Oklahoma Legislature passes bill that would criminalizing abortion procedures except to save a mother's life.


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

It has not and never will be overturned. It has been the law of the land for way too long to stop it now. Just think what the poverty level would be now without it??

Gary7 - that is, in and of itself - little better.  Yes; the issue is fractious; however, there are folks - on both sides - that still seek that un-alterable Final Decision, simply because they are unable - or unwilling - to "let a sleeping dog lie".

51 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

But that's my point, this law IS making that choice for someone else, and its making it blindly instead of doing the only logical thing and leaving it to the parents and the doctors; the only ones qualified to make that decision.

 

It's forcing the morals and beliefs of unqualified lawmakers onto other people, with zero consideration to the circumstances of the specific case. It's doubly wrong in Ireland, where the anti-abortion law is wholly based on the catholic religion and forced on -everyone- irrespective of their beliefs.

The reason why I am ok with such a law is because I don't believe this is a choice that should be made by anyone other than a doctor who believes it's medically necessary, or a court. Abortions are not necessary in any way, shape or form (sans the exceptions I've already provided). You don't want the child, then put it up for adoption. People seem to paint this extremely black and white, as if the inability to abort your child suddenly removes you of all choices you have regarding that child. It doesn't.

There is a place and a time for abortion, and legally defining that in my personal opinion is perfectly valid. Just as many medical procedures aren't just handed out for any old reason, neither should abortions. Unless medically necessary or rape is involved I personally believe an abortion has no ethical or moral ground to stand on, and also has little practical value (when you consider moral and ethical discussion). You can argue all you want that you are "saving them from a terrible life", but you don't actually know that.

2 minutes ago, Emn1ty said:

The reason why I am ok with such a law is because I don't believe this is a choice that should be made by anyone other than a doctor who believes it's medically necessary, or a court. Abortions are not necessary in any way, shape or form (sans the exceptions I've already provided). You don't want the child, then put it up for adoption. People seem to paint this extremely black and white, as if the inability to abort your child suddenly removes you of all choices you have regarding that child. It doesn't.

There is a place and a time for abortion, and legally defining that in my personal opinion is perfectly valid. Just as many medical procedures aren't just handed out for any old reason, neither should abortions. Unless medically necessary or rape is involved I personally believe an abortion has no ethical or moral ground to stand on, and also has little practical value (when you consider moral and ethical discussion). You can argue all you want that you are "saving them from a terrible life", but you don't actually know that.

Abortion is a very private issue, and only 2 people should be involved in that decision, the doctor and the woman thinking about the abortion.

Nobody else should be sticking their noses in it!

  • Like 2
Just now, Emn1ty said:

or rape is involved

Then why give rape a special dispensation?  It's not the baby's fault its the result of a violent attack, is it?  By your own logic, as the mother wouldn't normally be at risk to deliver, it could easily be adopted out. What matters the woman's state of mind if made to carry it to term? Seeing as you're ignoring the mental health of a couple with a seriously impaired baby, why consider a rape victims?

 

You're trying to apply broad rules to cases where that's just not possible. The individual case situation must always be considered.

1 minute ago, Stoffel said:

Abortion is a very private issue, and only 2 people should be involved in that decision, the doctor and the woman thinking about the abortion.

Nobody else should be sticking their noses in it!

To be fair, the father should have some input too.

  • Like 3
11 minutes ago, Stoffel said:

Abortion is a very private issue, and only 2 people should be involved in that decision, the doctor and the woman thinking about the abortion.

Nobody else should be sticking their noses in it!

I could care less about it being private, a regulation doesn't breech privacy in this case. It's red tape, not a government official standing in the room with you while you discuss it. Do you think mental health doctors should report potentially violent and homicidal behavior to local authorities, or is that not a good idea because mental health is a "private" issue? Be it private or not, there are some standards we need to set. Or is it just the cost of doing business?

 

9 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Then why give rape a special dispensation?  It's not the baby's fault its the result of a violent attack, is it?  By your own logic, as the mother wouldn't normally be at risk to deliver, it could easily be adopted out. What matters the woman's state of mind if made to carry it to term? Seeing as you're ignoring the mental health of a couple with a seriously impaired baby, why consider a rape victims?

 

You're trying to apply broad rules to cases where that's just not possible. The individual case situation must always be considered.

