Should I Move?


Recommended Posts

Yep, it's a "Downstream/Community" Distro based on Red Hat. Should be rock-solid and dependable for your needs, and has pretty good Documentation (read: as good or even better than Debian), the Driver Support is what's known as "LTS Model" (like the LTS Releases of Ubuntu, but more frequently updated for Enterprise needs), and the Security advisories are usually discovered first on Fedora/RH packages.

 

So, in short, Fedora is a slightly higher learning curve, slightly older packages versus something like Arch or even Ubuntu, but the stability and speed will be something you're not used to. Things "just work".

 

Having said that ... I found Fedora a little bit on the bland side, to be frank. I also found it to be "old school" in it's approach, and how it does things. Stuff that we take for granted on Ubuntu and Mint, and even Debian systems, Fedora will make ya work for it. Maybe this has changed -- it's been four years since I've tried it out -- but that's how I remember it being.

1 hour ago, Unobscured Vision said:

Yep, it's a "Downstream/Community" Distro based on Red Hat. Should be rock-solid and dependable for your needs, and has pretty good Documentation (read: as good or even better than Debian), the Driver Support is what's known as "LTS Model" (like the LTS Releases of Ubuntu, but more frequently updated for Enterprise needs), and the Security advisories are usually discovered first on Fedora/RH packages.

 

So, in short, Fedora is a slightly higher learning curve, slightly older packages versus something like Arch or even Ubuntu, but the stability and speed will be something you're not used to. Things "just work".

 

Having said that ... I found Fedora a little bit on the bland side, to be frank. I also found it to be "old school" in it's approach, and how it does things. Stuff that we take for granted on Ubuntu and Mint, and even Debian systems, Fedora will make ya work for it. Maybe this has changed -- it's been four years since I've tried it out -- but that's how I remember it being.

You have any other suggestions? Other than the Debian family (Ubuntu, Mint)? I don't think I'm ready for Arch yet. What about PCLinuxOS, OpenSUSE, Slackware, Gentoo, Elementary, Zorin?

 

Edit: Actually, I'm just thinking, the hell why not? Why not use Arch? What i need to do is collect all my programs that I use, day in day out. Like gedit, usb image writer, archive manager, file manager, etc. And see if I can (I should, but..) get them on Arch. I can load all this up on my spare SSD drive. Once I'm comfortable, I can run it full time. Sound like a plan? I could even just clone the drive, too...

Edited by Mindovermaster

Uhhh ... well ... /ponder

 

Arch might not be the best choice for ya. You (like me) want something that's "just gonna work" without having to fuss around with it, paying attention to every niggling little detail that needs to be set up "just so" because the Devs won't assume a set of good defaults for their users. Fedora will do that for you -- and the learning curve isn't steep by any means. It's meant for Secretaries, Researchers, and such that need to get work done and don't have time to screw around with the system. Arch ... well, you'll spend three hours (average) getting things set up. And while it's doing that, you'll be "sitting in the dark, drinking coffee" without any guarantee that it'll even install the Bootloader properly. Not once has it installed correctly for me -- not once. 

 

Arch is for people who have the time to get it working and don't mind "the hard way".

 

Debian & Fedora is for people who work in Enterprise and don't have the time to mess around.

 

Mint & Ubuntu are for people who just want to use their Computers (mostly) without the complications.

 

It's all about what you need it to do.

5 hours ago, Unobscured Vision said:

Uhhh ... well ... /ponder

 

Arch might not be the best choice for ya. You (like me) want something that's "just gonna work" without having to fuss around with it, paying attention to every niggling little detail that needs to be set up "just so" because the Devs won't assume a set of good defaults for their users. Fedora will do that for you -- and the learning curve isn't steep by any means. It's meant for Secretaries, Researchers, and such that need to get work done and don't have time to screw around with the system. Arch ... well, you'll spend three hours (average) getting things set up. And while it's doing that, you'll be "sitting in the dark, drinking coffee" without any guarantee that it'll even install the Bootloader properly. Not once has it installed correctly for me -- not once. 

 

Arch is for people who have the time to get it working and don't mind "the hard way".

 

Debian & Fedora is for people who work in Enterprise and don't have the time to mess around.

 

Mint & Ubuntu are for people who just want to use their Computers (mostly) without the complications.

 

It's all about what you need it to do.

huh, OK. I'll try loading up Fedora this weekend. I want to get away from Ubuntu/Debian. Ubuntu just isn't me. And Debian has that nagging problem....

 

 

On 8/17/2016 at 1:43 AM, Unobscured Vision said:

<snip>

*bashes head on desk*

 

WHY?! WHY?!

 

I try to install Fedora, OK, all good, go to look up how to install NVIDIA drivers. go through it, after second restart, where you take out the neveau drivers, the Nvidia install (In TTY1) doesn't want to play nicely. So, I just reinstalled Fedora again, same issue. Yes, I know it is the driver for my card.

