Recommended Posts

Quote

Update: nVidia may release THREE new GPUs in June instead of two, with the 1080 Ti rumoured to release alongside the other two.[3]

The latest in nVidia’s graphics card lineup will feature their new Pascal architecture, which promises enhanced power efficiency and floating point performance. Based on a GP104[1] core, the GTX 1080 will be nVidia’s flagship card and may use 8GB of GDDR5X [1] memory to achieve what is speculated to be as much as 384GB/s depending on memory clock over a 256-bit bus, which should eliminate bottlenecks and enable smoother high resolution gaming, plus post-120Hz refresh rates for high-end VR.

There is doubt whether nVidia may actually be able to equip a GPU for release in June considering JEDEC only finalised the GDDR5X standard in Q4 2015, but hope remains.[4]

Source: http://www.methodtech.co.uk/2016/04/nvidia-pascal-gtx-10801070-revealed-using-gddr5x/

I dont think Nvidia will be releasing hardware then, maybe a paper launch. I really don't think they will have GDDR5X unless they launch later like Q4 16. Seems like its more games trying to hold buyers off AMD cards that do seem like they are coming mid year. Either way this next gen of cards should be pretty good.

21 minutes ago, Circaflex said:

I wonder, if the standards apply. could you do some research (I'm not well versed in knowing where to snoop) on if they plan to release a mobile discrete card(s) for gaming laptops? I'll try what I can think of myself. (call Nvidia myself)

1 hour ago, chrisj1968 said:

I wonder, if the standards apply. could you do some research (I'm not well versed in knowing where to snoop) on if they plan to release a mobile discrete card(s) for gaming laptops? I'll try what I can think of myself. (call Nvidia myself)

Ill do some digging, but I have a hunch they are working on something for Thunderbolt 3 or will partner with someone to show how that is going to be the new awesome. With thunderbolt 3 you can use a dock to drive a desktop GPU and use that with the laptop. I know that isnt a mobile solution, so surely they will release some new cards, but Ill see what I can dig up.

 

Not trying to derail my original thread, but I found some info and it is somewhat related. So it seems, once we see pascal we might see something new, otherwise the best to hope for would be a rebrand.

 

Quote

The website HardwareBattle.com recently published an article claiming that an update to the GeForce GTX 970M and 980M from Nvidia are in the works. These updated models are supposed to be the "GeForce GTX 970MX" and "GeForce GTX 980MX". Our investigations, on the other hand, suggest that this is not correct as confirmed by multiple independent industry insiders close to Notebookcheck. There will be no update to the existing GTX 970M or GTX 980M, but all our sources are still expecting the upcoming GPU generation ("Pascal") by the end of 2016/start of 2017.

The new Polaris architecture from AMD is to be expected mid-2016, but the chances of consumer notebooks shipping with the new AMD GPU before the start of 2017 will be small.

So far, there has been no reason for Nvidia to upgrade its unrivaled top chips GeForce GTX 970M and GeForce GTX 980M. And then there there is also the Geforce GTX 980, which is completely out of range for current AMD graphics solutions.

The refreshed mainstream graphics cards GeForce 920MX, GeForce 930MX and GeForce 940MX were announced in the Lenovo ThinkPad notebooks at CES this year (we reported). These should be available soon and are still based on the 28 nm Maxwell architecture.

 

Source: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Nvidia-No-GTX-970MX-and-980MX-GPUs-are-in-the-works.158349.0.html

I have an older Radeon R7 250 and it's showing it's age.  It's the only thing left to upgrade in my system.  I wanted to get a GTX 960 but with the new cards around the corner, I think I'll save up for the Pascal equivalent of GTX 970

This is what I hate about pc hardware

4 months ago I built a new PC and used a 980 GTX K|ngp|n

Now these are coming out - and I wont want the 980 anymore.  

Between this and golf - the voices in my head telling me to buy stuff are killing me !

  • Like 3
9 minutes ago, T3X4S said:

This is what I hate about pc hardware

4 months ago I built a new PC and used a 980 GTX K|ngp|n

Now these are coming out - and I wont want the 980 anymore.  

Between this and golf - the voices in my head telling me to buy stuff are killing me !

LOL you and me both brother. I was planning to get some new sticks in June, but noooowwwwwwwwww I'll wait to see. Stupid expensive hobbies...

Just now, Circaflex said:

LOL you and me both brother. I was planning to get some new sticks in June, but noooowwwwwwwwww I'll wait to see. Stupid expensive hobbies...

I KNOW, RIGHT ?!?

Been looking at some new Mizuno irons - want them in a bad way - but.... noooooooooooooo   
My fiance has been kinda getting on to me about my spending habits lately - 

I dont know why I let her out of her cage - 

1 minute ago, Circaflex said:

LOL you and me both brother. I was planning to get some new sticks in June, but noooowwwwwwwwww I'll wait to see. Stupid expensive hobbies...

Hopefully it will result in price drops for GTX970 (which is still  closer to $300USD than $200USD, even for 2GB versions).

1 hour ago, Circaflex said:

Ill do some digging, but I have a hunch they are working on something for Thunderbolt 3 or will partner with someone to show how that is going to be the new awesome. With thunderbolt 3 you can use a dock to drive a desktop GPU and use that with the laptop. I know that isnt a mobile solution, so surely they will release some new cards, but Ill see what I can dig up.

 

Not trying to derail my original thread, but I found some info and it is somewhat related. So it seems, once we see pascal we might see something new, otherwise the best to hope for would be a rebrand.

 

 

Source: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Nvidia-No-GTX-970MX-and-980MX-GPUs-are-in-the-works.158349.0.html

I've come to understand that they tend to release a mobile version albeit crippled due to, of course, heat issues. I may lose some pipelines and some of the massive features of the desktop versions, but usually they do make a mobile version for gaming laptops. I'm basically getting all warm and fuzzy at the prospect of a mobile gaming card. I do lose the pipelines of course and some other features but still rocks in terms of gaming.

  • 3 weeks later...

I've been scratching my head over how to upgrade my system. I have a 970 running at 4k resolution and, at times, it shows it's limits. 4GB is barely enough and I've since learned that 970 only technically has 4GB of memory which doesn't help running high resolutions.

On 5/1/2016 at 4:01 PM, Bryan R. said:

I've been scratching my head over how to upgrade my system. I have a 970 running at 4k resolution and, at times, it shows it's limits. 4GB is barely enough and I've since learned that 970 only technically has 4GB of memory which doesn't help running high resolutions.

You mean 3.2GB  - 



 

I get you, Zagadka; the display is the holdback in my own case (4K is a space-eater in terms of display size), therefore, the GPU will be ready before the display itself is.  I'm hoping for Pascal because it will drive down the cost of GTX9xx (especially GTX960) so I can single-stage (not two-stage).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!