Nintendo Switch Official Specs Revealed


Recommended Posts

Nintendo Switch Official Specs Revealed

 

tumblr_oh98s6US8x1qjoleso1_500.gif

 

Size

102mm x 239mm x 13.9mm (with Joy-Con attached)
Please note: 28.4mm at the thickest, from the tips of the analog sticks to the ZL/ZR Button protrusions.

Weight

Approx. 297g
(With Joy-Con controllers attached: 398g)

Screen

Capacitive touch screen / 6.2 inch LCD / 1280x720 resolution

CPU/GPU

NVIDIA customized Tegra processor

System Memory

32 GB
Please note: a portion of this internal memory is reserved for use by the system.

Communication features

Wireless LAN (IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac compliant) / Bluetooth 4.1 (TV mode only. A wired LAN connection is possible through the use of a commercially available wired LAN adapter.)

Video Output

Maximum resolution: 1920x1080, 60 fps
Please note: output via HDMI cable in TV mode. In tabletop mode and handheld mode, the maximum resolution is 1280x720, which matches the screen resolution.

Audio Output

Supports linear PCM 5.1ch
Please note: output via HDMI cable in TV mode.

Speakers

Stereo

USB Terminal

USB Type-C terminal
Used for charging or for connecting to the Nintendo Switch dock.

Headphone Mic. Jack

Stereo output

Game card slot

Exclusively for Nintendo Switch game cards.

MicroSD screen slot

Compatible with microSD, microSDHC and microSDXC memory cards.
Please note: an update via an internet connection is required to use microSDXC memory cards.

Sensors

Accelerometer / gyroscope / brightness sensor

Operating environment

Temperature: 5 - 35°C / Humidity: 20 - 80%

Internal Battery

Lithium ion battery / battery capacity 4310mAh
Please note: the internal battery cannot be removed. If the battery needs to be replaced, we plan to offer paid replacement via Nintendo Customer Support.

Battery Life

Battery life can last for more than six hours, but will vary depending on the software and usage conditions.
For example, The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild can be played for roughly three hours on a single charge.

Charging time

3 hours approx.
Please note: this is the time taken to charge while the console is in sleep mode.

 

https://www.nintendo.co.uk/Nintendo-Switch/Specifications/Specifications-1176277.html#1

 

 

 

 

I came here expecting a picture of a toaster then realised it wasn't in the jokes section. :p 

 

Lets hope Nintendo can get good 3rd party support, we don't need amazing specs to enjoy a game but we do need decent games. :) 

  • Like 3
10 hours ago, warwagon said:

A wired LAN connection is possible through the use of a commercially available wired LAN adapter.)

Typical Nintendo, thinks it is kosher to sell people a port that is available on just about every other product.

  • Like 3
10 hours ago, Louisifer said:

Lets hope Nintendo can get good 3rd party support, we don't need amazing specs to enjoy a game but we do need decent games. :) 

I predict that 3rd parties will treat the Switch the way they treated the Wii U.

  • Like 3

People don't buy a Nintendo console for the 3rd party support anymore, best thing to do is get a PC for the multiplatform, indie and exclusive games and a Nintendo console for the 1st party games they release.

  • Like 2
10 minutes ago, microneppy said:

People don't buy a Nintendo console for the 3rd party support anymore, best thing to do is get a PC for the multiplatform, indie and exclusive games and a Nintendo console for the 1st party games they release.

Buying a console for one companies games is a ridiculous thought to me.  I wouldn't waste the money.

 

I suspect this will garner more third party support than they have in a long time.

3 hours ago, compl3x said:

Typical Nintendo, thinks it is kosher to sell people a port that is available on just about every other product.

I really don't understand why they can't just build it into the console. Surely the savings they make are just passed on to manufacturing the accessory in the end.

 

And a step back with the non-replacable battery too :no: No doubt it'll be easy enough to replace at home anyway, which is the only silver lining to the decision.

  • Like 2
6 hours ago, Andrew said:

I really don't understand why they can't just build it into the console. Surely the savings they make are just passed on to manufacturing the accessory in the end.

 

And a step back with the non-replacable battery too :no: No doubt it'll be easy enough to replace at home anyway, which is the only silver lining to the decision.

What's even the point anymore?  I haven't seen any real need for ethernet since 802.11n (though that certainly has range issues.)  If there's nothing to be gained from including it, why should they?  Especially if it means they'll be able to use a higher quality wireless part.

After noticing the glaring omission of a D-Pad and seeing how cramped the joycons are when used horizontally, I have no interest in one.

After noticing the glaring omission of a D-Pad and seeing how cramped the joycons are when used horizontally, I have no interest in one.

7 hours ago, LostCat said:

What's even the point anymore?  I haven't seen any real need for ethernet since 802.11n (though that certainly has range issues.)  If there's nothing to be gained from including it, why should they?  Especially if it means they'll be able to use a higher quality wireless part.

 

It's kind of funny because you could probably buy a switch and cabling to connect your console to your router for the price Nintendo is going to charge for a USB to Ethernet adaptor. I doubt the money saved on including an Ethernet port would cover the cost of a more expensive wireless chip or antennas.

 

We'd have to wait for a teardown to see which chip they are using. Regardles, I don't think it is difficult to include a port which has been a standard on hardware for decades. Neither Sony nor Microsoft have abandoned it for their consoles.

 

36 minutes ago, compl3x said:

 

It's kind of funny because you could probably buy a switch and cabling to connect your console to your router for the price Nintendo is going to charge for a USB to Ethernet adaptor. I doubt the money saved on including an Ethernet port would cover the cost of a more expensive wireless chip or antennas.

