EA Access will be free to Xbox One Gold Members on June 12-22nd


Recommended Posts

LostCat
On 5/19/2016 at 11:30 AM, SierraSonic said:

What do you get when EA discontinues the access program?

You keep your saves locally and in the cloud and life goes on just as if you'd unsubscribed.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SierraSonic
15 hours ago, LostCat said:

You keep your saves locally and in the cloud and life goes on just as if you'd unsubscribed.

That sounds like a nice way of saying "you get screwed out of all the titles you paid for monthly, and now to continue playing them, have to pay what any other person would have".

Link to post
Share on other sites
LostCat
2 minutes ago, SierraSonic said:

That sounds like a nice way of saying "you get screwed out of all the titles you paid for monthly, and now to continue playing them, have to pay what any other person would have".

If this line of thought had any relevance they wouldn't have introduced it for PC gamers just now.

 

Fact is, if they drop the subs at all, it won't be anytime soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SierraSonic
6 minutes ago, LostCat said:

If this line of thought had any relevance they wouldn't have introduced it for PC gamers just now.

 

Fact is, if they drop the subs at all, it won't be anytime soon.

EA's track record has been to abandon games within 10 years, even if they keep EA Access afloat, the back end game services will close down and the games will be useless.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
LostCat

At which point the single player would most likely still work fine where available, and multiplayer will have tens of new titles available anyway.

 

Next I suppose you'll tell me how the great god Origin fell under their command and they continue killing puppies and strangling babies.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SierraSonic
12 minutes ago, LostCat said:

At which point the single player would most likely still work fine where available, and multiplayer will have tens of new titles available anyway.

 

Next I suppose you'll tell me how the great god Origin fell under their command and they continue killing puppies and strangling babies.

Battlefield games, specifically BF2, are a great example of games that were screwed over by EA, saved by the community.

Great God What? Yes, you got me, I'm going to use wild and wacky fairy tales to try to win an argument based on facts.

I'm sure I own more EA titles than people with EA access and still spent less than someone who had it from the start. I put more faith in Valve with the Steam platform than I would ever put into EA with origin.

Link to post
Share on other sites
LostCat

What you're using is a template of ancient history and applying it to a modern service, despite it's irrelevance to the topic at hand.

 

Origin Systems.  And yes, I have basically heard that one from a bunch of Ultima fanatics I know.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SierraSonic

Ancient? It literally happened June of last year, to over 50 EA games, AFTER Origin was a thing.

 

Never played Ultima. Keep trying these misguided attempts instead of arguing the subject matter though, which should be the perceived value of EA Access, specifically it being free for a limited time for members of another pay for service that should be free, and wouldn't be paid for if it didn't hold multiplayer hostage.

Link to post
Share on other sites
MikeChipshop
5 hours ago, SierraSonic said:

That sounds like a nice way of saying "you get screwed out of all the titles you paid for monthly, and now to continue playing them, have to pay what any other person would have".

I'm sorry, are you not familiar with 'renting'? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
HawkMan
On 18.5.2016 at 5:30 PM, SierraSonic said:

That wasn't my intent, I was showing my dislike for EA Access and Gold/Plus, consoles are great devices that are being held back by said services. Like I said, for people who find the value in them, they are good/better, than the alternatives, such as not having them.

 

Regarding discounts, I think its overall cheaper to buy outright if your willing to wait for the GOTY editions of games or when there are bundles/sales than the savings you get by paying for savings. EA Access is for people who need the latest, right away, but I think in the long run they end up paying more. I've spent less than $500 for this gaming library. https://steamdb.info/calculator/76561197969306956/?cc=us

I realize the site says over $1k spent, but that's not fair seeing as I spent $8 or less for multiple bundles of 8-10 games, and they are calculating based only on steams lowest price.

EA access isn't for multiplayer. EA access gives you rebates on games, AND access to a very nice ever expanding library fo games while you pay. 

