No App Drawer for Android N?


Would you miss the app drawer if Google removed it from Android N?  

13 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you miss the app drawer if Google removed it from Android N?

    • Yes
      8
    • No
      4


Recommended Posts

on android i don't use app drawer i put all my apps on multiple screens and folders, if i want an app i use google search without wasting time looking for the app in app drawer. if the app drawer was like windows phone app list i'd use it more often

52 minutes ago, subcld said:

on android i don't use app drawer i put all my apps on multiple screens and folders, if i want an app i use google search without wasting time looking for the app in app drawer. if the app drawer was like windows phone app list i'd use it more often

That makes your home screen cluttered and you have to dig to find your apps. I use Action launcher, and put my most used apps on the desktop, along with widgets. I use quickpage to put more apps on there, and then lastly the app. drawer is searchable. There are many launchers that have searchable app drawers or you can customize them to free flow like WIndows Phone. 

15 minutes ago, tsupersonic said:

That makes your home screen cluttered and you have to dig to find your apps. I use Action launcher, and put my most used apps on the desktop, along with widgets. I use quickpage to put more apps on there, and then lastly the app. drawer is searchable. There are many launchers that have searchable app drawers or you can customize them to free flow like WIndows Phone. 

without doing so i feel my phone empty, i don't like that feeling, i tried multiple launchers i always find something wrong and i end up removing them

I'd miss it, I only keep a limited number of apps on my home screens plus different widgets. I don't want them all out there, the app drawer keeps everything in it that I don't use everyday, that's the point of it. Otherwise i'd be forced to change launcher which I don't feel the need to do now on 6.0, r I'll have to make a big folder called apps to drop everything in, more work for me.

"App Drawer" is like Windows Start Menu's "All Apps" so that you don't need every installed app's shortcut on the home screen. So now what they are gonna have an endlessly scrolling cluttered list of everything installed? Seems like a bad change.

  • 1 month later...
On 2/27/2016 at 8:17 AM, tsupersonic said:

Well thank god for custom launchers. I don't like all the icons on the desktop (a la iOS) - I always end up making a folder along called "Do Not Use" or "Junk" or "Apple." So, yes, I would miss it! 

While Lollipop has one, I don't use it - I simply have the most used apps on my screen (ala Windows or any other OS that I use) while leaving the rest in "general" (which is always a shortcut away in any case (since ICS, the "general" area is in the lower center - and no successor to ICS has moved it since - including N).

 

That is, in fact, one reason I like Arrow - it enforces shortcut discipline (unlike all too many launchers, it doesn't allow you to have multiple drawers/desktops); however, as I said before, the problem is not unique to Android (in most cases, Windows and desktop OSes in general are even more prone than Android and iOS, due to their larger displays).

 

If I see someone using multiple app drawers, I start wondering what their desktops (regardless of OS) must be like - and I start to cringe.

 

Yes - with most default launchers, it IS that bad; I kicked Lenovo's own HD Launcher, which was my tablet's default, completely to the curb for that *exact* reason.  (Heck, I even stopped using the virtual desktops "feature" in Windows (and most Linux distributions) for the same reason - why invite additional clutter?)

 

 

On 3/6/2016 at 4:43 AM, UXGaurav said:

"App Drawer" is like Windows Start Menu's "All Apps" so that you don't need every installed app's shortcut on the home screen. So now what they are gonna have an endlessly scrolling cluttered list of everything installed? Seems like a bad change.

And you really think that Classic Shell doesn't get cluttered?  Classic Shell gets cluttered for the exact same reason "All Apps" does - too many installers create shortcuts on the menu AND the desktop; it's only more recent installers that even give an option to not create ANY shortcuts in either place - why do you think I was happy to see the Start menu get banished with Windows 8?  Does Classic Shell auto-sort?  Windows 10's Start menu does - to the point that I never - as in ever - need to go to "All Apps" area to find anything on my Start Menu,  Does your "general" Apps drawer (a persistent feature in Android) sort?  Arrow DOES sort the general apps; in fact, like Windows 10, it has an area for the most recently added or updated apps.  Any launcher (or replacement shell) for ANY OS should have a sort feature, if it lacks any other - if only to keep down the clutter!

