So, what cool stuff can I do on OS X?


Recommended Posts

I've noticed you can mostly do anything on a Mac that you can on Windows, and it usually feels good to use a Mac, if you can understand what I mean from that. The user experience is extremely good. Although there is less choice of applications to install, you'll usually find they are well-built for the operating system.

 

Unless you're wanting to play games, other than emulators, I would suggest getting one, and macOS Sierra is a great operating system that is extremely well-optimised.

I've noticed you can mostly do anything on a Mac that you can on Windows, and it usually feels good to use a Mac, if you can understand what I mean from that. The user experience is extremely good. Although there is less choice of applications to install, you'll usually find they are well-built for the operating system.
 
Unless you're wanting to play games, other than emulators, I would suggest getting one, and macOS Sierra is a great operating system that is extremely well-optimised.

Quite agreed but the issue I found on the Mac is to play Blu Ray. I installed a Blu Ray drive and Mac don't play Blu Ray videos without third party players and these are not at the same level of the Windows version. Kind of disappointed it but at least I can play the movie.

@macoman Oh, I wasn't aware of that, since I don't have an external disc drive fitted to my MacBook Air, and we don't tend to carry Blu-Ray, only DVD. That is a definite downside to a Mac, though, if you're into high-quality digital media.

normal stuff(to expand of my other comment)

 

Boot camp for windows

parallels

vlc

perian

office

adobe apps(Photoshop etc)

 

Boot camp is great as Microsoft project does not have a mac version and it runs great via parallels and it even feels like a native app and the users does not know any difference as they can email or print direct via the mac.

 

This how I set them up at work as I have mixed windows and osx in my environment.

 

Thanks everyone for all for all of their input.

 

I've been running the latest version of OS X Sierra on a VMware with nearly all of the software recommended to me here.

 

I'm torn because I love my SP4 and I must have something I can remove the keyboard from to use as a tablet for watching Netflix or YouTube when I'm not using it for work. I would like to try Parallels and see how it is running both OS's simultaneously and having access to a common share file folder. I don't see though that Apple has anything with a removable keyboard like the SP4, plus they are on the expensive side.

 

I guess maybe in 3-4 years when my SP4 wears out, I'll look at an Apple option then.

  • 3 weeks later...

Follow up question now that I've had OS X for a few weeks......

 

How is everyone keeping their individual applications up-to-date? Not "apps" from the store, but the actual applications.

 

On Windows I have tools like PatchMyPC. What is the equivalent for OS X?

 

Thanks!

On 4/27/2017 at 6:57 PM, anguilla1980 said:

Yup, I don't see a point in paying a penny until I know I'm going to use the OS. I have an owned full version of Office 2016 Pro on my PC.

You can always get LibreOffice (free/opensource) https://www.libreoffice.org/.

It's on par to Office 2003 without an e-mail client.

22 minutes ago, anguilla1980 said:

Follow up question now that I've had OS X for a few weeks......

 

How is everyone keeping their individual applications up-to-date? Not "apps" from the store, but the actual applications.

 

On Windows I have tools like PatchMyPC. What is the equivalent for OS X?

 

Thanks!

Depends, some apps like Firefox / Chrome will auto update (and can be manually tripped).

Other apps, you have to go in to the app, typically under "Help" and have check for update.

Other's you may have to just download a new version and replace the old one. 

6 minutes ago, Eternal Tempest said:

You can always get LibreOffice (free/opensource) https://www.libreoffice.org/.

It's on par to Office 2003 without an e-mail client.

Depends, some apps like Firefox / Chrome will auto update (and can be manually tripped).

Other apps, you have to go in to the app, typically under "Help" and have check for update.

Other's you may have to just download a new version and replace the old one. 

 

 

That's exactly why I'm looking for an app that will update everything for me lol, like on Windows.

 

Are you saying that type of thing doesn't exist yet for OS X?

 

3 minutes ago, anguilla1980 said:

 

That's exactly why I'm looking for an app that will update everything for me lol, like on Windows.

 

Are you saying that type of thing doesn't exist yet for OS X?

 

Not aware of any, however I'm primary a windows user and it could exist.

