UK Xbox sales up 1000 percent, S sales outstrip PS4 Slim sales by 361 percent.


Recommended Posts

Quote

MICROSOFT / 29 SEP 2016

UK XBOX SALES UP 1000 PERCENT FOLLOWING XBOX ONE S LAUNCH

 

Xbox One S launch sales outstrip PS4 Slim sales by 361 percent.

 

BY VIXXIIE Xbox One sales have increased by almost 1000 percent in the UK since Microsoft released the new 500GB and 1TB Xbox One S models.

According to MCV, Microsoft's share of the hardware market for the week ending September 24 has jumped to 71 percent - a year-on-year increase of 76 percent, and a week-on-week rise of a significant 989 percent.

 

While Sony's new PlayStation 4 Slim is also now available, sales were down 66 percent year-on-year, with the PlayStation 4 taking just 19 percent of hardware sales last week - despite a week-on-week lift of 22 percent. According to the report, a comparison of both the Xbox One S and PlayStation 4 Slim launch weeks puts Microsoft's sales ahead by 361 percent.

 

In a statement, Xbox UK marketing director, Harvey Eagle said: "It’s great to see how popular both the Xbox One S and the FIFA 17 Xbox One S consoles are with fans, not just over the last week but since the Xbox One S was released in August. 4K video streaming and 4K UHD Blu-ray have been extremely well received by gamers and critics and we believe there is no better value right now for those looking to upgrade their console."

More information at ign.

 

Glad to see how much Microsoft has turned it around this generation since the failed launch and listening to their gamers. Hopefully they can continue to progress towards the Scorpio. 

Yeah,  not including 4K Blu-ray in Ps4 slim and even in PS4 Pro, was a terrible decision by Sony.

 

If I was not a PC gamer, I would get Xbox One S in a second (I did buy it at launch but returned due to not many games I have not already played on PC)

 

 

 

I really don't get the thinking behind the PS4 slim, not with the Pro coming so soon, anyone would be crazy to buy a slim now, new gamers looking to jump into PS should just wait and buy the PS4 Pro for $100 more, it's like a dead end device at this point.  Had the PS4 Pro been on the way 6-8 months later, then sure, like the XB1 S before the scorpio comes, but really they could've just reduced the costs of the default designed PS4 for now, and then when the Pro hit just stop OG PS4 production and let them run out of stock at $299.

 

By the time the OG PS4 did run out of stock and production ended, the PS4 Pro could probably see it's first price cut down to $349, I bet.   There was no need for a PS4 Slim.

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, E.worm Jimmy said:

Yeah,  not including 4K Blu-ray in Ps4 slim and even in PS4 Pro, was a terrible decision by Sony.

 

If I was not a PC gamer, I would get Xbox One S in a second (I did buy it at launch but returned due to not many games I have not already played on PC)

 

 

 

 

I get the downfall on the PS4 slim side - but why such an increase in sales? 

 

I honestly don't get the point of the S when you consider that Scorpio is coming next year. If I was thinking I wouldn't mind picking up an Xbox, I'd certainly be waiting for some more concrete details on Scorpio before I took the plunge on an S.

  • Like 1

amazon

6 minutes ago, Skiver said:

I get the downfall on the PS4 slim side - but why such an increase in sales? 

 

I honestly don't get the point of the S when you consider that Scorpio is coming next year. If I was thinking I wouldn't mind picking up an Xbox, I'd certainly be waiting for some more concrete details on Scorpio before I took the plunge on an S.

amazon, tesco and I think a few others had £50 off a new Xbox one S with fifa 17 included, I suspect a lot of parents jumped at that price for Christmas £199 and stick it away for Christmas.

 

Edit: oh and it's probably the cheapest 4k disc player on the market by some distance no? just like the PS3 was for blurays back in the day.

  • Like 3
1 hour ago, Skiver said:

I get the downfall on the PS4 slim side - but why such an increase in sales? 

 

I honestly don't get the point of the S when you consider that Scorpio is coming next year. If I was thinking I wouldn't mind picking up an Xbox, I'd certainly be waiting for some more concrete details on Scorpio before I took the plunge on an S.