 

So why are you complainign about paying for multiplayer in a thread about EA access. Gold is also worth if for the Games With Gold alone. But, think of how the Live community(or any online gaming community) is now, Then imagine if every teen and pre teen kid has access to live for free and could make new accounts with full online access whenever they wanted and banning had no measurable impact on them...

 

yeah, online would be an absolute cess pool. just like F2P games are a cesspool compared to the mild annoyance that is P2P games. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
HawkMan
5 hours ago, SierraSonic said:

That sounds like a nice way of saying "you get screwed out of all the titles you paid for monthly, and now to continue playing them, have to pay what any other person would have".

You didn't pay for them you paid for access to them, like you pay for access to Spotify/Groove/et al, or Netflix. 

 

and if you buy their games, the rebates makes EA Access worth it as well. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
HawkMan
5 hours ago, SierraSonic said:

EA's track record has been to abandon games within 10 years, even if they keep EA Access afloat, the back end game services will close down and the games will be useless.

But by the time they close down their ea sports 2015 games, their 2017 and 2018 and possibly 2019 games will be out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
LostCat

http://www.ea.com/1/service-updates Yes, it happened.  But not last year.  And to titles who had a good five or more year run and for the most part barely anyone was actually playing online.  And in most cases the single player portion still worked.

 

The reason it's irrelevant to this conversation is it hasn't happened to anything under the EA Access program.

 

And as they said, EA Access has nothing to do with paying for multiplayer, though it might well help pay server costs to keep services going longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SierraSonic
17 hours ago, MikeChipshop said:

I'm sorry, are you not familiar with 'renting'? 

Yes I am, and it is a waste of money.

17 hours ago, HawkMan said:

EA access isn't for multiplayer. EA access gives you rebates on games, AND access to a very nice ever expanding library fo games while you pay. 

 

So why are you complainign about paying for multiplayer in a thread about EA access. Gold is also worth if for the Games With Gold alone. But, think of how the Live community(or any online gaming community) is now, Then imagine if every teen and pre teen kid has access to live for free and could make new accounts with full online access whenever they wanted and banning had no measurable impact on them...

 

yeah, online would be an absolute cess pool. just like F2P games are a cesspool compared to the mild annoyance that is P2P games. 

Xbox Live is for multiplayer, and the title clearly states that XBL gets EA Access for free for a short time.

 

Games for gold is MS's EA Access, as long as you pay you get the games, stop paying and lose them, like renting.

 

Paywalls aren't a good solution to solve annoyingness, have you play l4d? Those games are troll city and aren't free. The main problem with paying for multiplayer is that people who can't afford to ###### away money monthly on entertainment are locked out. Rich bastards who want to troll still get access.

 

13 hours ago, LostCat said:

http://www.ea.com/1/service-updates Yes, it happened.  But not last year.  And to titles who had a good five or more year run and for the most part barely anyone was actually playing online.  And in most cases the single player portion still worked.

 

The reason it's irrelevant to this conversation is it hasn't happened to anything under the EA Access program.

 

And as they said, EA Access has nothing to do with paying for multiplayer, though it might well help pay server costs to keep services going longer.

Yet.

 

And yes, I mixed up BF2's date with BF:P4F, but they were within a year of each other, and how many games were dropped when BF2 was? A lot.

 

And you have to realise, I buy games when they either become GOTY editions that include all DLC, or when they are around $20, which means my playtime gets even more limited. Yet I still play HL and it's mods since 1999. They even completely overhauled the games since then. I just prefer to support the better support model. I'm just explaining my side of the story. Plus playing monthly isn't viable for gaming when I could barely play 4 hours a month now a days.

Link to post
Share on other sites
MikeChipshop
7 hours ago, SierraSonic said:

Yes I am, and it is a waste of money.

In your opinion. Seems quite a few folk, myself included, disagree with that. You know what though? That's fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SierraSonic
10 hours ago, MikeChipshop said:

In your opinion. Seems quite a few folk, myself included, disagree with that. You know what though? That's fine.

