Brother HL-3170CDW laser printer - Text in images will be printed grainy with rough edges


Recommended Posts

While doing my tests with that new printer I've noticed (well, actually my wife did, she's the designer) a problem.

If an image that contains text will be printed, the text will come out grainy regardless of the file resolution. 

(A Thank You card for example, the mixes graphics and text)

 

For example: 

http://i.imgur.com/43ViXVN.jpg

 

Do you see the rough edges? Like there's a lack of anti aliasing 

 

This is the original file  which is  6300x8910 

 

If I'll take the exact text with the same font and print it from word it will be printed fine.

 

Is there a known issue I'm missing here?

- Tried increasing DPI for the print to 1200 * 1200?

- Tried updating and using latest drivers?

- Tried any other paper (80 g or 100 g)?

- Tried updating to printer's latest firmware?

 

http://support.brother.com/g/b/downloadend.aspx?c=us&lang=en&prod=hl3170cdw_all&os=10013&dlid=dlf002976_000&flang=8&type3=375

Tried a few types of paper, firmware is updated to the latest including drivers (were installed yesterday)

The DPI is also very high. Also tried DPI 300 and 297x210 mm which is the preferred size for A4 prints. Still got the same result.

it may not be print DPI causing this, it can be the type of font and how its sent to the printer. 

 

you may be trying to resize a TT font to a size it doesn't actually list.

Have you tried a different TT font? If the scalable font isnt available in the chosen size, it tries to resize it and usually ends up looking quite aliased and pixelated.

 

 

"If an image that contains text will be printed"

 

Example image please..  So its a image of text, not actual text??

 

So I can print and compare..

19 hours ago, BudMan said:

"If an image that contains text will be printed"

 

Example image please..  So its a image of text, not actual text??

 

So I can print and compare..

There was a link in the first post: http://i.imgur.com/8J18TwP.jpg

 

9 hours ago, T3X4S said:

Is this just nature of the beast ?  Something that happens when one gets an el cheapo printer ?

 

Is $250 for a home printer considered cheap? I guess that for the laser printer category it is pretty cheap, though.

10 minutes ago, Shasoosh said:

Is $250 for a home printer considered cheap? I guess that for the laser printer category it is pretty cheap, though.

For black and white consumer laser? No, that is not cheap.

Its not a black and white printer.  Is a color laser and its a low end business class.. its max duty cycle is 30k pages a month..  Which seem's pretty freaking high if its meant as a cheap home printer ;)  Recommend print volume is up to 1500 pages a month..  That would be a ###### load of home printing ;)

 

I am not home currently to print that and see how it looks.  But when get home sure I can print out that image of text and post a picture of how it looks.  Did you post a picture of how your print of the brown fox image looks.  I don't recall seeing it.

9 minutes ago, BudMan said:

Its not a black and white printer.  Is a color laser and its a low end business class.. its max duty cycle is 30k pages a month..  Which seem's pretty freaking high if its meant as a cheap home printer ;)  Recommend print volume is up to 1500 pages a month..  That would be a ###### load of home printing ;)

 

I am not home currently to print that and see how it looks.  But when get home sure I can print out that image of text and post a picture of how it looks.  Did you post a picture of how your print of the brown fox image looks.  I don't recall seeing it.

Ah I must have mixed it up with another thread. My bad. 

57 minutes ago, BudMan said:

Its not a black and white printer.  Is a color laser and its a low end business class.. its max duty cycle is 30k pages a month..  Which seem's pretty freaking high if its meant as a cheap home printer ;)  Recommend print volume is up to 1500 pages a month..  That would be a ###### load of home printing ;)

 

I am not home currently to print that and see how it looks.  But when get home sure I can print out that image of text and post a picture of how it looks.  Did you post a picture of how your print of the brown fox image looks.  I don't recall seeing it.

This is the image printed as image in the printer perferences: http://i.imgur.com/fIncEMB.jpg

This is the image printed as document in the printer perferences. (looks worse with more rough edges but I thought I'd give it a shot): http://i.imgur.com/43ViXVN.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!