There's so much talk about how powerful the scorpio is going to be, and now I'm even hearing that maybe MS is going to push the specs higher than what they talked about at E3, that people are expecting it to cost a lot.   I don't buy it personally, I bet it costs $499 tops, and heck, MS might even aim for $399, people need to remember it's a year out and while it'll smoke the consoles out and coming out soon, I doubt it'll be as expensive as they think.

 

Lots of people can't wait to, and at $299, and less, I think you can find it for $249 with a game and stuff, why not?  Enjoy it now and then a year from now you'll have saved the needed $400-$500 to buy a Scorpio and move the S into a 2nd room.  With compatibility not being an issue I figure, hey, why not?   And 4k bluray looks great!

arrrg sorry being nitpicky, but 1000% no such dammed thing! its sales of Xbox one has increased ten fold.

 

100% is 100%, total, complete, you dont get such a thing!, its like stating infinity plus 1.. 

 

Im not having a pop at the OP its in the original article. 

 

I know of a few mates who have decied to jump on it, just because its hit that magic number £149. tbh Id consider one for that.....

 

 

6 minutes ago, Mando said:

arrrg sorry being nitpicky, but 1000% no such dammed thing! its sales of Xbox one has increased ten fold.

 

100% is 100%, total, complete, you dont get such a thing!, its like stating infinity plus 1.. 

 

Im not having a pop at the OP its in the original article. 

 

I know of a few mates who have decied to jump on it, just because its hit that magic number kr1,570.95 (£149.). tbh Id consider one for that.....

 

 

math disagrees with you. 

 

Carl one week bought 5 apples. 

Next week carl bough 20 apples. 

 

Carl increased the amount of apples bought more than 100%. so while yes, 100% is full saturation, in math unlike liquids, you can in fact go over full saturation and use higher numbers than 100% in certain situations like sales umbers over time and similar. 

1 minute ago, HawkMan said:

math disagrees with you. 

 

Carl one week bought 5 apples. 

Next week carl bough 20 apples. 

 

Carl increased the amount of apples bought more than 100%. so while yes, 100% is full saturation, in math unlike liquids, you can in fact go over full saturation and use higher numbers than 100% in certain situations like sales umbers over time and similar. 

erm no it doesnt.

 

Maths state "percent" means "out of one hundred" so no, 100% is 100% it doesnt go any higher.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/maths/number/percentagesrev1.shtml

 

'Percent' means 'out of 100'. If 90 per cent of the population owns a mobile phone, this means 90 out of every 100 people have one. The symbol '%' means per cent.

 

Finding percentages

A percentage is a fraction of 100.

30% (30 in each 100) as a fraction is 30/100

30% as a decimal is 0.3.

 

^ see maths. percent is abbreviated for percentury or per 100 buddy.

 

7 minutes ago, Mando said:

erm no it doesnt.

 

Maths state "percent" means "out of one hundred" so no, 100% is 100% it doesnt go any higher.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/maths/number/percentagesrev1.shtml

 

'Percent' means 'out of 100'. If 90 per cent of the population owns a mobile phone, this means 90 out of every 100 people have one. The symbol '%' means per cent.

 

Finding percentages

A percentage is a fraction of 100.

30% (30 in each 100) as a fraction is 30/100

30% as a decimal is 0.3.

 

^ see maths. percent is abbreviated for percentury or per 100 buddy.

 

none, of that means you can't go over a 100%

 

https://www.google.no/search?client=opera&q=can+you+have+more+than+100%+in+math&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

 

Quote

Can you get more than 100 percent?

People often say that percentages greater than 100 make no sense because you can't have more than all of something. This is simply silly and mathematically ignorant. A percentage is just a ratio between two numbers.

 

http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/58166.html

 

basically you're confusing percentage as used in how full something is, and used in ratios of change in stuff like sales, one can't be over 100 the other can. 

