Recommended Posts

There's a reason for the change of name as well as the design & technologies going into it. The rate of advancement over (even) the past three years has been insane.

 

- Technology that was "state of the art" has now been superseded and evolved by even better gear or compacted to 50~15% of it's originally envisioned size, etc.;

- Materials that were being finalized for use have evolved radically (this can't be understated ... the rate of change in the past five years compared to the prior THIRTY are nearly equal now), including some SpaceX-proprietary ones that they WON'T discuss out-of-chain or beyond need-to-know -- Academia is only hearing whispers about these materials and that's it;

- Design techniques are now oriented around multi-purpose/multi-role. Anything else is viewed as "waste of space/dead weight" unless it's absolutely critical to functionality;

- The new overall design is to ensure modularity, adaptability, upgradability and future-proofing. SpaceX fully intends on refitting these as well as proving new technologies as time goes on.

 

:yes: Bigger deal than BFR/BFS already were. My only concern is feature creep at this point.

Makes ya wonder if there's some previously-discarded tech that the SpaceX boffins are taking a very close look at -- something that required an "open-minded approach" to get working correctly ...

 

Gwynne wouldn't set a goal like that if SpaceX didn't have the ability.

I'm going to take the conservative outlook on this.

 

 

For now, the technology that we have constrains us to one star...our Sun...so technically, it is a starship...a multi planet ship in this star system.

 

This one was for Gwynne.

 

I would be comfortable in stating that nothing has changed from a few months ago...except that we have an acceleration in development...meaning a cash injection speeds thing up.

 

Best part...Starship........one of these better be Enterprise...or I will be really ticked. 

 

 

  • Like 1

They must have changed something which drastically sped development and lowered costs. 

 

I say this because in their recent quest for a $750m BoA organized loan, they received enough offers for the full amount at good rates but are only taking $250m. They don't need the rest.

  • sc302 locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google are hyprocrites for signing this. They have been pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft, only they do it on Android and ChromeOS.
    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!