PSA: Beware of buying the Mi Box from Walmart


Recommended Posts

My Amazon Firestick could no longer get a signal for some odd reason so I decided to replace it with the Mi Box.


I found these at Walmart, grabbed it from the shelf and took it to the counter. I plunked down the 70 bucks plus tax and the Wal-Mart dude went about unlocking that spider net security thing and stuck it in the bag. I got home and opened to box and my jaw droppped. The box was empty. Which is really odd since I watched him remove the security stuff. Now my problem is convincing the people at Walmart that they sold me an empty box.

After a bit of explaining my case, the manager said I should go back and grab another one which I did. There were about 6 or 7 boxes on the shelf and the first one I picked up felt like the one I had. Out of curiosity, I grabbed another and he had some weight mine did not have. I grabbed another and it was light too. So I took what I had and went back to Customer service. They removed all 3 security bands and only one had the Mi Box in it. The others were empty.

I got lucky. But beware if you decide to get one that it has the plastic on it. Mine did not have the plastic, only the security band.

mi-box_01.jpg

And at no time did you think "this box is a little on the light side"?

 

Anyway, mine should be coming direct from China in a few days.

My son and I are looking forward to fiddling with it over the weekend.

2 hours ago, Shiranui said:

And at no time did you think "this box is a little on the light side"?

Without knowing the weight, why would he? I got an SSD at work the other day and instantly thought id made a mistake with the order as it was so light, but the drive in fact was just very light and I didn't realise as I hadn't handled an SSD before.

5 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

If the box isn't sealed, open it BEFORE you leave the store, always.

 

Wal-Mart had its security band around it and it was locked.  Are you saying that isn't sufficient? 

11 hours ago, Shiranui said:

And at no time did you think "this box is a little on the light side"?

 

Anyway, mine should be coming direct from China in a few days.

My son and I are looking forward to fiddling with it over the weekend.

When I finally got one and got it home.  Setting it up was a breeze.  Installed Kodi and it is much better than my Firestick. Loads much faster.

I looked at one at walmart, few weeks ago. Scanned in the bar code and read some reviews online standing next to it. After reading the reviews decided not to buy one. It's to bad google stopped selling their Nexus player :( .. Actually I bought 5 of those :laugh: ... gave 2 to my mom 1 to my gf and I have 2

45 minutes ago, Jazmac said:

Wal-Mart had its security band around it and it was locked.  Are you saying that isn't sufficient? 

Well, given that the box was empty, along with several others, clearly it wasn't.

 

Probably, they were returns that the staff never bothered to actually check.

 

1 hour ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Well, given that the box was empty, along with several others, clearly it wasn't.

 

Probably, they were returns that the staff never bothered to actually check.

 

Quality control at Walmart isn't quality or control.  Which is why I try not to shop at Walmart or Sams.

To put this into perspective I used to work at a gamestop that was around the street from a walmart a long time ago. For one point in time a huge chunk of our trade ins from repeat customers came from walmart's "off the truck special". Seriously we had a chick to trade in like 80 PS2 memory cards at one time for cash. It got so bad that gamestop's lost prevention had to impose rules on how much you can take in from a single customer at a time. This was to protect gamestop if trail from walmart lead there so the police wouldnt seize 90% of the used items there. While it was obvious where this stuff was coming from we couldn't do anything about it to let walmart know.

6 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Well, given that the box was empty, along with several others, clearly it wasn't.

 

Probably, they were returns that the staff never bothered to actually check.

 

Hindsight is still 20/20. You would think that going into a megastore like walmart and having items on the shelf for sale with theft prevention on deck would give the customer a sense that what they are buying will in fact be in the package. Who would have thought that I need to inspect my box of Capt'n Crunch to make sure they didn't fill it with Fruit Loops. Whoda thunk it?  jk. Besides, this is walmart after all. I should have known not to go in there in the first place.   

17 hours ago, restroom said:

Without knowing the weight, why would he? I got an SSD at work the other day and instantly thought id made a mistake with the order as it was so light, but the drive in fact was just very light and I didn't realise as I hadn't handled an SSD before.

I would imagine that the main unit (176.5g), power supply, a remote and two AAA batteries would weigh discernibly more than an empty box.

