Recommended Posts

Does Apple list the proper technical specifications of their iPads anywhere? I'm looking for something that categorically states what the power class is of their devices but I can't find it.


The closest I've come is the user manual, which says under the Bluetooth section that it has a range of about 33ft (10m). Now that suggests it's Class 2, but I need something which states it in black and white.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1292958-bluetooth-power-class-of-ipad/
Share on other sites

No, I'm referring to the Power Class, not the version. So Class 1 devices transmit at 100mW: Class 2 at 10mW; Class 3 at 1mW. Typical ranges are 100m/10m/1m.

 

Almost all mobile devices are Class 2, and the ipad user manual states 33ft range (10m), but I need something to prove that.

You can find it, takes a bit of searching.

 

Here's one example:

Look up the device teardown on iFixit. Find the device used for bluetooth. In the case of the iPad 4, the Bluetooth device is a Broadcom BCM4334.

https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPad+4+Wi-Fi+Teardown/11462

 

Hop over to bluetooth.org and run a search for the module.

https://www.bluetooth.org/tpg/listings.cfm

 

We pull up a match to BCM4334 here:

https://www.bluetooth.org/tpg/QLI_viewQDL.cfm?qid=18552

 

Show the ICS details and see what's checked off. In the iPad 4, the BT module is class 1.

Capture.PNG

  • Like 2
16 minutes ago, zhangm said:

You can find it, takes a bit of searching.

 

Here's one example:

Look up the device teardown on iFixit. Find the device used for bluetooth. In the case of the iPad 4, the Bluetooth device is a Broadcom BCM4334.

https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPad+4+Wi-Fi+Teardown/11462

 

Hop over to bluetooth.org and run a search for the module.

https://www.bluetooth.org/tpg/listings.cfm

 

We pull up a match to BCM4334 here:

https://www.bluetooth.org/tpg/QLI_viewQDL.cfm?qid=18552

 

Show the ICS details and see what's checked off. In the iPad 4, the BT module is class 1.

Capture.PNG

wow...that is pretty cool.  I would have said class 2...but been el incorrecto per that spec sheet.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If only Windows would have a toggle switch named "Get the latest updates as soon as possible" inside Windows Update settings... But nah, let's hide the new stuff inside a controlled feature rollout, even if the user is explicitly asking for the new stuff as soon as possible.
    • After watching the Apple event earlier this week it is quite the contrast. Apple is going back and tweaking the code to make things more efficient in many areas of MacOS. Windows is boosting your electric build to hide their issues.
    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!