 

Other software to consider (free)

 

Gimp - (Photoshop Alternative) - https://www.gimp.org/

Audacity - (Simple audio recorder / editor) - http://www.audacityteam.org/

Krita - (Dawing / Painting software) - https://krita.org/en/

Flux - (Software to change the color of the screen based on the time of day) - https://justgetflux.com/news/pages/macquickstart/#download

Darktable (Adobe Lightroom alternative) - http://www.darktable.org/install/

On 4/28/2017 at 1:48 AM, T3X4S said:

Dude - office is $6.00 / mo.  seriously ?

$72 per year - $720 in ten years in today's dollars.

 

No thanks. 

 

Replacing fully licensed retail products with a subscription based service is one of biggest marketing scams ever.

24 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

$72 per year - $720 in ten years in today's dollars.

 

No thanks. 

 

Replacing fully licensed retail products with a subscription based service is one of biggest marketing scams ever.

Actually $699.90 if you buy 1 year subscriptions instead of paying monthly. The good thing is the one-time purchase option is very much available, but in 2027 you'll still be stuck with Office 2016 (that'll likely not be compatible with Windows 10 v2703), whereas an Office 365 user will always have the latest version. Some people do see the value in that and are willing to pay for it. Choice is good.

  • Like 1
4 minutes ago, Othello said:

Actually $699.90 if you buy 1 year subscriptions instead of paying monthly. The good thing is the one time purchase option is very much available, but in 2027 you'll still be stuck with Office 2016, whereas an Office 365 user will always have the latest version. Some people do see the value in hat and are willing to pay for it. Choice is good.

Reminds me of when the docx format first came out, but the previous version of Word couldn't handle it properly while only a few organizations upgraded to Office 2007.

 

Backwards compatibility is golden.

13 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

Reminds me of when the docx format first came out, but the previous version of Word couldn't handle it properly while only a few organizations upgraded to Office 2007.

 

Backwards compatibility is golden.

They released a Compatibility Pack soon enough and personally I never had any problem despite continued usage of Office 2K3 for a few years. Those who are concerned about long-term accessibility should have the sense not to use proprietary formats anyway. As a home user I can certainly see the advantage of the always updated subscription version (there's a 5 device/license multi-OS sub too), and <$6/month is far less than what I pay for many other services. Of course it all depends on your specific needs and usage patterns. Like I said, having both options available is good.

 

I think we should let this thread get back to cool OS X stuff now. :)

1 hour ago, Mirumir said:

$72 per year - $720 in ten years in today's dollars.

 

No thanks. 

 

Replacing fully licensed retail products with a subscription based service is one of biggest marketing scams ever.

Hold on.... you are "no thanks" to something that only cost you $720 over a decade of having the latest version?   LOL You really are in Russia, huh ?   Bread and Vodka lines are 4 hours long ?

Say hi to Gorby

 

24 minutes ago, T3X4S said:

Hold on.... you are "no thanks" to something that only cost you $720 over a decade of having the latest version?   LOL You really are in Russia, huh ?   Bread and Vodka lines are 4 hours long ?

Say hi to Gorby

That's gotta be the height of your imagination and knowledge of Russia, although you did forget to mention banya and balalaika.

 

Spoiler

 

Quote

having the latest version?

p.s. because the retail versions of MS products never get updated  and have a really short lifespan. /s

 

 

4 hours ago, Mirumir said:

That's gotta be the height of your imagination and knowledge of Russia, although you did forget to mention banya and balalaika.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

p.s. because the retail versions of MS products never get updated  and have a really short lifespan. /s

 

 

I understand cost is relative - but $700 over a decade?

I dont know why you chose to make the update comment hidden, was that some kind of big reveal ?  Your shot across the bow ?

By update- I am talking about if you bought O365 in 2013, when 2016 came out, you can upgrade, then when the next version comes out, as long as you pay the tiny little payment - you get to stay on the latest version.

 

I think you knew this.  I get that everyone's spending habits are different - but the cost of O365 is great.  I have 2 computers, but have 6 licenses (1 is a Biz Premium, which is more expensive but I wanted it to mess with the Business apps for learning) - it was so cheap I actually used it as "gifts" for people when they were in need.  They think its an amazing gesture and it cost me next to nothing.  IMO its a great idea.

I personally don't like where the "Command" key is. I'm not used to copying and pasting like that so I installed Karabiner. I also have Slow Quit Apps so if you have a habit of closing your apps using Command-W and you accidentally hit Command-Q, it won't close your app right away. You will have to hold it to close the app.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!