Recommended Posts

Hello…

 

I work at IT and this happened 3 times in the past 2, 3 weeks.

 

I do many clean installs and yesterday was the third computer that I had cleaned and install fresh on old PCs (5-8 years). All went well and they were running with a good speed, but after all the updates for Windows 7, they started to run very, very slow, it's impossible to work with the PCs like that, I had to reformat again, install OS and don't do no updates, and so far, so good, the speed is good again.

 

Obviously this isn't the best solution because of the safety issue.

 

I tried to find the problem with the slow down, AV, CCC, stats of hardware, but nothing.

 

I don't want to update them to Windows 10 because some external hardware might not be fully compatible.

 

What other choices do I have?

 

Thank you.

After doing the install and all the updates do another reboot then manually start System Maintenance from within Control Panel -> Security and Maintenance -> Maintenance. Then leave the computer until it is finished. Then run it again! Yes I know it is a pain in the ass but what this does is all Windows to go through and tidy up everything. It will optimise the disks (defrag), clean up and regen all of the .NET GAC, do boot optimisations, etc. I have found doing this gets the computer back up to running at a good speed. I am sure others will say it is pointless but just give it a try on one machine and then see if it made any difference for you. I don't have many Windows 7 machines these days but for the ones I do have this has always worked great for me. 

  • Like 2

silly q but anything showing under "all users" in task manager sucking up resources?

 

i support 1500 desktops on w7 pro and haven't experienced this slowdown or have end users report systems being slow post patching (via WSUS) since the last major W7 service pack.

 Have you tried other source media, incase somethings not quite right with the image your using? Ive seen usb W7 media installs go awry from time to time. outwith my own home pcs, I cant recall the last time i reformatted a pc without using SCCM, thankfully we have limited standard boxes of tin so management is simple.

 

You need to work out whats causing it, as leaving w7 PCs unpatched is not recommended, for security reasons at the very least, as you have stated :) 

 

I always remove old login profiles that no longer access systems, disk clean (advanced system clean) then defragment the drive also when a lot of patches have been applied. an old habit, but a good habit :) I also make sure sys restore etc is disabled before joining to the domain if its an old school install method, this is very rarely, i usually just nuke existing installs and redeploy the image.

 

I also make sure all clients have at least 4Gb ram especially if platter drives. win 7 on any less is painful :) 

Edited by Mando
23 hours ago, Pedro3 said:

Thanks for the tips, will try what you both told me and then I'll give feedback :)

a slow and painful way is to apply each patch singular and test after each one, no fun but doable buddy :) One to watch for is Office validation file, ive seen that slow down MS Office to the point the whole machine struggles.

On 1/31/2016 at 6:29 AM, Pedro3 said:

Hello…

 

I work at IT and this happened 3 times in the past 2, 3 weeks.

 

I do many clean installs and yesterday was the third computer that I had cleaned and install fresh on old PCs (5-8 years). All went well and they were running with a good speed, but after all the updates for Windows 7, they started to run very, very slow, it's impossible to work with the PCs like that, I had to reformat again, install OS and don't do no updates, and so far, so good, the speed is good again.

 

Obviously this isn't the best solution because of the safety issue.

 

I tried to find the problem with the slow down, AV, CCC, stats of hardware, but nothing.

 

I don't want to update them to Windows 10 because some external hardware might not be fully compatible.

 

What other choices do I have?

 

Thank you.

If you do a lot of re-installs of the same version of Windows 7 I suggest that you prepare a Preinstallation image that is up to date and loaded with all common programs. This can easily be restored to a hard drive (we use Macrium Reflect) and put to use quickly. It's a huge time saver.

15 hours ago, seeprime said:

If you do a lot of re-installs of the same version of Windows 7 I suggest that you prepare a Preinstallation image that is up to date and loaded with all common programs. This can easily be restored to a hard drive (we use Macrium Reflect) and put to use quickly. It's a huge time saver.

If I do that, I just need to install the drivers for the specific machine, right?

13 hours ago, Pedro3 said:

If I do that, I just need to install the drivers for the specific machine, right?

Yes. Anu drivers not in the pre-installation image need to be downloaded and installed for the clean install to run well. 

it's hard to diagnose something like this. I'm guessing that the hard drives here are traditional hard drives so there's probably a lot of trashing happening. Perhaps the C: partition is too small, so the updates are taking too much free space. Perhaps there's not enough RAM so there's a lot of thrashing with the page file. Perhaps the computers are missing chipset drivers. This will cripple a PC's performance.

 

How does it act slow, exactly? For how long?

5 hours ago, Jason S. said:

it's hard to diagnose something like this. I'm guessing that the hard drives here are traditional hard drives so there's probably a lot of trashing happening. Perhaps the C: partition is too small, so the updates are taking too much free space. Perhaps there's not enough RAM so there's a lot of thrashing with the page file. Perhaps the computers are missing chipset drivers. This will cripple a PC's performance.

 

How does it act slow, exactly? For how long?

Totally agree, it's hard to diagnose. The HDDs are SATA and 120GB (I think). There's no partitions. RAM is 2GB. I've formatted one of them, install everything except updates and is working great (for an old PC).

 

When I turn them on, they work OK, but after about 15 minutes I can't do almost nothing, I click on the Start Menu and have to wait almost a minute. They work, but are so slooooow. And it's not just the Start Menu, it's everything that I click, a folder, open an application, etc.

It sounds windows performing a shadow copy at every boot or reboot or user login. Are you sure you installed (the SP1 iso install to current) updates in order, without manipulation, adding optional updates manually in between?

There is a windows 7 32-bit update for windows update itself, WindowsUpdate would be stuck in "checking for updates" state and never update. Are you using 32-bit installs, because you are running only 2GB?

Google for "windows update stuck at checking for updates" --> http://superuser.com/questions/951960/windows-7-sp1-windows-update-stuck-checking-for-updates

 

I had that same issue (similar) with some Vista installations, it detected a incorrect /  wrong shutdown and would initiate a full system scan and system recovery at each and every boot and or user login (this scenario should only take place once a week)

The HDD LED would burn continuously for 1 to 2 hours before settling down, it turned out to be a windows service that was misbehaving after a windows update.

I turned off almost everything regarding system checking and still it would hogg the HDD and perform a recovery or shadow volume copy.

Only recently there was a fix in the updates that finally fixed that issue with that service.

 

  • 1 year later...

Up until now, after resinstalling windows 7 and not doing no updates, the computers work fine.

 

Yes, I know it's a security risk and I always talk about it, but people prefer to take that risk instead of buying a new computer. And, in a certain way, I agree with them. Looks like is just Apple forcing us to buy new hardware…

51 minutes ago, Dot Matrix said:

This post is a year old... 

 

But if you're my IT Dept... Have you tried cleaning the browser cache? :p

In all fairness, I've seen some employees with over 2GB worth of browser cache alone. Not counting what's in the rest of the temp folder or the recycle bin.

  • zhangm locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!