• 0

Issues Validating XML with DTD


Question

Hey guys.  So I've been taking an XML class but I am having trouble getting this file to validate correctly.  Keep getting that it is not well-formed.  Not sure where I am going wrong and can't find a solid answer, not to mention the teacher doesn't seem to know much about what she is teaching.

This is the error I get from xmlvalidation.com:

 

 

Errors in file photos.dtd: 

errorjump.png 13: 3 The markup declarations contained or pointed to by the document type declaration must be well-formed.

 

And when I use Notepad++ XML Tools validation I get:

XML Parsing error at line 31:

Start tag expected, '<' not found

 

Here is the XML:

 

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<!--
   New Perspectives on XML
   Tutorial 2
   Case Problem 1

   Catalog of photos from the Our Lady of Bergen Historical Society
   Author: <removed>
   Date:   1/28/2016

   Filename:         photos.xml
   Supporting file:  photos.dtd
-->
<!DOCTYPE catalog SYSTEM "photos.dtd">
 
<catalog type="photos">

   <photo cid="c1748" donatedBy="John Borelli">
      <name metadata="tunis cooper property museum">Tunis R. Cooper property</name>
      <description>
      <![CDATA[ 
         This photo was taken by John Borelli's great-grandfather. It is believed to have been taken around 1830.
         David Demarest originally purchased the site of the chair factory in 1663. This site was under the ownership 
         of the Demarest family until 1758.  The property is listed in the National and New Jersey Registers of Historic Places.
      ]]>
      </description>
      <date>1830 circa</date>
      <images>
         <img src="1748a.jpg" />
         <img src="1748b.jpg" />
      </images>
   </photo>

   <photo cid="c1749" donatedBy="John Borelli">
      <name metadata="tunis cooper property museum">Tunis R. Cooper property</name>
      <description>
      <![CDATA[ 
         A more recent picture of the property taken by the Borelli family.  The property is listed in the 
         National and New Jersey Registers of Historic Places.
      ]]>
      </description>
      <date>1950 circa</date>
      <images>
         <img src="1749a.jpg" />
      </images>
   </photo>

   <photo cid="c1411" donatedBy="Saint Johns Catholic Church">
      <name metadata="saint johns catholic church">Saint Johns Church</name>
      <description>
      <![CDATA[ 
         A more recent picture of the property taken by the Borelli family.  The property is listed in the 
         National and New Jersey Registers of Historic Places.
      ]]>
      </description>      
      <date>1921</date>
   </photo>

   <photo cid="c2003" donatedBy="Linda Choo">
      <name metadata="bergenfield elementary school">Bergenfield School</name>
      <description>
      <![CDATA[ 
         The No. 5 Public School, a.k.a. Bergenfield School
      ]]>
      </description>
      <date>1920 circa</date>
      <images>
         <img src="2003a.jpg" />
         <img src="2003b.jpg" />
      </images>
   </photo>

   <photo cid="c2078" donatedBy="Maria Giodelli">
      <name metadata="coopers pond water">Coopers Pond</name>
      <description>
      <![CDATA[ 
         A favorite spot where we used to go hang out as kids.  The picture shows my brothers Robert and Michael.
      ]]>
      </description>
      <date>May 4, 1941</date>
      <images>
         <img src="2078a.jpg" />
      </images>
   </photo>

   <photo cid="c2079" donatedBy="Linda Uffington">
      <name metadata="watch timekeeping pocket railway">Pocket Watch</name>
      <description>
      <![CDATA[ 
         A more recent picture of the property taken by the Borelli family.  The property is listed in the 
         National and New Jersey Registers of Historic Places.
      ]]>
      </description>
      <date>1870 circa</date>
      <images>
         <img src="2079a.jpg" />
         <img src="2079b.jpg" />
      </images>
   </photo>

   <photo cid="c3233">
      <name metadata="hotel">Bergenfield Hotel</name>
      <description>
      <![CDATA[ 
         The Knollfield Hotel was known as the Bergenfield Hotel.  The property is listed in the 
         National and New Jersey Registers of Historic Places.
      ]]>
      </description>
      <date>circa 1920</date>
   </photo>

   <photo cid="c3433">
      <name metadata="sweeney coal fuel">Sweeney Coal</name>
      <description>
      <![CDATA[ 
         Sweeny Fuel Company located near New Bridge Road and railroad tracks.
      ]]>
      </description>
      <date>1920</date>
      <images>
         <img src="3433a.jpg" />
         <img src="3433b.jpg" />
         <img src="3433c.jpg" />
      </images>
   </photo>

</catalog>

 

And the DTD file:

 

<!--
   New Perspectives on XML
   Tutorial 2
   Case Problem 1

   Catalog of photos from the Our Lady of Bergen Historical Society
   Author: <removed>
   Date:   1/28/2016

