Boston to hire 6 rejected white firefighters


Recommended Posts

The Boston Fire Department has agreed to hire six men who were passed over in favor of minority group members with lower test scores, marking the first time the city has voluntarily agreed to hire rejected white applicants since a federal appeals court declared its affirmative action plan unconstitutional last March.

 

The six white men will join four others, who challenged the department's 29-year-old affirmative action plan and won a ruling from the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. All of the men had been turned down in favor of minority applicants who scored lower on a statewide civil service exam.

"This was a recognition by the city that the time has come to do away with the minority hiring preferences and judge everyone on an equal footing regardless of their race," said Mark J. Ventola, the lawyer for the six men who had filed suit in August. "It's a trend I'm hoping will continue."

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/...e_firefighters/

thoughts?

This is good I think. Affirmative action has no place in society. The playing field is level, and why does anyone need to advance because of color? Anyone who thinks that AA is needed, needs to ask themselves do they really think minorities need special allowances because they are less than you are? They aren't less and everyone has the same chances to do anything they want to do in life, but you should have to work for it and get there on your merits, not your color.:)

There should be closed interviews and tests, much like symphony orchestra auditions. The applicant and judges never speak or even see each other, it's all behind a curtain.

I agree with you silly_walk, doing everything this way is the only way to prevent discrimination. i do however feel that statistics should be kept in the aggregate so we can see trends and begin to determine the reasons behind them.

Makes me wonder how many other qualified people have been denied because of their race. I wonder how the community would feel knowing that the most qualified police, fire fighters, etc., are not serving because a magic number had to be met. I wonder if mistakes were made that wouldn't have been had the most qualified person been doing the job the first time around. Makes me wonder....

Makes me wonder how many other qualified people have been denied because of their race. I wonder how the community would feel knowing that the most qualified police, fire fighters, etc., are not serving because a magic number had to be met. I wonder if mistakes were made that wouldn't have been had the most qualified person been doing the job the first time around. Makes me wonder....

Kinda scary, isn't it?

Personally, I want things like my local firefighters on the job because of their demonstrated merit to do the job without consideration for race or whatever that's probably irrelevant. Certainly don't want any firefighter altering how they do their *own* job based upon race considerations of those they protect.

Am just sad in this case that lower test scores were initially "promoted", assuming the test is indeed markedly relevant to the job to be done.

Also sad that affirmative action may be / have been affecting things that can be *so* crucially important to actual merit. Not good.

In case of fire/emergency, i want the person who is able to help me, don't care if they are black, white, green or purple. I remember reading in the paper ~year ago about a woman suing because she was cut from fire dept application process. Her story: it was b/c she was a woman. THeir story with records and video to back it up: could lift ladder and get it to proper window. again who can help me in my time of need. apparently not her.

This is good I think. Affirmative action has no place in society. The playing field is level, and why does anyone need to advance because of color? Anyone who thinks that AA is needed, needs to ask themselves do they really think minorities need special allowances because they are less than you are? They aren't less and everyone has the same chances to do anything they want to do in life, but you should have to work for it and get there on your merits, not your color.:)

The playing field isn't level although it is more level than it has been traditionally.

I personally don't like AA because of the tokenism. "He's the token whatever that was hired through AA". If I was a minority who had the legitimate credentials then I'd hate to have to wear that assumed albatros around my neck.

I think there are better ways to get certain jobs more reflective of society. Education/advertising is good. Training and internship programs aimed at a certain minority would also be good.

I don't have a problem with encourging HR to hire an EQUALLY qualified minority over an EQUALLY qualified non-minority but once it dips to hiring a less qualified person over a more qualified person then I don't think you're doing anybody a service (minority or not).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Lilly-Livered American Media Are Scared
    • Really? Despite the memory price rises, nothing can kill it? I thought something would.
    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!