-
Posts
-
By hellowalkman · Posted
Windows 11 blocks Google Chrome due to a Microsoft safety feature, fix out by Sayan Sen Microsoft has a parental control and safety feature called "Microsoft Family Safety" which allows users to create safe spaces for their family members for browsing the web by setting up filters so as to block and filter inappropriate content and limit browsing to kid-friendly and family friendly content. However, as it turns out, following Chrome version updates 137.0.7151.68, 137.0.7151.69, Google's web browser is getting automatically blocked by Microsoft Family Safety as affected users have reported that the browser will automatically close or crash and then fail to reopen. Thus if you are using Edge, you get the green signal from the Family Safety app, but not if you are using Google Chrome. The issue seems to be affecting mainly Windows 11 devices but Windows 10 or macOS may be affected too. A thread on Microsoft's official Windows forum by Peter Priestley1, which is presumably from an educational institute, says: The thread has been upvoted by 122 people at the time of writing. There are plenty of other such threads online and users also say that they have tried all sorts of things like refreshing cookies and appdata but "nothing" seems to fix it. This shows that Microsoft's safety feature is certainly robust and that it is not easy to bypass but it also means affected users are not too happy about it considering it is seemingly blocking all versions of Chrome. There is one fix that worked though, renaming chrome.exe to something else like chrome1.exe for example. A Chrome community manager, Ellen T, has confirmed that the Microsoft feature is indeed what is causing it and the only way to fix the issue is to "unblock Chrome" inside the Family Safety app. Ellen says: Microsoft has also shared a similar guidance on the issue according to Fred SR., a senior member of the Chrome community. -
By Astra.Xtreme · Posted
Typical Microsoft... Go half way and then lazily stop. As if adding all the other directional options would have been so difficult... -
By Astra.Xtreme · Posted
Some of these robots are getting pretty human-like, but obviously stronger and more bendy. Weight and balance is probably a big hurdle because of all the batteries they have to pack in them, but it'll continue to improve. I'm guessing these companies foresee a future where every household has a robot slave...I mean, assistant. -
-
By leonsk29 · Posted
You can do that right now, so what stops you? Nobody forbids you from installing Windows 10 on your PC.
-
-
Recent Achievements
-
Helen Shafer earned a badge
Week One Done
-
emptyother earned a badge
First Post
-
Crunchy6 earned a badge
Week One Done
-
KynanSEIT earned a badge
One Month Later
-
gowtham07 earned a badge
One Month Later
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Tell a friend
Question
Twiddle
Hey guys. So I've been taking an XML class but I am having trouble getting this file to validate correctly. Keep getting that it is not well-formed. Not sure where I am going wrong and can't find a solid answer, not to mention the teacher doesn't seem to know much about what she is teaching.
This is the error I get from xmlvalidation.com:
Errors in file photos.dtd:
And when I use Notepad++ XML Tools validation I get:
XML Parsing error at line 31:
Start tag expected, '<' not found
Here is the XML:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<!--
New Perspectives on XML
Tutorial 2
Case Problem 1
Catalog of photos from the Our Lady of Bergen Historical Society
Author: <removed>
Date: 1/28/2016
Filename: photos.xml
Supporting file: photos.dtd
-->
<!DOCTYPE catalog SYSTEM "photos.dtd">
<catalog type="photos">
<photo cid="c1748" donatedBy="John Borelli">
<name metadata="tunis cooper property museum">Tunis R. Cooper property</name>
<description>
<![CDATA[
This photo was taken by John Borelli's great-grandfather. It is believed to have been taken around 1830.
David Demarest originally purchased the site of the chair factory in 1663. This site was under the ownership
of the Demarest family until 1758. The property is listed in the National and New Jersey Registers of Historic Places.
]]>
</description>
<date>1830 circa</date>
<images>
<img src="1748a.jpg" />
<img src="1748b.jpg" />
</images>
</photo>
<photo cid="c1749" donatedBy="John Borelli">
<name metadata="tunis cooper property museum">Tunis R. Cooper property</name>
<description>
<![CDATA[
A more recent picture of the property taken by the Borelli family. The property is listed in the
National and New Jersey Registers of Historic Places.
]]>
</description>
<date>1950 circa</date>
<images>
<img src="1749a.jpg" />
</images>
</photo>
<photo cid="c1411" donatedBy="Saint Johns Catholic Church">
<name metadata="saint johns catholic church">Saint Johns Church</name>
<description>
<![CDATA[
A more recent picture of the property taken by the Borelli family. The property is listed in the
National and New Jersey Registers of Historic Places.
]]>
</description>
<date>1921</date>
</photo>
<photo cid="c2003" donatedBy="Linda Choo">
<name metadata="bergenfield elementary school">Bergenfield School</name>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The No. 5 Public School, a.k.a. Bergenfield School
]]>
</description>
<date>1920 circa</date>
<images>
<img src="2003a.jpg" />
<img src="2003b.jpg" />
</images>
</photo>
<photo cid="c2078" donatedBy="Maria Giodelli">
<name metadata="coopers pond water">Coopers Pond</name>
<description>
<![CDATA[
A favorite spot where we used to go hang out as kids. The picture shows my brothers Robert and Michael.
]]>
</description>
<date>May 4, 1941</date>
<images>
<img src="2078a.jpg" />
</images>
</photo>
<photo cid="c2079" donatedBy="Linda Uffington">
<name metadata="watch timekeeping pocket railway">Pocket Watch</name>
<description>
<![CDATA[
A more recent picture of the property taken by the Borelli family. The property is listed in the
National and New Jersey Registers of Historic Places.
]]>
</description>
<date>1870 circa</date>
<images>
<img src="2079a.jpg" />
<img src="2079b.jpg" />
</images>
</photo>
<photo cid="c3233">
<name metadata="hotel">Bergenfield Hotel</name>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Knollfield Hotel was known as the Bergenfield Hotel. The property is listed in the
National and New Jersey Registers of Historic Places.
]]>
</description>
<date>circa 1920</date>
</photo>
<photo cid="c3433">
<name metadata="sweeney coal fuel">Sweeney Coal</name>
<description>
<![CDATA[
Sweeny Fuel Company located near New Bridge Road and railroad tracks.
]]>
</description>
<date>1920</date>
<images>
<img src="3433a.jpg" />
<img src="3433b.jpg" />
<img src="3433c.jpg" />
</images>
</photo>
</catalog>
And the DTD file:
<!--
New Perspectives on XML
Tutorial 2
Case Problem 1
Catalog of photos from the Our Lady of Bergen Historical Society
Author: <removed>
Date: 1/28/2016
Filename: photos.dtd
Supporting File: photos.xml
-->
<!DOCTYPE catalog [
<!ELEMENT catalog (photo+)>
<!ATTLIST type catalog NMTOKEN #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT photo (name, description, date, images?)>
<!ATTLIST cid photo ID #REQUIRED>
<!ATTLIST donatedBy photo CDATA #IMPLIED>
<!ELEMENT name (#PCDATA)>
<!ATTLIST metadata name NMTOKENS #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT description (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT date (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT images (img+)>
Edited by Perfect72<!ELEMENT img (EMPTY)>
<!ATTLIST src img CDATA #REQUIRED>
]>
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1287978-issues-validating-xml-with-dtd/Share on other sites
3 answers to this question
Recommended Posts