Rape is a special dispensation because it is something outside your control. Rape is the one scenario where you have been given something against your will, while any other circumstance is something you had complete control over. You didn't take all the precautions, don't rely on a procedure that wouldn't have been necessary to begin with.

Yes, I am painting a broad brush, but that's how policy works. You have to take into consideration the general, while leaving room for the specific. As I said, there should always be room for special circumstances but I don't think this issue should be left up to almost entirely the mother as it presently is. If people aren't going to take the proper precautions when it comes to sexual encounters, that's their problem. Privacy has nothing to do with that, and we shouldn't foster such thinking. When I have more time, I will take a look into if there's any numbers on the reasons people get abortions and see what the most common reasons are (and whether or not this particular law would affect them and if they do, whether or not that reason really justifies such an action).

4 minutes ago, Emn1ty said:

If people aren't going to take the proper precautions when it comes to sexual encounters, that's their problem.

Just to clarify, I don't believe an abortion should generally be allowed unless there is a medical reason for it. As you say, adoption is available so personal choice shouldn't be a factor, just medical indication.

 

Just now, FloatingFatMan said:

Just to clarify, I don't believe an abortion should generally be allowed unless their is a medical reason for it. As you say, adoption is available so personal choice shouldn't be a factor, just medical indication.

 

Right, which perhaps this bill is a bit heavy handed but to me it does have ground. It's a medical decision, it should have medical precedent beyond just, "I wasn't planning to have a kid."

12 minutes ago, Emn1ty said:

I could care less about it being private, a regulation doesn't breech privacy in this case. It's red tape, not a government official standing in the room with you while you discuss it. Do you think mental health doctors should report potentially violent and homicidal behavior to local authorities, or is that not a good idea because mental health is a "private" issue? Be it private or not, there are some standards we need to set. Or is it just the cost of doing business?

 

You are comparing two completely different things here!

A woman having an abortion has no effect on anyone other than the woman.

Not reporting somebody with potentially violent and homicidal behavior can have a serious impact on the well being of others.

 

They have set a standard years ago with Roe vs Wade, so why is it that some people want to change the law? And why is it always bible thumpers?

17 minutes ago, Ravensky said:

You mean back to where it should have stayed...

Back in the good old days where black people had no rights, women weren't allowed to vote and the white man was high and mighty?

Those good old days you mean?!?

Gotta love the predictably backwards nature of conservatives.

29 minutes ago, Stoffel said:

You are comparing two completely different things here!

A woman having an abortion has no effect on anyone other than the woman.

Not reporting somebody with potentially violent and homicidal behavior can have a serious impact on the well being of others.

 

They have set a standard years ago with Roe vs Wade, so why is it that some people want to change the law? And why is it always bible thumpers?

And possibly the father, and her family as well the child to be. Children affect more than just the woman carrying them (something people also seem to ignore). Why is suicide looked down on when it "doesn't affect anyone other than the person who did it"? It's their choice, right? Their body? Their life? This logic has many holes.

 

And if you think the opposition is just "bible thumpers", you're ignoring the moral quandary would still exist without religion.

  • Like 2
1 minute ago, Emn1ty said:

And possibly the father, and her family as well the child to be. Children affect more than just the woman carrying them (something people also seem to ignore). Why is suicide looked down on when it "doesn't affect anyone other than the person who did it"? It's their choice, right? Their body? Their life? This logic has many holes.

 

What child/children are you talking about? If the woman chooses to abort there are no children affected. Who said anything about looking down on suicide? Why do you always come up with comparisons that make no sense what so ever?

As far as I know there is no law against suicide so it looks like people have less issues with that than abortion.

I am a big fan of assisted suicide like it exists in the Netherlands

1 hour ago, Emn1ty said:

Rape is a special dispensation because it is something outside your control. 

 

 

You know what else is outside of your control ?

 

How the genes that are passed on from the mother and father to create the baby and the potential for diseases and disabilities to occur.

 

One child you have could be perfectly healthy and the next one could be disabled or otherwise impaired.

51 minutes ago, Stoffel said:

 

What child/children are you talking about? If the woman chooses to abort there are no children affected. Who said anything about looking down on suicide? Why do you always come up with comparisons that make no sense what so ever?

As far as I know there is no law against suicide so it looks like people have less issues with that than abortion.

I am a big fan of assisted suicide like it exists in the Netherlands

There is no law because there's no way to punish someone who is dead. But if suicide was legally accepted, euthanasia wouldn't be illegal in the US. But it is. And there is a potential child affected (emphasis so you understand the context).

