Oklahoma Man Arrested in Police "Chase" @ 208mph in a Mustang


Recommended Posts

THAT is one fast mustang.
http://www.foxnews.com/auto/2016/11/16/oklahoma-speeder-caught-at-208-mph.html

Capture.JPG

I would love to know what this guy has done to his car to make it able to hit those speeds.  That is amazingly fast.
The work that would have to go into a car to make it handle those speeds, and potentially faster, must be extensive.

  • Like 2

If that were me, and I was getting my mugshot - it would be a mugshot for the ages.  Ear to Ear grin with one raised eyebrow as if to suggest "yeah - thats right... 208 bitches"

  • Like 5
1 minute ago, T3X4S said:

If that were me, and I was getting my mugshot - it would be a mugshot for the ages.  Ear to Ear grin with one raised eyebrow as if to suggest "yeah - thats right... 208 bitches"

 

hqdefault.jpg

  • Like 4
2 hours ago, T3X4S said:

THAT is one fast mustang.
http://www.foxnews.com/auto/2016/11/16/oklahoma-speeder-caught-at-208-mph.html

Capture.JPG

I would love to know what this guy has done to his car to make it able to hit those speeds.  That is amazingly fast.
The work that would have to go into a car to make it handle those speeds, and potentially faster, must be extensive.

155 is the stock limiter, I would assume not much would have to be done to reach higher speeds in a gt.  Obviously removing the limiter, reflashing the computer.  but gt500's will hit 180 or somewhere up there.  final gear would have to be low and possibly some other mods...but I can only assume it wouldn't be too hard in a 2011, if it were a gt or gt500.  He could of been driving a gt500 but they stated mustang...so pick your random iteration of model and I could probably figure it out.  

 

Reflash would be a given, final drive gear may have to be changed (rear gears), not much for power needs to be done maybe you can add a power adder but that will just get you there faster, but that depends on the model..You will want somewhere around 500 so you can figure out that a 100 shot of nitrous would get cars there pretty safely.

4 hours ago, sc302 said:

155 is the stock limiter, I would assume not much would have to be done to reach higher speeds in a gt.  Obviously removing the limiter, reflashing the computer.  but gt500's will hit 180 or somewhere up there.  final gear would have to be low and possibly some other mods...but I can only assume it wouldn't be too hard in a 2011, if it were a gt or gt500.  He could of been driving a gt500 but they stated mustang...so pick your random iteration of model and I could probably figure it out.  

 

Reflash would be a given, final drive gear may have to be changed (rear gears), not much for power needs to be done maybe you can add a power adder but that will just get you there faster, but that depends on the model..You will want somewhere around 500 so you can figure out that a 100 shot of nitrous would get cars there pretty safely.

Getting a car to hit 200 is not easy.  Sure - if its geared for high end - that certainly helps - but most people, and most mustang owners - dont care about top speed.
I know you know a lot more about mustangs than I ever will - but - getting any car to 200+ is tough, considering the faster you go - the harder it pushes back.
 

48 minutes ago, T3X4S said:

Getting a car to hit 200 is not easy.  Sure - if its geared for high end - that certainly helps - but most people, and most mustang owners - dont care about top speed.
I know you know a lot more about mustangs than I ever will - but - getting any car to 200+ is tough, considering the faster you go - the harder it pushes back.
 

True but consider a gt with no mods and the limiter removed can hit close to 160, how much more do you think it will need to hit 200? The car is at around 400 hp if it is a GT. The GT500 will hit 180's bone stock.   Do you think it is that difficult to get 100 hp out of a car already making 400 or more hp?  Everything is done in ratios, squeezing 100 hp out of a engine making 50 hp is like getting blood from a stone...getting another 100 hp out of a car making 4-500 stock is like going to the bank for a loan when you have a 700+ credit score.   200 hp is also pretty easy.  You could probably bet it is a no brainer up to about 2x the stock hp. 

 

Without anything else else on a gt, a stock street supercharger kit will yield about 600hp.  You could go turbo, get real aggressive with the turbo and fuel, put in a custom turbo cam and a few other goodies and hit that 800+ mark. 

 

A pulley change and a tune, can get an additional 100 hp, bringing the total hp to 600, out of the gt500. 

 

 

These arent jap cars that squeeze every bit of power out of the engine combo with no room to grow, these are American cars with tolerances built into them, knowing that people will beat the crap out of them...do you think it is normal for the blocks to be able to handle 2x the hp?  They know these cars are destined for the modding block some time in their life....there is so much aftermarket support for it.   They are the only model car that I know of that has a racing series just for them. Nmra, this racing body is just for mustangs.  Nira  is for all imports, nhra is for all hot rods. 

