Oklahoma Legislature passes bill that would criminalizing abortion procedures except to save a mother's life.


Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, ThaCrip said:

That's the truth.

No, that's YOUR truth, given to you by the writings of some farmer's imaginary friend 2000 or so years ago.  If it happened today, they'd be put in a nice soft room.  

 

You're entitled to believe what you like, but you don't get to call it the truth and you don't get to make others abide by your truth.

Without reading all the other posts, my personal view, which is likely to be unpopular I'm sure is this:

 

Today people are probably more promiscuous than ever before, so, accidents DO happen. If someone does get pregnant accidently and feels they are not ready or in a position to have the child, then they should be allowed to have the option to terminate. However, there should be other consequences to this. Educational programs they should be made to attend etc. and even strict fines for repeat offenders. The money made can go to helping those who struggle to conceive.

 

In my mind, if you disallow people to abort, then you will end up with unruly people running around in future generations, as their own parents where not in a position to actually parent them properly themselves. It becomes a vicious cycle.

3 hours ago, DocM said:

In Oklahoma it wouldn't matter what the turnout is because 57% of Democrats and 68.7% overall there are pro-life. 

 

http://soonerpoll.com/oklahoma-is-a-pro-life-state/

Surprising - oh well, they get what they deserve either way.

 

14 hours ago, warwagon said:

A side from rape, there are really no reason women should be getting pregnant (knocked up) by accident. One girl I knew was having sex with a guy who she told me he never wore a condom and he never pulled out. She said, it's ok "i'm on the pill".

 

I said.. uh if you miss a pill or for some reason the pill doesn't work, I see a child in your future. She said "Don't worry about it"

 

Her child is now 8 months old :laugh:

 

It really makes you wonder if these people ever took sex ed.

Same thing happened when I was doing some relief work at another store around 80km from where I live - one girl has had 5 abortions: does she use the pill? nope, makes her bloated and feel fat. Does her boyfriend use a condom? nope, doesn't like the feel of latex. So basically as a person living in a single payer health system I'm subsidising that idiot's reckless behaviour. Personally I don't give two hoots if someone is getting an abortion for what ever reason but I do have a major problem I'm the one subsidising the result of really stupid life choices. Really, if I was a woman I'd be petrified about getting pregnant and having my life destroyed - if I was going to have sex I'd not only be on the pill but also insisting that my lover was using a condom to protect me from STD's.

1 hour ago, Mr Nom Nom's said:

Really, if I was a woman I'd be petrified about getting pregnant and having my life destroyed

Jeez dude. Having a baby does not "destroy" your life! I have 2 kids, and they're the most wonderful things that ever happened to me after meeting my partner! Get a little perspective please.

2 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Jeez dude. Having a baby does not "destroy" your life! I have 2 kids, and they're the most wonderful things that ever happened to me after meeting my partner! Get a little perspective please.

If you're not in a financial position to be able to support those kids the yes, it can destroy your life.

1 minute ago, Mr Nom Nom's said:

If you're not in a financial position to be able to support those kids the yes, it can destroy your life.

No, it doesn't. It may make your future difficult, but in no way does it "destroy" your life.

21 minutes ago, Mr Nom Nom's said:

If you're not in a financial position to be able to support those kids the yes, it can destroy your life.

This is exactly how I see it. Not just financially though, but also other personal factors. If your not mentally ready or have other live events that need to take precedent, then absolutely you should be given the option to terminate.

 

However, if you continually keep getting yourself pregnant and wanting to abort, there has to be strict penalties, including jail time for absolute pee taking.

 

18 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

No, it doesn't. It may make your future difficult, but in no way does it "destroy" your life.

I don't agree that it would destroy a life, but it would change it dramatically. If your not at a point in your life where you are stable enough to parent a child, then you should have the option to terminate.

Just now, restroom said:

I don't agree that it would destroy a life, but it would change it dramatically. If your not at a point in your life where you are stable enough to parent a child, then you should have the option to terminate.

Adoption.

41 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

No, it doesn't. It may make your future difficult, but in no way does it "destroy" your life.

All your hopes, dreams and aspirations for the future have now been destroyed - from that moment onwards you have no life because your life now revolves around taking care of another life. So yes, your life has been destroyed because you are no longer able to fulfil your life but hope that with enough denial that maybe you can find meaning and purpose in something you never wanted in the first place in much the same way that a person with cancer tries to console themselves about God putting them on a new path and it is a new test of faith that they need to preserver through. Denying reality doesn't make a calamity magically disappear or transform into a 'blessing' no matter how much you may want to deny the obviousness of what is standing before you.

Just now, Mr Nom Nom's said:

All your hopes, dreams and aspirations for the future have now been destroyed - from that moment onwards you have no life because your life now revolves around taking care of another life. So yes, your life has been destroyed because you are no longer able to fulfil your life but hope that with enough denial that maybe you can find meaning and purpose in something you never wanted in the first place in much the same way that a person with cancer tries to console themselves about God putting them on a new path and it is a new test of faith that they need to preserver through.

