Is it worth upgrading from a 32" to a 40" TV?


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, adrynalyne said:

I've considered that ;)

 

We had a house built and it has a large blank white 9 foot wall in the great room.

Consider it? What the hell are you waiting for man? That would be right at the top of my "Things I need to do, right ####ing now!" list. :D

*Funds for a 4K projector permitting.

OP... Go as big as you can (within reason). But I'd also suggest going for quality over size (I wish that's what she said) if you can't afford both.

 

Then sit back and bask in it's glory.

21 minutes ago, FiB3R said:

Consider it? What the hell are you waiting for man? That would be right at the top of my "Things I need to do, right ####ing now!" list. :D

*Funds for a 4K projector permitting.

OP... Go as big as you can (within reason). But I'd also suggest going for quality over size (I wish that's what she said) if you can't afford both.

 

Then sit back and bask in it's glory.

Happy wife = happy life? LOL.

 

I have to sell her on it first. Buying and installing is the easy part ;) and we just picked up a 4K HDR TV prior to building the house.

 

  • Like 2
6 hours ago, DaDude said:

It's like wearing two articles of clothing that don't match

You are too funny. I often wear clothing that don't match, breaking the expectations, making the things that don't typically work together, work together.

 

But, then again, there was his thread here about flip-flops. So I don't have high expectations.

17 hours ago, adrynalyne said:

Ever had one? They are terrible. 

There's good and bad in all brands, I've got 3 polaroid TV's in my house they're 3 years old this Christmas, one in the kitchen, the other 2 in my kids rooms, never missed a beat

Would I recommend one? Nope, but that's not because they're unreliable, they're just nothing fancy (Unlike my Panasonic)

  • Like 1
5 minutes ago, The Evil Overlord said:

There's good and bad in all brands, I've got 3 polaroid TV's in my house they're 3 years old this Christmas, one in the kitchen, the other 2 in my kids rooms, never missed a beat

Would I recommend one? Nope, but that's not because they're unreliable, they're just nothing fancy (Unlike my Panasonic)

Even the worst TVs will last 3-5 years. After the time is when you see how terrible they are. 

 

My latest TV is a Sony. My last one was a Sony and it went 13 years before the HDMI port broke on it. 

1 minute ago, adrynalyne said:

Even the worst TVs will last 3-5 years. After the time is when you see how terrible they are. 

 

My latest TV is a Sony. My last one was a Sony and it went 13 years before the HDMI port broke on it. 

Don't disagree with me, I'll report you :p 

  • Like 1
6 hours ago, xendrome said:

Then why are you even posting this topic?

I want to hear from people whether upgrading 8 inches is a massive difference that's worth investing in. Obviously, 32" to 50" is. But since I mentioned that my living room layout only allows up to 40", I want to know if it's worth spending the money for just a slight upgrade in size. It's Black Friday and I wanted an answer now and don't have time to really think about it, so I needed some advice asap. Based on the responses here, it looks like the answer is no.

6 hours ago, Open Minded said:

I think he needs positive reinforcement to save his money.

Actually, I was expecting quite the opposite. In a home theater forum, I was expecting a lot of people to say, "Yes. Go for it and upgrade." But since I didn't get one response like that, it definitely does put a whole new light on things.

i went from a old 25-27" TV (the old heavy ones) to a LG 43" 1080p (mfg date Jan 2016) in May of this year for $222.59 (normally that TV costs i think $350+(but only catch is it's refurbished but works like new)) and it was a big upgrade, obviously.

 

but since the OP is already on 32", and it's a modern type of TV at that with a good brand name, i would probably wait a while and go bigger as prices will likely drop even further. but then again 32" is fairly small for today's standards as that's kinda why i waited as i did not want to go under a 40 something inch. i plan on having my current TV for i would imagine at least 10 years or so (probably an EASY 5+ years) simply because i doubt something is going to be better enough to justify the costs of getting another TV. but if you got money to burn i would upgrade otherwise if you are trying to be a bit wiser with your $$$ i would wait a little while and go with as big of a TV you can get for a decent cost while sticking to the name brands as i can't really see spending more than around $500 for a TV nowadays and a good brand one at that as personally i would rather get a good brand TV than get a bigger screen but with a lesser brand simply because i want my TV to last and i heard the name brands tend to use better quality components in their TV's so they will probably last longer (i even turn my brightness etc settings down to help extend LED life). but if you are one of those people who upgrades their TV every 5 years or so then getting a cheaper/no name/larger TV might not be a bad option.

