slow, it's impossible to work with the PCs like that, I had to reformat again, install OS and don't do no updates, and so far, so good, the speed is good again.

 

Obviously this isn't the best solution because of the safety issue.

 

I tried to find the problem with the slow down, AV, CCC, stats of hardware, but nothing.

 

I don't want to update them to Windows 10 because some external hardware might not be fully compatible.

 

What other choices do I have?

 

Thank you.

After doing the install and all the updates do another reboot then manually start System Maintenance from within Control Panel -> Security and Maintenance -> Maintenance. Then leave the computer until it is finished. Then run it again! Yes I know it is a pain in the ass but what this does is all Windows to go through and tidy up everything. It will optimise the disks (defrag), clean up and regen all of the .NET GAC, do boot optimisations, etc. I have found doing this gets the computer back up to running at a good speed. I am sure others will say it is pointless but just give it a try on one machine and then see if it made any difference for you. I don't have many Windows 7 machines these days but for the ones I do have this has always worked great for me. 

  • Like 2

silly q but anything showing under "all users" in task manager sucking up resources?

 

i support 1500 desktops on w7 pro and haven't experienced this slowdown or have end users report systems being slow post patching (via WSUS) since the last major W7 service pack.

 Have you tried other source media, incase somethings not quite right with the image your using? Ive seen usb W7 media installs go awry from time to time. outwith my own home pcs, I cant recall the last time i reformatted a pc without using SCCM, thankfully we have limited standard boxes of tin so management is simple.

 

You need to work out whats causing it, as leaving w7 PCs unpatched is not recommended, for security reasons at the very least, as you have stated :) 

 

I always remove old login profiles that no longer access systems, disk clean (advanced system clean) then defragment the drive also when a lot of patches have been applied. an old habit, but a good habit :) I also make sure sys restore etc is disabled before joining to the domain if its an old school install method, this is very rarely, i usually just nuke existing installs and redeploy the image.

 

I also make sure all clients have at least 4Gb ram especially if platter drives. win 7 on any less is painful :) 

Edited by Mando
23 hours ago, Pedro3 said:

Thanks for the tips, will try what you both told me and then I'll give feedback :)

a slow and painful way is to apply each patch singular and test after each one, no fun but doable buddy :) One to watch for is Office validation file, ive seen that slow down MS Office to the point the whole machine struggles.

On 1/31/2016 at 6:29 AM, Pedro3 said:

Hello…

 

I work at IT and this happened 3 times in the past 2, 3 weeks.

 

I do many clean installs and yesterday was the third computer that I had cleaned and install fresh on old PCs (5-8 years). All went well and they were running with a good speed, but after all the updates for Windows 7, they started to run very, very slow, it's impossible to work with the PCs like that, I had to reformat again, install OS and don't do no updates, and so far, so good, the speed is good again.

 

Obviously this isn't the best solution because of the safety issue.

 

I tried to find the problem with the slow down, AV, CCC, stats of hardware, but nothing.

 

I don't want to update them to Windows 10 because some external hardware might not be fully compatible.

 

What other choices do I have?

 

Thank you.

If you do a lot of re-installs of the same version of Windows 7 I suggest that you prepare a Preinstallation image that is up to date and loaded with all common programs. This can easily be restored to a hard drive (we use Macrium Reflect) and put to use quickly. It's a huge time saver.

15 hours ago, seeprime said:

If you do a lot of re-installs of the same version of Windows 7 I suggest that you prepare a Preinstallation image that is up to date and loaded with all common programs. This can easily be restored to a hard drive (we use Macrium Reflect) and put to use quickly. It's a huge time saver.

If I do that, I just need to install the drivers for the specific machine, right?

13 hours ago, Pedro3 said:

If I do that, I just need to install the drivers for the specific machine, right?

Yes. Anu drivers not in the pre-installation image need to be downloaded and installed for the clean install to run well. 

it's hard to diagnose something like this. I'm guessing that the hard drives here are traditional hard drives so there's probably a lot of trashing happening. Perhaps the C: partition is too small, so the updates are taking too much free space. Perhaps there's not enough RAM so there's a lot of thrashing with the page file. Perhaps the computers are missing chipset drivers. This will cripple a PC's performance.