 

The point is, an abortion affects more than just the mother. Do you dispute that?

 

38 minutes ago, ramesees said:

You know what else is outside of your control ?

 

How the genes that are passed on from the mother and father to create the baby and the potential for diseases and disabilities to occur.

 

One child you have could be perfectly healthy and the next one could be disabled or otherwise impaired.

And thus why I said if there's a legitimate medical reason for a fetus to be aborted, then by all means. This is for the doctor to decide, not the woman having the child. There are definitely things you have control over and things you don't, but we shouldn't be aborting children just because we were loose in our application of preventative measures or because the kid has a mental illness or a physical deformation. This kind of thought process reminds me distinctly of eugenics, but is "justified" by the moral excuse of "well they aren't a real person yet.". If that makes things "ok" for you, then I guess that's your prerogative. But personally I find it quite unnecessary and frankly presumptuous to choose to snuff out a potential life for whatever trivial reason you can come up with, especially for reasons that you couldn't possibly know to be the case before they come to pass.

http://www.wikihow.com/Put-a-Child-up-for-Adoption

 

Best case scenario although if you're willing to go through all that, it's best you not get preggo in the first place. Some can't afford it so rather than deal with  the consequences and responsibility, will use the abortion method in whichever state (few and far between) that allow it. Some will even go as far as abandoning it in some street corner or on the doorsteps of a church in hopes they'll deal with the problem she created. As much as it feels good for skin on skin contact, wearing a condom is a safer bet than the pill.

9 hours ago, illegaloperation said:

Of cause they have to be reasonable restrictions. (i.e. no backyard abortions)

 

Banning abortions for political reasons aren't reasonable restrictions.

 

Depending on the poll,  60-65% want seriously restricted abortions, and I guarantee you that includes many in the medical professions. 

 

9 hours ago, illegaloperation said:

How about every time there's a baby that nobody wants to adopt, he/she is dropped off at your house and it is your responsibility to raise him/her on your own dime?

A baby is the easiest child to get adopted. Prospective adoptive parents stampede over each other to get inline. Its getting the older kids adopted that is hard.

 

Many US states & municipalities have laws where an unwanted child can be dropped at a fire house or medical facility, no questions asked.

This is what happens when half your eligible voting population can't be bothered getting off their backside to vote in state elections - you allow the most extreme to hijack the process and end up with that sort of legislation being passed. People might want to blame the politicians who make these laws but it is the voters who put these politicians in charge in the first place just as Scott Walker was voted in by the majority of his state - if you want to get angry then don't blame Scott because he and his party were up front about what they wanted to do and if people decided to sit on and skip voting then whose fault is it?

Edited by Mr Nom Nom's
27 minutes ago, Mr Nom Nom's said:

This is what happens when half your eligible voting population can't be bothered getting off their backside to vote in state elections - 

In Oklahoma it wouldn't matter what the turnout is because 57% of Democrats and 68.7% overall there are pro-life. 

 

http://soonerpoll.com/oklahoma-is-a-pro-life-state/

12 hours ago, warwagon said:

A side from rape, there are really no reason women should be getting pregnant (knocked up) by accident. One girl I knew was having sex with a guy who she told me he never wore a condom and he never pulled out. She said, it's ok "i'm on the pill".

 

I said.. uh if you miss a pill or for some reason the pill doesn't work, I see a child in your future. She said "Don't worry about it"

 

Her child is now 8 months old :laugh:

 

It really makes you wonder if these people ever took sex ed.

 

 

Frankly, I'm paranoid when it comes to this sort of thing. I don't want a kid, and I don't want an STD/STI from a chick. My brother has Chlamydia right now. He didn't wrap it, and he got more than just a one nighter.  I abide by this rule;

 

Wrap it before you Tap it.

Abortion is gravely wrong (i.e. mortal sin) in the eyes of God (i.e. The Holy Trinity (Father/Son(Jesus Christ)/Holy Spirit)). so outside of some rare circumstances (like doing it to save the mothers life for example), abortion is ALWAYS wrong.

 

That's the truth.

 

basically the liberals, who are pro-choice, put a persons choice higher than a persons right to life. their choice came when they choose to have sex and a child is an effect of that choice. now they should take responsibility for their choice.

 

nice to see Oklahoma trying to follow God's ways instead of society for a change ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!