1 hour ago, PGHammer said:

And you really think that Classic Shell doesn't get cluttered?  Classic Shell gets cluttered for the exact same reason "All Apps" does - too many installers create shortcuts on the menu AND the desktop; it's only more recent installers that even give an option to not create ANY shortcuts in either place - why do you think I was happy to see the Start menu get banished with Windows 8?  Does Classic Shell auto-sort?  Windows 10's Start menu does - to the point that I never - as in ever - need to go to "All Apps" area to find anything on my Start Menu,  Does your "general" Apps drawer (a persistent feature in Android) sort?  Arrow DOES sort the general apps; in fact, like Windows 10, it has an area for the most recently added or updated apps.  Any launcher (or replacement shell) for ANY OS should have a sort feature, if it lacks any other - if only to keep down the clutter!

You didn't understand what I was trying to say. I was saying that there should be choice to the *user* to keep only certain apps he wants (e.g. pinned or most used) vs the option to access full list hidden somewhere. That the full All Apps list might become the only option is what I called a bad change. Any list will get cluttered if the USER himself installs more apps/programs than what he regularly uses.

 

Yes Classic Shell has the ability to sort whatever lists it has - whether it's the pinned list, the All Apps list or the most used list. And the phone I use does have a feature to sort by name, by installed date or user customized order, although on my phone I hardly ever use the All Apps list - the Play Store automatically pins whatever is installed to the home screen. If I don't need it, I remove the shortcut. That same idea doesn't work well for me on the Desktop because I use more programs on it - far more than what I can pin.

 

And 10's menu auto sorts? I thought it only sorted the All Apps list by name. It doesn't have a function to automatically sort the most used list or the pinned list, does it?

Edited by UXGaurav
7 hours ago, UXGaurav said:

You didn't understand what I was trying to say. I was saying that there should be choice to the *user* to keep only certain apps he wants (e.g. pinned or most used) vs the option to access full list hidden somewhere. That the full All Apps list might become the only option is what I called a bad change. Any list will get cluttered if the USER himself installs more apps/programs than what he regularly uses.

 

Yes Classic Shell has the ability to sort whatever lists it has - whether it's the pinned list, the All Apps list or the most used list. And the phone I use does have a feature to sort by name, by installed date or user customized order, although on my phone I hardly ever use the All Apps list - the Play Store automatically pins whatever is installed to the home screen. If I don't need it, I remove the shortcut. That same idea doesn't work well for me on the Desktop because I use more programs on it - far more than what I can pin.

 

And 10's menu auto sorts? I thought it only sorted the All Apps list by name. It doesn't have a function to automatically sort the most used list or the pinned list, does it?

It doesn't sort the most-used or pinned lists by default (likely because it would get dragged into court if it did) - however, Arrow does sort both.  (And again, it's because Arrow isn't the default - unless a user sets it that way in Android; different rules have been shown to apply to Windows, as opposed to Android; also, with Android, it's Microsoft that is the outsider.)

 

Lastly, because it sorts everything, why would you need to resort to "All Apps" for anything? (Windows 10's Menu - not Classic Shell.)  The default sort for Windows 10's Menu is first numeric, then alpha - Arrow uses the same sort characteristic.

 

I've tried to address your quite valid point about "All Apps" in Windows; the issue there is that most installs don't offer a choice on shortcuts that get dumped into the menu (in any version of Windows); generally, it's only the most recent installers (especially third-party installers used by game repackers) that offer a choice at all - why do YOU think I have whacked Nero as a repeat offender?  Finally, Play Store autopin is as bad as installer autopin (in any other OS) - the only saving grace is that - surprisingly - it's NOT the default in Android (it may, however, be the default in your launcher - are you using the launcher that came with the phone, or a third-party launcher?)

8 hours ago, PGHammer said:

While Lollipop has one, I don't use it - I simply have the most used apps on my screen (ala Windows or any other OS that I use) while leaving the rest in "general" (which is always a shortcut away in any case (since ICS, the "general" area is in the lower center - and no successor to ICS has moved it since - including N).

 

That is, in fact, one reason I like Arrow - it enforces shortcut discipline (unlike all too many launchers, it doesn't allow you to have multiple drawers/desktops); however, as I said before, the problem is not unique to Android (in most cases, Windows and desktop OSes in general are even more prone than Android and iOS, due to their larger displays).

 

If I see someone using multiple app drawers, I start wondering what their desktops (regardless of OS) must be like - and I start to cringe.

 

Yes - with most default launchers, it IS that bad; I kicked Lenovo's own HD Launcher, which was my tablet's default, completely to the curb for that *exact* reason.  (Heck, I even stopped using the virtual desktops "feature" in Windows (and most Linux distributions) for the same reason - why invite additional clutter?)