 

Having said that, I do sympathize. It's is perfectly reasonable for the customer to expect that they are not buying an empty box. I once bought a box of chocolates in Melbourne as a present. I was shocked when, back in Japan,  we opened the box only to find that exactly 50% of the chocolates were missing. (we emailed them and they kindly sent us a full box).

 

Now I shake everything.

Edited by Shiranui
  • Like 2
9 hours ago, Gotenks98 said:

To put this into perspective I used to work at a gamestop that was around the street from a walmart a long time ago. For one point in time a huge chunk of our trade ins from repeat customers came from walmart's "off the truck special". Seriously we had a chick to trade in like 80 PS2 memory cards at one time for cash. It got so bad that gamestop's lost prevention had to impose rules on how much you can take in from a single customer at a time. This was to protect gamestop if trail from walmart lead there so the police wouldnt seize 90% of the used items there. While it was obvious where this stuff was coming from we couldn't do anything about it to let walmart know.

This is somewhat ironic... I preordered Rockband 3 from GameStop. I don't know why. Music gaming had passed its prime by 2010, but my wife insisted the $5 extra was worth it. (Yes, we paid $65 for a $60 game to guarantee we had it on launch day. I still feel stupid for agreeing to that.)

 

However, when we got the game home, the disc would not play. This is straight out of a sealed box. This was not a game GameStop employees had played and re-sealed. (They do that.) This was factory sealed. Did some Googling, and found out there was a manufacturing defect. The disc was poorly pressed.

 

Went to return it to GameStop, and not only were they aware of the manufacturing defect, they were under strict orders to not accept returns. They were hoping, literally, that music gamers were so stupid that we would simply buy a second copy at the full $60 price.

 

So we went next door and returned it to Walmart. They gave us a little grief for not having a receipt, but when we explained that the disc was defective and that we just wanted the same exact thing, they happily agreed. (For some reason they got it in their heads that we wanted a refund, which they will not usually do without a receipt. But an even exchange for the same product, they absolutely will.)

 

Now we are happy buying games and electronics from Walmart. They may be a big evil box store, but they dealt fairly with us when we were a little less than fair. (I don't feel bad at all. I've worked in retail, and I know that they will send the defective copy right back to the manufacturer and get it replaced... the manufacturer eats the cost on that, not the retailer.)

 

Getting back to the OP, this reminds me of an old Internet legend about Best Buy and a brick and wood that was supposed to be a monitor (when they weighed a ton). Customer buys monitor. Takes it home, it's been replaced by bricks and wood to get the weight right. Customer takes it back. Best Buy accuses customer of swapping the monitor for the junk and lying about it. Customer accuses Best Buy of the reverse. Stalemate. Not to mention the eBay/PayPal/Laptop scam that's been going on for years. (Buy a laptop on eBay. Pay with PayPal. Receive laptop. Pawn laptop or otherwise get rid of laptop ASAP (optional). Accuse seller of not shipping laptop, and taking money and running. File dispute with PayPal. Get money back. Keep or sell laptop. Not sure if PayPal ever fixed that, but a lot of people made good money on that, and a lot of people got taken for a lot of money... probably money they could not afford to lose.

 

Commerce really sucks sometimes.

On 11/14/2016 at 11:10 PM, dragontology said:

...

Getting back to the OP, this reminds me of an old Internet legend about Best Buy and a brick and wood that was supposed to be a monitor (when they weighed a ton). Customer buys monitor. Takes it home, it's been replaced by bricks and wood to get the weight right. Customer takes it back. Best Buy accuses customer of swapping the monitor for the junk and lying about it. Customer accuses Best Buy of the reverse. Stalemate. Not to mention the eBay/PayPal/Laptop scam that's been going on for years. (Buy a laptop on eBay. Pay with PayPal. Receive laptop. Pawn laptop or otherwise get rid of laptop ASAP (optional). Accuse seller of not shipping laptop, and taking money and running. File dispute with PayPal. Get money back. Keep or sell laptop. Not sure if PayPal ever fixed that, but a lot of people made good money on that, and a lot of people got taken for a lot of money... probably money they could not afford to lose.

 

Commerce really sucks sometimes.

I was worried to say the least.  Timing was the key too because if this had been well into the Christmas holidays, I might be out 70 bucks today.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!