11 minutes ago, HawkMan said:

none, of that means you can't go over a 100%

 

https://www.google.no/search?client=opera&q=can+you+have+more+than+100%+in+math&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

 

 

http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/58166.html

 

basically you're confusing percentage as used in how full something is, and used in ratios of change in stuff like sales, one can't be over 100 the other can. 

it doesnt make it right mate, percent means out of 100. (from per  (Latin), centum (hundred in Latin)

 

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/percent

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/percent

 

anyhoos, its irrelevent :) 

3 hours ago, Cnónna said:

amazon, tesco and I think a few others had £50 off a new Xbox one S with fifa 17 included, I suspect a lot of parents jumped at that price for Christmas £199 and stick it away for Christmas.

 

Edit: oh and it's probably the cheapest 4k disc player on the market by some distance no? just like the PS3 was for blurays back in the day.

This. They've been selling the console for peanuts to gain ground probably since 2014. I'm sure we'll see similar news with PS4 clearance sales too, although it's not exactly a 1:1 comparison.

48 minutes ago, Mando said:

it doesnt make it right mate, percent means out of 100. (from per  (Latin), centum (hundred in Latin)

 

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/percent

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/percent

 

anyhoos, its irrelevent :) 

and again, doesn't mean you can't go over, it's MATH. out of 100 just means the fractions it's based off, you can still have 120 out of a 100. 

2 hours ago, HawkMan said:

and again, doesn't mean you can't go over, it's MATH. out of 100 just means the fractions it's based off, you can still have 120 out of a 100. 

lol lets agree to disagree buddy :) its still an impressive figure :) looking like MS long game with consoles may be paying off finally. 

 

 

14 hours ago, George P said:

There's so much talk about how powerful the scorpio is going to be, and now I'm even hearing that maybe MS is going to push the specs higher than what they talked about at E3, that people are expecting it to cost a lot.   I don't buy it personally, I bet it costs $499 tops, and heck, MS might even aim for $399, people need to remember it's a year out and while it'll smoke the consoles out and coming out soon, I doubt it'll be as expensive as they think.

 

Lots of people can't wait to, and at $299, and less, I think you can find it for $249 with a game and stuff, why not?  Enjoy it now and then a year from now you'll have saved the needed $400-$500 to buy a Scorpio and move the S into a 2nd room.  With compatibility not being an issue I figure, hey, why not?   And 4k bluray looks great!

 
2

TBH I'm one of those that think Scorpio is going to cost $600 so I get that side of things, however maybe I'm a unique case but I don't have endless amounts of throwaway money - it's a reason I console game because I can't afford to keep up, so the idea that this amount of people would happily spend $300 on a console and perhaps even consider even another $300 the year later on something that just does the same thing but slightly better is beyond me. Heck, I'm a day one buyer and I'm still struggling to justify the cost of a new console in my own mind thanks to being spoilt by the 360's lifespan.

 

However again I'm perhaps a unique case (I don't believe so) in that I don't have a TV capable of HDR or 4K so either one today would be a complete waste of money. I'm looking at a 4K TV that I desperately want but the conversation of wanting to drop £900 on a TV doesn't usually go very far when we're about to redecorate the bathroom and the Kitchen is due to follow shortly :p

 

20 minutes ago, George P said:

You guys have went way off topic you know.

 
 

Agreed - if you want to have a discussion about math and percentages I'd suggest a new topic.

  • Like 1

In statistics, when you see numbers as absurdly large or biased such as these figures, it means there is a problem with your sample and/or methodology, or at the very least there is an undefined influence on the results that can't be dismissed. This is well, well beyond standard deviation, so I would be hesitant to accept them.

6 minutes ago, Skiver said:

TBH I'm one of those that think Scorpio is going to cost $600 so I get that side of things, however maybe I'm a unique case but I don't have endless amounts of throwaway money - it's a reason I console game because I can't afford to keep up, so the idea that this amount of people would happily spend $300 on a console and perhaps even consider even another $300 the year later on something that just does the same thing but slightly better is beyond me. Heck, I'm a day one buyer and I'm still struggling to justify the cost of a new console in my own mind thanks to being spoilt by the 360's lifespan.