 

 

Multiple app drawers? Do you mean multiple home pages? Typically there is just one app drawer (where users can scroll horizontally or vertically).

 

Me personally I have three home pages. I currently use Action Launcher 3. My main page has a weather/clock widget, most commonly used apps at the bottom. My left page has two widgets - one is 2x6, and contains a scrolling list of emails (displays who send the email, subject, time), the other widget is 3x6 and again is a scrolling list of calendar appointments (shows days/date, calendar appointment and location). Both of these widgets are actionable, I can create new email, and new calendar appointments, and tap on the headers to go into the actual app. My right page has a 5x4 calendar widget (one month view). This widget is actionable, I can look at other months, create new appointments, tap on individual days to get meetings for that day. I've also enabled the quickbar (Google search bar at the top of every home page), quick page (swipeable 5x6 home page from right screen edge - can be accessed from any home page), and quickdrawer (swipeable 5x6 list of all apps I have installed with letter shortcut). Of course I have a dock, a searchable app drawer, and gestures. This is a very customized power user setup. 

man, i hope not!  i only have one home screen with widgets, one screen with quick dial/quick message icons and one screen with a couple drawers of util, game, media apps.

 

90% of my background is visible, besides the one screen with all the weather, keep, alarm, etc....  widgets

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Russia was able to invade Crimea because of those people. But my point is that I've personally heard how great it was to be "back in Russia" right afterwards - look how great it is now. I've asked you a question in another comment which you haven't answered, so I'll ask it again: is it better now without "Europrats"?
    • ZimaBoard 2 1664 Starter Kit review: it's a cool and affordable DIY NAS by Steven Parker IceWhale Technology reached out to me asking if I was interested in testing the ZimaBoard 2, and after convincing them to send me the Starter Kit, it arrived at my doorstep in May. A bit of background: it is a Shanghai-based Chinese company founded in 2020, which specializes in single-board servers and personal cloud solutions. From searching around online, user feedback on the company and ZimaOS is mostly positive, so we're off to a good start. In addition, I should probably point out that although they do not have a large portfolio of NAS devices, with just four of what they do offer, they seem to have covered everything from a relatively low-priced entry point with the ZimaBoard 2, right up to the high end, with the ZimaCube 2 Creator Pack that even includes an NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000. Anyway, as already mentioned, what we have today is the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit, and here are the full specifications: ZimaBoard 2 Model 832, 1664 CPU Intel Core N150 (4x E Cores/Threads, Max burst up to 3.6 GHz) TDP: 6W (Base) 10W (Max) Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (1.00 GHz) Memory 8 GB, 16 GB DDR5 4800MT/s non ECC SODIMM (soldered) Disk Capacity 60 TB (30 TB x 2) Supported RAID Types TRAID, TRAID +, RAID0, RAID1, RAID5, RAID 6, RAID 10 Storage 2 x SATA 3.0 6Gb/s Ports with Power Bootloader 32 GB, 64 GB eMMC Network 2x RJ-45 2.5 GbE PCIe 1 x PCIe 3.0 (via LPC) USB Ports 2 x USB-A 3.1 (5 Gbps) Display Mini-DisplayPort 1.4 (4K@60Hz) Hardware Transcoding Engine H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, VC-1 Maximum resolution: 4K (4096 x 2160); Maximum FPS: 60 Virtualization Intel® AES New Instructions Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) Size (H/W/D) 140mm x 83mm x 31mm Weight 0.4 kg (only ZimaBoard 2 device) Power 12v 5A Power Supply Warranty 1 year (Global) 2 Years (EU) OS ZimaOS v1.6.1 MSRP $339, $399 ($548.60) As you can see above, there are two variants of the ZimaBoard 2. The lesser variant has half the eMMC storage and 8 GB less RAM, although it also costs $60 less than the top variant we are testing today. The above pricing is only for the ZimaBoard 2. I put the MSRP of the Starter Kit next to it in brackets, although as of publishing, it is discounted to $534.50. The ZimaBoard 2 started life on Kickstarter and shipped to backers in August last year. It became available via the official website in late 2025 and Q1 2026. This hobbyist NAS contains the still relatively new N150 Intel CPU released in the first quarter of 2025, with support for DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, although in this case, the memory is integrated into the board itself, so it will not be possible to upgrade or expand the amount. It also supports AV1 decoding, as well as H.264, VP8, VP9, H.265 (8 bit), and H.265 (10 bit). The different capabilities in the Alder Lake-N (and Twin Lake) series are listed below. Processor E-cores L3-cache Turbo clock GPU GPU-clock TDP Intel N355 8 6 MB 3.9 GHz 32 EUs 1.35 GHz 9 W Intel Core 3 N350 3.9 GHz 