 

I just went, the hell with it. Install Mint 17.3 (I despise 18) When I installed the drivers, after the reset, it gives me that same error. The only thing that fixes it is going into repair (sp?) mode and quickly go out of it, and I get a desktop.

 

So, REALLY, something isn't playing up here. Is it just my GFX? Can't be my CPU/HDD/RAM....

I found this: http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia#GeForce_6.2BAC8-7

 

But it said I need to look at the Configuration page: http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration

And I couldn't run the .repo file. I couldn't find gpk file, either...

 

This is just odd, lol.

Update: I'm currently looking at ArchBang (I used to use CrunchBang, fork of Debian, but it dead now...) Has an easier installer. I remember using it several years ago.

 

And the NVIDIA install looks 1000x easier... Yeah, I have to "read the wiki", but it is easier.

 

I'm not a huge Arch fan, but I have used it before. I was testing it on my laptop. I'm sure you people on here can help me with that. :)

 

(Just like OrangeKiller helped me LOADS with Ubuntu/Debian)

Update 2: I'm installing Archbang as we speak, but I looked around, and found something very very interesting... I had to run the OpenRC version. As the Systemd didn't want to work. Could this mean that Systemd is what's fricking me over? I read a LOT of problems with it... Could that be the bad apple, or am I just paranoid?

Update 3: OK... F you, Archy bang... Wouldn't install. I tried looking up stuff on google, to no avail. Scratch that. I heard of another one I wanted to try. PCLinuxOS. So I downloaded that, burned to flash drive, put it in, ran fine in live install, then I reboot. Looks rather nice... *screeeeeeeeeeeeeeeech* I couldn't run java. Openjdk wasn't in their repository. And, for some reason, It wouldn't allow me to read my one external drive. Say's I don't have permissions to it. So an hour after looking that up, I'm like, F you, too... Also installing the NVIDIA drivers were super sketchy...

 

So now I am back on Mint 17.3. Maybe it just needed a fresh install from my trouble above. IDeK, it, just, works....

 

Anyway, I know you told me long ago @Unobscured Vision, but how do you install the NVIDIA drivers?

 

I read up on this: https://community.linuxmint.com/tutorial/view/176

 

Is that needed anymore? Notice the article was a year ago...

  • Like 1

No problem, I'll walk ya through it. :yes:

 

First order of business, install all updates. Reboot. (Very important, because latest drivers need latest updates.)

 

Second, install Kernel 4.4.0-34. That's the latest 4.4 Kernel. I don't have any experience with the newer ones, so I'm sticking to what I know for now. We're just interested in getting a stable, working config at this point and that's what works for me. Reboot again.

 

Third, citing this article here (Webupd8.org), follow the instructions to add the Graphics Drivers Team PPA. An apt-get update later, then run the Driver Manager and install the Nvidia-364.x Driver (or whatever the recommended one is, it'll be around that version). Don't install the 370.x yet ... I haven't used it and I'm not familiar with its' behavior on 17.3 systems. Install the 364.x Driver, and when it's finished (and you've checked that everything is okay, including checking that Nvidia-Settings is installed too ...) go ahead and Reboot.

 

This should be all ya need to do. If it isn't, we'll explore options. :) 

 

And I apologize for not being available earlier. I've got a longtime friend who's in crisis lately, and I went to go visit her.

I installed the latest drivers, (but still waiting on the kernel) and rebooted, but it brings up a blank screen. The only way I can get in is by going into repair mode, and exit out of there, and it works fine. Don't ask...

Sorry for the late response. I'm one of the unfortunates that seem to be stricken with the mass Comcast outages the past few days. My replies will likely be few and far between until Comcast gets their crap together.

 

You install new Kernels using the Mint Update Manager, then View -> Linux Kernels. Pick the 4.4 Kernel I specified above, install it then reboot. Then reinstall the Nvidia driver, 'cause it won't work with 3.x Kernels. That's probably why you've been having trouble.

BTW, too... Mint needs better documentation... When I was looking up how to get NVIDIA drivers or kernel, I saw 10+ other ways to do it that sounded to farfetched. And were several years old.

Well, I got stuck doing a reinstall last night. Talk about [upset] ... yeah. Trying on Kubuntu 16.04.2 with the Nvidia-370 driver. Rebooting now. With all the internet trouble, it's taken 12 hours to get updates and the driver installed ... ugh.

Okay, the Nvidia-370 drivers are nice and fast. Using the 4.4.0-34 Kernel. Try that driver, and see how things go. I did it from the Terminal, simply sudo apt-get install nvidia-370 and nvidia-settings and it'll give you the right ones.

Would it be potent to install Ubuntu? But install a new DE, as I hate Unity. Because as I understand it, Mint is "based off Ubuntu", not true 100% Ubuntu. Course 16.10 is right around the corner, too... Hopefully it is better than 16.04...

 

Now I think of it, would it be wise to try Debian Testing, at all? You know, not Jessie. Maybe that has a fix?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!