   Filename:         photos.dtd
   Supporting File:  photos.xml
-->
<!DOCTYPE catalog [
    <!ELEMENT catalog (photo+)>
    <!ATTLIST type catalog NMTOKEN #REQUIRED>

    <!ELEMENT photo (name, description, date, images?)>
    <!ATTLIST cid photo ID #REQUIRED>
    <!ATTLIST donatedBy photo CDATA #IMPLIED>

    <!ELEMENT name (#PCDATA)>
    <!ATTLIST metadata name NMTOKENS #REQUIRED>

    <!ELEMENT description (#PCDATA)>
    <!ELEMENT date (#PCDATA)>

    <!ELEMENT images (img+)>
    <!ELEMENT img (EMPTY)>
    <!ATTLIST src img CDATA #REQUIRED>
    ]>

Edited by Perfect72
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1287978-issues-validating-xml-with-dtd/
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
<!--
   New Perspectives on XML
   Tutorial 2
   Case Problem 1
   Catalog of photos from the Our Lady of Bergen Historical Society
   Author: <removed>
   Date:   1/28/2016
   Filename:         photos.dtd
   Supporting File:  photos.xml
-->
<!DOCTYPE catalog [
    <!ELEMENT catalog (photo+)>
    <!ATTLIST type catalog NMTOKEN #REQUIRED>
    <!ELEMENT photo (name, description, date, images?)>
    <!ATTLIST cid photo ID #REQUIRED>
    <!ATTLIST donatedBy photo CDATA #IMPLIED>
    <!ELEMENT name (#PCDATA)>
    <!ATTLIST metadata name NMTOKENS #REQUIRED>
    <!ELEMENT description (#PCDATA)>
    <!ELEMENT date (#PCDATA)>
    <!ELEMENT images (img+)>
    <!ELEMENT img (EMPTY)>
    <!ATTLIST src img CDATA #REQUIRED>
]>

Should be:

<!--
   New Perspectives on XML
   Tutorial 2
   Case Problem 1
   Catalog of photos from the Our Lady of Bergen Historical Society
   Author: <removed>
   Date:   1/28/2016
   Filename:         photos.dtd
   Supporting File:  photos.xml
-->
<!ELEMENT catalog (photo+)>
<!ATTLIST type catalog NMTOKEN #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT photo (name, description, date, images?)>
<!ATTLIST cid photo ID #REQUIRED>
<!ATTLIST donatedBy photo CDATA #IMPLIED>
<!ELEMENT name (#PCDATA)>
<!ATTLIST metadata name NMTOKENS #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT description (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT date (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT images (img+)>
<!ELEMENT img (EMPTY)>
<!ATTLIST src img CDATA #REQUIRED>

The doctype is only needed when you put the dtd inline in the xml file.

Source: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5455394/problem-with-external-referenced-dtd-in-xml

 

Also you're missing quite a few attribute declarations :rofl:

  • 0

Woops, I forgot I did end up removing that after figuring it out, but still keep getting errors. Is it the missing declarations?  I am completely new to XML and like I said, my teacher isn't much help besides just reading passages from the book which I'm not very good at learning with.

  • 0
  On 06/02/2016 at 17:02, Perfect72 said:

Woops, I forgot I did end up removing that after figuring it out, but still keep getting errors. Is it the missing declarations?  I am completely new to XML and like I said, my teacher isn't much help besides just reading passages from the book which I'm not very good at learning with.

