Recommended Posts

Quote

 

Written By Jason Faulkner

 

Return to Vvardenfell in Bethesda's new content for The Elder Scrolls Online

 

The Elder Scrolls Online players already technically have access to the Province of Morrowind in the form of Stonefalls, the Deshaan Plains, and Bal Foyen, but the latest expansion to ESO will bring the mainland of Vvardenfell. The Elder Scrolls Online: Morrowind will be the largest ESO content update Bethesda has released yet, and adds the same amount of area as included in The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind's base game.

 

The new expansion to ESO takes place 700 years before the events of The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind, so you'll get to see Vvardenfell in its heyday. Red Mountain hasn't erupted and thrown the province into turmoil, and Vivec City is still in its infancy. All the sights are waiting to be seen, from the mushroom towers of the Telvanni wizards to the docks of Seyda Neen.

 

The Elder Scrolls Online: Morrowind also brings the first new class since the premiere of ESO. The Warden is a druid-like warrior who has the ability to use nature-based magic to fight their foes. Additionally, the Warden gets a powerful companion in the form of the War Bear, a bear that rips through the Warden's enemies with massive claws.

 

A new Player-vs-Player mode arrives with Vvardenfell as well. The Battlegrounds PvP mode will pit teams of 4v4v4 against each other in arena-style combat. These battles will take place in the Ashlands and are sure to be intense.

 

 

 

Continues...

So when they say the $60 version includes Morrowind and the "base game" does that mean everything up until now or just the very initial release plus Morrowind.

According to the wikipedia there are DLCs for:

The Imperial City

Orsinium

Thieves Guild

Dark Brotherhood

and Shadows of the Hist

If NONE of those are included in the $60 price then I'll pass.  If ALL of them are included that may be worth giving it a try.  The "Gold" edition that's already available seems to include everything but the last one (and the upcoming Morrowind)

 

5 hours ago, Asmodai said:

So when they say the $60 version includes Morrowind and the "base game" does that mean everything up until now or just the very initial release plus Morrowind.

According to the wikipedia there are DLCs for:

The Imperial City

Orsinium

Thieves Guild

Dark Brotherhood

and Shadows of the Hist

If NONE of those are included in the $60 price then I'll pass.  If ALL of them are included that may be worth giving it a try.  The "Gold" edition that's already available seems to include everything but the last one (and the upcoming Morrowind)

As far as I know those were all free content updates. So they should be included.

17 hours ago, trag3dy said:

 

As far as I know those were all free content updates. So they should be included.

I'm pretty sure they're not.  They're all paid DLC.

Also on consoles at least you can get the bare minimum game called "Tamriel Unlimited" (the name they gave it when they dropped the subscription) for $20 which included NONE of the DLCs I listed.

You can also get the "Gold" version right now for $60 which includes Tamriel Unlimited + The Imperial City DLC + Orsinium DLC + Thieves Guild DLC + Dark Brotherhood DLC.

 

This is what confuses me about the new $60 Morrowind game that includes the "base game" plus Morrowind Expansion.  The Morrowind Expansion is $20 if you already have the game.  So that means it would cost only $40 to buy Tamriel Unlimited and then the Morrowind DLC so if that's what they're calling the base game it's a $20 rip off.  On the other hand if they're going to reduce the price of the Gold Edition in June when the Morrowind expansion comes out (to say $40 or so) and make the new $60 Morrowind include everything in Gold + Shadows of the Hist then it would seem like a reasonable deal... it's just "base game" doesn't sound like all prior DLC expansions to me.

57 minutes ago, John. said:

The base game is normally just the first game they introduce, bar any DLCs or expansions, so can't see you getting everything for the $60

Then I guess with the $60 Morrowind Base Game plus Morrowind release they're just expecting people to be too stupid to realize that you can get the base game for $20 and the Morrowind expansion for $20 and save yourself $20 over the overpriced Morrowind release?  That doesn't even include the fact you can probably find the base game on sale for even cheaper than the $20 MSRP since it's been out for a while.  WOW, what a deal!

 

EDIT:  Just found out the Morrowind DLC is $40 for people who already have the game, not $20.  You're still probably better off finding the base game on sale and paying the $40 over buying the new $60 release but at least that makes a bit more sense.  Either way I'll pass.

43 minutes ago, Andrew said:

Remember it's also possible to subscribe to the game which provides Crowns (in-store currency), which you can use to buy the DLCs. You can then cancel the sub and but keep the DLC unlocked.

I was under the impression that the DLC you unlocked via subscription were only accessible so long as you keep your subscription active.

2 minutes ago, Asmodai said:

I was under the impression that the DLC you unlocked via subscription were only accessible so long as you keep your subscription active.

The expansions are automatically unlocked when you subscribe, but you are also given 1500 Crowns per subscribed month to spend however you wish (costumes, expansions, mounts and pets). The Crowns don't expire when you cancel the Sub and anything you paid for is yours to keep. Two months membership would unlock 1 expansion.

 

Or you could buy Crowns when they go on sale (usually a few times per year), at 40-50% off.

 

 

  • 4 months later...

Anyone still kicking in game? Haven't played since launch, but enjoying coming back (starting over with a new char, I think my old ones are logged off in dungeons etc)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!