Actually the only time to rent something is when something you bought is broken and you need it out of necessity, for example a car. Almost every other time it just doesn't make sense to spend money to temporarily have something, especially with long term renting, as it usually ends up being cheaper to buy outright.  Unless we are talking about rent to own, where you pay extra to pay toward eventually keeping what you rented. I read articles online that state it make sense to rent a house where you live instead of buying, but that only makes sense if you plan on upgrading your house constantly or selling it off. But IMO renting it out instead of selling it makes more sense. It's easy to rent to those who think it saves them money, and even then it basically only makes sense if you plan to move a lot.

 

Regardless, when it comes to these services, it makes just as much sense as it does for a car or house, spend money for instant gratification and only lose out long term.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
HawkMan
On 28.5.2016 at 2:46 AM, SierraSonic said:

 

Xbox Live is for multiplayer

 

Games for gold is MS's EA Access, as long as you pay you get the games, stop paying and lose them, like renting.

 

 

A or B, not both

Link to post
Share on other sites
SierraSonic
10 minutes ago, HawkMan said:

A or B, not both

What do you mean?

 

Both were available subject matter due to the way the title and content of the article were presented.

On ‎5‎/‎27‎/‎2016 at 2:11 AM, HawkMan said:

But by the time they close down their ea sports 2015 games, their 2017 and 2018 and possibly 2019 games will be out. 

That's supposed to be a good thing? I've hated yearly game titles since the 90s. Great way to make small changes and make full profit year on year, even car manufactures make noticeable mid cycle refreshes and then worthwhile changes every cycle. Yearly cycles are just a money grab and work as a way of outdating the previous title quicker. Same with yearly refreshes of phones. All pointless in the end when you can just wait a bit longer to get the significant updates.

Edited by SierraSonic
Link to post
Share on other sites
HawkMan

Live is for MP. EA access is for games subscription of rebates. not MP, Live offers some if it to, but it's not it's reason for existing.

 

they are up for 2-3 years at least. and they're sports games, regular improvements and changes are part of the game. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
SierraSonic
10 hours ago, HawkMan said:

Live is for MP. EA access is for games subscription of rebates. not MP, Live offers some if it to, but it's not it's reason for existing.

 

they are up for 2-3 years at least. and they're sports games, regular improvements and changes are part of the game. 

Live, and thus Games for gold, were mentioned in the article and title, they can be talked about. They are comparable services that other than also giving access to multiplayer also allow renting of games such as EA access does.

 

Small patch like changes and roster updates do not make for full game releases.

Link to post
Share on other sites
HawkMan

EA access is a pure renting service, Live is not, live is a multiplayer access service. the games you get are completely a bonus, it's also not a rent in the same way since you only get games released while you subscribed not all of them. 

 

you're working very hard to compare apples to grilled steak for some reason. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
xendrome
14 hours ago, SierraSonic said:

Actually the only time to rent something is when something you bought is broken and you need it out of necessity, for example a car. Almost every other time it just doesn't make sense to spend money to temporarily have something, especially with long term renting, as it usually ends up being cheaper to buy outright.  

So you buy every movie you want to watch? Never go to the theater, or pay for TV? That's the same thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SierraSonic
1 hour ago, HawkMan said:

EA access is a pure renting service, Live is not, live is a multiplayer access service. the games you get are completely a bonus, it's also not a rent in the same way since you only get games released while you subscribed not all of them. 

 

you're working very hard to compare apples to grilled steak for some reason. 

My comparison is with games for gold and ea access, my extra hate is requiring gold for multiplayer in the first place. Making live even worse, but both are still bad.

1 hour ago, xendrome said:

So you buy every movie you want to watch? Never go to the theater, or pay for TV? That's the same thing.

The difference with movies is that even if I bought every movie I ever watched I wouldn't be able to live long enough to see all the ones I want to, and even then, most of the movies I'd watch once and that satisfies me enough at that point. I own movies I want to watch over and over, I rent* movies for filling in the gap.