 

How does it act slow, exactly? For how long?

5 hours ago, Jason S. said:

it's hard to diagnose something like this. I'm guessing that the hard drives here are traditional hard drives so there's probably a lot of trashing happening. Perhaps the C: partition is too small, so the updates are taking too much free space. Perhaps there's not enough RAM so there's a lot of thrashing with the page file. Perhaps the computers are missing chipset drivers. This will cripple a PC's performance.

 

How does it act slow, exactly? For how long?

Totally agree, it's hard to diagnose. The HDDs are SATA and 120GB (I think). There's no partitions. RAM is 2GB. I've formatted one of them, install everything except updates and is working great (for an old PC).

 

When I turn them on, they work OK, but after about 15 minutes I can't do almost nothing, I click on the Start Menu and have to wait almost a minute. They work, but are so slooooow. And it's not just the Start Menu, it's everything that I click, a folder, open an application, etc.

It sounds windows performing a shadow copy at every boot or reboot or user login. Are you sure you installed (the SP1 iso install to current) updates in order, without manipulation, adding optional updates manually in between?

There is a windows 7 32-bit update for windows update itself, WindowsUpdate would be stuck in "checking for updates" state and never update. Are you using 32-bit installs, because you are running only 2GB?

Google for "windows update stuck at checking for updates" --> http://superuser.com/questions/951960/windows-7-sp1-windows-update-stuck-checking-for-updates

 

I had that same issue (similar) with some Vista installations, it detected a incorrect /  wrong shutdown and would initiate a full system scan and system recovery at each and every boot and or user login (this scenario should only take place once a week)

The HDD LED would burn continuously for 1 to 2 hours before settling down, it turned out to be a windows service that was misbehaving after a windows update.

I turned off almost everything regarding system checking and still it would hogg the HDD and perform a recovery or shadow volume copy.

Only recently there was a fix in the updates that finally fixed that issue with that service.

 

  • 1 year later...

Up until now, after resinstalling windows 7 and not doing no updates, the computers work fine.

 

Yes, I know it's a security risk and I always talk about it, but people prefer to take that risk instead of buying a new computer. And, in a certain way, I agree with them. Looks like is just Apple forcing us to buy new hardware…

51 minutes ago, Dot Matrix said:

This post is a year old... 

 

But if you're my IT Dept... Have you tried cleaning the browser cache? :p

In all fairness, I've seen some employees with over 2GB worth of browser cache alone. Not counting what's in the rest of the temp folder or the recycle bin.

  • zhangm locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
    • Nvidia GeForce NOW gains support for Dark Scrolls, Empulse, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final update of June for Nvidia's cloud gaming service GeForce NOW is now available, and it is touting support for six more games. The company is also drawing subscriber attention towards the summer sales kicking off across stores, so they can stock up on more cloud-supported titles. Of course, the Steam Summer Sale is the biggest promotion, which is kicking off later today. "Supported Steam games can be streamed across devices with GeForce NOW, making it easy to buy a game once, keep progress synced and pick up where the gameplay left off on PCs, Macs, handheld devices, phones, TVs and more," says the company. "In other words, the Steam Summer Sale brings the deals; GeForce NOW adds the flexibility." Don't forget that the GeForce NOW summer sale is still active as well. This limited-time offer drops the 12-month Performance membership from $99.99 to $64.99, saving members $35. At the same time, the 12-month Ultimate membership is currently going for $129.99, dropping the price by $70 from the original $199.99. Here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: Dark Scrolls (New release on Steam, available June 22) SAND: Raiders of Sophie (New release on Steam, available June 22) Deer & Boy (New release on Steam, available June 23) EMPULSE (New release on Steam, available June 24) The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales (Steam) FATAL FURY: City of the Wolves (Steam) With the June expansions coming to an end, Nvidia should be announcing its July GeForce NOW plans next week. Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!