Weird message when running anything from CMD prompt - W10 1607


Recommended Posts

Getting this weird error in bold when running any type of cmd prompt application, WIN32 apps work fine and launch with no error. And the cmd prompt app works fine, just shows that error prior.

Doesn't matter if it's a regular cmd prompt or elevated. Could be related to the latest version of OfficeScan

 

Anyone else able to reproduce or have any ideas?

 

C:\WINDOWS\system32>ping 172.16.50.254
[0x7FFE573C70E3] ANOMALY: use of REX.w is meaningless (default operand size is 64)

Pinging 172.16.50.254 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 172.16.50.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64

 

C:\WINDOWS\system32>dism
[0x7FFE573C70E3] ANOMALY: use of REX.w is meaningless (default operand size is 64)

Deployment Image Servicing and Management tool
Version: 10.0.14393.0

 

  On 05/09/2016 at 22:36, Gary7 said:

But you are getting that error no matter what you input right?

Expand  

The error is, [0x7FFE573C70E3] ANOMALY: use of REX.w is meaningless (default operand size is 64), no matter the usage in CMD. The request timing out has nothing to do with his error, you got that error because like OP mentioned the address isnt routeable via public internet. 

 

If I understand correctly, the message shows up but the task in CMD completes just fine? Have you tried running sfc /scannow to see if there are integrity problems? Might need to rebuild the image health and restore via dism

  On 05/09/2016 at 22:40, Circaflex said:

The error is, [0x7FFE573C70E3] ANOMALY: use of REX.w is meaningless (default operand size is 64), no matter the usage in CMD. The request timing out has nothing to do with his error, you got that error because like OP mentioned the address isnt routeable via public internet. 

 

If I understand correctly, the message shows up but the task in CMD completes just fine? Have you tried running sfc /scannow to see if there are integrity problems? Might need to rebuild the image health and restore via dism

Expand  

Exactly, and yes SFC/DISM shows clean. I think I have narrowed it down to TrendMicro OfficeScan. If I open a CMD prompt and type ping, I get it, if I unload OfficeScan, type ping again in the same prompt, it doesn't do it. 

I just pushed out a new update to TrendMicro Office Scan that fixes Firewall/Antivirus Status reporting in W10 Redstone, so this must be causing it.  Hopefully this will help others when they start Googling it. And I guess we will wait for TrendMicro to issue a fix/update.

  On 05/09/2016 at 22:43, xendrome said:

Exactly, and yes SFC/DISM shows clean. I think I have narrowed it down to TrendMicro OfficeScan. If I open a CMD prompt and type ping, I get it, if I unload OfficeScan, type ping again in the same prompt, it doesn't do it. 

I just pushed out a new update to TrendMicro Office Scan that fixes Firewall/Antivirus Status reporting in W10 Redstone, so this must be causing it.  Hopefully this will help others when they start Googling it. And I guess we will wait for TrendMicro to issue a fix/update.

Expand  

Good to know, I will keep an eye on my corporate laptop as we also run trendmicro office scan.

I'm assuming you've installed something and a non-Microsoft component has extended itself into the cmd prompt environment with the REXX interpreter.  What could it be ... dunno.  Third party Anti virus maybe?  Graphics driver?

 

Did you install anything prior to receiving the error?

  On 05/09/2016 at 22:44, Circaflex said:

Good to know, I will keep an eye on my corporate laptop as we also run trendmicro office scan.

Expand  

Yeah this is the update here - http://downloadcenter.trendmicro.com/index.php?clk=tbl&clkval=4554&regs=NABU&lang_loc=1 under the product patch and titled "osce-11-sp1-5010-6125-win-all-criticalpatch.exe
Supports Windows 10 Red Stone 1" released 8-29-2016

 

It def wasn't doing it prior to this.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Rumor: Apple eyeing over 5 million Samsung displays for '2026' foldable iPhone by David Uzondu You've probably been hearing rumors about Apple foldables for a while now, and in fact, this is perhaps the umpteenth article you've read about the topic. Still, new information from analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, claims that production of the first foldable iPhone could finally kick off later this year, pointing toward a launch in 2026. This news centers on a major component order, with Samsung being the exclusive supplier for the initial run, which neatly corroborates previous supply chain reports we have seen over the years. Apple and Samsung are supposedly working together to solve the one thing that has bugged people since foldables became a thing: the crease. Samsung has improved its panels over time, but Apple is reportedly pushing to have it nearly invisible before any phone ships to customers. This obsession with getting the hardware perfect feels very on-brand. After all, this is the company that is usually late to the party with new product categories, perfecting its take on devices like iPhones, iPads, the Apple Watch, and also AI. Okay, that last one isn't going smoothly for the company, but its track record with hardware is generally a different story. And the evidence for that hardware push is now getting much more specific. The new report from Kuo (translated) claims that Samsung Display is setting up a production line with the capacity of close to 8 million units. For context, the original Galaxy Fold sold less than a million units, and Samsung has been notoriously cagey about the exact number ever since. Despite their growing popularity, foldables are still a pretty niche category, but an initial order of this size, if true, suggests Apple thinks it can be the company to finally push them into the mainstream. Then again, Apple has not had a ton of success with its recent foray into the niche mixed-reality segment with the Apple Vision Pro, so maybe its magic touch has its limits. Of course, you should always take this sort of information with a grain of salt until you hear an official word from Apple. The specs are not finalized, and tech timelines can change depending on production issues or last-minute tweaks.
    • Cheaper maybe; effective, based on past experience, not likely. And yes, companies are on the market to generate profits but there is a huge difference between long terms plans and short ones generating profits but compromising the long term health, and consequently profits, of companies.
    • Lightweight = 100 MB, really? IrfanView is 4 MB!
    • Cool! Something no one wants that eats up storage space and battery life for free! /s
    • GT games are boring compared to Forza (Horizon or Motorsport)
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Karan Khanna earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Karan Khanna earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      MikeK13 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      OHI Accounting earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      OHI Accounting earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      695
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      267
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      202
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      170
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      135
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!