1.35 GHz 7 W Intel Core i3-N305 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 9 W Intel Core i3-N300 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz Intel N250 4 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 6 W Intel Processor N200 3.7 GHz 0.75 GHz Intel N150 3.6 GHz 24 EUs 1 GHz Intel N97 1.2 GHz 12 W Intel Processor N100 3.4 GHz 0.75 GHz 6 W The CPU is part of the Twin Lake series that sits near the bottom of the N-series, designed for low- powered systems and entry-level laptops, and as such has a base level TDP of just 6W. As I have noted before, we are seeing another NAS with a great amount of RAM. It's important to mention that the ZimaBoard 2's memory is integrated into the base board (which is why they have two variants of it). As a reminder, up until a couple of years ago, it was commonplace to only get 2 or 4GB max on a flagship Synology or QNAP home NAS. Ever since the likes of TerraMaster and more have entered the market with ample RAM sizes included in their NAS offerings, it has gone a long way in forcing the hands of the traditional makers to up their game a bit. First impressions The Starter Kit came in one outer box with several packages inside it (shown above). I forgot to take pics of it because when it arrived, it wasn't clear what was inside, and I had to confirm with my contact that I received the entire Starter Kit. In the box ZimaBoard 2 ZimaBoard 2 HDD Expansion Bracket + PCIe card frame Zimaboard Mini DisplayPort Male to HDMI Female Cable 4K 60Hz Zimaboard PCIe 3.0 x4 to Dual NVMe M.2 SSD Adapter Card Quick guide [full online guide] Limited warranty notice Screws Design Where to start? You'd be forgiven for mistaking it as an SSD enclosure if not for all the ports on it. It is completely made out of metal, and the top is an entire heatsink. It has a premium feel about it, but it definitely looks like a hobby device. As you will see, the completed build looks like it belongs in a server or meter closet rather than as a showpiece on someone's desk. On what I am calling the rear, there's a Mini DisplayPort (1.4), two 2.5 GbE ports, with Type A 3.1 USB ports, and then the barrel connector port. Around the front, there are two SATA6 ports with a power connector in the middle. Left side Right side One side is completely free of ports. On the other there's a slit that allows for the feed of a CPU fan cable, and a PCIe 3.0 X4 slot. Top Bottom The top is entirely made up of a heatsink except for the extended height for the I/O on the rear. Around the other side, you can find the ZIMA branding and some regulatory information stamped near the bottom. As you may see from the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, it scratches quite easily from just moving it around on my Ikea island. Teardown Before we get started, let's have a look at this thing on the inside. The steps to get to the board are as follows: Remove the four smaller Torx screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2; Remove the four larger Torx screws on the sides of the device; Carefully unstick the CMOS battery from the PCB; Remove two Phillips screws on the PCB; Lift out the PCB. Yes, as you can tell from the instructions, you need three different tools to remove Torx and Phillips screws (10 in total), and unhelpfully, one of the screws is located under the CMOS battery, which is stuck onto the PCB. Building Now comes the fun part. Because the ZimaSpace website does not provide any guidance on how to put the Starter Kit together. They only have guidance for connecting the CPU fan. However, they did upload a video to their YouTube channel that shows the entire process. To install the fan, first remove the four screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, then on the inside, there is a CPU FAN connector where you can attach the fan, reattach the ZimaBoard 2 frame, and feed the fan cable through the provided slit. Then remove the nearest screw on the side and attach the fan frame to the side of the device using the same screw. ZimaBard 2 screws Aligning the screws Bottom view Remember those four screws we removed to access the CPU FAN? Longer screws are provided in the box with the HDD Expansion Bracket, which is what you will now need to attach the ZimaBoard 2 to it. Helpfully, the orientation on how to attach it is made obvious when the frame can only be screwed on at the same overall length as the ZimaBoard 2. If you do it the wrong way around (which is what I did initially) one side hangs off the frame, and it becomes difficult to attach the PCIe Adapter Card cable. PCIe card frame Other side PCIe slot connector Next, it's time to attach the PCIe card frame, which is fastened with the help of 3.5-inch SATA HDD (3 screws). These are toolless screws that you can just use your fingers to fasten them with. Then it is time to connect the provided PCIe cable with the slot connector on one side of the ZimaBoard 2, feed it through the bottom of the HDD frame, and fasten it with two standoffs. Both bracket options 2280 standoffs with 2x 4TB MP44Q The PCIe 3.0 X4 card comes with a short bracket