36 minutes ago, sc302 said:

True but consider a gt with no mods and the limiter removed can hit close to 160, how much more do you think it will need to hit 200? The car is at around 400 hp if it is a GT. The GT500 will hit 180's bone stock.   Do you think it is that difficult to get 100 hp out of a car already making 400 or more hp?  Everything is done in ratios, squeezing 100 hp out of a engine making 50 hp is like getting blood from a stone...getting another 100 hp out of a car making 4-500 stock is like going to the bank for a loan when you have a 700+ credit score.   200 hp is also pretty easy.  You could probably bet it is a no brainer up to about 2x the stock hp. 

 

Without anything else else on a gt, a stock street supercharger kit will yield about 600hp.  You could go turbo, get real aggressive with the turbo and fuel, put in a custom turbo cam and a few other goodies and hit that 800+ mark. 

 

A pulley change and a tune, can get an additional 100 hp, bringing the total hp to 600, out of the gt500. 

 

 

These arent jap cars that squeeze every bit of power out of the engine combo with no room to grow, these are American cars with tolerances built into them, knowing that people will beat the crap out of them...do you think it is normal for the blocks to be able to handle 2x the hp?  They know these cars are destined for the modding block some time in their life....there is so much aftermarket support for it.   They are the only model car that I know of that has a racing series just for them. Nmra, this racing body is just for mustangs.  Nira  is for all imports, nhra is for all hot rods. 

717hp 2015 Hennesey Mustang topped out at 195...so we are probably looking at 850hp+ to get to 208. Once you get into really high speeds, it takes massive horsepower for even small gains.

 

I think it far more likely that someone is wrong about what the real speed was.

Perhaps. It is all internet speculation at this point. But even that isn't all that hard to do being that 1000+ hp combos are documented. 

 

If you were to follow sloppymechanics, they have a few combos that are in the 800-900 range or There abouts.  Most of which you can pickup at the junk yard on the cheap vs paying new.  They are all about getting mass hp on the low budget. 

Like I said, you all know much more than me about what it takes to get those cars to certain speeds. 
The only thing I know are things like it takes the Bugatti Veyron 250hp to get it to 150mph.  It takes another 750hp to get it to hit 100mph more...

Once you get to a certain point, it becomes a herculean effort to get 5mph more.  Sure, it is very possible the 208 is a mistake.  A couple years ago, Grapevine, TX PD claimed they clocked some drunk @ 150 in a stock Chevy Blazer.  It was later "revealed" that the  radar clock was wrong, and that charge was dropped.

 

Anything over 200 takes a bit of power. 

 

Does it take 1000+ hp, well you can look at supercar specs to determine that.   

 

Lambo does 239mph at under 700 hp

911 turbo s 193 mph at 540 hp

 

 

You can can look at others in the 200+ mph range. 

 

 

There is quite a bit that can change to get it there.   Weight, final drive, hp, transmission gear ratios all play a part. 

 

 

Remember gt500 of that year has around 500 hp and hits 180s. How much more is needed to hit 200?   I don't think it is another 300+ hp. 

  • Like 1
8 hours ago, sc302 said:

Fwiw, and because you got me curious, the 2013 gt500 at 662 hp hits 202mph. 

 

Source: http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2011/11/16/the-2013-shelby-gt500s-official-top-speed-202-mph/

Thats what SVT claims.

 

Car and Driver could only hit 190, Motortrend only hit 196.

 

I'd be curious how long a straight, perfect road you would need to hit 202. I am certain that wasn't the case in the above article. I am still standing by 850hp+, or nitrous added to an already beastly car as mentioned earlier. It could have also been gutted for weight savings.

 

10 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

Thats what SVT claims.

 

Car and Driver could only hit 190, Motortrend only hit 196.

 

I'd be curious how long a straight, perfect road you would need to hit 202. I am certain that wasn't the case in the above article. I am still standing by 850hp+, or nitrous added to an already beastly car as mentioned earlier. It could have also been gutted for weight savings.

Maybe another 100 hp tops 200. Aerodynamics plays a big part at that speed. 

8 hours ago, sc302 said:

Anything over 200 takes a bit of power. 

 

Does it take 1000+ hp, well you can look at supercar specs to determine that.   

 

Lambo does 239mph at under 700 hp

911 turbo s 193 mph at 540 hp

 

 

You can can look at others in the 200+ mph range. 

 

 

There is quite a bit that can change to get it there.   Weight, final drive, hp, transmission gear ratios all play a part. 

 

 

Remember gt500 of that year has around 500 hp and hits 180s. How much more is needed to hit 200?   I don't think it is another 300+ hp. 

but did the GT500 hit 180 because that was the max or did it hit 180 because it was limited to 180?

10 minutes ago, sc302 said:

 

Maybe another 100 hp tops 200. Aerodynamics plays a big part at that speed. 

Maybe.

 

A Veyron has a top speed of 258 (rounded). It takes another 297hp in the Chiron to get to 261 (rounded). That is a whole 3MPH faster.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      526
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      146
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!