I'm a parent. You are completely, utterly, categorically and unalterably, wrong.

6 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Adoption.

I see adoption as something that can should be used as a last resort. I.E. someone wanted and had a child, but something happens and they no longer want or are unable to adequately look after the child, so send them for adoption. Why would you force someone to have a child when they don't want, then disrupt that childs life by having it adopted? My friend turned to drugs and eventually killed himself once her found out he was adopted...

3 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

I'm a parent. You are completely, utterly, categorically and unalterably, wrong.

I'm a parent too, but I kind of agree with him. Some people plan their lives out and don't want children involved in that equation. Just because it turned out ok for you, doesn't mean it would for everyone. If someone really didn't want that child, they could end up resentful toward it and in the long run then damage that child, who will go on to have children of their own and may pass that resentment along the line (may pass, not a guarantee).

 

People should be given the option, if that option is available, but should also face consequences, particularly If they abuse that system. Essentially, if someone continually falls pregnant and getting abortions, then eventually the option should be removed for them or essentially a form of sterilization.

 

Likewise, if a male keeps having children with different women and cant afford to pay for them or give them ALL a good upbringing, then I'm all for sterilization of that person too.

3 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

I'm a parent. You are completely, utterly, categorically and unalterably, wrong.

I wouldn't say he's wrong. I've known a couple of girls in the last few years. 1 had kids and every thing we did had to revolve around the kids. She could NEVER do ANYTHING at the spare of the moment. Can she come over? Gotta bring the kids. Can we go for a walk? Gotta bring the kids. Sure she could get a baby sitter but there again, she wasn't financially sound.

 

The other girl had no kids. She could come up and do stuff on a whim.

Just now, warwagon said:

I wouldn't say he's wrong. I've known a couple of girls in the last few years. 1 had kids and every thing we did had to revolve around the kids. Can she come over? Gotta bring the kids. Sure she could get a baby sitter but there again, she wasn't financially sound.

 

The other girl had no kids. She could come up and do stuff on a whim.

Oh noes, she had to plan stuff!! Her life is destroyed!!

 

(Yes, that IS sarcasm! :p )

 

2 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Oh noes, she had to plan stuff!! Her life is destroyed!!

 

(Yes, that IS sarcasm! :p )

 

The other one, who was free to do stuff on a whim was really refreshing.

 

I don't want kids, I've never wanted kids as long as I can remember. So Last year... actually more than a year, last May, I went and got fixed. No Natural kids for this guy!

Just now, warwagon said:

The other one, who was free to do stuff on a whim was really refreshing.

 

I don't want kids, I've never wanted kids as long as I can remember. So went and got fixed last year. No Natural kids for this guy!

That's fine for you, but the point i'm making here is that having a child does not "destroy" your life, at all. Sure, you have to make some changes, maybe some sacrifices, and plan more, but destroyed? That's nothing but ridiculous hyperbole.  If anything, kids massively enrich your life and make such changes well worth it.

 

My sister has 5 kids and no partner, she managed to still train as a nurse, get  a home, and have a good life. 

17 hours ago, Emn1ty said:

So at what point do mental and physical disabilities allow you to decide that someone else's potential life is not worth living? This is the problem, it's an ethics and morals discussion. But medically there's no harm in giving birth to that child. Are we like the Spartans now? Throwing our newborns off cliffs because they don't meet the requirements for a "good life"? Where do we draw this line?

Your anecdote, while moving, is irrelevant to policy. We cannot create policy on the minority of cases out there. The thing is, prior to birth was it absolutely known the number of complications the child would have? Was it predicted they would only live under two years? What about children who were, before or even upon birth given only a few years to live but then lived to be in their 20's and 30's? This is why such anecdotes aren't meaningful. For every case you can bring forward where limited or illegal abortions were a detriment I can name a scenario where such predictions were completely wrong and an abortion in those scenarios would have prevented that life from even having a chance.

So please, tell me. At what point do we have a right to choose whether or not someone's life is worth living for them? They aren't us, and you cannot possibly think you have the ability to judge whether or not the child got anything out of the short life she lived. It may seem a shame and a waste to you, but what about the child? If you had to choose between a shot at even some existence and oblivion what would you choose (and why are you making that choice for someone else, regardless of whether or not they are a person at the time of the decision)?

There are way too many variables. My boss for instance. His son, diagnosed Autistic. The doctors advised to institutionalise him as he would never speak, interact with others, or otherwise have any normal life. The parents did not take the expert medical advice and this, now 23 year old, graduated high school with honors, drives a car, graduated college, has a teaching job dealing with children with Autism. 

6 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

That's fine for you, but the point i'm making here is that having a child does not "destroy" your life, at all. Sure, you have to make some changes, maybe some sacrifices, and plan more, but destroyed? That's nothing but ridiculous hyperbole.  If anything, kids massively enrich your life and make such changes well worth it.

 

My sister has 5 kids and no partner, she managed to still train as a nurse, get  a home, and have a good life. 

