Recommended Posts

USAF is looking to use Reaction Engines Ltd.'s (UK) SABRE and SCIMITAR engine precooler for high Mach flight engines. 

 

SDC broke it:

 

http://www.space.com/32115-skylon-space-plane-engines-air-force-vehicle.html?cmpid=514648

 

The REL precooler tech  was given a thumbs up by the USAF Research Lab (USAFRL) last year, and REL is now partnered with BAE Systems which now holds 20% of REL. The USAFRL cooperation with Reaction Engines is continuing under a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement. USAFRL is headquartered at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio.

 

The SBIR (Small Business Innovation Research) posting says the desired performance is to precool incoming air by at least 500°F at 55,000 feet. REL's precooler has precooled air from 1,832°F  (1000°C) down to -238°F (-150°C) in 10 milliseconds with no frosting. It also mentions the possibility of commercialization.

 

This appears similar to REL's SCIMITAR boosted turbo-ramjet engine

 

scimitarengine.jpg

 

PopSci story on SCIMITAR
http://www.popsci.com/military-aviation-space/article/2008-01/green-skies-mach-5

 

For takeoff, landing and subsonic flight, the A2's Scimitar engine sends intake air through a bypass duct [1] and into a turbine [2], like a standard jet engine. After reaching supersonic speed, though, the engine redirects air from the bypass duct through the engine core [3] for flight up to Mach 5. Like a ramjet, the Scimitar works by taking in air from the atmosphere at high speeds and funneling (or "ramming") it until it's intensely compressed. At this point, the extremely hot air mixes with fuel and causes ignition. But the Scimitar one-ups traditional ramjet design by adding a turbine [4] that compresses the incoming air even further. Ramjets usually can't use turbines because the incoming air is so hot that it will melt the turbine blades. The Scimitar solves that problem by first cooling the air in a heat exchanger [5] using gaseous helium.

 

SBIR solicitation 

 

https://www.sbir.gov/sbirsearch/detail/870285

 

Durable Pre-cooling Heat Exchangers for High Mach Flight

 

Agency: Department of Defense
Release Date: December 10, 2015
Branch: n/a
Open Date: December 10, 2015
Program / Phase / Year: SBIR / Phase I / 2016
Application Due Date: February 17, 2016
Solicitation: DoD 2016.1
Close Date: February 17, 2016
Topic Number: AF161-074
Description: TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Air Platform

 

The technology within this topic is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the Export Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls dual use items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals (FNs), their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed, and the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s) in accordance with section 5.4.c.(8) of the solicitation and within the AF Component-specific instructions. Offerors are advised foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to the technical data under US Export Control Laws. Please direct questions to the AF SBIR/STTR Contracting Officer, Ms. Gail Nyikon, [email protected].

 

OBJECTIVE: Enable turbomachinery operation in excess of Mach 4 by pre-cooling the incoming air. Utilize modern materials, manufacturing, and design processes to design a durable pre-cooling heat exchanger.

 

DESCRIPTION: Throughout the past 50 years, there have been multiple efforts to develop a single air-breathing engine that is capable of thrust from takeoff up to Mach 4 speeds and faster. A major challenge in developing this capability is the hot air that is ingested at high Mach speeds. There have been attempts dating back to the 1960s to solve this problem by using a pre-cooler heat exchanger in front of the air compressor face to reduce the temperature of the incoming air. It is expected that high Mach flight will be growing in importance for the Air Force to execute its five core missions and that precooled propulsion could be an enabler for new platform capabilities. The objective of this topic is to mature the technology for a lightweight and compact pre-cooler heat exchanger for high Mach propulsion that uses turbomachinery.
No pre-cooling heat exchanger has ever been flown. The biggest difficulty is getting the heat exchanger light weight and compact enough to be practical for flight. In many industries, modern manufacturing has allowed for lighter weight components and unique geometries to be built. 

 

This topic will leverage modern manufacturing techniques (e.g., additive manufacturing, friction stir welding, C&C milling, etc.) to develop a pre-cooler heat exchanger that is practical to be used in a propulsion system on a high Mach flight system. At the end of the Phase II, it is expected to fabricate a scaled prototype of the heat exchanger and conduct initial evaluation testing. Throughout this topic, it is important to address thermal integration for the necessary systems involving the heat exchanger.

 

Important attributes of pre-cooler heat exchangers (of roughly equal importance) that need to be addressed include durability, affordability, ability to integrate with propulsion and flight systems, scalability, manufacturability, impact on ground operations, material and manufacturing maturity, amount of pressure drop across the heat exchanger, and maintainability. The pre-cooler should be able to cool incoming freestream air to about 500 degrees F or cooler for flight conditions at altitudes above 55,000 feet. It is also expected the heat exchanger to be developed will have a specific power of at least 15kW/lbm.

 

Both Phase I and Phase II will consist of an appropriate level of design and systems engineering efforts to understand what it will take to fully develop the proposed solution. These efforts should address all issues but focus on the demonstrations that will be performed in Phase II. Modeling of the heat exchangers performance and its integration is needed throughout both phases to understand its potential. Recommend developing one or more reference vehicle platform designs for one or more Air Force core missions to show how the heat exchanger could enable that capability.


A letter of endorsement from a Versatile Affordable Advanced Turbine Engines (VAATE) participant is highly encouraged.