option, handy if you decide to place it inside a different NAS or rack server, but here we need the long bracket. Oddly enough, the M.2 standoffs were preinstalled into the 22110 position, but extra standoffs are included in the box, which I installed at the 2280 position for our use. I added a couple of MP44Q M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSDs (2 x 4TB) that can be availed on Amazon for $478.99 (the lowest price for 3 months) that TEAMGROUP supplied us with Then we have the almost completed build, you just need to push the card into the PCIe slot. Unfortunately, IceWhale Technologies did not provide a screw for the PCIe card frame (this is also apparent in their own video). Here it is at several different angles, with the last pic showing the SATA Y-Cable connected to the two WD Red Plus 4TB drives. Setup and Usage Next, you connect your cables to the I/O, and the ZimaBoard 2 powers on automatically, as there is no power button on the device. Power is controlled through the Settings in ZimaOS. BIOS The ZimaBoard 2 includes an Aptio BIOS from American Megatrends [1, 2, 3], and you can setup pretty much everything here including the boot order, which is locked to the UEFI OS, however above that choice you can enable or disable booting to a SATA/USB bootloader so this would still allow you to switch to an alternative bootloader and boot from it, or disable it to instead always start from the first disk with an OS installed on it. Initial Setup Upon connecting to the LAN and booting up, the ZimaBoard 2 can be reached by navigating to the IP address (shown if you have a monitor connected), or you can find it using the ZIMA Client desktop application, which is essentially a Zima device finder. Initializing the ZimaBoard 2 The ZimaOS setup process is pretty straightforward, through a wizard, and in full above, it basically consists of setting up an account and some handy tips, and that's that! Post Setup (ZimaOS update) Upon first boot, you are alerted that there is a ZimaOS update from 1.5.0 to 1.6.1, which I applied; the full process is shown above with the changelog. ZimaBoard 2 Storage Setup Next, it is time to set up the storage. ZimaOS actually throws everything onto the eMMC flash drive; it is also the default location of AppData, which is definitely something to be wary about, as the 45GB available storage could fill up quickly. HDDs I first attempted to create a Storage Pool using the two 4TB WD Red Plus NAS drives, and got an error message: After several attempts and then looking online, I discovered it was a bug with ZimaOS where the fix was simply to reboot ZimaOS and then try again, this time I was able to create a RAID mirror using the two drives. SSDs I did the same for the SSDs, as you will see in the above gallery, when I created the second Storage Pool, it only allowed me to select available drives. ZimaBoard 2 AppData ZimaOS comes with an App Store that includes a repository of almost 400 apps, so you will be able to find most of what you'll need for a NAS (although after a quick search, I wasn't able to find a Surveillance Manager), and now comes the important part: moving the default AppData location off the 45GB eMMC and onto a larger volume: Open Settings Then Apps Then, in the Select a new location field, click on the new Storage volume you want to move it to (in my case, the Apps Storage Pool), which is the SSD RAID mirror. Confirm the Migration warning Be praised! You can also do this for Docker (which by default installs onto the 45GB eMMC flash drive) and the User database. Plex Setup Next, I tested the configuration by installing the Plex Server app from the App Store. The library folders must already exist (which I placed into the Storage Pool). Plex Server setup is straightforward and requires very little configuration. In my case, all I had to do was add the media path I just created, which you can also browse to using the folder icon in the path field. In addition, you can now map the new Media library in Windows Explorer using the Zima Client. Oddly enough, it is not possible to access the ZimaBoard 2 over the Network Neighborhood; you must map drives using the client, which is shown in the last image in the above gallery. I watched one of my Blu-Ray rips, which is Dolby Vision with Dolby Atmos, and the content played fine with no stuttering or buffering, which is what anyone needs in this scenario. ZimaBoard 2 Zima Client mobile app There's also a client for mobile. It is pretty barebones, as shown in the above gallery, for example, the Apps screen launches the WebUI for that app, and the Backup must be done manually. On opening Backup, you can select internal storage folders on your phone to backup to the ZimaBoard 2's storage, and although this is constantly scanned, the backup action itself must be manually triggered. There is an option to allow foreground backup (last image in the above gallery), but this basically means the queued backup gets triggered when you manually open the app. Benchmarking SATA PCIe 3.0 X4 A CrystalDiskMark test on a mapped network drive from within a