Yes, I think Destroy is a bit too dramatic. Would it be safe to say while it doesn't destroy it does throw a giant curve ball? Once people have kids they go on and on about how they couldn't imagine life without them. Well of course. But you also can't miss what you haven't had.

 

 

42 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

That's fine for you, but the point i'm making here is that having a child does not "destroy" your life, at all. Sure, you have to make some changes, maybe some sacrifices, and plan more, but destroyed? That's nothing but ridiculous hyperbole.  If anything, kids massively enrich your life and make such changes well worth it.

 

My sister has 5 kids and no partner, she managed to still train as a nurse, get  a home, and have a good life. 

To take a quote that you used earlier... It does not destroy YOUR life. Being you in particular. Different people with different circumstances, it may well destroy their life... or at least their life as they know it.

  • Like 2
8 minutes ago, restroom said:

To take a quote that you used earlier... It does not destroy YOUR life. Being you in particular. Different people with different circumstances, it may well destroy their life... or at least their life as they know it.

Changed is not destroyed. If their life is "destroyed", they're dead, and kids don't do that! It just brings about a large change to their lives, that's all.  Enough with the stupid hyperbole.

3 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Changed is not destroyed. If their life is "destroyed", they're dead, and kids don't do that! It just brings about a large change to their lives, that's all.  Enough with the stupid hyperbole.

Sorry, but I disagree. If it destroys (as it can) your career then it certainly hasn't been of benefit to you and your not of benefit to the child by bringing it in to the world at that point in your life. If the person building a career was to wait to be more stable and capable, then surely that's better than having a child too soon.

 

I'm sorry, but you appear to be simply taking the word destroyed and making it out to be something which you know non of us meant, because you are becoming frustrated with our counter argument.

 

Perhaps "destroying their livelihood, career prospects" may better suite your requirement?

18 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

But that's my point, this law IS making that choice for someone else, and its making it blindly instead of doing the only logical thing and leaving it to the parents and the doctors; the only ones qualified to make that decision.

 

It's forcing the morals and beliefs of unqualified lawmakers onto other people, with zero consideration to the circumstances of the specific case. It's doubly wrong in Ireland, where the anti-abortion law is wholly based on the catholic religion and forced on -everyone- irrespective of their beliefs.

This, so much this for freedom from religion

 

 

9 hours ago, DocM said:

Depending on the poll,  60-65% want seriously restricted abortions, and I guarantee you that includes many in the medical professions. 

If the many in the medical professions includes you, a retired gyn-ob named Ron Paul and a retired ophthalmologist named Rand Paul, that does not qualify as many in the medical professions

Also, I would like to see the medical reasons on why the abortion procedures should be restricted, not the personal opinions or the blabber evnagelicals repeat ad nauseam.

Abortions are one of the safest medical procedure to date.

 

 

9 hours ago, chrisj1968 said:

I can see this as a good thing. Some women use Abortion as a form of birth control.

And why should it be a problem?

 

 

8 hours ago, ThaCrip said:

Abortion is gravely wrong (i.e. mortal sin) in the eyes of God (i.e. The Holy Trinity (Father/Son(Jesus Christ)/Holy Spirit)). so outside of some rare circumstances (like doing it to save the mothers life for example), abortion is ALWAYS wrong.

 

That's the truth.

 

basically the liberals, who are pro-choice, put a persons choice higher than a persons right to life. their choice came when they choose to have sex and a child is an effect of that choice. now they should take responsibility for their choice.

 

nice to see Oklahoma trying to follow God's ways instead of society for a change ;)

Wrong country, the theocracy where white bearded men are interpreting a holy book to meet their own goal is Saudi Arabia.

 

 

43 minutes ago, xrobwx said:

There are way too many variables. My boss for instance. His son, diagnosed Autistic. The doctors advised to institutionalise him as he would never speak, interact with others, or otherwise have any normal life. The parents did not take the expert medical advice and this, now 23 year old, graduated high school with honors, drives a car, graduated college, has a teaching job dealing with children with Autism. 

There is an entire specturm of Autisms and there have been leaps in children care and education since the 90s that allowed this kid to have a life.

 

 

6 minutes ago, restroom said:

I'm sorry, but you appear to be simply taking the word destroyed and making it out to be something which you know non of us meant, because you are becoming frustrated with our counter argument.

Then perhaps you need to read a dictionary and select the correct words to describe your arguments, instead of going for the dumb hyperbole?

Interesting discussion. I respect both sides. For me, I can't judge anyone else's life situation. Also, as a male, I will never know what it's like to be pregnant. I will say that if a woman really wants to abort her pregnancy, she will. If their are safe places to do that, great. Otherwise, we can go back to the coathanger days. The end result will be the same. I would also hazard a guess that those of you who say that these women should simply carry a baby to term and then give it up for adoption are predominantly men. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you are at a scale where that minor cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 and beyond WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a fully managed 10g+ switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports, a few 25g uplink ports are nice for this switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue. Just make sure you always connect them to your distribution/main switch, don't daisy chain, the path should never have more steps than Client>Access>Distribution>Firewall>Internet or Client>Access>Distribution>Server if it is local.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!