 

However again I'm perhaps a unique case (I don't believe so) in that I don't have a TV capable of HDR or 4K so either one today would be a complete waste of money. I'm looking at a 4K TV that I desperately want but the conversation of wanting to drop £900 on a TV doesn't usually go very far when we're about to redecorate the bathroom and the Kitchen is due to follow shortly :p

 

 

It really comes down to the type of buyer, remember the S starts at $299 but has sales already making it $249 with a game.     If gamers think the Scorpio is going to cost $600 or more then they'll just get the S and wait for Scorpio to drop in price.   I don't think it'll cost that much, MS saw the problems with the original XB1 at $499, though it was also the weaker of the two at the time so that was two strikes against it.    Scorpio being so much more powerful could justify being $200 more than a PS4 Pro but still, I don't think they'd want to be so much more, and we're talking a year from now,  so we'll see how it goes down.

 

There's also a group of buyers out there that game but don't follow the tech news as much, probably don't even know what the Scorpio is.    My money is on it being $500 tops, a repeat of the XB1 pricing but with another 2TB internal hdd, and maybe a 2nd option with 1TB hdd for a bit less.   We've got a year to speculate. 

53 minutes ago, Skiver said:

TBH I'm one of those that think Scorpio is going to cost $600 so I get that side of things, however maybe I'm a unique case but I don't have endless amounts of throwaway money - it's a reason I console game because I can't afford to keep up, so the idea that this amount of people would happily spend $300 on a console and perhaps even consider even another $300 the year later on something that just does the same thing but slightly better is beyond me. Heck, I'm a day one buyer and I'm still struggling to justify the cost of a new console in my own mind thanks to being spoilt by the 360's lifespan.

 

However again I'm perhaps a unique case (I don't believe so) in that I don't have a TV capable of HDR or 4K so either one today would be a complete waste of money. I'm looking at a 4K TV that I desperately want but the conversation of wanting to drop £900 on a TV doesn't usually go very far when we're about to redecorate the bathroom and the Kitchen is due to follow shortly :p

 

Agreed - if you want to have a discussion about math and percentages I'd suggest a new topic.

Spener just went out and said Scorpio will be priced at standard console prices and not be expensive. 

http://www.winbeta.org/news/microsoft-phil-spencer-project-scorpio

 

Quote

“So you can see the price of the S today. When we designed both of these, which we kind of designed it in parallel. We thought about the price performance of what we wanted to hit with the Scorpio, relative to what we were going to be able to do with the S. So that we would have a good price continuum, so people wouldn’t look at these two things as so disconnected because of the price delta,” Spencer explains. “So I think you will feel like it’s a premium product, a premium console. And not something, anything more than that. So I wouldn’t get people worried that this thing is going to be unlike any console price you’ve ever seen. We didn’t design it that way. That said, the opening price point for the Xbox One S, and the different hard drive sizes that is a critical part of this whole product. When I think about it as a product line, you should expect the pricing to kind of be in line with that.”

 

Just now, HawkMan said:

Spener just went out and said Scorpio will be priced at standard console prices and not be expensive. 

 

Well, I picked up my 360 for around £270 at near enough launch (If not a day one thin) and my XB1 cost me £430 (i think) on day one so that doesn't really say much. 

 

I think George will be right, it will be around the same price as the XB1 launched at.

4 minutes ago, HawkMan said:
 

Interesting, again that supports the above - I'd love for them to do some sort of upgrade program where it's got a fairly nice discount if you trade in your XB1/XB1S for one of these, it would certainly make it an easier justification.

I haven't bought any of my consoles on day 1, I always wait a few months for a few more games to come out and then jump in.  Like the XB1, it came out in November but I didn't buy mine till February.   I expect to do the same with the Scorpio, if not a little later since I just finished my new PC, got my 1070 in there, so I'll be gaming on the PC for a bit more.  If the Scorpio is November again, then I'll probably swing out and buy one in March or April.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!