Windows 11 25H2 PC (image above) connected over a 2.5 GbE was well within acceptable ranges. Writes were generally better on the SSD RAID mirror. SATA PCIe 3.0 X1 I also ran the NAS Performance tester, which tests the link speed performance. As you can see, it pretty much maxes out the 2.5GbE connection. Of course, you can also opt to bond the two 2.5 GbE connections for a bit more umph, but I didn't do that. Thermals Top PCIe card SATA HDDs Next, I measured some hotspots while playing content on Plex. It's fair to say this will perform better than a NAS that is enclosed in a metal or plastic case, as almost everything storage-wise is exposed! Anyway, the ZimaBoard 2 did not break a sweat with Plex streaming or disk benchmarks. ZimaOS Factory Reset ZimaOS does not include a factory reset option. Instead, you have to download the ZimaOS image and flash it to the eMMC manually. The flashing process is shown in the above gallery. The steps to do so are listed below: Download the ZimaOS image here; Open BalenaEtcher (Run as Administrator) and select the image; Select your inserted USB drive (min 8 GB) Flash to it; Connect your USB drive, monitor, keyboard, USB hub (optional), mouse (optional), and network cable (recommended) to the ZimaBoard 2; Connect power and press F11 continuously; Select your USB drive starting with UEFI in the boot device menu; Press Enter on the Install ZimaOS option; Select /dev/mmcblk0 (MMC) flash drive as target; Confirm with (three times) to wipe the target disk; Wait a couple of minutes while ZimaOS installs; Remove the USB drive and confirm with a reboot; Your ZimaBoard 2 has been factory reset. However, you don't have to stick with ZimaOS, in fact the company also offers official CasaOS images, that are based on Debian; or as they say themselves, put anything you want on this "hackable single board server" it's up to you. Conclusion I had a lot of fun putting this together. I've custom-built all my own PCs and servers since the 90s, and this is the first time I have had to put a NAS together. Even if the actual base ZimaBoard 2 was already a completed build, it still feels pretty custom. I just wish that IceWhale Technology included a getting-started guide in the box for the Start Kit, which would have really completed this kit. Instead, I had to search for the official video on the YouTube channel to make sure I wasn't doing anything wrong. So who is this for? Definitely the hobbyist who is comfortable building their own PC and servers. It also has a much smaller footprint than its nearest equivalent (in terms of specs), like the Beelink Me Pro, which is another NAS I will be testing soon. Although the Beelink does not come with the PCIe 3.0 X4 expansion, the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit suddenly looks to be a great bargain, even if it only offers the two 3.5-inch bays over the four in the other example. It makes a lot of sense to use Intel's N150 chip inside a NAS; it is more than capable of doing what the ZimaBoard 2 is intended for, media streaming and backup. It also looks like the IceWhale Technology staff are quite active in the official forums helping people with issues they come across with ZimaOS and the devices, peer support seems to be good as well, I was quickly able to find why I was not able to create a new Storage Pool in ZimaOS v1.6.1 even though that is quite a serious bug, hopefully it will be fixed in the next update. If you are comfortable with the command line and Docker, you'll be fine. You can do great things with this hardware. This was my first time with ZimaOS. It seems a bit barebones in comparison to the likes of Synology DSM, TOS, and UGOS, but it has a ton of apps to get you started with your home or small business NAS. Where to buy As of publishing, IceWhale Technology is running a discount of up to 5% for the Starter Kit. If you opt to get just the ZimaBoard 2 itself, it does come with a SATA Y-Cable, so you will be able to connect up to two 3.5-inch HDDs to it. ZimaBoard 2 1668 Starter Kit for $534.50 on Amazon US (was $548.60) ZimaBoard 2 832 Starter Kit for $372.88 on Amazon US (was $390.60) Zimaboard 2 1668 (16GB+64GB) for $419.90 on Amazon US Zimaboard 2 832 (8GB+32GB) for $359.90 on Amazon Disclosure: IceWhale Technology provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. Good to know The Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, when you purchase through links on our site, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • It's in the Insider's group so yes it's technically beta, though these days it's hard to see much of a difference unless you opt for the most extreme beta builds, which I don't. When I moved here from the Release Preview channel I did so primarily because I wanted to see how well the restored taskbar functionality (restored from Win10, and earlier) is working and whether it was time to finally abandon SAB--and it is--working fine, so far. Not as polished as SAB, but it'll do for me.
    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      488
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!