 

For how cheap TVs are these days, 55 inch should be minimal

 

it probably depends on how you view the situation as opinions vary. but i figure when it comes to TV size it's pretty much like this nowadays...

 

20 something inch (or smaller) = tiny

30 something inch = small

40 something inch = typical/decent size (these are probably the sweet spot for cost/size/quality ratio, give or take, as you get respectable size/name brand/good price)

50 something inch = large

60" or larger = huge (i imagine those beyond 60 something inch are massive but i don't really think many people have TV's beyond 60" or so. so i did not bother listing them)

 

i sorta came to that conclusion simply because, while i can't say for sure, i would imagine most people's TV's are smaller than 50" as i would guess the typical home with a decent TV is probably in the 40 something inch range, give or take a little.

 

so basically... anything around 50" should be more than good enough for the average person in my opinion as that's no where near small and i guess it just depends on how much someones wants to spend. but in my opinion... lately, it's probably not worth spending more than around $500 for a TV (maybe $1000 or so on the high end) because TV's have been good for years now. like good quality (the brand names) at a respectable size (say 40 something inch) at a cheap enough price. i know if you go with the more generic names in TV's you can increase size quite a bit while still keeping price fairly low. but personally i would rather sacrifice screen size for a TV that will last (i.e. i prefer the name brands).

13 hours ago, adrynalyne said:

I've considered that ;)

 

We had a house built and it has a large blank white 9 foot wall in the great room.

The thing with projectors is that using a wall may not be the best option. for good blacks and contrast at least with a high lumen projector, you need a cinema gray screen, and optimally proper screen, though there are paints that work well as well, but you need a perfectly flat wall. any imperfection will affect the picture, and just white paint won't reflect properly, a proper screen/screen paint is made to reflect the light properly.  The best option is a frame screen, not a pulldown as they get V folds/waves from the weight, with a black flocked or matte cloth clad frame to frame the picture and add contrast, it also allows you to slightly overscale the image and get a properly square picture. 

 

Also I wouldn't reccomend a projector for regular TV viewing. to much use on the bulb for most people. and the picture quality isn't even close to get with a cheap TV in day time unless you plan to permantly black out the living room. in other words, unless you have a special TV/media/gaming room, get a big TV. 120 inch picture is nice for movies and games, but that's about it. 

8 hours ago, LUTZIFER said:

For how cheap TVs are these days, 55 inch should be minimal, unless you live in a little travel trailer or tent.

My bedroom TV is 55 inch and it's the smallest in the house by far.

Well, I can easily fit 55 inch if there were nothing else on that side of the living room. But I have a drawer and a desk table on that side of the living room as well. Adding a 55" inch TV would require me to move or throw away the drawer and desk and dedicate that entire wall space to a TV. Not sure I really want to do that....

8 hours ago, ThaCrip said:

but if you got money to burn i would upgrade otherwise if you are trying to be a bit wiser with your $$$ i would wait a little while and go with as big of a TV you can get for a decent cost while sticking to the name brands as i can't really see spending more than around $500 for a TV nowadays and a good brand one at that as personally i would rather get a good brand TV than get a bigger screen but with a lesser brand simply because i want my TV to last and i heard the name brands tend to use better quality components in their TV's so they will probably last longer (i even turn my brightness etc settings down to help extend LED life). but if you are one of those people who upgrades their TV every 5 years or so then getting a cheaper/no name/larger TV might not be a bad option.

I don't think TVs today last very long. I bought a 720p Samsung TV back in late 2008 during Black Friday and it broke in mid 2014. That's just a little under 6 years. I even sacrificed a 1080p TV in the hopes of getting a good quality, name brand 720p TV. But it took less than 6 years for the TV to finally stop turning on. And it was working great until one day, it just suddenly started having issues powering on. I don't feel confident that TVs are built to last anymore. If my current TV is anything like my old one, then it has only about 3 more years of life left....

20 hours ago, DaDude said:

I don't think TVs today last very long. I bought a 720p Samsung TV back in late 2008 during Black Friday and it broke in mid 2014. That's just a little under 6 years. I even sacrificed a 1080p TV in the hopes of getting a good quality, name brand 720p TV. But it took less than 6 years for the TV to finally stop turning on. And it was working great until one day, it just suddenly started having issues powering on. I don't feel confident that TVs are built to last anymore. If my current TV is anything like my old one, then it has only about 3 more years of life left....

Thanks for the info.

