Recommended Posts

Musk gave a long interview at SXSW, with buddy Jonathan Nolan delivering questions.  Mostly pretty light, but a few morsels,

 

 

 

 

Went into base fundamentals. Insists the base needs pizzas and beer ;)

 

His brother Kimball Musk showed up at the end, then they all started singing a song from '3 Amigos.' 

Edited by DocM

Yep. Right in-line with what the projections have been with manufacturing, assembly, and vendor/procurement have been saying. Returns on investment(s) will start coming in by 2021 or so. Lots of capital already spent on BFR/BFS, and it's already been expensive. Not as expensive as Apollo/Saturn (in today's money), which is a great thing.

 

Once the technical documents and engineering spec sheets start making their rounds, expect a massive shift in fab techniques as Industry adopts. :yes: BFR/BFS are a way, way bigger deal under the hood than a lot of people really get.

Yup. The largest composite cryo-liquid  launcher now is Rocket Lab's Electron, but BFR/S are at the far opposite end of the scale. New vehicles between will need to follow their lead in order to be relevant wrt payload mass fraction..  

And here it comes....

 

This is not where the first ships are being built but a much larger factory measuring about 18859.32 m2/203,000 ft2 and 32 meters/105 ft tall, which is a bit high for the 9 meter/30 foot core fuelling speculation that the 12 meter/39.33 foot BFR may return later. 750 employees, about 16-18 months construction.

 

Bethlehem Shipyard Historic District

Terminal Island 

 

Reddit thread

 

Summary

 

Google Maps....

 

LA BFR factory: WW Marine Composites (a SpaceX subsidiary)


Product: "commercial transportation vessels" :woot:

 

The property manager's LinkedIn says:

 

Quote


WW Marine Redevelopment Project
Starting January 2017. 

I was involved in negotiations with WW Marine Composites, LLC (WWM) on a 40-year ground lease for the repurposing and redevelopment of the vacant 17-acre former Southwest Marine site located on Terminal Island. 

WWM develops advanced rockets and spacecraft. The WWM proposal includes the development of a high tech R&D facility to design, develop, and manufacture prototypes and first-generation models of space transportation vessels for exploration. 

 

The vessels, once completed, will be too large for delivery by road or rail and must be transported via barge, necessitating the proposed facility to be located adjacent to the water. The proposed project will put a major piece of underutilized LA Port property (vacant since 2002) back into useful service and provide the LA Port with a tenant, who will make a $42 million capital investment, as well as improvements, to the property along Berth 240Z and Y and a portion of Berth 240X.

 

https://www.portoflosangeles.org/Board/2018/March 2018/03_15_18_Special_Agenda_Item_7.pdf

 

Quote


The proposed Project involves the issuance of a 10-year Lease (with up to two 10-year lease extension/renewal options) for the construction and operation of a facility to manufacture large commercial transportation vessels at Berth 240 off Seaside Avenue on Terminal Island. The approximately 18-acre proposed Project site includes portions of the former Southwest Marine site. The site is entirely disturbed with abandoned industrial buildings, unused compacted dirt area, and paved areas. Operation would involve research and development of transportation vessels and would likely include general manufacturing procedures such as welding, composite curing, cleaning, painting, and assembly operations. The majority of operations would take place inside the facility, with exterior operations limited to transit of vehicles, forklift traffic, and mobilization of manufactured products onto a barge at the dockside for testing and delivery. Finished vessels would need to be transported via water due to their size; thus there is the need to locate the facility immediately adjacent to the water. In addition, the lease would accommodate recovery operations undertaken by Space Exploration Technologies to bring to shore vehicles returning from space that are retrieved by an autonomous drone ship offshore.

 

5aaff012279dc_BFRfactorysite1-800.thumb.jpg.4b280fc001352603ee6e23f5f417203e.jpg

 

5aaff026a98be_BFRfactorysite2-800.thumb.jpg.fdbfacdcfb9e48d5900935ed922c902b.jpg

 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1

Really the only place BFR can do polar-trajectory launches from in California is VAFB.