 

*Rent includes subscribing to xfinity triple play (because it overall saves me money with phone and internet services, and I have free HBO and ShowTime for life). Hulu, Netflix, and amazon prime (because my girlfriend likes to watch series in one sitting, needs access to exclusives, and I like the other benefits of prime as I more than cover free shipping twice over a year), and going to the theater (mainly for the experience with others).

 

I have justifications for my renting, even though overall I hate the idea of it I can find ways to make it worth it. I always use coupons for the movie theater, usually a free ticket coupon. Hulu and Netflix are technically my only extra renting services, but again not mainly for me. Pandora is my main guilt trip with renting, but if I'm not watching tv, or playing games, I always have music playing especially at work, and it's quality is better than youtube, and it keeps the ads away, also I have pretty generic taste in music and don't like to specify my musical interests. Even in the car I only started to use it to bypass radio ads. If multiplayer was more worth it (as if I had more time to dedicate to gaming specifically on the xbox) I'd consider getting it, but it's value right now would only increase if I limit pc gaming and had 4x more free time. As it is, I use the 2 week trials and am done after that, not one game that is exclusive to a console has held my interest enough to force me to pay monthly for it.

 

I want to get solar panels and live off the grid, have an electric car to stop "renting" gas, and overall do not like to give money away on one time expenses unless they are for my survival or a rare lifetime event. I want to have enough money stored away to be able to get a insurance exemption. I value my life enough to rent health insurance. ETC

Edited by SierraSonic
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By LoneWolfSL
      Halo 4 Insider testing is now live across PC and Xbox One, brings cross-play support
      by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe

      343 Industries planned to kick off the first Insider test of Halo 4 last weekend but was pushed back at the last minute. In a surprise opening and without waiting for the next weekend, the developer has now kicked off the highly-anticipated flight. If previous plans hold true, everyone who has signed up to be a Halo Insider will receive an invite this time, meaning both PC (across Steam and Microsoft Store) and Xbox One users are eligible.

      According to 343 Industries community manager John Junyshek, the invites are still going out in waves, so keep an eye out for an email with instructions or head to HaloWaypoint and check for notifications there.

      From Halo 4, this flight contains Requiem, Forerunner, Reclaimer, Shutdown, and Composer campaign missions, 11 multiplayer maps across Social and Competitive playlists, and Spartan Ops content, among other enhancements such as Forge improvements, advanced graphics options, and an FOV slider.

      Aside from those, 343 Industries is finally preparing to bring cross-play across PC and Xbox One versions as well as input-based matchmaking and server region selection capabilities to the Master Chief Collection. The testing of these features is also happening in this build.

      In other Halo news, it was announced earlier today that Halo: The Master Chief Collection will be receiving Xbox Series X|S enhancements on November 17, bringing many enhancements that have been made to the new PC version over to the next-gen console version.

    • By LoneWolfSL
      Fallout 76 goes free-to-play for a week across all platforms
      by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe



      In the Fallout universe, October 23 marks the day that the almost-world-ending thermonuclear war began, kicking off the events that spawned all the Fallout storylines fans know and love. Celebrating the occasion, Bethesda is hosting a Free Play event for Fallout 76 alongside sales and more.

      From now until October 26, Fallout 76 is free-to-play across PC (Steam and Bethesda client), Xbox One, and PlayStation 4, with the full game - including the human NPC-adding Wastelanders update - available to try out. However, keep in mind that Xbox Live Gold is still a requirement for Xbox One players.

      Moreover, the Fallout 76 subscription service, Fallout 1st, has also received a trial for players to try out for free until October 26. Interested wasteland dwellers can find a Fallout 1st Limited Preview item in the Atomic Shop, which will grant them access to the Scrapbox and Survival Tent. The former provides unlimited storage for crafting components, while the latter is a user-spawned, fully-equipped fast-travel point.