 

We'd have to wait for a teardown to see which chip they are using. Regardles, I don't think it is difficult to include a port which has been a standard on hardware for decades. Neither Sony nor Microsoft have abandoned it for their consoles.

It's not just a port though, it's an extra chip which needs its own space and bandwidth, and wouldn't be available at all except when docked.

 

If tablet mode wasn't a thing I'm sure they'd have included it.

 

Also last I checked X1 and PS4 both used 802.11N rather than AC, so their wireless is comparatively lacking.

On 1/29/2017 at 4:43 AM, microneppy said:

People don't buy a Nintendo console for the 3rd party support anymore, best thing to do is get a PC for the multiplatform, indie and exclusive games and a Nintendo console for the 1st party games they release.

People largely don't buy a Nintendo console anymore.  There was a lot of excitement around the Switch prior to the specs being released (leaked) because people thought Nintendo might actually be trying to get 3rd party support back.  The Switch will fail just like the Wii U if it doesn't get 3rd party support.  Sure there are people that will buy a Nintendo console just for the Nintendo exclusives... those are the people that bought the Wii U and it's a very small number relative to the other consoles.  I actually think Nintendo has the best first party titles but that's just not enough to drive high sales.  People don't buy Xbox or PlayStation ONLY for the 1st party games either.  The top selling games are multiplatform (Madden, CoD, GTA, etc.) and if your console is excluded from them then that's a huge sales problem.  If you can't get them then you should at least come in cheap enough to be a "second" console.  At $300 though the Switch is more expensive than the Xbox One S and the same as the non-Pro PS4 so it's not priced as a "second" console.

  • Like 2
On 1/29/2017 at 4:00 AM, compl3x said:

I predict that 3rd parties will treat the Switch the way they treated the Wii U.

I suspect you're right but here's my crazy contrarian idea of how they may just get 3rd party support.

 

Despite what their marketing is saying stop thinking of it as a non-portable console.  It's NOT a competitor to the Xbox One or PS4 and so it won't get 3rd party ports of those games.  As a portable though it will get all the third parties that previously made games for the 3DS so that's a fair amount of 3rd party support.  Furthermore they'll EXPAND beyond the 3DS third parties by using a mobile-like architecture.  So they may well get slightly upgraded ports of mobile games from 3rd parties.  So instead of Xbox One/PS4/PC/Switch multiplatform games as people were hoping for you'll get Android/iOS/Switch multiplatform games in addition to previous 3DS 3rd parties and Nintendo's first parties.

 

So if that happens then yes they'll have 3rd party support... just not in the way people expected.

5 minutes ago, LostCat said:

Am I the only one who finds it kind of hilarious 'official specs' don't even bother with basic processor, GPU, RAM details?  'It's a custom Tegra' doesn't really tell me much.

No, you're not. There are stories all over the internet mentioning how they don't specify the GPU/CPU.  It's pretty well known that it's the Tegra X1 though... I'm not sure there is really anythign "custom" about it beyond the fact they severely underclock it.  We'll know for sure when it launches though as iFixIt and such sites will do "tear-downs" and open it up to see what's inside.

Yay:

 

Nintendo Switch batteries can be replaced, Switch-branded microSD cards also coming in Japan

 

It really was an unprecedented move for them to stop users replacing batteries, so I'm glad it will be possible :yes:

 

While I'm here, good news from JP on pre-orders:

 

Nintendo Switch pre-orders already account for 80% of the console's shipment in Japan

 

Not surprising  really considering the gaming trends over there, but good news nonetheless.

2 minutes ago, Andrew said:

Eh?

Quote

The 4,310mAh lithium ion battery won't be able to be removed by the user like a traditional tablet or smartphone

 

  • Like 1
On 1/30/2017 at 5:28 AM, LostCat said:

What's even the point anymore?  I haven't seen any real need for ethernet since 802.11n (though that certainly has range issues.)  If there's nothing to be gained from including it, why should they?  Especially if it means they'll be able to use a higher quality wireless part.

Ethernet > Wifi. Every single time.

 

On 1/30/2017 at 1:51 PM, LostCat said:

 

It's not just a port though, it's an extra chip which needs its own space and bandwidth, and wouldn't be available at all except when docked.

 

If tablet mode wasn't a thing I'm sure they'd have included it.

 

Also last I checked X1 and PS4 both used 802.11N rather than AC, so their wireless is comparatively lacking.

The xbox one S does use AC since its more widely adopted now, Not sure about the Pro/Slim, I'm sure they have updated it also to AC. I know the PS4 had terrible wifi, even no 5ghz range, had to hardwire a few of my friends houses over the weekends for free :laugh: 

7 hours ago, Vandalsquad said:

Ethernet > Wifi. Every single time.

Before AC I might've agreed with you.  These days the nanoseconds you save...sure, I still use ethernet, but only for my main PC.

 

I only really see the point if you've just got iffy networking equipment you can't/won't replace.

  • Like 1
9 hours ago, Vandalsquad said:

Ethernet > Wifi. Every single time.

 

The xbox one S does use AC since its more widely adopted now, Not sure about the Pro/Slim, I'm sure they have updated it also to AC. I know the PS4 had terrible wifi, even no 5ghz range, had to hardwire a few of my friends houses over the weekends for free :laugh: 

I notice no difference at all with AC.  i am never going back to cable.   why?   my internet is fast enough for my PC.     maybe in future I will have a super PC?  but by then the wireless would have improved too. 

 

for HOME use, cable is out, imho.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!