 

BFS, however ... once the regs are amended, should be able to launch from designated corridors anywhere. About like airports situated around big cities, they'll need to set up launch corridors but shouldn't be a big deal once the technology is proven (and California is a stickler about that). Can't have desert scrubland that's home to some species of small gecko overflown, ya know.

The construction clock is running.

 

https://www.teslarati.com/spacexs-first-bfr-manufacturing-facility-approved-long-beach-port-la-photos/

 

Quote

SpaceX’s first BFR manufacturing facility approved by the Port of LA

>
On March 15, around a week after the environmental impact assessment gave a green light for SpaceX’s facility, Port of Los Angeles’ Board of Harbor Commissioners approved the proposal, effectively giving SpaceX permission to begin serious demolition and construction activities at Berth 240, an abandoned lot located on the San Pedro side of the greater Port of Los Angeles, which refers to both Ports of San Pedro and Long Beach. To provide context, SpaceX’s primary manufacturing facilities in Hawthorne, CA occupy 10-15 acres of urban real estate – in other words, even partial development of Berth 240’s 18 acres would mark a huge expansion of the company’s available manufacturing and refurbishment space, an absolute necessity for the construction of a launch vehicle as large as BFR.

The construction of such a facility would make it significantly easier for SpaceX to build its first BFR/BFS prototypes, avoiding the massive disruption and cost that transporting the 9m-diameter vehicle through downtown LA. Rather than dealing with that nightmare, SpaceX would instead be able to simply crane an assembled booster or spaceship onto a barge (perhaps a drone ship?) that would then ship the rocket hardware through the Panama Canal to the company’s facilities in Cape Canaveral, FL or Boca Chica, TX.
>

  • Like 1

As a southern Cali resident (San Diego area), this makes me rather happy. I've driven up to SpaceX HQ a few times just to show my daughter the S1 they have outside the building and also to watch them ship out S1's from there. This will give us another chance to see some amazing things without having to visit another state. Excited to see what comes out of this new shop.

  • Like 1

They're also moving stage refurbishment, Dragon recovery, fairing recovery and ASDS ops to the new facility.

 

With Starlink launches going out of Vandenberg like popcorn San Pedro's going to get busy.

  • Like 1

Got the full plan, and it sounds like the 9 meter composite cryotanks and other large parts will be shipped from Janicki Industries (which is near Seattle). They did composites for B2, F-22, 787 & others, and they will do the B-21 Raider bomber

 

Janicki Industries also built the NASA/Boeing 5.5 meter qualification liquid hydrogen  cryotank, and the 12 meter ITS liquid oxygen cryotank Musk showed at IAC2016, and was tested to destruction in 2017.

 

12 meter ITS cryotank

 

 

Quote

Operation

 

The proposed Project operations would be industrial manufacturing, involving the research, development, design, and manufacture of prototypes and first-generation models of specialized transportation vessels. 

The facility is intended to be a state-of-the-art industrial manufacturing facility serving to prototype new ideas and technologies for specialized transportation vessels. The proposed facility would be on an approximately 10-acre site. 

Operations would include up to 750 workers daily, working in shifts with up to 500 workers at a time (two shifts would be 7 a.m.  3 p.m. and 3 p.m.  8 p.m.) to develop and manufacture prototype and first generation vessels. Workers would be from the greater Los Angeles area workforce, with commuting distances expected to average approximately 13 miles each way. Up to 50 customers or visitors daily are anticipated. A total of 438 parking spaces would be provided within the lease area, including open areas adjacent to the vacant buildings comprising the former Southwest Marine Shipyard. There is one existing access point from South Seaside Avenue, which would be used in conjunction with two new additional access driveways from South Seaside Avenue. Though no disturbance or use of the historic buildings is proposed, the lease area would include historic buildings and the Applicant would be responsible for maintaining the historic buildings structures in compliance with the LAHD Built Environmental Historic, Architecture and Cultural Resource Policy adopted by the Harbor Commissioners Resolution 13-7479 in April 2013.