      Picking up Fallout 76 will allow players to carry on where they left off following the free event's departure without losing their progress. The base game is discounted by 60% during the event across all platforms, with further sales happening for the Fallout 76 Deluxe Edition, various bundles, as well as Atoms. Discounts for Fallout 4 and Fallout Shelter in-game bundles have also kicked off celebrating the event.

    • By Asher Madan
      Xbox Deals with Gold feature Fallout, Madden NFL, and more
      by Asher Madan



      Every week, Microsoft and select publishers discount a number of titles for weekly Deals with Gold, Spotlight, and Publisher (Cozy Games and Bombs Drop) sales. This week, games from Fallout, Madden NFL, and other franchises are available for substantially less.

      Below, you'll find the Xbox One and Xbox 360 games with their respective discounts. Xbox Live Gold members receive additional discounts on a number of titles through the paid subscription.

      Xbox One

      Xbox 360

      Many of the Xbox 360 games appear to be backward compatible so you'll be able to play them on your Xbox One and the upcoming Xbox Series X|S. Currently, Microsoft isn't adding any more backward compatible titles to the program, but that should change in 2021.

      Which titles are you interested in? Did you pick any up? Let us know in the comments below.

    • By Usama Jawad96
      Pulling an EA: NBA 2K21 now has unskippable ads during loading screens
      by Usama Jawad

      EA received a lot of flak last month for introducing advertisements in UFC 4 a month after launch, and the company eventually had to remove them following backlash. While fan outcry should have been a clear indicator to other companies that gamers are not a fan of this tactic of being forced to watch ads in a premium game, it appears that 2K Sports has done exactly the same with its latest release, NBA 2K21.

      NBA 2K21 launched on current-gen consoles, PC, and Stadia on September 4, 2020, and is slated for release on next-gen consoles next month. Depending upon which version of the game you buy, you could end up paying a base price of $60 all the way up to $100. Regardless of it being a premium title, it appears that the publisher has decided to introduce unskippable advertisements in the game, a month after launch.

      Stevivor recorded adverts for the Oculus Quest 2 on Xbox One, PlayStation 4, and PC editions of the title, during pre-game loading screens. The site says that sometimes these ads run even longer than it takes for NBA 2K21 to load, which is quite ridiculous, as it indicates that you're essentially being forced to watch an ad even though the game has fully loaded.

      See one of the jarring ad in the video below:

      The move is certainly despicable considering NBA 2K21 is a full-priced AAA game and that advertisements have been suddenly introduced a month after launch, without warning. That said, the publisher did the same with last year's entry in the franchise so while these ads are not entirely surprising, it's understandable that players are outraged that the company is continuing this practice.

      Source: Stevivor via IGN

    • By Asher Madan
      You can earn these Destiny 2: Trials of Osiris rewards from October 16 to 20
      by Asher Madan



      Every week, Destiny 2 hosts a Trials of Osiris event where teams of three compete for access to The Lighthouse. The Lighthouse promises Pinnacle rewards that boost you closer to the current Power Level cap.

      The player vs. player competition also grants other items if you get three, five, or seven wins. However, you'll have to get seven wins in a row, without a loss, if you want to grab the Pinnacle gear from The Lighthouse. You can take a look at the Trials of Osiris rewards from October 16 to 20 below.

      Three wins: Arms of the Exile legendary armor Five wins: Astral Horizon legendary shotgun Seven wins: Tomorrow's Answer legendary rocket launcher Flawless: Helmet of the Exile legendary armor Trials of Osiris starts at 1 PM EDT on Friday and lasts until 1 PM EDT on Tuesday. You can use the Passage of Mercy from Saint-14 because it forgives one loss if you're aiming for Flawless. If you manage to get seven wins in a row, you'll have to manually select The Lighthouse location displayed in the Crucible menu to obtain the Pinnacle reward. This involves jumping across a few platforms and opening the chest where Saint-14 and Osiris are standing.