 

but i wonder if what you experienced is typical or a bit of a fluke? ; i hope it's more of a fluke because i would expect a good brand TV like that (Samsung/LG etc) to make it at least around 10 years minimum otherwise it's pretty much crap, especially when you pay good money for it which TV's are not really cheap enough to be disposable. but i guess with any kind of stuff like this there are going to be cases where they die earlier than expected but i would hope a high percentage of good brand TV's would make it at least around 10 years before dying because if anything around 5 years is happening fairly often the TV manufacturers should either raise TV quality or lower prices.

 

also, did that TV see a lot of use? ; like was it powered on a good portion of the day, day after day etc?

 

but being that was 2008 and it's now 2016... i am hoping TV tech is matured (i.e. reliability is about as good as it can get) as i figure with technology in general the earlier days tend to be a bit more unreliable than after it's been around for many years and more refined. but i guess even if i do get screwed a bit and mine only lasts around 5 years (if it don't get at least this much the TV is just crap) at least i did not pay a fortune for mine. but still, it's the thought of it.

I researched the issue afterwards and it looks like Samsung was using bad capacitors for their tv and that's what caused my tv to crap out so soon. A lot of people did complain about it and hopefully their current TVs don't have that issue anymore, but only time will tell.

 

With that said, I still will always buy Samsung TVs as I personally think their TVs have the best picture quality.

On 2016/11/25 at 8:22 PM, adrynalyne said:

Ever had one? They are terrible. 

Oh really? For decades I had been laboring under the misapprehension that the Polaroid name was synonymous with large-screen, high-definition electric televisions of the finest quality.

Thank you so much for setting me straight.

12 hours ago, DaDude said:

I researched the issue afterwards and it looks like Samsung was using bad capacitors for their tv and that's what caused my tv to crap out so soon. A lot of people did complain about it and hopefully their current TVs don't have that issue anymore, but only time will tell.

 

With that said, I still will always buy Samsung TVs as I personally think their TVs have the best picture quality.

Yeah, Samsung is definitely one of the best brands for TV's i would assume and it probably has been that way for many years now (probably 10+ years?). but it's surprising they would use crap capacitors for their TV's as that's usually what you would think the lesser brands would do to cut costs, but not the higher quality companies like Samsung etc. but it makes me wonder if fixing that TV was something the average person could do as if you could simply solder in a capacitor or two it might be worth attempting a fix since it would be cheap enough. but if plenty of crap needed fixing then it's probably not worth it at that point.

The issue with 32" TVs is that the TV itself is more suitable for 720p than 1080p or in fact 1080-anything; 32" is a 720 design - and it takes only math to drop THAT hammer on you - what is the height and width needed to produce a 32" screen size (compared to 40" or even 42")?  Naturally, I'm talking visual usable screen, leaving bezel or unusable screen out of the picture.  In the early days of HD, 720p was the most commonplace formfactor (especially when all there was was broadcast HDTV).  Nowadays, both cable and other forms of HDTV have driven 1080i and 1080p to the forefront, especially compared to 720p (while FOX broadcast has kept 720p, their FX counterpart has moved north to 1080i and 1080p), and upscaling has moved the option even further north - 4K looks "wrong" on a 32" screen, while it is at least passable on screens of 40" and 42".

  • 2 years later...

I am resurrecting this thread because I'm strongly considering upgrading my TV. TVs are so cheap now and plus I got a good raise and bonus at work, so I can very well afford to upgrade right now. :D

 

I was thinking of upgrading my 32" Samsung TV to a bigger size 43" TV, not so much because of the higher resolution (I don't foresee myself watching any 4K content anytime soon), but but mostly because I want a bigger size TV. I was debating about getting this Sony TV, but it was $650 at the time when I was looking to buy it. Now that it dropped to $550 and is available at my nearby Best Buy, I was thinking of picking it up this weekend.

This is the TV I am looking to buy:
https://www.bestbuy.com/site/sony-43-class-led-x800e-series-2160p-smart-4k-uhd-tv-with-hdr/5748210.p?skuId=5748210

I want this TV because I want something with a center stand and also, it has plenty of ports, especially HDMI. And I saw this TV on display at Best Buy and I, personally, think it has such a great picture.

Anyone here feel this TV is worth picking up this weekend for $550? Or are there any caveats that anyone here feels I should be aware of?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ditto that, I have a few Alexa devices around the house to control lighting and such for a disabled person I live with, and it shows a *lot* of ads on the display. The dots are simple but effective. A lot cheaper too.
    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!