Expand  

Your teacher isn't much help teaching you something as defunct as DTD.  Can I ask why you aren't learning XSD instead?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon lays off more staff across Goodreads and Kindle divisions by Hamid Ganji Dozens of Amazon employees working on the retailer's book divisions have been laid off. As reported by Reuters, Amazon confirmed that it's cutting jobs across the Goodreads review site and Kindle units, which impacts fewer than 100 workers. Amazon says the recent layoffs across Goodreads and Kindle divisions are meant to improve efficiency and streamline operations. The giant retailer has constantly reduced staff across various divisions over the past few years. According to CEO Andy Jassy, reducing headcounts helps the company to eliminate bureaucracy. "As part of our ongoing work to make our teams and programs operate more efficiently and to better align with our business roadmap, we've made the difficult decision to eliminate a small number of roles within the Books organization," an Amazon spokesperson said. Layoffs recently impacted employees in Amazon's Wondery podcast division, devices and services units, communications, and in-store staff. However, Amazon's Q1 results show the retailer has added about 4,000 jobs compared to Q4 2024. After the Covid pandemic settled down, many companies began laying off thousands of staff they hired during the pandemic to respond to growing demands. The layoff trend among tech firms still exists today, and AI has amplified it. The latest data shows that in 2025, about 62,832 tech employees were laid off across 141 tech companies. Also, 152,922 tech employees across 551 companies were laid off in 2024. More layoffs are expected to occur due to declining economic growth, tariffs, and the expansion of AI across companies. Amazon is also gearing up to double down in AI investments and robotics. The company has recently announced the forming of a new agentic AI team to develop an agentic AI framework for use in robotics. Also, a new report by The Information indicates that Amazon has begun testing humanoid robots for package delivery.
    • Major Privacy 0.98.1.1 Beta by Razvan Serea MajorPrivacy is a cutting-edge privacy and security tool for Windows, offering unparalleled control over process behavior, file access, and network communication. It is a continuation of the PrivateWin10 project. By leveraging advanced kernel-level protections, MajorPrivacy creates a secure environment where user data and system integrity are fully safeguarded. Unlike traditional tools, MajorPrivacy introduces innovative protection methods that ensure mounted encrypted volumes are only accessible by authorized applications, making it the first and only encryption solution of its kind. MajorPrivacy – Ultimate Privacy & Security for Windows key features Process Protection – Isolate processes to block interference from unauthorized apps, even with admin privileges. Software Restriction – Block unwanted apps and DLLs to ensure only trusted software runs. Revolutionary Encrypted Volumes Secure Storage – Create encrypted disk images for sensitive data. Exclusive Access – Unlike traditional tools, only authorized apps can access mounted volumes—blocking all unauthorized processes. File & Folder Protection – Lock down sensitive files and prevent unauthorized access or modifications. Advanced Network Firewall – Control which apps can send or receive data online. DNS Monitoring & Filtering – Track domain access and block unwanted sites (Pi-hole compatible filtering coming soon). Tweak Engine – Disable telemetry, cloud integration, and invasive Windows features for better privacy. Why MajorPrivacy? Kernel-Level Security – Protects at the deepest system level. Unmatched Encryption Protection – Keeps mounted volumes safe from all unauthorized access. Full System Control – Block, isolate, or restrict processes as needed. Enhanced Privacy – Stops Windows & apps from collecting unnecessary data. Perfect for privacy-conscious users, IT pros, and anyone who wants total system control. Major Privacy 0.98.1.1 Beta changelog: The 0.98.1 release of MajorPrivacy introduces significant enhancements and a number of critical fixes aimed at improving usability, localization, and system integration. A major new feature is the introduction of full translation support, allowing the application interface and tweaks to be localized into multiple languages. Initial translations include AI-assisted German and Polish versions, a community-contributed Turkish translation, and Simplified Chinese. Users interested in contributing translations or adding new languages are encouraged to participate via the forum. This version also improves compatibility and deployment by bundling the Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable with the installer, which is required for the ImDisk user interface. Several important bugs have been resolved. The installer now correctly removes the driver during uninstallation. Tweak definitions have been cleaned up for better consistency. A number of networking issues were addressed, including failures related to network shares and incorrect handling of mapped drive letters. It is now required to use full UNC paths for defining rules involving shared resources. Additionally, configuration persistence issues on system shutdown have been fixed, as well as problems affecting protected folder visibility and rule precedence involving enclave conditions. Finally, the underlying driver code has been refactored, laying the groundwork for better maintainability and future enhancements. MajorPrivacy-v0.98.1.1.exe (0.98.1a) hotfix for #71 Download: Major Privacy 0.98.1.1 Beta | 47.4 MB (Open Source) View: MajorPrivacy Home Page | Github Project page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OpenAI responds to The New York Times' ChatGPT data demands by Pradeep Viswanathan The New York Times has sued OpenAI for the unauthorized use of its news articles to train large language models. As part of the ongoing lawsuit, the NYT recently asked the court to require OpenAI to retain all ChatGPT user content indefinitely. The NYT's argument is that they may find something in the data that supports their case. Brad Lightcap, COO of OpenAI, wrote the following regarding the NYT's sweeping demand: OpenAI has already filed a motion asking the Magistrate Judge to reconsider the preservation order, since indefinite retention of user data breaches industry norms and its own policies. Additionally, OpenAI has also appealed this order with the District Court Judge. Until OpenAI wins its appeal, it will be complying with the court order. The content defined by the court order will be stored separately in a secure system and will be accessed or used only for meeting legal obligations. Only a small, audited OpenAI legal and security team will be able to access this data as necessary to comply with our legal obligations. As of early 2025, ChatGPT has over 400 million weekly active users, and this data retention order will affect a significant number of them. OpenAI confirmed that ChatGPT Free, Plus, Pro, and Teams subscription users, and developers who use the OpenAI API (without a Zero Data Retention agreement) will be affected by this order. ChatGPT Enterprise, ChatGPT Edu, and API customers who are using Zero Data Retention endpoints will not be affected by this court change.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Uranus_enjoyer earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Uranus_enjoyer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      jfam earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      survivor303 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      428
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      239
    3. 3
      snowy owl
      211
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      211
    5. 5
      Xenon
      157
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!