 

Commercialization of the pre-cooler heat exchanger involves integration of the pre-cooler into high-speed propulsion systems for DoD and/or commercial needs such as point to point cargo and access to space.

 

Commercialization of the heat exchanger can also be used for propulsion thermal management and terrestrial applications.

Remote access to the DoD Supercomputing Resource Center (DSRC) to cleared personnel will be made available if needed.

 

PHASE I: Conduct initial design of the pre-cooler heat exchanger with an emphasis on its integration and manufacturing. Based on higher level platform requirements, derive requirements for the heat exchanger components that have early verification and validation. Develop plans for the Phase II fabrication and testing.

 

PHASE II: Fabricate a scaled prototype of the heat exchanger utilizing the proposed manufacturing approach. Conduct testing in a relevant laboratory environment. Develop and validate performance and lifting models based on the testing. Utilize this information to increase the understanding of how the heat exchanger integrates into a platform or platforms.

 

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: Phase III will focus on maturing the heat exchanger and beginning to integrate it into a full propulsion system and a vehicle platform. Additional Phase III activities can consist of applying the heat exchanger and its manufacturing to other defense and commercial domains.

 

REFERENCES:

 

Murthy, S.N.B., "Developments In High-Speed Vehicle Propulsion Systems," AIAA, 1996.

Balepin, V., et.al., "Combined propulsion for SSTO rocket - From conceptual study to demonstrator of deep cooled turbojet," AIAA 96-4497.

 

Taguchi, H., et.al., "Performance Evaluation of Hypersonic Pre-Cooled Turbojet Engine," 20th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, AIAA 2015-3593.

 

Ahren, J.E., "Thermal management of air-breathing propulsion systems," 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA 92-0514, 1992.

 

Murray, J.J., et.al., "An Experimental Precooler for Airbreathing Rocket Engines," 48th International Astronautical Federation Congress Melbourne, Australia 1998, IAF-98-S.5.02.

 

KEYWORDS: high mach, precooling, precooler, heat exchanger, thermal, materials, manufacturing, design, propulsion, hypersonic

  • Like 2

Call me crazy, but I see a possible spin-off of this tech -- super-chilling extremely hot air to prevent reentry overheating of spacecraft.

 

Obviously it would make these spacecraft insanely heavy though ... hmm. A superchilling system like this isn't exactly lightweight. Needs more thought.

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...

1) Reaction Engines will soon sign a Phase 3B SABRE engine development contract with ESA. It's said this is to cut metal for a test engine.

 

2) 2 new managers via Lockheed Martin and Safan (Ariane 6)

 

Quote


Reaction Engines Ltd., a UK based company developing a new class of aerospace engine, today announces the strengthening of its leadership team with two senior management appointments and the establishment of a US-based subsidiary to lead its engagement with potential US government and industry partners.

The company has appointed Mark Wood to the newly created role of Chief Operating Officer & Engineering Director, with responsibility for operational leadership, improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the business through integration, collaboration and operational best practices.

Mark Wood joins Reaction Engines from Safran Power UK, where he most recently held the position of Engineering Director, with responsibility for Safran Power Engineering in the UK and for engineering services across the whole Power division. He will report to Mark Thomas, Reaction Engines Chief Executive Officer.

He will shape the companys organisational development for the future and take on functional leadership of the Engineering Team, enabling Richard Varvill to focus on Chief Engineering the SABRE engine & technologies.

Mark Thomas said I am delighted to welcome Mark Wood on board. He has over 20 years experience in the aerospace industry and a very relevant and impressive track record of successfully delivering complex engineering programmes. He brings additional strength to Reaction Engines leadership team as we continue to grow the Company. Mark has hit the ground running and is integrating well. I look forward to working with him and know that his energy and experience will have a positive effect on everyone.

Mark Wood said I am really excited to be joining Reaction Engines. The technologies that have been developed to date are truly cutting edge and I am delighted to be able to be part of the future growth of the company. I look forward to working with Mark Thomas and the team as we continue on this exciting journey.

Reaction Engines has also established a new US-based subsidiary, Reaction Engines Inc. to support the expansion of the companys development efforts and lead engagement with potential US government and industry partners.
The company has appointed Dr. Adam Dissel, an aerospace leader with over 15 years experience in the development of advanced vehicle systems, to lead the new subsidiary as President of Reaction Engines Inc. Dr. Dissel joins Reaction Engines Inc. from Lockheed Martin Space Systems where he served as System Architect for Responsive Space. He will report to Mark Thomas, Chief Executive Officer of Reaction Engines Ltd.

Mark Thomas commented The establishment of a US office is the obvious next step for us, building on excellent work done under a collaborative R&D agreement with future export markets in mind. I am delighted that Adam has joined the team as President of Reaction Engines Inc. His skillset, experience and strong customer focus is very relevant to the task ahead and I look forward to working together to grow this part of our business.

Dr. Adam Dissel, President of Reaction Engines Inc., said I have followed the impressive progress of Reaction Engines and the SABRE engine with great interest for many years, and I am thrilled to now join such a fantastically skilled group of people and work towards future development and partnership opportunities in the US. The SABRE engine class is the most exciting new evolution in propulsion in decades and I am eager to advance the applications where these technologies could result in breakthrough system capabilities in high-speed flight and space access.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!