Most materials necessary for manufacturing would be delivered via truck and approximately 10 truck trips per day would be expected with deliveries. For oversized components, deliveries would be via barge delivering directly to the new facility from Seattle. It is anticipated that there would be an average of one delivery by barge per month, with peak periods necessitating up to three deliveries by barge in a month. 

Due to their large size, finished products would be transported by water for either testing or delivery, which necessitates the location of the facility adjacent to the water. A barge would depart for transportation of products for testing or delivery up to three times a month. 
>>

 

 

Screenshot_20180325-154153.thumb.jpg.a65c32f281c0e24c2d4513488e1c303e.jpg

  • Like 2

Ahhh ... my realm. Very, very good stuff what goes into making these tanks. Both the science and the materials. :yes:(Y) And Janicki are the best at doing this stuff, bar none.

  • 2 weeks later...

It's called a mandrel. A robotic arm applies several layers of either carbon fiber threads or tape, pre-coated with resin, in a programmed pattern which enhances strength as it rotates. A similar tech is used to wind the Boeing 787 fuselage sections. Those are usually done using several layers: a straight base layer, a helical winding, and another straight binding layer are common.  Unobscured Vision is the composites expert so he can expand if he wants.

 

787 sections

 

This is likely for the ~15 meter section where the propellant tanks are shown in this Spaceship render, which is a lo-res render from the engineering plans. The propulsion and wing section is likely aluminum-lithium alloy, and the payload section designed for the task; passenger + cargo, cargo only, propellant tanker, or satellite deployment.

 

017D7753-D24A-40AD-9EFE-ECB6A351807E.thumb.jpg.31df6ab6f356b6beed43078a7cb9b398.jpg

Edited by DocM
  • Like 2

Teslarati.com is on the case, and SpaceX is no longer using Janicki Industries in WA as a composites tooling source. They bought the tooling from AscentntAerospace

 Coast Composites of Santa Ana, CA.

 

https://ascentaerospace.com/coastcompositeshome/

 

https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-bfr-factory-rocket-tooling-site-activity/

 

Quote

>
Hours after SpaceX CEO Elon Musk revealed the first photos of tooling for the manufacture of BFR, Teslarati photographer Pauline Acalin sped down to Port of San Pedro to survey a large dockside tent the company was constructing as of December 2017. Now complete, the temporary facility appears to be exploding with SpaceX activity as the company surges ahead with plans to assemble the first Mars rocket and spaceship prototypes  rocket-powered hops could begin as soon as early next year, with orbital launches following about a year after that.

Per a number of related discoveries, the tooling pictured in Musks teaser is almost certainly located in the same tent pictured above. Of particular note, a source involved in the work has confirmed that SpaceX is using a new supplier for the custom tooling needed to manufacture BFR. The sources comments were confirmed to be accurate minutes later in photos taken by Teslaratis senior SpaceX stalker that peg Ascent Aerospace Coast Composites as the tooling manufacturer. As if to dispatch any lingering doubt, Ascent Aerospace appears to have also independently confirmed its involvement through a rare post on social media.
>

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1

Thanks @DocM for the shoutout. :yes: When I first saw this piece of equipment I immediately thought it was either the spindle or the mandrel, but I wanted to wait until I saw more of it because I've never seen either pieces of equipment this large before. They're true monsters. Now that we can view it from multiple angles (especially the interior) it's indeed a very, very large and mighty mandrel.

 

The spindle is used to feed the material, where the mandrel is used for slight tension to smooth out any force inconsistencies from the spindle. I know it would appear to be defining the same thing, and technically they are the same thing almost, but you need both when doing Composites like this because the fibre is very fragile. It depends on the process they're using, though -- lots of processes don't use both; it's only when the fibre threads needs to be specifically spaced out that they'll use both. It's very, very technical. :yes: 

I could go on and on about processes with Composites. I won't bore you all with the details; but it's very tricky, very detail-oriented, and there are lots of ways to do things. :D 

I'm still figuring out exactly what their specific approach is going to be with this. Will discuss with classmates tomorrow -- we will have answers in short order. :yes: 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!