Cannot see Network Workstations in network on Windows 2012 R2.


Recommended Posts

I cannot see my network workstations from my Windows 2012 R2 server.  All the workstations are Windows 10.  But at a Windows 10 workstation I can see all the

workstations and server in network.

 

The following services are started and running on the Windows 2012 R2 server.

 

DNS Client

Function Discovery Resource Publication

SSDP Discovery

UPnP Device Host

 

Please Help!

what do you mean you cannot see you network workstations.

 

first things that come to mind, local software/microsoft/antivirus firewalls on the workstations.

 

second thing that comes to mind, dns not right/pointing to the wrong address

 

third thing that comes to mind, there is so much relevant detail here that the issue was caused by the potato I had for lunch.  (I should know better than to eat potatoes when you are working).

you haven't exactly answered the question "what do you mean you cannot see the workstations?" question.   Can I assume that it is an Active Directory Server or a Active Directory member server or is that too much of an assumption?

 

can you not connect to the administrative share?  can you not remote desktop into them?  can you not do a nslookup to find them?  can you not get ping replies?  can you not see them in the network option in windows explorer?  how exactly are you trying to "see" them?  You can see that there are a number of ways to "see" them...I don't know where to start troubleshooting other than trying to puke up that potato for you.

 

1st...what happens when you try to connect to \\computername\c$ ?

2nd...what happens when you try to rdp into them?

3rd...what happens when you try a "nslookup computername" on the server?

4th...what happens when you try to "ping computername" on the server?

5th..what happens when you try to browse for them in file explorer?

 

error messages, events, anything to help me.....screen shot would be great.  so you have some irrelevant services installed...great!  I am happy you have them installed, that really helps knowing that information....as much as my potato.

 

memory is over rated.  short or long. 

 

 

but back to the issue.  are you still having issues?  can you answer my questions?  are you not the person who can answer those questions?   if not perhaps you can get someone who can... 

Windows 2012 R2 server with active directory.  Actually there are 2 Windows 2012 R2 servers on the domain.  I can see both servers in windows explorer and can ping each one.  I also see one of the workstations but I cannot ping it.

 

What did you mean by:

second thing that comes to mind, dns not right/pointing to the wrong address

 

I'll try your 1st through 5th and let you know.

well if dns has the wrong address in its database

 

 

ie:  host1 A 192.168.2.1

 

host1 actual ip 192.168.2.157

 

you are going to have issues connecting to host1

 

yes this does happen occasionally, though not often.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It seems like I'm just renting games now. I can't resell them and they can be removed from the steam or Epic store or the servers shut down at any time.
    • Sure - let's expand on that a bit then to try and be of more help. It's not a one-time use code that can be gamed - each time the proof is required a new transaction takes place to go through the "proof" process. It's a unique step each time. Not a...reusable QR code or pass so to speak. Each time proof is required, a new cryptographic transaction is required. The tricky part here, is trusted issuers. That is still needed. Since this is open source - it doe snot mean that Google has to be the issuer. Google has just provided the tooling to do this, but they don't store the data - to be clear. Presumably, again - you would have some type of government or state issued digital ID that supports the zero-knowledge functions. Effectively, the same entities today that have your information and you (assumingly trust) would continue to have it, it would just be able to be leveraged in a more private manner when you go somewhere or interact with anything requireing age verification. To fake this, someone would need to have a legitimate private key tied to an actual real identity. Cryptographic checks using zero-knowledge would fail otherwise - and again - it can't be used over and over again. Can someone screw up and somehow leak that private key? Sure. No different than leaking your password to your private accounts - a password change would be necessary and let's hope that future implementation of ZKP-based identities bake in some kind of 2FA/MFA for better security. There's not much to hack here, as I said - really comes down to the issuer. If you receive this from the government, none of your real data gets sent to say "MyHubOfChoice.com" when doing age verification - the protocol is only designed to say "Yes - I meet the requirement." Reality is, this keeps you more anonymous than you could ever be today with age verification without having to share anything else about you. However, it's worth stating that anonymity isn't the goal with ZKP - it's removing disclosure. True anonymity is more difficult, as how everything works today to an extent you need to prove who you are with a "trusted" source (ie government/state issued ID). And that data, at the end of the day, does sit in a centralized db as designed. Could that change in the future, perhaps. But the goal of this is just to not have to hand over anymore information than you need to.
    • Oh yeah because its SO hard to duplicate some of the server's logic on the client
    • Software versions increase while older ones are deprecated. This is nothing new, except now it's not included with Windows. Do you not upgrade your software? The biggest issue for me living with 2.0 was that the new versions never upgraded it, it installed side-by-side. I accidentally launched the shite version more than once on accident.
    • They would have to include .NET (not be to be confused with legacy .NET Framework), and they don't. That might be why...dunno. Or maybe because it's open source (guessing)? It's kind of nice to have it separated from the OS.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      K.I.S.S. earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      solidox earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      solidox earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Devesh Beri earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      956400 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      444
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      162
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      147
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      66
    5. 5
      +thexfile
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!